Conflict adjustment devoid of perceptual selection

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 144, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 31-39

  Wendt, Mike ^a   Luna Rodriguez, Aquiles ^a   Kiesel, Andrea ^b   Jacobsen, Thomas ^a  

^a HELMUT SCHMIDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Conflict adjustment; Task switching

Indexed keywords

2343 LEARNING & MEMORY; 2346 ATTENTION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONFLICT; CONFLICT ADJUSTMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; TASK SWITCHING;

2343 LEARNING & MEMORY; 2346 ATTENTION; CONFLICT ADJUSTMENT; TASK SWITCHING;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 84879167084     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.04.019     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Botvinick M.M., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Carter C.S., Cohen J.D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review 2001, 108:624-652.
2. Braver T.S. The variable nature of cognitive control: A dual mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2012, 16:106-113.
3. Brown J.W., Reynolds J.R., Braver T.S. A computational model of fractionated conflict-control mechanisms in task-switching. Cognitive Psychology 2007, 55:37-85.
4. Bugg J.M., Chanani S. List-wide control is not entirely elusive: Evidence from picture-word Stroop. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2011, 18:930-936.
5. Bugg J.M., Jacoby L.L., Chanani S. Why it is too early to lose control in accounts of item-specific proportion congruency effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 2011, 37:844-859.
6. Bugg J.M., McDaniel M.A., Sculli M.K., Braver T.S. Revealing list-level control in the Stroop task by uncovering its benefits and costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 2011, 37:1595-1606.
7. Corballis P.M., Gratton G. Independent control of processing strategies for different locations in the visual field. Biological Psychology 2003, 64:191-209.
8. Crump M.J.C., Gong Z., Milliken B. The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: Location as a contextual cue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:316-321.
9. Crump M.J.C., Milliken B. The flexibility of context-specific control: Evidence for context-driven generalization of item-specific control settings. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 62:1523-1532.
10. Crump M.J.C., Vaquero J.M.M., Milliken B. Context-specific learning and control: The roles of awareness, task relevance, and relative salience. Consciousness and Cognition 2008, 17:22-36.
11. De Pisapia N., Braver T.S. A model of dual control mechanisms through anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex interactions. Neurocomputing 2006, 69:1322-1326.
12. Deosenbach N.U.F., Fair D.A., Cohen A.L., Schlagger B.L., Petersen S.E. A dual-network architecture of top-down control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008, 12:99-105.
13. Eriksen B.A., Eriksen C.W. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics 1974, 16:143-149.
14. Fernandez-Duque D., Knight M.B. Cognitive control: Dynamic, sustained, and voluntary influences. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:340-355.
15. Funes M.J., Lupiáñez J., Humphreys G. Sustained vs. transient cognitive control: Evidence of a behavioural dissociation. Cognition 2010, 114:338-347.
16. Goschke T. Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task set switching. Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII 2000, 331-355. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Monsell, J. Driver (Eds.).
17. Gratton G., Coles M.G.H., Donchin E. Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 1992, 121:480-506.
18. Hübner M., Kluwe R.H., Luna-Rodriguez A., Peters A. Response selection difficulty and asymmetrical costs of switching between tasks and stimuli: No evidence for an exogenous component of task-set reconfiguration. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30:1043-1063.
19. Kiesel A., Kunde W., Hoffmann J. Evidence for task-specific resolution of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:800-806.
20. Kiesel A., Steinhauser M., Wendt M., Falkenstein M., Jost K., Philipp A.M., et al. Control and interference in task switching-A review. Psychological Bulletin 2010, 136:849-874.
21. King J.A., Korb F.M., Egner T. Priming of control: Implicit contextual cuing of top-down attentional set. The Journal of Neuroscience 2012, 32:8192-8200.
22. Logan G.D., Zbrodoff N.J. When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in Stroop-like tasks. Memory & Cognition 1979, 7:166-174.
23. Mayr U., Awh E., Laurey P. Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6:450-452.
24. Neill W.T., Valdes L.A., Terry K.M., Gorfein D.S. The persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1992, 18:993-1000.
25. Notebaert W., Verguts T. Cognitive control acts locally. Cognition 2008, 106:1071-1080.
26. Otten L.J., Sudevan P., Logan G.D., Coles M.G.H. Magnitude versus parity in numerical judgments: Event-related brain potentials implicate response conflict as the source of interference. Acta Psychologica 1996, 94:21-40.
27. Pashler H., Baylis G. Procedural learning: 2. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1991, 17:33-48.
28. Purmann S., Badde S., Wendt M. Adjustments to recent and frequent conflict reflect two distinguishable mechanisms. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009, 16:350-355.
29. Schmidt J.R. The parallel episodic processing (PEP) model: Dissociating contingency and conflict adaptation in the item-specific proportion congruent paradigm. Acta Psychologica 2013, 142:119-126.
30. Schmidt J.R., Besner D. The Stroop effect: Why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:514-523.
31. Schmidt J.R., De Houwer J., Besner D. Contingency learning and unlearning in the blink of an eye: A resource dependent process. Consciousness and Cognition 2010, 19:235-250.
32. Simon J.R., Small A.M. Processing auditory information: Interference from an irrelevant cue. Journal of Applied Psychology 1969, 53:433-435.
33. Spapé M.M., Hommel B. He said, she said: Episodic retrieval induces conflict adaptation in an auditory Stroop task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15:1117-1121.
34. Stroop J.R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1935, 18:643-662.
35. Stürmer B., Leuthold H., Soetens E., Schröter H., Sommer W. Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:1345-1363.
36. Sudevan P., Taylor D.A. The cuing and priming of cognitive operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 1987, 13:89-103.
37. Torres-Quesada M., Funes M.J., Lupiáñez J. Dissociating proportion congruent and conflict adaptation effects in a Simon-Stroop procedure. Acta Psychologica 2013, 142:203-210.
38. Verguts T., Notebaert W. Hebbian learning of cognitive control: Dealing with specific and nonspecific adaptation. Psychological Review 2008, 115:518-525.
39. Verguts T., Notebaert W. Adaptation by binding: A learning account of cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2009, 13:252-257.
40. Wendt M., Kiesel A. Conflict adaptation in time: Foreperiods as contextual cues for attentional adjustment. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2011, 18:910-916.
41. Wendt M., Kluwe R.H., Vietze I. Location-specific vs. hemisphere-specific adaptation of processing selectivity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15:135-140.
42. Wendt M., Luna-Rodriguez A. Conflict-frequency affects flanker interference: Role of stimulus-ensemble-specific practice and flanker-response contingencies. Experimental Psychology 2009, 56:206-217.
43. Wendt M., Luna-Rodriguez A., Jacobsen T. Conflict-induced perceptual filtering. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 2012, 38:675-686.