Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion

Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 193-251

  Navon, David ^a,b   Miller, Jeff ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

Central bottleneck; Dual task deficit; Dual task performance; Outcome conflict; Overlapping tasks paradigm; PRP; Psychological refractory period; Resource theory; Response grouping; Single bottleneck model; Single channel hypothesis; Task preparation

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; MENTAL FUNCTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REVIEW;

HUMANS; MENTAL PROCESSES; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 0036583139     PISSN: 00100285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0767     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. Allport, D. A. (1980). Attention and performance. In G. Glaxton (Ed.), Cognitive psychology: New directions (pp. 112-153). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
2. Allport, D. A., Antonis, B., & Reynolds, P. (1972). On the division of attention: A disproof of the single-channel hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 24, 225-235.
3. Bertelson, P. (1966). Central intermittency twenty years later. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 153-163.
4. Bertelson, P. (1967). The time course of preparation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19, 272-279.
5. Borger, R. (1963). The refractory period and serial choice-reactions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 1-12.
6. Broadbent, D. E. (1971). Decision and stress. London: Academic Press.
7. Carrier, L. M., & Pashler, H. (1995). Attentional limits in memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 1339-1348.
8. Craik, K. J. W. (1947). Theory of the human operator in control systems. I. The operator as an engineering system. British Journal of Psychology, 38, 56-61.
9. Craik, K. J. W. (1948). Theory of the human operator in control systems. II. Man as an element in a control system. British Journal of Psychology, 38, 142-148.
10. Creamer, L. R. (1963). Event uncertainly, psychological refractory period and human data processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 187-194.
11. Davis, R. (1957). The human operator as a single channel information system. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 9, 119-129.
12. Davis, R. (1959). The role of "attention" in the psychological refractory period. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 211-220.
13. De Jong, R. (1993). Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 965-980.
14. Duncan, J. (1980). The demonstration of capacity limitation. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 75-96.
15. Ehrenstein, A., Schweikert, R., Choi, S., & Proctor, R. W. (1997). Scheduling processes in working memory: Instructions control the order of memory search and mental arithmetic. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 766-802.
16. Fagot, C., & Pashler, H. (1992). Making two responses to a single object: Implications for the central attentional bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1058-1079.
17. Gopher, D. (1986). In defence of resources: On structures, energies, pools and the allocation of attention. In G. R. J. Hockey, A. W. K. Gaillard, & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.) Energetics and human information processing (pp. 353-371). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
18. Gopher, D. (1993). The skill of attention control: Acquisition and execution of attention strategies. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 299-322). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Gopher, D. (1994). Analysis and measurement of mental load. In G. d'Ydewalle, P. Eelen, & P. Bertelson (Eds.), International perspectives on psychological science. Vol 2: The state of the art (pp. 265-291). Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
20. Gopher, D., & Donchin, E. (1986). Workload: An examination of the concept. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 1-49). New York: Wiley.
21. Gopher, D., & Navon, D. (1980). How is performance limited: Testing the notion of central capacity. Acta Psychologica, 46, 161-180.
22. Gopher, D., Brickner, M., & Navon, D. (1982). Different difficulty manipulations interact differently with task emphasis: Evidence for multiple resources, 8, 146-157.
23. Gottsdanker, R. (1979). A psychological refractory period or an unprepared period? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 208-215.
24. Gottsdanker, R. (1980). The ubiquitous role of preparation. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 355-371). Amsterdam: North Holland.
25. Gottsdanker, R., & Way, T. C. (1966). Varied and constant intersignal intervals in psychological refractoriness. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 792-804.
26. Hawkins, H. L., Rodriguez, E., & Reicher, G. M. (1979). Is time-sharing a general ability? ONR Technical Report No. 3, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
27. Herman, L. M., & Kantowitz, B. H. (1970). The psychological refractory period effect: Only half the double stimulation story? Psychological Bulletin, 73, 74-88.
28. Hirst, W., & Kalmar, D. (1987). Characterizing attentional resources. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 68-81.
29. Hirst, W., Spelke, E. S., Reaves, C. C., Caharack, G., & Neisser, U. (1980). Dividing attention without alternation or automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 98-117.
30. Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1368-1384.
31. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
32. Johnston, J. C., McCann, R. S., & Remington, R. W. (1995). Chronometric evidence for two types of attention. Psychological Science, 6, 365-369.
33. Kafry, D. (1971). Task complexity and refractoriness in the RSI design. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Hebrew University, Jerusalem (in Hebrew, cited in Kahneman, 1973).
34. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
35. Kantowitz, B. H. (1974). Double stimulation with varying response requirements. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 1092-1107.
36. Kantowitz, B. H., & Knight, J. L. (1976). Testing tapping time-sharing. II. Auditory secondary task. Acta Psychologica, 40, 343-362.
37. Kantowitz, B. H., & Knight, J. L. (1976). On experimenter-limited processes. Psychological Review, 83, 502-507.
38. Karlin, L., & Kestenbaum, R. (1968). Effects of number of alternatives on the psychological refractory period. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 167-178.
39. Keele, S. (1973). Attention and human performance. Palisades, CA: Goodyear.
40. Kerr, B. (1973). Processing demands during mental operations. Memory & Cognition, 1, 401-412.
41. Kinchla, R. A. (1980). The measurement of attention. In R. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and Performance VIII (pp. 213-238). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Kinsbourne, M. (1981). Single channel theory. In D. H. Holding (Ed.), Human skills (pp. 65-89). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
43. Koch, R. (1995). Hicks's law and the psychological refractory period. Paper presented at the KNAW Symposium on Discrete versus Continuous Information Processing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
44. Logan, G. D. (1979). On the use of a concurrent memory load to measure attention and automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 189-207.
45. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
46. Logan, G. D., & Burkell, J. (1986). Dependence and independence in responding to double stimulation: A comparison of stop, change, and dual-task paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 549-563.
47. Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393-434.
48. Logan, G. D., & Schulkind, M. D. (2000). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations. I. Semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1072-1090.
49. Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press.
50. McCann, R. S., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 471-484.
51. McGill, W. (1963). Stochastic latency mechanisms. In R. D. Luce, R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 309-360). New York: Wiley.
52. McLeod, P. (1977). Parallel processing and the psychological refractory period. Acta Psychologica, 41, 381-391.
53. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997a). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3-65.
54. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997b). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review, 104, 749-791.
55. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1999). Precis to a practical theory of cognition and action: Some lessons from EPIC computational models of human multiple-task performance. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and Performance XVII (pp. 17-88). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56. Moray, N. (1967). Where is capacity limited? A survey and a model. Acta Psychologica, 27, 84-92.
57. Navon, D. (1984). Resources-A theoretical soup stone? Psychological Review, 91, 216-234.
58. Navon, D. (1985). Attention division or attention sharing? In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and Performance XI (pp. 133-146). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
59. Navon, D. (1989a). The importance of being visible: On the role of attention in a mind viewed as an anarchic intelligence system; Basic tenets. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1, 191-213.
60. Navon, D. (1989b). The importance of being visible: On the role of attention in a mind viewed as an anarchic intelligence system; Applications to the field of attention. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1, 215-238.
61. Navon D. (1990a). Do people allocate limited processing resources among concurrent activities? In L. Green & J. H. Kagel (Eds.), Advances in behavioral economics (Vol. 2, pp. 209-225). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
62. Navon, D. (1990b). Exploring two methods for estimating performance trade-off. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 155-157.
63. Navon, D. (1998). Is it processing capacity that is being defined? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 841-842.
64. Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human information processing system. Psychological Review, 86, 214-255.
65. Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1980). Task difficulty, resources, and dual-task performance. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and Performance (Vol. 8, pp. 297-315). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
66. Navon, D., Gopher, D., Chillag, N., & Spitz, G. (1984). On separability of and interference between tracking dimensions in dual-axis tracking. Journal of Motor Behavior, 16, 364-391.
67. Navon, D., & Miller, J. (1987). The role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 435-448.
68. Navon, D., & Miller, J. (1998). How single is the single bottleneck? Unpublished manuscript, Dunedin, New Zealand, University of Otago.
69. Norman, D. A., & Bobrow, D. J. (1975). On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 44-64.
70. Pashler, H. E. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 358-377.
71. Pashler, H. E. (1989). Dissociations and dependencies between speed and accuracy: Evidence for a two component theory of divided attention in simple tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 469-514.
72. Pashler, H. E. (1990). Do response modality effects support multiprocessor models of divided attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 826-842.
73. Pashler, H. E. (1991). Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: Distinct attentional mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 1023-1040.
74. Pashler, H. E. (1993). Doing two things at the same time. American Scientist, 81, 48-55.
75. Pashler, H. (1994a). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
76. Pashler, H. (1994b). Graded capacity sharing in dual-task interference? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 330-342.
77. Pashler, H. (1994c). Overlapping mental operations in serial performance with preview. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 47, 161-191.
78. Pashler, H. E. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
79. Pashler, H. E., & Johnston, J. C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 41, 19-45.
80. Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1998). Attentional limitations in dual-task performance. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 155-189). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
81. Pashler, H. E., & O'Brien, S. (1993). Dual-task interference and the cerebral hemispheres. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 315-330.
82. Popper, K. R. (1995). The logic of scientific discovery (14th ed.). London: Routledge. [First published in 1934.]
83. Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
84. Posner, M. I., & Boies, S. W. (1971). Components of attention. Psychological Review, 78, 391-408.
85. Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1969). Psychological refractory delay and response-stimulus interval duration in serial, choice-response tasks. Acta Psychologica, 30, 195-219.
86. Roldan, C. E. (1979). Time-shared comparatory tracking and attention. Paper presented at the 40th meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Quebec City.
87. Rosenbrock, H. H. (1960). An automatic method for finding the greatest or least value of a function. Computer Journal, 3, 175-184.
88. Ruthruff, E. R., Pashler, H. E., & Klaassen, A. (1996). Processing bottlenecks in dual-task performance: Structural limitation or strategic postponement. Unpublished manuscript.
89. Sanders, A. F. (1979). Some remarks on mental load. In N. Moray (Ed.), Mental workload: Its theory and measurement (pp. 41-77). New York: Plenum Press.
90. Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing. I. Detection, search and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1-66.
91. Shumacher, E. H., Lauber, E. J., Glass, J. M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Gmeindl, L., Kieras, D. E., & Meyer, D. E. (1999). Concurrent response-selection processes in dual-task performance: Evidence for adaptive executive control of task scheduling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 791-814.
92. Smith, M. C. (1967). The psychological refractory period as a function of performance of a first response. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19, 350-352.
93. Smith, M. C. (1969). The effect of varying information on the psychological refractory period. Acta Psychologica, 30, 220-231.
94. Sperling, G., & Melchner, M. J. (1978). The attention operation characteristics: Examples from visual search. Science, 202, 315-318.
95. Telford, C. W. (1931). The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 1-36.
96. Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
97. Triggs, T. J. (1968). Capacity sharing and speeded reactions to successive signals. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1968. Dissertation Abstracts International 1969 30 877B (University Microfilms No. 69-12, 259).
98. Tsang, P. S., Shaner, T. L., & Vidulich, M. A. (1995). Resource scarcity and outcome conflict in time-sharing performance. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 365-378.
99. Ulrich, R., & Stapf, K. H. (1985). A double-response paradigm to study stimulus intensity effects upon the motor system in simple reaction time experiments. Perception and Psychophysics, 36, 545-558.
100. van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1981). Short-term visual information forgetting. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
101. van Selst, M., Ruthruff, E., & Johnston, J. (1999). Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1268-1283.
102. Welford, A. T. (1952). The "psychological refractory period" and the timing of high-speed performance-A review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology, 43, 2-19.
103. Welford, A. T. (1967). Single-channel operation in the brain. Acta Psychologica, 27, 5-22.
104. Wickens, C. D. (1980). The structure of attentional resources. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance (Vol. XIII, pp. 239-257). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
105. Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 63-102). New York: Academic Press.