Sequential modulation of backward crosstalk and Task-Shielding in Dual-Tasking

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 631-647

  Janczyk, Markus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Backward crosstalk; Conflict tasks; Dual Task; Gratton effect; Sequential modulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CONFLICT; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84947966969     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: 19391277     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000170     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624
2. Bugg, J. M., & Crump, M. J. (2012). In support of a distinction between voluntary and stimulus-driven control: A review of the literature on proportion congruent effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 367. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00367
3. Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523-547. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.4.523
4. Cohen, R. G., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2004). Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: Generation and recall of motor plans. Experimental Brain Research, 157, 486-495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-1862-9
5. Crump, M. J., Gong, Z., & Milliken, B. (2006). The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: Location as a contextual cue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 316-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193850
6. Duthoo, W., Abrahamse, E. L., Braem, S., Boehler, C. N., & Notebaert, W. (2014). The congruency sequence effect 3.0: A critical test of conflict adaptation. PLoS ONE, 9, e110462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110462
7. Egner, T. (2007). Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 380-390. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/CABN.7.4.380
8. Egner, T., & Hirsch, J. (2005). Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1784-1790. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn1594
9. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03203267
10. Fagot, C., & Pashler, H. (1992). Making two responses to a single object: Implications for the central attentional bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1058-1079. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1058
11. Fielding, J., Georgiou-Karistianis, N., Bradshaw, J., Millist, L., & White, O. (2005). No sequence dependent modulation of the Simon effect in Parkinson's disease. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 251-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.05.015
12. Fischer, R., Gottschalk, C., & Dreisbach, G. (2014). Context-sensitive adjustment of cognitive control in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 399-416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0034310
13. Fischer, R., & Hommel, B. (2012). Deep thinking increases task-set shielding and reduces shifting flexibility in dual-task performance. Cognition, 123, 303-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.015
14. Fischer, R., Miller, J., & Shubert, T. (2007). Evidence for parallel semantic memory retrieval in dual tasks. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1685-1699. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193502
15. Fischer, R., Plessow, F., Kunde, W., & Kiesel, A. (2010). Trial-to-trial modulations of the Simon effect in conditions of attentional limitations: Evidence from dual tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1576-1594. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019326
16. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480-506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480
17. Hommel, B. (1998a). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1368-1384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.5.1368
18. Hommel, B. (1998b). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713756773
19. Hommel, B., & Eglau, B. (2002). Control of stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Psychological Research, 66, 260-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-002-0100-y
20. Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-003-0132-y
21. Janczyk, M., Augst, S., & Kunde, W. (2014). The locus of the emotional Stroop effect: A study with the PRP paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 151, 8-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.05.011
22. Janczyk, M., Pfister, R., Hommel, B., & Kunde, W. (2014). Who is talking in backward crosstalk? Disentangling response- from goal-conflict in dual-task performance. Cognition, 132, 30-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.03.001
23. Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W. III, Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303, 1023-1026. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1089910
24. Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., & Hoffmann, J. (2006). Evidence for task-specific resolution of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 800-806. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03194000
25. Kunde, W., & Stöcker, C. (2002). A Simon effect for stimulus-response duration. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 55, 581-592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02724980143000433
26. Kunde, W., & Wühr, P. (2006). Sequential modulations of correspondence effects across spatial dimensions and tasks. Memory & Cognition, 34, 356-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193413
27. Lehle, C., & Hübner, R. (2009). Strategic capacity sharing between two tasks: Evidence from tasks with the same and with different task sets. Psychological Research, 73, 707-726. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0162-6
28. Lehle, C., Steinhauser, M., & Hübner, R. (2009). Serial or parallel processing in dual tasks: What is more effortful? Psychophysiology, 46, 502-509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00806.x
29. Leuthold, H., & Schröter, H. (2006). Electrophysiological evidence for response priming and conflict regulation in the auditory Simon task. Brain Research, 1097, 167-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.055
30. Lien, M.-C., & Proctor, R. W. (2000). Multiple spatial correspondence effects on dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1260-1280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.26.4.1260
31. Lien, M.-C., & Proctor, R. W. (2002). Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 212-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196277
32. Lien, M.-C., Ruthruff, E., Hsieh, S., & Yu, Y.-T. (2007). Parallel central processing between tasks: Evidence from lateralized readiness potentials. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 133-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03194040
33. Logan, G. D., & Delheimer, J. A. (2001). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 668-685. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.3.668
34. Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393-434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.393
35. Logan, G. D., & Schulkind, M. D. (2000). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1072-1090. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.26.3.1072
36. MacLeod, C. M. (2005). The Stroop task in cognitive research. In A. Wenzel & D. C. Rubin (Eds.), Cognitive methods and their application to clinical research (pp. 17-40). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10870-002
37. Mayr, U., Awh, E., & Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 450-452.
38. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review, 104, 749-791. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.749
39. Meyer, D. E., Kieras, D. E., Lauber, E., Schumacher, E. H., Glass, J., Zurbriggen, E., . . . Apfelblat, D. (1995). Adaptive executive control: Flexible multiple-task performance without pervasive immutable response-selection bottlenecks. Acta Psychologica, 90, 163-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(95)00026-Q
40. Miller, J., Ulrich, R., & Rolke, B. (2009). On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 273-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.08.003
41. Notebaert, W., Gevers, W., Verbruggen, F., & Liefooghe, B. (2006). Top-down and bottom-up sequential modulations of congruency effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 112-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193821
42. Notebaert, W., & Verguts, T. (2008). Cognitive control acts locally. Cognition, 106, 1071-1080. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.011
43. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220
44. Pfister, R., & Janczyk, M. (2013). Confidence intervals for two sample means: Calculation, interpretation, and a few simple rules. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 9, 74-80.
45. Plessow, F., Schade, S., Kirschbaum, C., & Fischer, R. (2012). Better not to deal with two tasks at the same time when stressed? Acute psychosocial stress reduces task shielding in dual-task performance. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 557-570. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-012-0098-6
46. Praamstra, P., Kleine, B. U., & Schnitzler, A. (1999). Magnetic stimulation of the dorsal premotor cortex modulates the Simon effect. Neuroreport, 10, 3671-3674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001756-199911260-00038
47. Scherbaum, S., Dshemuchadse, M., Fischer, R., & Goschke, T. (2010). How decisions evolve: The temporal dynamics of action selection. Cognition, 115, 407-416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.02.004
48. Scherbaum, S., Fischer, R., Dshemuchadse, M., & Goschke, T. (2011). The dynamics of cognitive control: Evidence for within-trial conflict adaptation from frequency-tagged EEG. Psychophysiology, 48, 591-600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01137.x
49. Schmidt, J. R. (2013). Questioning conflict adaptation: Proportion congruent and Gratton effects reconsidered. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 615-630. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0373-0
50. Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0020586
51. Stelzel, C., Brandt, S. A., & Schubert, T. (2009). Neural mechanisms of concurrent stimulus processing in dual tasks. NeuroImage, 48, 237-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.064
52. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0054651
53. Stürmer, B., & Leuthold, H. (2003). Control over response priming in visuomotor processing: A lateralized event-related potential study. Experimental Brain Research, 153, 35-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1579-1
54. Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345-1363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.6.1345
55. Stürmer, B., Seiss, E., & Leuthold, H. (2005). Executive control in the Simon task: A dual-task examination of response priming and its suppression. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 590-618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09541440540000077
56. Thomson, S. J., Danis, L. K., & Watter, S. (2015). PRP training shows Task 1 response selection is the locus of the backward response compatibility effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 212-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0660-z
57. Tombu, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (2002). All-or-none bottleneck versus capacity sharing accounts of the psychological refractory period phenomenon. Psychological Research, 66, 274-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-002-0101-x
58. Tombu, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 3-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.1.3
59. Ullsperger, M., Bylsma, L. M., & Botvinick, M. M. (2005). The conflict adaptation effect: It's not just priming. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 467-472. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/CABN.5.4.467
60. Ulrich, R., & Miller, J. (2008). Response grouping in the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm: Models and contamination effects. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 75-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.06.004
61. Wühr, P. (2004). Sequential modulations of logical-recoding operations in the Simon task. Experimental Psychology, 51, 98-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.51.2.98
62. Wühr, P. (2005). Evidence for gating of direct response activation in the Simon task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 282-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196373
63. Wühr, P. (2006). The Simon effect in vocal responses. Acta Psychologica, 121, 210-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.12.003
64. Wühr, P., & Ansorge, U. (2005). Exploring trial-by-trial modulations of the Simon effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 58, 705-731. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02724980443000269
65. Wühr, P., Duthoo, W., & Notebaert, W. (2015). Generalizing attentional control across dimensions and tasks: Evidence from transfer of proportion-congruent effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 68, 779-801. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.966729
66. Zhao, L., Bai, Y., Ma, J., & Wang, Y. (2015). Local control mechanisms of implicit and explicit conflicts. Experimental Psychology, 62, 153-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000281
67. Zwosta, K., Hommel, B., Goschke, T., & Fischer, R. (2013). Mood states determine the degree of task shielding in dual-task performance. Cognition and Emotion, 27, 1142-1152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.772047