Equivalence of cognitive processes in brain imaging and behavioral studies: Evidence from task switching

NeuroImage

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 572-577

  Koch, Iring ^a   Ruge, Hannes ^a   Brass, Marcel ^a   Rubin, Orit ^b   Meiran, Nachshon ^b   Prinz, Wolfgang ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; EXPERIMENTAL TEST; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0141535092     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00206-4     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Allport A., Styles E.A., Hsieh S. Shifting intentional set exploring the dynamic control of tasks . Umiltà C., Moscovitch M. Attention and Performance, Vol. XV, Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing. 1994;421-452 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. Brass M., von Cramon D.Y. The role of the prefrontal cortex in task preparation. Cereb. Cortex. 12:2002;908-914.
3. D'Esposito M., Zarahn E., Aguirre G.K. Event-related functional MRI implications for cognitive psychology . Psychol. Bull. 125:1999;155-164.
4. Dove A., Pollmann S., Schubert T., Wiggins C.J., von Cramon D.Y. Prefrontal cortex activation in task switching an event-related fMRI study . Cognit. Brain Res. 9:2000;103-109.
5. Hommel B. Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychol. Res. 56:1994;261-268.
6. Kimberg D.Y., Aguirre G.K., D'Esposito M. Modulation of task-related neural activity in task-switching an fMRI study . Cognit. Brain Res. 10:2000;189-196.
7. Koch I. Automatic and intentional activation of task sets. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 27:2001;1474-1486.
8. Kornblum S., Hasbroucq T., Osman A. Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility a model and taxonomy . Psychol. Rev. 97:1990;253-270.
9. Kornblum S., Stevens G.T., Whipple A., Requin J. The effects of irrelevant stimuli. 1. The time course of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response consistency effects with Stroop-like stimuli, Simon-like tasks, and their factorial combinations. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Perception Performance. 25:1999;688-714.
10. Lien M.-C., Proctor R.W. Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects implications for response selection . Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 9:2002;212-238.
11. Lu C.-H., Proctor R.W. The influence of irrelevant location information on performance a review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects . Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 2:1995;174-207.
12. MacLeod C.M. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect an integrative review . Psychol. Bull. 109:1991;163-203.
13. Meiran N. Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 22:1996;1423-1442.
14. Meiran N. The reconfiguration of the stimulus task-set and the response task-set during task switching. Monsell S., Driver J. Attention & Performance, Vol. XVIII, Control of Cognitive Processes. 2000;377-400 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
15. Meiran N., Chorev Z., Sapir A. Component processes in task switching. Cognit. Psychol. 41:2000;211-253.
16. Miller E.K., Cohen J.D. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24:2001;167-202.
17. Rogers R.D., Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. J. Exp. Psychol. General. 124:1995;207-231.
18. Sohn M.-H., Ursu S., Anderson J.R., Stenger V.A., Carter C.S. The role of prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex in task switching. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:2000;13448-13453.