Automatic and Intentional Activation of Task Sets

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 1474-1486

  Koch, Iring ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; MALE; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ATTENTION; COGNITION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; MALE; REACTION TIME; SET (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 85047683291     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.6.1474     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Allport, A., & Wylie, G. (1999). Task-switching: Positive and negative priming of task-set. In G. W. Humphreys, J. Duncan, & A. M. Treisman (Eds.), Attention, space and action: Studies in cognitive neuroscience (pp. 273-296). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
2. Allport, A., & Wylie, G. (2000). Selection-for-action in competing (Stroop) tasks: "Task-switching," stimulus-response bindings, and negative priming. In S. Monsell & J. S. Driver (Eds.), Attention & performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 35-70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention & performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Curran, T., & Keele, S. W. (1993). Attentional and nonattentional forms of sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 189-202.
5. Dienes, Z., & Berry, D. (1997). Implicit learning: Below the subjective threshold. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 3-23.
6. Frensch, P. A., & Miner, C. S. (1994). Effects of presentation rate and individual differences in short-term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learning. Memory & Cognition, 22, 95-110.
7. Goschke, T. (2000). Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task-set switching. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention & performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 333-355). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Heuer, H., Schmidtke, V., & Kleinsorge, T. (2001). Implicit learning of sequences of tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 967-983.
9. Hoffmann, J., & Koch, I. (1998). Implicit learning of loosely defined structures. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. French (Eds.), Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 161-199). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Hübner, R., Futterer, T., & Steinhauser, M. (2001). On attentional control as source of residual shift costs: Evidence from two-component task shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 640-653.
11. Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of psychology (Whole No. 89).
12. Kamin, L. J. (1968). "Attention-like" processes in classical conditioning. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Miami Symposium on the Prediction of Behavior: Aversive stimulation (pp. 9-31). Miami, FL: University of Miami Press.
13. Koch, I. (2000). The role of external cues for endogenous advance reconfiguration in task switching. Manuscript submitted for publication.
14. Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2000). The role of stimulus-based and response-based spatial information in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 863-882.
15. Mayr, U. (1996). Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: Evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 350-364.
16. Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26.
17. Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2000). Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1124-1140.
18. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423-1442.
19. Meiran, N., Chorev, Z., & Sapir, A. (2000). Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 211-253.
20. Monsell, S. (1996). Control of mental processes. In V. Bruce (Ed.), Unsolved mysteries of the mind: Tutorial essays in cognition (pp. 93-148). Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
21. Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1-32.
22. Perruchet, P., & Amorim, M.-A. (1992). Conscious knowledge and changes in performance in sequence learning: Evidence against dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 785-800.
23. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
24. Shallice, T. (1994). Multiple levels of control processes. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention & performance XV: Conscious and non-conscious information processing (pp. 395-420). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Shanks, D. R., & Johnstone, T. (1999). Evaluating the relationship between explicit and implicit knowledge in a sequential reaction time task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1435-1451.
26. Shanks, D. R., & St. John, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 17, 367-447.
27. Spector, A., & Biederman, I. (1976). Mental set and mental shift revisited. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 669-679.
28. Wylie, G., & Allport, A. (2000). Task switching and the measurement of "switch costs." Psychological Research, 63, 212-233.