Central Cross-Talk in Task Switching: Evidence From Manipulating Input-Output Modality Compatibility

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1075-1081

  Stephan, Denise Nadine ^a   Koch, Iring ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; Cross talk; Modality compatibility; Selective attention; Task switching

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 77954152906     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0019695     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Allport A., Styles E.A., Hsieh S. Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. Attention and Performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing 1994, 421-452. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. C. Umiltà, M. Moscovitch (Eds.).
2. Altmann E.M. Comparing switch costs: Alternating runs and explicit cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:475-483.
3. Altmann E.M., Gray W.D. An integrated model of cognitive control in task switching. Psychological Review 2008, 115:602-639.
4. Greenwald A.G. On doing two things at once: Time sharing as a function of ideomotor compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1972, 94:52-57.
5. Greenwald A.G. On doing two things at once: III. Confirmation of perfect timesharing when simultaneous tasks are ideomotor compatible. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:859-868.
6. Hazeltine E., Ruthruff E., Remington R.W. The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: Evidence for content-dependent central interference. Cognitive Psychology 2006, 52:291-345.
7. Hommel B., Müsseler J., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2001, 24:849-937.
8. Hunt A.R., Kingstone A. Multisensory executive functioning. Brain and Cognition 2004, 55:325-327.
9. Koch I. Automatic and intentional activation of task sets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:1474-1486.
10. Koch I. The role of crosstalk in dual-task performance: Evidence from manipulating response-set overlap. Psychological Research 2009, 73:417-424.
11. Koch I., Gade M., Schuch S., Philipp A.M. The role of inhibition in task switching: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2010, 17:1-14.
12. Lukas S., Philipp A.M., Koch I. Switching attention between modalities: Further evidence for visual dominance. Psychological Research 2010, 74:255-267.
13. Meiran N. Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1996, 22:1423-1442.
14. Meiran N. Task switching: Mechanisms underlying rigid vs. flexible self control. Self control in society, mind, and brain 2010, 202-220. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. R. Hassin, K. Ochsner, Y. Trope (Eds.).
15. Meiran N., Chorev Z., Sapir A. Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology 2000, 41:211-253.
16. Meiran N., Kessler Y., Adi-Japha E. Control by action representation and input selection (CARIS): A theoretical framework for task switching. Psychological Research 2008, 72:473-500.
17. Meyer D.E., Kieras D.E. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review 1997, 104:3-65.
18. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. The visual brain in action 2006, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. 2nd ed.
19. Monsell S. Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7:134-140.
20. Navon D., Miller J. Role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1987, 13:435-448.
21. Pashler H. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin 1994, 116:220-244.
22. Pashler H. Task switching and multitask performance. Attention and Performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes 2000, 277-307. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Monsell, J. Driver (Eds.).
23. Philipp A.M., Koch I. Switching of response modalities. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 2005, 58(A):1325-1338.
24. Proctor R.W., Vu K.-P.L. Stimulus-response compatibility principles: Data, theory, and practice 2006, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL.
25. Rogers R.D., Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1995, 124:207-231.
26. Ruthruff E., Hazeltine E., Remington R.W. What causes residual dual-task interference after practice?. Psychological Research 2006, 70:494-503.
27. Schubotz R.I., von Cramon D.Y., Lohmann G. Auditory what, where, and when: A somatotopy in lateral premotor cortex. NeuroImage 2003, 20:173-185.
28. Scott S.K., Johnsrude I.S. The neuroanatomical and functional organization of speech perception. Trends in Neurosciences 2003, 26:100-107.
29. Stelzel C., Schumacher E.H., Schubert T., D'Esposito M. The neural effect of stimulus-response modality in dual-task performance: An fMRI study. Psychological Research 2006, 70:514-525.
30. Wickens C.D. Processing resources in attention. Varieties of attention 1984, 63-102. Academic Press, New York, NY. R. Parasuraman, D.R. Davies (Eds.).