A Review of Contemporary Ideomotor Theory

Psychological Bulletin

Volumn 136, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 943-974

  Shin, Yun Kyoung ^a   Proctor, Robert W ^a   Capaldi, E J ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Action planning; Common coding; Ideomotor theory; Motor control; Response effect association

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LEARNING; MOTIVATION; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; GOALS; HUMANS; LEARNING; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 78349289912     PISSN: 00332909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0020541     Document Type: Article

References (201)

1. Aarts H., Custer R., Marien H. Preparing and motivating behavior outside of awareness. Science 2008, March 21, 319:1639. doi: 10.1126/science.1150432.
2. Abbruzzese G., Trompetto C., Schieppati M. The excitability of the human motor cortex increases during execution and mental imagination of sequential but not repetitive finger movements. Experimental Brain Research 1996, 111:465-472.
3. Adams J.A. A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior 1971, 3:111-150.
4. Allport D.A. Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological consideration of attention and action. Perspectives on perception and action 1987, 395-419. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. H. Heuer, A.F. Sanders (Eds.).
5. Aschersleben G., Prinz W. Synchronizing actions with events - The role of sensory information. Perception & Psychophysics 1995, 57:305-317.
6. Band G.P.H., van Steenbergen H., Ridderinkhof R.K., Falkenstein M., Hommel B. Action-effect negativity: Irrelevant action effects are monitored like relevant feedback. Biological Psychology 2009, 82:211-218. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.06.011.
7. Bargh J.A., Chartrand T.L. The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist 1999, 54:462-479. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.462.
8. Bargh J.A., Morsella E. The unconscious mind. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2008, 3:73-79.
9. Bässler U. Sensory control of leg movement in stick insect Carausius morosus. Biological Cybernetics 1977, 25:61-72.
10. Bässler U. Influence of femoral chordotonal organ afferences on ecdysis and on the development of motor programs in locust larvae. Physiological Entomology 1983, 8:353-357.
11. Bässler U. Timing and shaping influences on the motor output for walking in stick insects. Biological Cybernetics 1987, 55:397-401.
12. Baumeister R.F., Vohs K.D. Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and application 2004, Guilford Press, New York, NY.
13. Beckers T., De Houwer J., Eelen P. Automatic integration of non-perceptual action effect features: The case of the associative affective Simon effect. Psychological Research 2002, 66:166-173. doi: 10.1007/s00426-002-0090-9.
14. Bekkering H., Brass M., Woschina S., Jacobs A.M. Goal-directed imitation in patients with ideomotor apraxia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2005, 22:1-14. doi: 10.1080/02643290442000275.
15. Bekkering H., Wohlschläger A., Gattis M. Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2000, 53:153-164. doi: 10.1080/027249800390718.
16. Blank, D. S., Lewis, J. M., & Marshall, J. B. (2005). The multiple roles of anticipation in developmental robotics. In C. Castelfranchi, C. Balkenius, M. Butz, & A. Ortony (Program Cochairs), From reactive to anticipatory cognitive embodied systems (Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Fall Symposium Technical Report FS-05-05). Stanford, CA: AAAI Press.
17. Bolles R.C. Reinforcement, expectancy, and learning. Psychological Review 1972, 79:394-409. doi: 10.1037/h0033120.
18. Brass M., Bekkering H., Prinz W. Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychologica 2001, 106:3-22. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918%2800%2900024-X.
19. Brass M., Bekkering H., Wohlschläger A., Prinz W. Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain and Cognition 2000, 44:124-143. doi: 10.1006/brcg.2000.1225.
20. Brunswik E. Distal focusing of perception. Size constancy in a representative sample of situations. Psychological Monographs 1944, 56:1-49.
21. Bush R.R., Galanter E., Luce R.D. Characterization and classification of experiments. Handbook of mathematical psychology 1963, 77-102. Wiley, New York, NY. R.D. Luce, R.R. Bush (Eds.).
22. Butz M.V., Sigaud O., Gerard P. Intentional models and anticipations in adaptive learning systems. Anticipatory behavior in adaptive learning systems: Foundations, theories, and systems 2003, 86-109. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany. M.V. Butz, O. Sigaud, P. Gérard (Eds.).
23. Buxbaum L.J., Kyle K.M., Menon R. On beyond mirror neurons: Internal representations subserving imitation and recognition of skilled object-related actions in humans. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 25:226-239. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.05.014.
24. Carlton L.G. Processing visual feedback information for movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1981, 7:1019-1030. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.7.5.1019.
25. Carpenter W.B. On the influence of suggestion in modifying and directing muscular movement, independently of volition. Proceedings of the Royal Institution 1852, 147-154.
26. Carpenter W.B. Principles of mental physiology 1874, Henry S. King, London, England.
27. Caspy T., Lubow R.E. Generality of U.S. preexposure effects: Transfer from food to shock or shock to food with and without the same response requirements. Animal Learning & Behavior 1981, 9:524-532.
28. Chase R.A., Harvey S., Standfast S., Rapin I., Sutton S. Studies on sensory feedback: 1. Effect of delayed auditory-feedback on speech and keytapping. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1961, 13:141-152.
29. Cho Y.S., Proctor R.W. Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2003, 10:45-73.
30. Cleeremans A., McClelland J.L. Learning the structure of event sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1991, 120:235-253.
31. Cock J., Meier B. Incidental task sequence learning: Perceptual rather than conceptual?. Psychological Research 2007, 71:140-151. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0005-7.
32. Cohen A., Ivry R.I., Keele S.W. Attention and structure in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1990, 16:17-30. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.16.1.17.
33. Colwill R.M., Rescorla R.A. Postconditioning devaluation of a reinforcer affects instrumental responding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 1985, 11:120-132. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.11.1.120.
34. Colwill R.M., Rescorla R.A. Associative structures in instrumental learning. Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory 1986, 20:55-104.
35. Colwill R.M., Rescorla R.A. Evidence for the hierarchical structure of instrumental learning. Animal Learning & Behavior 1990, 18:71-82.
36. Craighero L., Fadiga L., Rizzolatti G., Umiltà C. Action for perception: A motor-visual attentional effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1999, 25:1673-1692. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.6.1673.
37. De Houwer J., Eelen P. An affective variant of the Simon paradigm. Cognition & Emotion 1998, 12:45-61. doi: 10.1080/026999398379772.
38. DeLong R.E., Wasserman E.A. Effects of differential reinforcement expectancies on successful matching-to-sample performance in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 1981, 7:394-412. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.7.4.394.
39. De Maeght S., Prinz W. Action induction through action observation. Psychological Research 2004, 68:97-114. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0148-3.
40. de Wit S., Dickinson A. Associative theories of goal-directed behaviour: A case for animal-human translational models. Psychological Research 2009, 73:463-476. doi: 10.1007/s00426-009-0230-6.
41. Drost U.C., Rieger M., Brass M., Gunter T.C., Prinz W. When hearing turns into playing: Movement induction by auditory stimuli in pianists. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A 2005, 58:1376-1389. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000610.
42. Elsner B., Hommel B. Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27:229-240. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.229.
43. Elsner B., Hommel B. Contiguity and contingency in action-effect learning. Psychological Research 2004, 68:138-154. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0151-8.
44. Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Pavesi G., Rizzolatti G. Motor facilitation during action observation: A magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology 1995, 73:2608-2611.
45. Fedorchak P.M., Bolles R.C. Differential outcome effect using a biologically neutral outcome difference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 1986, 12:125-130. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.12.2.125.
46. Finney S.A. Auditory feedback and musical keyboard performance. Music Perception 1997, 15:153-174.
47. Finney S.A., Palmer C. Auditory feedback and memory for music performance: Sound evidence for an encoding effect. Memory & Cognition 2003, 31:51-64.
48. Gibson J.J. Perception of the visual world 1950, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.
49. Goldenberg G. Imitating gestures and manipulating a mannikin: The representation of the human body in ideomotor apraxia. Neuropsychologia 1995, 33:63-72. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932%2894%2900104-W.
50. Gordon P.C., Meyer D.E. Control of serial order in rapidly spoken syllable sequences. Journal of Memory and Language 1987, 26:300-321. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X%2887%2990116-1.
51. Greenwald A.G. Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Review 1970, 77:73-99. doi: 10.1037/h0028689.
52. Greenwald A.G. On doing two things at once: Timesharing as a function of ideomotor compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1972, 94:52-57. doi: 10.1037/h0032762.
53. Greenwald A.G. On doing two things at once: III. Confirmation of perfect timesharing when simultaneous tasks are ideomotor compatible. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:859-868.
54. Greenwald A.G., Shulman H.G. On doing two things at once: II. Elimination of the psychological refractory period effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1973, 101:70-76. doi: 10.1037/h0035451.
55. Haggard P., Clark S., Kalogeras J. Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5:382-385. doi: 10.1038/nn827.
56. Halsband U. Brain mechanisms of apraxia. Comparative neuropsychology 1998, 184-212. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. A.D. Milner (Ed.).
57. Hamilton A., Wolpert D., Frith U. Your own action influences how you perceive another person's action. Current Biology 2004, 14:493-498. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.007.
58. Hanakawa T., Dimyan M.A., Hallett M. Motor planning, imagery, and execution in the distributed motor network: A time-course study with functional MRI. Cerebral Cortex 2008, 18:2775-2788. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn036.
59. Harless E. Der Apparat des Willens [The apparatus of the will]. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik [Magazine for philosophy and philosophical criticism] 1861, 38:50-73. Pfeffer, Halle, Germany. I.H. Fichte, H. Ulrici, I.U. Wirth (Eds.).
60. Heider F. The function of the perceptual system [Monograph]. Psychological Issues 1959, 1:135-152. (Original work published 1930).
61. Heider F. Thing and medium [Monograph]. Psychological Issues 1959, 1(3):1-34. (Original work published 1926).
62. Herbart J.F. Lehrbuch zur Psychologie [Textbook for psychology] 1816, Unzer, Königsberg, Germany.
63. Herbart J.F. Psychologie als Wissenschaft neu gegründet auf Erfahrung, Metaphysik und Mathematik. Zweiter, analytischer Teil [Psychology as science based on experience, metaphysics, and mathematics: Part 2] 1825, Unzer, Königsberg, Germany.
64. Hick W.E. On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1952, 4:11-26.
65. Hoffmann J., Koch I. Stimulus-response compatibility and sequential learning in the serial reaction time task. Psychological Research 1997, 60:87-97. doi: 10.1007/BF00419682.
66. Hoffmann J., Sebald A., Stöcker C. Irrelevant response effects improve serial learning in serial reaction time tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:470-482. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.470.
67. Hommel B. Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research 1993, 55:270-279.
68. Hommel B. The cognitive representation of action: Automatic integration of perceived action effects. Psychological Research 1996, 59:176-186. doi: 10.1007/BF00425832.
69. Hommel B. Planning and representing intentional action. Scientific World Journal 2003, 3:593-608.
70. Hommel B. Coloring an action: Intending to produce color events eliminates the Stroop effect. Psychological Research 2004, 68:74-90. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0146-5.
71. Hommel B. Consciousness and control: Not identical twins. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2007, 14:155-176.
72. Hommel B. Feature integration across perception and action: Event files affect response choice. Psychological Research 2007, 71:42-63. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0035-1.
73. Hommel B. Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychological Research 2009, 73:512-526. doi: 10.1007/s00426-009-0234-2.
74. Hommel B., Alonso D., Fuentes L.J. Acquisition and generalization of action effects. Visual Cognition 2003, 10:965-986.
75. Hommel B., Lippa Y. S-R compatibility effects due to context-dependent spatial stimulus coding. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1995, 2:370-374.
76. Hommel B., Müsseler J. Action-feature integration blinds to feature-overlapping perceptual events: Evidence from manual and vocal. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2006, 59:509-523.
77. Hommel B., Müsseler J., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2001, 24:849-937.
78. Howard J.H., Mutter S.A., Howard D.V. Serial pattern learning by event observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1992, 18:1029-1039. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.1029.
79. Howell P., Powell D.J. Delayed auditory-feedback with delayed sounds varying in duration. Perception & Psychophysics 1987, 42:166-172.
80. Hull C.L. Goal attraction and directing ideas conceived as habit phenomena. Psychological Review 1931, 38:487-506. doi: 10.1037/h0071442.
81. Iacoboni M. Mirroring people: The new science of how we connect with others 2008, Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, New York, NY.
82. Iacoboni M., Molnar-Szakacs I., Gallese V., Buccino G., Mazziotta J.C., Rizzolatti G. Grasping the intentions of others with one's own mirror neuron system. Public Library of Science Biology 2005, 3:529-535.
83. Ideomotor. (n.d.). In Merriam-Webster's online dictionary (11th ed.). Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ideomotor.
84. Ishimura G., Shimojo S. Voluntary action captures visual motion 1994, Association for Research in Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Sarasota, FL.
85. James W. The principles of psychology 1950, 2. Dover, New York, NY, (Original work published 1890).
86. Jansson E., Wilson A.D., Williams J.H.G., Mon-Williams M. Methodological problems undermine tests of the ideo-motor conjecture. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 182:549-558.
87. Jeannerod M. Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage 2001, 14:103-109.
88. Kahneman D., Treisman A., Gibbs B.J. The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology 1992, 24:175-219. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285%2892%2990007-O.
89. Keele S.W., Jennings P., Jones S., Caulton D., Cohen A. On the modularity of sequence representation. Journal of Motor Behavior 1995, 27:17-30.
90. Keller P.E., Wascher E., Prinz W., Waszak F., Koch I., Rosenbaum D.A. Differences between intention-based and stimulus-based actions. Journal of Psychophysiology 2006, 20:9-20. doi: 10.1027/0269-8803.20.1.9.
91. Klapp S.T., Anderson W.G., Berrian R.W. Implicit speech in reading, reconsidered. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1973, 100:368-374. doi: 10.1037/h0035471.
92. Klatzky R.L. Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: Definitions, distinctions, and interconnections. Spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary approach to representation and processing of spatial knowledge 1998, 1-17. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. C. Freska, C. Habel, K.F. Wender (Eds.).
93. Knuf L., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. An analysis of ideomotor action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2001, 130:779-798. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.779.
94. Koch I. Automatic and intentional activation of task sets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:1474-1486. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.6.1474.
95. Koch I., Hoffmann J. The role of stimulus-based and response-based spatial information in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 2000, 26:863-882. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.4.863.
96. Koch I., Kunde W. Verbal response-effect compatibility. Memory & Cognition 2002, 30:1297-1303.
97. Kornblum S. Dimensional overlap and dimensional relevance in stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility. Tutorials in motor behavior II 1992, 743-777. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. G.E. Stelmach, J. Requin (Eds.).
98. Kornblum S., Hasbroucq T., Osman A. Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review 1990, 97:253-270. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.253.
99. Kray J., Eenshuistra R., Kerstner H., Weidema M., Hommel B. Language and action control: The acquisition of action goals in early childhood. Psychological Science 2006, 17:737-741. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01774.x.
100. Kunde W. Exploring the hyphen in ideo-motor action. Behavioral and Brain Science 2001, 24:891-892.
101. Kunde W. Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27:387-394. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.2.387.
102. Kunde W. Temporal response-effect compatibility. Psychological Research 2003, 67:153-159. doi: 10.1007/s00426-002-0114-5.
103. Kunde W., Hoffmann J., Zellmann P. The impact of anticipated action effects on action planning. Acta Psychologica 2002, 109:137-155. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918%2801%2900053-1.
104. Kunde W., Koch I., Hoffmann J. Anticipated action effects affect the selection, initiation, and execution of actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology 2004, 57:87-106. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000143.
105. Kunde W., Wuhr P. Actions blind to conceptually overlapping stimuli. Psychological Research 2004, 68:199-207.
106. Lamb J., Kaufman H. Information transmission with unequally likely alternatives. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1965, 21:255-259.
107. Lattal K.A., Gleeson S. Response acquisition with delayed reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 1990, 16:27-39. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.16.1.27.
108. Laycock T. On the reflex functions of the brain. Reprinted from N. XXXVII of The British and Foreign Medical Review 1845, 1-16. Adlard, London, England.
109. Laycock T. Mind and brain: Or, the correlations of consciousness and organisation 1860, II. Sutherland & Knox, Edinburgh, Scotland.
110. Lewicki P., Czyzewska M., Hoffman H. Unconscious acquisition of complex procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1987, 13:523-530. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.13.4.523.
111. Lien M.-C., McCann R.E., Ruthruff E., Proctor R.W. Dual-task performance with ideomotor compatible tasks: Is the central processing bottleneck intact, bypassed, or shifted in locus?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:122-144. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.122.
112. Lien M.-C., Proctor R.W., Allen P.A. Ideomotor compatibility in the psychological refractory period effect: 29 years of oversimplification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:396-409. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.28.2.396.
113. Lien M.-C., Proctor R.W., Ruthruff E. Still no evidence for perfect timesharing with two ideomotor-compatible tasks: A reply to Greenwald (2003). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:1267-1272. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.6.1267.
114. Livingstone M., Hubel D. Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: Anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science 1988, May 6, 240:740-749. doi: 10.1126/science.3283936.
115. Lotze R.H. Medizinische Psychologie oder Physiologie der Seele [Medical psychology or physiology of the soul] 1852, Weidmannsche Buchhandlung, Leipzig, Germany.
116. MacKay D.G. The problems of flexibility, fluency, and speed-accuracy trade-off in skilled behavior. Psychological Review 1982, 89:483-506. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.89.5.483.
117. MacKay D.G. Self-inhibition and the disruptive effects of internal and external feedback in skilled behavior. Generation and modulation of action patterns 1986, 174-186. Springer, New York, NY. H. Heuer, C. Fromm (Eds.).
118. MacKay D.G. Asymmetries in the relationship between speech perception and production. Perspectives on perception and action 1987, 301-333. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. H. Heuer, A.F. Sanders (Eds.).
119. MacNeilage P. Evolution and lateralization of the two great primate action systems. Language origin: A multidisciplinary approach 1992, Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. J. Wind, B. Chiarelli, B. Bichakjian, A. Nocentini (Eds.).
120. Meck W.H. Postreinforcement signal-processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 1985, 11:52-70. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.11.1.52.
121. Meltzoff A.N., Moore M.K. Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science 1977, October 7, 198:75-78. doi: 10.1126/science.198.4312.75.
122. Meltzoff A.N., Moore M.K. Explaining facial imitation: A theoretical model. Early Development and Parenting 1997, 6:179-192.
123. Meltzoff A.N., Prinz W. The imitative mind: Development, evolution, and brain bases 2002, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
124. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. The visual brain in action 1995, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
125. Morin R.E., Grant D.A. Learning and performance of a key-pressing task as a function of the degree of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1955, 49:39-47. doi: 10.1037/h0041584.
126. Mowrer O.H. Learning theory and symbolic processes 1960, Wiley, New York, NY.
127. Munn N.L. Handbook of psychological research on the rat 1950, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.
128. Müsseler J., Hommel B. Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1997, 23:861-872. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.23.3.861.
129. Müsseler J., Hommel B. Detecting and identifying response-compatible stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1997, 4:125-129.
130. Nattkemper D., Prinz W. Stimulus and response anticipation in a serial reaction task. Psychological Research 1997, 60:98-112. doi: 10.1007/BF00419683.
131. Nattkemper D., Ziessler M. Cognitive control of action: The role of action effects. Psychological Research 2004, 68:71-73. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0145-6.
132. Nissen M.J., Bullemer P. Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology 1987, 19:1-32. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285%2887%2990002-8.
133. Norman J. Two visual systems and two theories of perception: An attempt to reconcile the constructivist and ecological approaches. Behavioral and Brain Science 2002, 25:73-96.
134. Ochipa C., Rothi L.J.G., Heilman K.M. Ideational apraxia: A deficit in tool selection and use. Annals of Neurology 1989, 25:190-193. doi: 10.1002/ana.410250214.
135. Ottoboni G., Tessari A., Cubeli R., Umiltà C. Is handedness recognition automatic? A study using a Simon-like paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:778-789. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.4.643b.
136. Parsons L.M. Imagined spatial transformation of one's body. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1987, 116:172-191. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.116.2.172.
137. Pashler H. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin 1994, 116:220-244. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220.
138. Passingham R.E., Toni I., Rushworth M.F.S. Specialisation within the prefrontal cortex: The ventral prefrontal cortex and associative learning. Experimental Brain Research 2000, 133:103-113. doi: 10.1007/s002210000405.
139. Perenin M.T., Vighetto A. Optic ataxia: A specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms: I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects. Brain 1998, 111:643-674.
140. Pfordresher P.Q. Auditory feedback in music performance: Evidence for a dissociation of sequencing and timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:949-964. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.949.
141. Pfordresher P.Q. Auditory feedback in music performance: The role of melodic structure and musical skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:1331-1345. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1331.
142. Pfordresher P.Q., Palmer C. Effects of delayed auditory feedback on timing of music performance. Psychological Research 2002, 66:71-79. doi: 10.1007/s004260100075.
143. Pfordresher P.Q., Palmer C. Effects of hearing the past, present, or future during music performance. Perception & Psychophysics 2006, 68:362-376.
144. Prinz W. Ideo-motor action. Perspectives on perception and action 1987, 47-76. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. H. Heuer, A.F. Sanders (Eds.).
145. Prinz W. Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 1997, 9:129-154. doi: 10.1080/713752551.
146. Proctor R.W., Vu K.P.L. The cognitive revolution at age 50: Has the promise of the human information-processing approach been fulfilled?. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 2006, 21:253-284. doi: 10.1207/s15327590ijhc2103_1.
147. Proctor R.W., Wang H.F. Set- and element-level stimulus-response compatibility effects for different manual response sets. Journal of Motor Behavior 1997, 29:351-365.
148. Rescorla R.A. Association of multiple outcomes with instrumental response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 1991, 17:465-474.
149. Rescorla R.A. Full preservation of a response-outcome association through training with a 2nd outcome. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1995, 48B:252-261.
150. Rescorla R.A., Colwill R.M. Associations with anticipated and obtained outcomes in instrumental learning. Animal Learning & Behavior 1989, 17:291-303.
151. Rescorla R.A., Solomon R.L. Two-process learning theory: Relationship between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning. Psychological Review 1967, 74:151-182. doi: 10.1037/h0024475.
152. Restle F. Discrimination of cues in mazes: A resolution of the " place-vs.-response" question. Psychological Review 1957, 64:217-228. doi: 10.1037/h0040678.
153. Rieger M. Letters as visual-action effects in skilled typing. Acta Psychologica 2007, 126:138-153. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.11.006.
154. Rizzolatti G. The mirror neuron system and imitation. Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science: Vol. 1. Mechanisms of imitation and imitation in animals 2005, 55-76. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Hurley, N. Chater (Eds.).
155. Rizzolatti G., Fadiga L., Galleses V., Fogassi L. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research 1996, 3:131-141.
156. Rosen R. Anticipatory systems 1985, Pergamon Press, London, England.
157. Rosenbaum D.A., Kenny S.B., Derr M.A. Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1983, 9:86-102. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.9.1.86.
158. Rosenbaum D.A., Marchak F., Barnes H.J., Vaughan J., Slotta J.D., Jorgensen M.J. Constraints for action selection: Overhand versus underhand grips. Attention and performance XIII: Motor representation and control 1990, 321-342. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. M. Jeannerod (Ed.).
159. Rothi L.J., Ochipa C. A cognitive neuropsychological model of limb praxis. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1991, 8:443-458. doi: 10.1080/02643299108253382.
160. Schubö A., Prinz W., Aschersleben G. Perceiving while acting: Action affects perception. Psychological Research 2004, 68:208-215.
161. Schubotz R.I., von Cramon D.Y. Functional organization of the lateral premotor cortex: fMRI reveals different regions activated by anticipation of object properties, location and speed. Cognitive Brain Research 2001, 11:97-112.
162. Schütz-Bosbach S., Prinz W. Perceptual resonance: Action-induced modulation of perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11:349-355. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.005.
163. Sekiyama K. Kinesthetic aspects of mental representations in the identification of left and right hands. Perception & Psychophysics 1982, 32:89-95.
164. Shin Y.K., Cho Y.S., Lien M.-C., Proctor R.W. Is the psychological refractory period effect for ideomotor-compatible tasks eliminated by speed-stress instruction?. Psychological Research 2007, 71:553-567. doi: 10.1007/s00426-006-0066-2.
165. Shin Y.K., Proctor R.W. Are spatial responses to visuospatial stimuli and spoken responses to auditory letters ideomotor-compatible tasks? Examination of set-size effects on dual-task interference. Acta Psychologica 2008, 129:352-364.
166. Simon J.R. The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective 1990, 31-86. North-Holland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. R.W. Proctor, T.G. Reeve (Eds.).
167. Singer W. The organization of sensory-motor representations in the neocortex: A hypothesis based on temporal coding. Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information 1994, 77-107. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. C. Umiltà, M. Moscovitch (Eds.).
168. Spence K.W. Behavior theory and conditioning 1956, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
169. Stock A., Stock C. A short history of ideo-motor action. Psychological Research 2004, 68:176-188.
170. Stöcker C., Sebald A., Hoffmann J. The influence of response-effect compatibility in a serial reaction time task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology; Section A 2003, 56:685-703. doi: 10.1080/02724980244000585.
171. Stürmer B., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: A study of imitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26:1746-1759. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.6.1746.
172. ten Hoopen G., Akerboom S., Raaymakers E. Vibrotactual choice reaction-time, tactile receptor systems and ideomotor compatibility. Acta Psychologica 1982, 50:143-157.
173. Thorndike E.L. The elements of psychology 1905, Seiler, New York, NY.
174. Thorndike E.L. Ideo-motor action. Psychological Review 1913, 20:91-106. doi: 10.1037/h0072027.
175. Trapold M.A. Are expectancies based upon different positive reinforcing events discriminably different. Learning and Motivation 1970, 1:129-140.
176. Trapold M.A., Overmeier J.B. The second learning process in instrumental learning. Classical conditioning II: Current theory and research 1972, 427-452. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, NY. A.H. Black, W.F. Prokasy (Eds.).
177. Treisman A., Schmidt H. Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology 1982, 14:107-141. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285%2882%2990006-8.
178. Umiltà C. The control operations of consciousness. Consciousness in contemporary science 1988, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. A.J. Marcel, E. Bisiach (Eds.).
179. Urcuioli P.J., DeMarse T. Associative processes in differential outcome discriminations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Behavior 1996, 22:192-204. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.22.2.192.
180. Usher M., Olami Z., McClelland J.L. Hick's law in a stochastic race model with speed-accuracy tradeoff. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2002, 46:704-715. doi: 10.1006/jmps.2002.1420.
181. Viswanathan, N., Tobin, S. J., Fowler, C. A., & Magnuson, J. S. (2008, November). Motor compatibility effects on speech perception. Poster session presented at the 49th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago, IL.
182. Vogt S. Visuomotor couplings in object-oriented and imitative actions. The imitative mind: Development, evolution, and brain bases 2002, 206-220. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. A. Meltzoff, W. Prinz (Eds.).
183. Volition. (n.d.-a). In Wikitionary. Retrieved from http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/volition.
184. Volition. (n.d.-b). In WordNet [Database]. Retrieved from http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=volition.
185. Wang D.-Y.D., Proctor R.W., Pick D.F. Coding controlled and triggered cursor movements as action effects: Influences on the auditory Simon effect for wheel-rotation responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:657-669.
186. Waszak F., Wascher E., Keller P., Koch I., Aschersleben G., Rosenbaum D.A., Prinz W. Intention-based and stimulus-based mechanisms in action selection. Experimental Brain Research 2005, 162:346-356. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-2183-8.
187. Weeks D.J., Proctor R.W. Salient-features coding in the translation between orthogonal stimulus and response dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1990, 119:355-366.
188. Wegner D. The mind's best trick: How we experience conscious will. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7:65-68. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613%2803%2900002-0.
189. Westwood D.A., Goodale M.A. Perception and action planning: Getting it together. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 2001, 24:907-908.
190. Willingham D.B., Nissen M.J., Bullemer P. On the development of procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1989, 15:1047-1060. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.15.6.1047.
191. Wise S.P., di Pellegrino G., Boussaoud D. The premotor cortex and nonstandard sensorimotor mapping. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 1996, 74:469-482. doi: 10.1139/cjpp-74-4-469.
192. Witt J.K., Proffitt D.R., Epstein W. Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:880-888. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.880.
193. Wohlschläger A. Visual motion priming by invisible actions. Vision Research 2000, 40:925-930. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989%2899%2900239-4.
194. Wolpert D.M. Internal models in human motor control: A computational and psychophysical perspective. Journal of Physiology (London) 1997, 501P:S12.
195. Wright C.E., Marino V.F., Belovsky S.A., Chubb C. Visually guided, aimed movements can be unaffected by stimulus-response uncertainty. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 179:475-496.
196. Wühr P., Müsseler J. Blindness to response-compatible stimuli in the psychological refractory period paradigm. Visual Cognition 2002, 9:421-457. doi: 10.1080/13506280143000520.
197. Ziessler M. The impact of motor responses on serial-pattern learning. Psychological Research 1994, 57:30-41. doi: 10.1007/BF00452993.
198. Ziessler M. Response-effect learning as a major component of implicit serial learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1998, 24:962-978. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.24.4.962.
199. Ziessler M., Nattkemper D. Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: Further evidence from serial reaction task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:595-613. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.3.595.
200. Ziessler M., Nattkemper D. Effect anticipation in action planning. Attention and performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action 2002, 645-672. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. W. Prinz, B. Hommel (Eds.).
201. Ziessler M., Nattkemper D., Frensch P. The role of anticipation and intention in the learning of effects of self-performed actions. Psychological Research 2004, 68:163-175. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0153-6.