Distinguishing between the partial-mapping preparation hypothesis and the failure-to-engage hypothesis of residual switch costs

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1207-1226

  Lindsen, Job P ^a   de Jong, Ritske ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; Preparation; Residual switch cost; Task switching

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTICIPATION; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; RECREATION;

ANTICIPATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REVERSAL LEARNING; SET (PSYCHOLOGY); VIDEO GAMES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957337433     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0020362     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Allport A., Styles E., Hsieh S. Shifting intentional set-exploring the dynamic control of tasks. Attention and Performance xv 1994, 15:421-452.
2. Allport D., Wylie G. Task switching, stimulus response bindings, and negative priming. Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance xviii 2000, 35-70. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Monsell, J. Driver (Eds.).
3. Anderson J.R. Retrieval of prepositional information from long-term memory. Cognitive Psychology 1974, 6:451-474.
4. Braver T., Reynolds J., Donaldson D. Neural mechanisms of transient and sustained cognitive control during task switching. Neuron 2003, 39:713-726.
5. de Jong R. An intention-activation account of residual switch costs. Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance xviii 2000, 357-376. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Monsell, J. Driver (Eds.).
6. de Jong R., Berendsen E., Cools R. Goal neglect and inhibitory limitations: Dissociable causes of interference effects in conflict situations. Acta Psychologica 1999, 101:379-394.
7. de Jong R., Gladwin T.E., Hart B.M. Movement-related EEG indices of preparation in task switching and motor control. Brain Research 2006, 1105:73-82.
8. Emerson M., Miyake A. The role of inner speech in task switching: A dual-task investigation. Journal of Memory and Language 2003, 48:148-168.
9. Gilbert S., Shallice T. Task switching: A pdp model. Cognitive Psychology 2002, 44:297-337.
10. Gladwin T., de Jong R. Bursts of occipital theta and alpha amplitude preceding alternation and repetition trials in a task-switching experiment. Biological Psychology 2005, 68:309-329.
11. Gladwin T., Lindsen J., de Jong R. Pre-stimulus EEG effects related to response speed, task switching and upcoming response hand. Biological Psychology 2006, 72:15-34.
12. Goschke T. Involuntary persistence and intentional reconfiguration in task-set switching. Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance xviii 2000, 331-355. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Monsell, J. Driver (Eds.).
13. Hommel B. Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:494-500.
14. Hyman R. Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1953, 45:188-196.
15. Jennings J.R., van der Molen M.W. Preparation for speeded action as a psychophysiological concept. Psychological Bulletin 2005, 131:434-459.
16. Koch I. The role of external cues for endogenous advance reconfiguration in task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2003, 10:488-492.
17. Lien M., Ruthruff E., Remington R., Johnston J. On the limits of advance preparation for a task switch: Do people prepare all the task some of the time or some of the task all the time?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:299-315.
18. Logan G.D., Schneider D.W. Interpreting instructional cues in task switching procedures: The role of mediator retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 2006, 32:347-363.
19. Mayr U., Keele S. Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2000, 129:4-26.
20. Meiran N. Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 1996, 22:1423-1442.
21. Meyer D.E., Kieras D.E. EPIC- A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review 1997, 104:749-791.
22. Miyake A., Emerson M.J., Padilla F., Ahn J.-C. Inner speech as a retrieval aid for task goals: The effects of cue type and articulatory suppression in the random task cuing paradigm. Acta Psychologica 2004, 115:123-142.
23. Monsell S. Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7:134-140.
24. Monsell S., Mizon G. Can the task-cueing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:493-516.
25. Nieuwenhuis S., Monsell S. Residual costs in task switching: Testing the failure-to-engage hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2002, 9:86-92.
26. Olivers C.N.L., Nieuwenhuis S. The beneficial effect of concurrent task-irrelevant mental activity on temporal attention. Psychological Science 2005, 16:265-269.
27. Olivers C.N.L., Nieuwenhuis S. The beneficial effects of additional task load, positive affect, and instruction on the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:364-379.
28. Rogers R., Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1995, 124:207-231.
29. Rubinstein J.S., Meyer D.E., Evans J.E. Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27:763-797.
30. Verbruggen F., Liefooghe B., Vandierendonck A., Demanet J. Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: A recipe to diminish the residual switch cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 2007, 33:342-356.
31. Waszak F., Hommel B., Allport A. Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus - task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology 2003, 46:361-413.
32. Yantis S., Meyer D., Smith J. Analyses of multinomial mixture distributions-new tests for stochastic-models of cognition and action. Psychological Bulletin 1991, 110:350-374.
33. Yeung N., Monsell S. Switching between tasks of unequal familiarity: The role of stimulus-attribute and response-set selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:455-469.