Talking while looking: On the encapsulation of output system representations

Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 73, Issue , 2014, Pages 72-91

  Huestegge, Lynn ^a,b   Pieczykolan, Aleksandra ^a,b   Koch, Iring ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^b RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Crosstalk; Dual task interference; Encapsulation; Modularity; Saccadic eye movements; Vocal responses

Indexed keywords

ADULT; COGNITION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; SPEECH; VISION;

ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SACCADES; SPEECH; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84903825907     PISSN: 00100285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Anderson J.R., Taatgen N.A., Byrne M.D. Learning to achieve perfect timesharing: Architectural implications of Hazeltine, Teague, and Ivry (2002). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 33:749-761.
2. Atchley P., Dressel J. Conversation limits the functional field of view. Human Factors 2004, 46:664-673.
3. Atchley P., Dressel J., Jones T.C., Burson R., Marshall D. Talking and driving: Applications of crossmodal action reveal a special role for spatial language. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung 2011, 75:525-534.
4. Barrett H.C., Frederick D.A., Haselton M.G., Kurzban R. Can manipulations of cognitive load be used to test evolutionary hypotheses?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006, 91:513-518.
5. Barrett H.C., Kurzban R. Modularity in cognition: Framing the debate. Psychological Review 2006, 113:628-647.
6. Bekkering H., Adam J.J., Kingma H., Huson A., Whiting H.T.A. Reaction time latencies of eye and hand movements in single- and dual-task conditions. Experimental Brain Research 1994, 97:471-476.
7. Buller D.J. Adapting minds: Evolutionary psychology and the persistent quest for human nature 2005, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
8. Carruthers P. The case for massively modular models of mind. Contemporary debates in cognitive science 2005, 205-225. Blackwell, Oxford, England. R. Stainton (Ed.).
9. Coltheart M. Modularity and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1999, 3:115-120.
10. D'Avella A., Pai D.K. Modularity for sensorimotor control: Evidence and a new prediction. Journal of Motor Behavior 2010, 42:361-369.
11. DeSteno D., Bartlett M., Braverman J., Salovey P. Sex differences in jealousy: Evolutionary mechanism or artifact of measurement?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 83:1103-1116.
12. Fagot C., Pashler H. Making two responses to a single object: Implications for the central attentional bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18:1058-1079.
13. Fodor J. The modularity of mind 1983, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
14. Frankenhuis W.E., Ploeger A. Evolutionary psychology versus Fodor: Arguments for and against the massive modularity hypothesis. Philosophical Psychology 2007, 20:687-710.
15. Friston K.J., Price C.J. Modules and brain mapping. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2011, 28:241-250.
16. Hazeltine E., Ruthruff E., Remington R.W. The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: Evidence for content-dependent central interference. Cognitive Psychology 2006, 52:291-345.
17. Hazeltine E., Wifall T. Searching working memory for the source of dual-task costs. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung 2011, 75:466-475.
18. Holender D. Interference between a vocal and a manual response to the same stimulus. Tutorials in motor behavior 1980, 421-431. North-Holland, Amsterdam. G.E. Stelmach, J. Requin (Eds.).
19. Hommel B. Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:1368-1384.
20. Horn A.K., Leigh R.J. The anatomy and physiology of the ocular motor system. Handbook of Clinical Neurology 2011, 102:21-69.
21. Huestegge L. The role of saccades in multitasking. Towards an output-related view on eye movements. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung 2011, 75:452-465.
22. Huestegge L., Koch I. Crosstalk between simultaneously executed saccades and manual responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35:352-362.
23. Huestegge L., Koch I. Crossmodal action selection: Evidence from dual-task compatibility. Memory and Cognition 2010, 38:493-501.
24. Huestegge L., Koch I. Fixation disengagement enhances peripheral perceptual processing: Evidence for a perceptual gap effect. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 201:631-640.
25. Huestegge L., Koch I. Constraints in task-set control: Modality dominance patterns among effector systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2013, 142:633-637.
26. Hutton S.B. Cognitive control of saccadic eye movements. Brain and Cognition 2008, 68:327-340.
27. Isa T., Yoshida M. Saccade control after V1 lesion revisited. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2009, 19:608-614.
28. Jiang J., Egner T. Using neural pattern classifiers to quantify the modularity of conflict-control mechanisms in the human brain. Cerebral Cortex 2013, 10.1093/cercor/bht029.
29. Kiesel A., Steinhauser M., Wendt M., Falkenstein M., Jost K., Philipp A., et al. Control and interference in task switching - A review. Psychological Bulletin 2010, 136:849-874.
30. Koch I. The role of crosstalk in dual-task performance: Evidence from manipulating response-set overlap. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung 2009, 73:417-424.
31. Koch I., Prinz W. Process interference and code overlap in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:192-201.
32. Kornblum S., Hasbroucq T., Osman A. Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis of stimulus-response compatibility - A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review 1990, 97:253-270.
33. Kowler E., Anderson E., Dosher B., Blaser E. The role of attention in the programming of saccades. Vision Research 1995, 35:1897-1916.
34. Lehle C., Hübner R. Strategic capacity sharing between two tasks: Evidence from tasks with the same and different task sets. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung 2009, 73:707-726.
35. Lien M.-C., Proctor R.W. Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2002, 9:212-238.
36. Logan G.D., Gordon R.D. Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review 2001, 108:393-434.
37. Logan G.D., Schulkind M.D. Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 2000, 26:1072-1090.
38. Lünenburger L., Kutz D.F., Hoffmann K.P. Influence of arm movements on saccades in humans. European Journal of Neuroscience 2000, 12:4107-4116.
39. MacDonald J., McGurk H. Visual influences on speech perception processes. Perception and Psychophysics 1978, 24:253-257.
40. Magen H., Cohen A. Modularity beyond perception: Evidence from the PRP paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2010, 36:395-414.
41. Marr D. Vision 1982, H. Freeman, New York.
42. Meyer D.E., Kieras D.W. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review 1997, 104:3-65.
43. Miyake A., Emerson M.J., Padilla F., Ahn J. Inner speech as a retrieval aid for task goals: The effects of cue type and articulatory suppression. Acta Psychologia 2004, 115:123-142.
44. Munoz D.P., Armstrong I., Coe B. Using eye movements to probe development and dysfunction. Eye movements: A window on mind and brain 2007, 100-124. Elsevier, Oxford, UK. R.P.G. van Gompel, M.H. Fischer, W.S. Murray, R.L. Hill (Eds.).
45. Navon D., Miller J. Role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1987, 13:435-448.
46. Navon D., Miller J. Queuing or sharing. A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology 2002, 44:193-251.
47. Pashler H. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin 1994, 116:220-244.
48. Pashler H., Carrier M., Hoffman J. Saccadic eye movements and dual-task interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1993, 46A:51-82.
49. Pinker S. So how does the mind work?. Mind and Language 2005, 20:1-24.
50. Prinz J.J. Is the mind really modular?. Contemporary debates in cognitive science 2006, 22-36. Blackwell, Malden, MA. R.J. Stainton (Ed.).
51. Pylyshyn Z.W. Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1999, 22:341-423.
52. Rayner K. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 62A:1457-1506.
53. Simonyan K., Horwitz B. Laryngeal motor cortex and control of speech in humans. Neuroscientist 2011, 17:197-208.
54. Sperber D. Modularity and relevance: How can a massively modular mind be flexible and context-sensitive?. The innate mind: Structure and content 2005, 53-68. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, S. Stich (Eds.).
55. Stephan D.N., Koch I. Central crosstalk in task switching - Evidence from manipulating input-output modality compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2010, 36:1075-1081.
56. Stephan D.N., Koch I. The role of input-output modality compatibility in task switching. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung 2011, 75:491-498.
57. Stephan D.N., Koch I., Hendler J., Huestegge L. Task switching, modality compatibility, and the supra-modal function of eye movements. Experimental Psychology 2013, 60:90-99.
58. Sternberg S. Modular processes in mind and brain. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2011, 28:156-208.
59. Strayer D., Drews F., Johnston W. Cell-phone induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2003, 9:23-32.
60. Stelzel C., Schubert T. Interference effects of stimulus-response modality pairings in dual tasks and their robustness. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung 2011, 75:476-490.
61. Sweeney J.A., Luna B., Keedy S.K., McDowell J.E., Clementz B.A. FMRI studies of eye movement control: Investigating the interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor brain systems. NeuroImage 2007, 36:54-60.
62. Tibber M.S., Grant S., Morgan M.J. Oculomotor responses and visuospatial perceptual judgments compete for common limited resources. Journal of Vision 2009, 9((12): 21):1-13.
63. Tombu M., Jolicoeur P. A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:3-18.
64. Tooby J., Cosmides L. The psychological foundations of culture. The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture 1992, 19-136. Oxford University Press, Oxford. J.H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, J. Tooby (Eds.).
65. Wickens C.D. Multiple resources and mental workload. Human Factors 2008, 50:449-455.