On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies

Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 273-310

  Miller, Jeff ^a   Ulrich, Rolf ^b   Rolke, Bettina ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Divided attention; Dual task performance; Optimization; Psychological refractory period; Serial and parallel processing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; REFRACTORY PERIOD, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SERIAL LEARNING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 63149168960     PISSN: 00100285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Allport D.A. Attention and performance. In: Claxton G. (Ed). Cognitive psychology - New directions (1980), Routledge and Kegan Paul, London 112-153
2. Anderson J.R. The adaptive character of thought (1990), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
3. Bausenhart K.M., Rolke B., Hackley S.A., and Ulrich R. The locus of temporal preparation effects: Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13 (2006) 536-542
4. Borger R. The refractory period and serial choice-reactions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 15 (1963) 1-12
5. Conway R.W., Maxwell W.L., and Miller L.W. Theory of scheduling (1967), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
6. De Jong R. Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 19 (1993) 965-980
7. De Jong R. The role of preparation in overlapping-task performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology 48 (1995) 2-25
8. Dickman S.J., and Meyer D.E. Impulsivity and speed-accuracy tradeoffs in information processing. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 54 (1988) 274-290
9. Ernst M.O., and Banks M.S. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415 (2002) 429-433
10. Geisler W.S., and Diehl R.L. A Bayesian approach to the evolution of perceptual and cognitive systems. Cognitive Science 27 (2003) 379-402
11. Ghez C. Voluntary movement. In: Kandel E.R., Schwartz J.H., and Jessell T.M. (Eds). Principles of neural science. 3rd ed. (1991), Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, Conn. 609-625
12. Gottsdanker R. A psychological refractory period or an unprepared period?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 5 (1979) 208-215
13. Gottsdanker R. The ubiquitous role of preparation. In: Stelmach G.E., and Requin J. (Eds). Tutorials in motor behavior (1980), North Holland, Amsterdam 355-372
14. Hackley S.A., and Valle-Inclán F. Which stages of processing are speeded by a warning signal?. Biological Psychology 64 (2003) 27-45
15. Hazeltine E., Teague D., and Ivry R.B. Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 28 (2002) 527-545
16. Hirst W., Spelke E.S., Reaves C.C., Caharack G., and Neisser U. Dividing attention without alternation or automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 109 (1980) 98-117
17. Hommel B. Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 24 (1998) 1368-1384
18. Hubel D.H. The brain. Scientific American 241 (1979) 39-47
19. Ivry R.B., Franz E.A., Kingstone A., and Johnston J.C. The psychological refractory period effect following callosotomy: Uncoupling of lateralized response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 24 (1998) 463-480
20. Jersild A.T. Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology 89 (1927)
21. Jolicœur P., and Dell'Acqua R. Attentional and structural constraints on visual encoding. Psychological Research 62 (1999) 154-164
22. Kahneman D. Attention and effort (1973), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
23. Kandel E.R. Perception of motion, depth, and form. In: Schwartz J.H., Kandel E.R., and Jessell T.M. (Eds). Principles of neural science. 3rd ed. (1991), Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, Conn. 440-466
24. Keele S.W. Attention and human performance (1973), Goodyear Publishing Co., Pacific Palisades, CA
25. Legge G.E., Hooven T.A., Klitz T.S., Mansfield J.S., and Tjan B.S. Mr. Chips 2002: New insights from an ideal-observer model of reading. Vision Research 42 (2002) 2219-2234
26. Lien M.C., Schweickert R., and Proctor R.W. Task switching and response correspondence in the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 29 (2003) 692-712
27. Logan G.D., and Delheimer J.A. Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 27 (2001) 668-685
28. Logan G.D., and Gordon R.D. Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review 108 (2001) 393-434
29. Logan G.D., and Schulkind M.D. Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 26 (2000) 1072-1090
30. Luria R., and Meiran N. Online order control in the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 29 (2003) 556-574
31. Martin J.H. Coding and processing of sensory information. In: Schwartz J.H., Kandel E.R., and Jessell T.M. (Eds). Principles of neural science. 3rd ed. (1991), Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, Conn. 329-340
32. McLeod P. A dual task response modality effect: Support for multiprocessor models of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 29 (1977) 651-667
33. McLeod P. Does probe RT measure central processing demand?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 30 (1978) 83-89
34. McLeod P. What can probe RT tell us about the attention demands of movement?. In: Stelmach G.E., and Requin J. (Eds). Tutorials in motor behavior (1980), North Holland, Amsterdam 579-590
35. Meyer D.E., Abrams R.A., Kornblum S., Wright C.E., and Smith J.E.K. Optimality in human motor performance: Ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychological Review 95 (1988) 340-370
36. Meyer D.E., and Kieras D.E. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: I. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review 104 (1997) 3-65
37. Meyer D.E., and Kieras D.E. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review 104 (1997) 749-791
38. Meyer D.E., and Kieras D.E. Precis to a practical unified theory of cognition and action: Some lessons from EPIC computational models of human multiple-task performance. In: Gopher D., and Koriat A. (Eds). Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (1999), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 17-88
39. Miller J.O., and Ulrich R. Simple reaction time and statistical facilitation: A parallel grains model. Cognitive Psychology 46 (2003) 101-151
40. Movellan J.R., and McClelland J.L. The Morton-Massaro law of information integration: Implications for models of perception. Psychological Review 108 (2001) 113-148
41. Müller-Gethmann H., Ulrich R., and Rinkenauer G. Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology 40 (2003) 597-611
42. Navon D. The importance of being conservative: Some reflections on human Bayesian behaviour. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology 31 (1978) 33-48
43. Navon D. Resources - A theoretical soup stone?. Psychological Review 91 (1984) 216-234
44. Navon D., and Gopher D. On the economy of the human information processing system. Psychological Review 86 (1979) 214-255
45. Navon D., and Miller J.O. Role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 13 (1987) 435-448
46. Navon D., and Miller J.O. Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology 44 (2002) 193-251
47. Niemi P., and Näätänen R. Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin 89 (1981) 133-162
48. Pashler H.E. Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 10 (1984) 358-377
49. Pashler H.E. Do response modality effects support multiprocessor models of divided attention?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 16 (1990) 826-842
50. Pashler H.E. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin 116 (1994) 220-244
51. Pashler H.E. Graded capacity-sharing in dual-task interference?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 20 (1994) 330-342
52. Pashler H.E., and Johnston J.C. Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology 41 (1989) 19-45
53. Rauschecker J.P. Parallel processing in the auditory cortex of primates. Audiology & Neuro-Otology 3 (1998) 86-103
54. Rinkenauer G., Ulrich R., and Wing A.M. Brief bimanual force pulses: Correlations between the hands in force and time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 27 (2001) 1485-1497
55. Rolke B., and Hofmann P. Temporal uncertainty degrades perceptual processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14 (2007) 522-526
56. Rumelhart D.E., and McClelland J.L. Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Foundations Vol. 1 (1986), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
57. Ruthruff E.D., Johnston J.C., and Van Selst M. Why practice reduces dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 27 (2001) 3-21
58. Ruthruff E.D., Johnston J.C., Van Selst M., Whitsell S., and Remington R. Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: Has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 29 (2003) 280-289
59. Ruthruff E.D., Pashler H.E., and Hazeltine E. Dual-task interference with equal task emphasis: Graded capacity sharing or central postponement?. Perception & Psychophysics 65 (2003) 801-816
60. Ruthruff E.D., Pashler H.E., and Klaassen A. Processing bottlenecks in dual-task performance: Structural limitation or strategic postponement?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8 (2001) 73-80
61. Schumacher E.H., Lauber E.J., Glass J.M., Zurbriggen E.L., Gmeindl L., Kieras D.E., et al. Concurrent response-selection processes in dual-task performance: Evidence for adaptive executive control of task scheduling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 25 (1999) 791-814
62. Schumacher E.H., Seymour T.L., Glass J.M., Fencsik D.E., Lauber E.J., Kieras D.E., et al. Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: Uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck. Psychological Science 12 (2001) 101-108
63. Schwarz W., and Ischebeck A. On the interpretation of response time vs onset asynchrony functions: Application to dual-task and precue-utilization paradigms. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 45 (2001) 452-479
64. Schweickert R., and Boggs G.J. Models of central capacity and concurrency. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 28 (1984) 223-281
65. Shaw M.L., and Shaw P. Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 3 (1977) 201-211
66. Smith M.C. The effect of varying information on the psychological refractory period. Acta Psychologica 30 (1969) 220-231
67. Spector A., and Biederman I. Mental set and mental shift revisited. American Journal of Psychology 89 (1976) 669-679
68. Spelke E., Hirst W., and Neisser U. Skills of divided attention. Cognition 4 (1976) 215-230
69. Sperling G. A unified theory of attention and signal detection. In: Parasuraman R., and Davies D.R. (Eds). Varieties of attention (1984), Academic Press, New York 103-182
70. Telford C.W. The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology 14 (1931) 1-36
71. Tombu M., and Jolicœur P. All-or-none bottleneck versus capacity sharing accounts of the psychological refractory period phenomenon. Psychological Research 66 (2002) 274-286
72. Tombu M., and Jolicœur P. A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 29 (2003) 3-18
73. Townsend J.T., and Ashby F.G. The stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes (1983), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
74. Van Selst M., Ruthruff E., and Johnston J.C. Can practice eliminate the Psychological Refractory Period effect?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 25 (1999) 1268-1283
75. Wässle H., Grunert U., Rohrenbeck J., and Boygott B.B. Retinal ganglion cell density and cortical magnification factor in the primate. Vision Research 30 (1990) 1897-1911
76. Welford A.T. The "psychological refractory period" and the timing of high-speed performance - A review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology 43 (1952) 2-19
77. Welford A.T. Evidence of a single-channel decision mechanism limiting performance in a serial reaction task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 11 (1959) 193-210
78. Welford A.T. Single-channel operation in the brain. Acta Psychologica 27 (1967) 5-22
79. Wickens C.D. The effects of divided attention on information processing in manual tracking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 2 (1976) 1-13
80. Wickens C.D., and Seidler K.S. Information access in a dual-task context: Testing a model of optimal strategy selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 3 (1997) 196-215
81. Wühr P., and Müsseler J. Blindness to response-compatible stimuli in the psychological refractory period paradigm. Visual Cognition 9 (2002) 421-457