Task inhibition, conflict, and the n-2 repetition cost: A combined computational and empirical approach

Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 94, Issue , 2017, Pages 1-25

  Sexton, Nicholas J ^a   Cooper, Richard P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ASSOCIATION; CONFLICT; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); JUDGMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; REACTION TIME;

EID: 85013377890     PISSN: 00100285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Allport, A., Styles, E., Hsieh, S., Shifting intentional set – Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. Umilta, C., Moscovitch, M., (eds.) Attention and performance xv: Conscious and nonconscious information processing, Vol. 15, 1994, MIT Press, Cambridge, 421–452.
2. Allport, A., Wylie, G., Task switching, stimulus-response bindings, and negative priming. Control of cognitive processes attention and performance XVIII, 2000, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 35–70.
3. Altmann, E.M., Gray, W.D., An integrated model of cognitive control in task switching. Psychological Review 115:3 (2008), 602–639.
4. Arbuthnott, K.D., The influence of cue type on backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31:5 (2005), 1030–1042.
5. Arbuthnott, K.D., Asymmetric switch cost and backward inhibition: Carryover activation and inhibition in switching between tasks of unequal difficulty. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale 62:2 (2008), 91–100.
6. Arbuthnott, K.D., Woodward, T.S., The influence of cue-task association and location on switch cost and alternating-switch cost. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale 56:1 (2002), 18–29.
7. Botvinick, M.M., Braver, T., Barch, D., Carter, C., Cohen, J., Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review 108:3 (2001), 624–652.
8. Brown, J.W., Reynolds, J.R., Braver, T.S., A computational model of fractionated conflict-control mechanisms in task-switching. Cognitive Psychology 55:1 (2007), 37–85.
9. Cohen, J.D., Dunbar, K., McClelland, J.L., On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the stroop effect. Psychological Review 97:3 (1990), 332–361.
10. Cohen, J.D., Huston, T., Progress in the use of interactive models for understanding attention and performance. Umiltá, C., Moscovitch, M., (eds.) Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing, 1994, MIT Press, 453–476.
11. Cooper, R., Shallice, T., Contention scheduling and the control of routine activities. Cognitive Neuropsychology 17:4 (2000), 297–338.
12. Gade, M., Koch, I., Linking inhibition to activation in the control of task sequences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12:3 (2005), 530–534.
13. Gade, M., Koch, I., Cue-task associations in task switching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 60:6 (2007), 762–769.
14. Gade, M., Koch, I., The influence of overlapping response sets on task inhibition. Memory & Cognition 35:4 (2007), 603–609.
15. Gade, M., Schuch, S., Druey, M., Koch, I., Inhibitory control in task switching. Task switching and cognitive control, 2014, Oxford University Press, 137.
16. Gilbert, S.J., Shallice, T., Task switching: A PDP model. Cognitive Psychology 44:3 (2002), 297–337.
17. Goschke, T., Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task set switching. Monsell, S., Driver, J., (eds.) Control of cognitive processes. Attention and performance XVIII, 2000, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 331–355.
18. Grange, J.A., Houghton, G., Temporal cue-target overlap is not essential for backward inhibition in task switching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62:10 (2009), 2068–2079.
19. Grange, J.A., Houghton, G., Models of cognitive control in task switching. Task switching and cognitive control, 2014, Oxford University Press, 160–199.
20. Grange, J.A., Juvina, I., The effect of practice on n-2 repetition costs in set switching. Acta Psychologica 154 (2015), 14–25.
21. Grange, J.A., Juvina, I., Houghton, G., On costs and benefits of n-2 repetitions in task switching: Towards a behavioural marker of cognitive inhibition. Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung 77:2 (2013), 211–222.
22. Houghton, G., Pritchard, R., Grange, J.A., The role of cue-target translation in backward inhibition of attentional set. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 35:2 (2009), 466–476.
23. Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A.M., Koch, I., Control and interference in task switching – A review. Psychological Bulletin 136:5 (2010), 849–874.
24. Koch, I., Gade, M., Philipp, A.M., Inhibition of response mode in task switching. Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) 51:1 (2004), 52–58.
25. Koch, I., Gade, M., Schuch, S., Philipp, A.M., The role of inhibition in task switching: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17:1 (2010), 1–14.
26. Logan, G.D., Bundesen, C., Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29:3 (2003), 575–599.
27. Logan, G.D., Schneider, D.W., Distinguishing reconfiguration and compound-cue retrieval in task switching. Psychologica Belgica 50:3 (2010), 413–433.
28. Longman, C.S., Lavric, A., Munteanu, C., Monsell, S., Attentional inertia and delayed orienting of spatial attention in task-switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Per, 40(4), 2014, 1580.
29. Mayr, U., Keele, S.W., Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129:1 (2000), 4–26.
30. McClelland, J.L., Toward a theory of information processing in graded, random, and interactive networks. Meyer, D.E., Kornblum, S., (eds.) Attention and performance 14: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience, 1993, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, US, 655–688.
31. Meiran, N., Chorev, Z., Sapir, A., Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology 41:3 (2000), 211–253.
32. Norman, D., Shallice, T., Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. Davidson, R., Schwartz, R., Shapiro, R., (eds.) Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research and theory IV, 1986, Plenum Press.
33. Peirce, J.W., Generating stimuli for neuroscience using psychopy. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 2, 2009, 10.
34. Philipp, A.M., Jolicoeur, P., Falkenstein, M., Koch, I., Response selection and response execution in task switching: Evidence from a go-signal paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33:6 (2007), 1062–1075.
35. Philipp, A.M., Koch, I., Task inhibition and task repetition in task switching. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 18:4 (2006), 624–639.
36. Pitt, M.A., Kim, W., Navarro, D.J., Myung, J.I., Global model analysis by parameter space partitioning. Psychological Review, 113(1), 2006, 57.
37. Roberts, S., Pashler, H., How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing. Psychological Review 107:2 (2000), 358–367.
38. Rogers, R.D., Monsell, S., Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 124:2 (1995), 207–231.
39. Rubinstein, J.S., Meyer, D.E., Evans, J.E., Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27:4 (2001), 763–797.
40. Schneider, D.W., Modeling graded response congruency effects in task switching. Acta Psycholo 153 (2014), 160–168.
41. Schneider, D.W., Perceptual and conceptual priming of cue encoding in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2016.
42. Schneider, D.W., Logan, G.D., Modeling task switching without switching tasks: A short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(3), 2005, 343.
43. Schuch, S., Koch, I., The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29:1 (2003), 92–105.
44. Sohn, M.H., Anderson, J.R., Task preparation and task repetition: Two-component model of task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 2001, 764.
45. Steinhauser, M., Hübner, R., Distinguishing response conflict and task conflict in the stroop task: Evidence from ex-gaussian distribution analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 35:5 (2009), 1398–1412.
46. Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., Verbruggen, F., Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin 136:4 (2010), 601–626.
47. Yeung, N., Monsell, S., Switching between tasks of unequal familiarity: The role of stimulus-attribute and response-set selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29:2 (2003), 455–469.