Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 149-165

  Miller, Jeff ^a   Alderton, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Backward crosstalk; Bottleneck models; Psychological refractory period; Response force

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; RESPONSE TIME; SHORT TERM MEMORY; TOUCH;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COLOR PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; REFRACTORY PERIOD, PSYCHOLOGICAL; TOUCH;

EID: 33244468341     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.149     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Arend, U., & Wandmacher, J. (1987). On the generality of logical receding in spatial interference tasks. Acta Psychologica, 65, 193-210.
2. Arnell, K. M., & Duncan, J. (2002). Separate and shared sources of dual-task cost in stimulus identification and response selection. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 105-147.
3. Cohen, A., & Shoup, R. E. (1997). Perceptual dimensional constraints in response selection processes. Cognitive Psychology, 32, 128-181.
4. Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 529-553.
5. De Jong, R. (1993). Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 965-980.
6. De Jong, R., Liang, C. C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750.
7. Donders, F. C. (1969). Over de snelheid van psychische processen [On the speed of mental processes] (W. G. Koster, Trans.). In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance II (pp. 412-431). Amsterdam: North Holland. (Original work published 1868)
8. Duncan, J. (1977a). Response selection errors in spatial choice reaction tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 415-423.
9. Duncan, J. (1977b). Response selection rules in spatial choice reaction tasks. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 49-62). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Duncan, J. (1978). Response selection in spatial choice reaction: Further evidence against associative models. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 429-440.
11. Duncan, J. (1979). Divided attention: The whole is more than the sum of its parts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 216-228.
12. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
13. Fagot, C., & Pashler, H. E. (1992). Making two responses to a single object: Implications for the central attentional bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1058-1079.
14. Franz, E. A. (1997). Spatial coupling in the coordination of complex actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 50(A), 684-704.
15. Glencross, D. J., Piek, J. P., & Barrett, N. C. (1995). The coordination of bimanual synchronous and alternating tapping sequences. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 3-15.
16. Gottsdanker, R. (1969). Interacting responses to crowded signals. Acta Psychologica, 30, 168-176.
17. Gottsdanker, R., & Way, T. C. (1966). Varied and constant intersignal intervals in psychological refractoriness. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 792-804.
18. Hackley, S. A., & Valle-Inclán, F. (1999). Accessory stimulus effects on response selection: Does arousal speed decision making? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 321-329.
19. Hedge, A., & Marsh, N. W. A. (1975). The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondence on two-choice response-time. Acta Psychologica 34, 427-439.
20. Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1368-1384.
21. Hommel, B., & Eglau, B. (2002). Control of stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Psychological Research, 66, 260-273.
22. Hommel, B., & Schneider, W. X. (2002). Visual attention and manual response selection: Distinct mechanisms operating on the same codes. Visual Cognition, 9, 392-420.
23. Jolicœur, P. (1999). Concurrent response-selection demands modulate the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1097-1113.
24. Ketelaars, M. A., Khan, M. A., & Franks, I. M. (1999). Dual-task interference as an indicator of online programming in simple movement sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1302-1315.
25. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. M. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
26. Leuthold, H., Sommer, W., & Ulrich, R. (1996). Partial advance information and response preparation: Inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 307-323.
27. Lien, M. C., & Proctor, R. W. (2000). Multiple spatial correspondence effects on dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1260-1280.
28. Logan, G. D., & Delheimer, J. A. (2001). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 668-685.
29. Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393-434.
30. Logan, G. D., & Schulkind, M. D. (2000). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1072-1090.
31. Lu, C. H., & Proctor, R. W. (1994). Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 286-298.
32. Lu, C. H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174-207.
33. Mattes, S., Leuthold, H., & Ulrich, R. (2002). Stimulus-response compatibility in intensity-force relations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 55(A), 1175-1191.
34. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997a). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: I. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3-65.
35. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997b). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: II. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review, 104, 749-791.
36. Meyer, D. E., Kieras, D. E., Lauber, E., Schumacher, E. H., Glass, J., Zurbriggen, E., et al. (1995). Adaptive executive control: Flexible multiple task performance without pervasive immutable response-selection bottlenecks. Acta Psychologica, 90, 163-190.
37. Miller, J. O. (in press). Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: Effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies. Psychological Research.
38. Miller, J. O., & Low, K. A. (2001). Motor processes in simple, go/no-go, and choice reaction time tasks: A psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 266-289.
39. Monsell, S., & Driver, J. (2000). Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Mordkoff, J. T. (1998). Between-dimension flanker effects: A clarification with encouraging implications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 670-675.
41. Navon, D. (1984). Resources - A theoretical soup stone? Psychological Review, 91, 216-234.
42. Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1980). Task difficulty, resources, and dual-task performance. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VII (pp. 297-315). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Navon, D., & Miller, J. O. (1987). Role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 435-448.
44. Navon, D., & Miller, J. O. (2002). Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 193-251.
45. Pashler, H. E. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 358-377.
46. Pashler, H. E. (1987). Detecting conjunctions of color and form: Reassessing the serial search hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 191-201.
47. Pashler, H. E. (1993). Dual-task interference and elementary mental mechanisms. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV. Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 245-264). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Pashler, H. E. (1994a). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
49. Pashler, H. E. (1994b). Graded capacity-sharing in dual-task interference? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 330-342.
50. Pashler, H. E., & Johnston, J. C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 41(A), 19-45.
51. Pashler, H. E., & Johnston, J. C. (1998). Attentional limitations in dual-task performance. In H. E. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 155-189). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
52. Rinkenauer, G., Ulrich, R., & Wing, A. M. (2001). Brief bimanual force pulses: Correlations between the hands in force and time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1485-1497.
53. Romaiguere, P., Hasbroucq, T., Possamaï, C. A., & Seal, J. (1993). Intensity to force translation: A new effect of stimulus-response compatibility revealed by analysis of response time and electromyographic activity of a prime mover. Cognitive Brain Research, 1, 197-201.
54. Rosenbaum, D. A., Inhoff, A. W., & Gordon, A. M. (1984). Choosing between movement sequences: A hierarchical editor model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 372-393.
55. Ruthruff, E. D., Johnston, J. C., & Van Selst, M. (2001). Why practice reduces dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 3-21.
56. Sanders, A. F. (1977). Structural and functional aspects of the reaction process. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 3-25). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
57. Sanders, A. F., & Houtmans, M. J. M. (1985). There is no central stimulus encoding during saccadic eye shifts: A case against general parallel processing notions. Acta Psychologica, 60, 323-338.
58. Simon, J. R. (1968). Effect of ear stimulated on reaction time and movement time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 344-346.
59. Spijkers, W. A. C., & Heuer, H. (1995). Structural constraints on the performance of symmetrical bimanual movements with different amplitudes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 48(A), 716-740.
60. Spijkers, W. A. C., Heuer, H., Steglich, C., & Kleinsorge, T. (2000). Specification of movement amplitudes for the left and right hands: Evidence for transient parametric coupling from overlapping-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1091-1105.
61. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
62. Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1625-1640.
63. Tombu, M., & Jolicœur, P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 3-18.
64. Ulrich, R., Rinkenauer, G., & Miller, J. O. (1998). Effects of stimulus duration and intensity on simple reaction time and response force. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 915-928.
65. Vincent, S. B. (1912). The function of the viborissae in the behavior of the white rat. Behavioral Monographs 1(5).
66. Wakelin, D. R. (1976). The role of the response in psychological refractoriness. Acta Psychologica, 40, 163-175.
67. Way, T. C., & Gottsdanker, R. (1968). Psychological refractoriness with varying differences between tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 38-45.
68. Wong, K. F. E. (2002). The relationship between attentional blink and psychological refractory period. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 54-71.
69. Zhang, H. (2000). The Simon effect and its reversal in three-choice Hedge and Marsh tasks: Evidence for irrelevant stimulus-response compatibility and stimulus congruity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1018-1037.