Online Order Control in the Psychological Refractory Period Paradigm

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 556-574

  Luria, Roy ^a   Meiran, Nachshon ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION; COLOR VISION; HUMAN; MENTAL FUNCTION; REACTION TIME; REVIEW; VISION;

COLOR PERCEPTION; CUES; HUMANS; MENTAL PROCESSES; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0141530957     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.556     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 421-452). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Allport, D. A., & Wylie, G. (2000). Task switching, stimulus-response bindings, and negative priming. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 35-70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Botvinick, M., & Plaut, D. C. (2003). Doing without schema hierarchies: A recurrent connectionist approach to routine sequential action and its pathologies. Manuscript submitted for publication.
4. Carlson, R. A., & Sohn, M. H. (2001). Cognitive control of multistep routines: Information processing and conscious intentions. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 443-464). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Cooper, R., & Shallice, T. (2000). Contention scheduling and the control of routine activities. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 297-338.
6. De Jong, R. (1993). Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 965-980.
7. De Jong, R. (1995). The role of preparation in overlapping-task performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 2-25.
8. De Jong, R. (2000). An intention-activation account of residual switch costs. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 357-376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Dreisbach, G., Haider, H., & Kluwe, R. H. (2002). Preparatory processes in the task-switching paradigm: Evidence from the use of probability cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 468-483.
10. Duncan, J. (1977). Response selection rules in spatial choice reaction tasks. In S. Dornik (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 49-61). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Fagot, C. (1994). Chronometric investigations of task switching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
12. Gopher, D., Armony, L., & Greenshpan, Y. (2000). Switching tasks and attention policies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 308-339.
13. Grafman, J. (1995). Similarities and distinctions among current models of prefrontal cortical functions. In J. Grafman, K. J. Holyoak, & F. Boller (Eds.), Structure and functions of the human prefrontal cortex: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (Vol. 769, pp. 337-368). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
14. Greenberg, E. (2000). The influence of stress on executive functions: Task switching. Unpublished master's thesis, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
15. Hartley, A. A., & Little, D. M. (1999). Age related differences and similarities in dual task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 416-449.
16. Hayes, A. E., Davidson, M. C., Keele, S. W., & Rafal, R. D. (1998). Toward a functional analysis of the basal ganglia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 178-198.
17. Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1368-1384.
18. Hommel, B., & Schneider, W. X. (2002). Visual attention and manual response selection: Distinct mechanisms operating on the same codes. Visual Cognition, 9, 392-420.
19. Humphreys, G. W., & Forde, E. M. E. (1998). Disordered action schema and action disorganization syndrome. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 771-811.
20. Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology, 14(Whole No. 89).
21. Kleinsorge, T., & Heuer, H. (1999). Hierarchical switching in a multidimensional task space. Psychological Research, 62, 300-312.
22. Krampe, R. T., Mayr, U., & Fuchs, A. (2000, July). Attentional factors in sequencing complex finger movements. Poster session presented at the 19th Annual Attention and Performance Conference, Kloster-Irsee, Germany.
23. Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior (pp. 112-136). New York: Wiley.
24. Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393-434.
25. Logan, G. D., & Schulkind, M. D. (2000). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task conditions: I. Semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1072-1090.
26. Los, S. A. (1996). On the origin of mixing costs: Exploring information processing in pure and mixed blocks of trials. Acta Psychologica, 94, 145-188.
27. Lundy, D. H., Wenger, J. L., Schmidt, R. J., & Carlson, R. A. (1994). Serial step learning of cognitive sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1183-1195.
28. MacKay, D. G. (1987). The organization of perception and action: A theory for language and other cognitive skills. New York: Springer-Verlag.
29. Mayr, U. (2001). Age differences in the selection of mental sets: The role of inhibition, stimulus ambiguity, and response-set overlap. Psychology and Aging, 16, 96-109.
30. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423-1442.
31. Meiran, N. (2000a). Modeling cognitive control in task switching. Psychological Research, 63, 234-249.
32. Meiran, N. (2000b). Reconfiguration of the stimulus task sets and response task sets during task switching. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 377-400). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Meiran, N., Chorev, Z., & Sapir, A. (2000). Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 211-253.
34. Meiran, N., Levine, J., Meiran, N., & Henik A. (2000). Task set switching in schizophrenia. Neuropsychology, 14, 471-482.
35. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997a). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3-65.
36. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997b). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review, 104, 749-791.
37. Meyer, D. E., Kieras, D. E., Lauber, E., Shumacher, E. H., Glass, J., Zurbriggen, E. L., et al. (1995). Adaptive executive control: Flexible multiple-task performance without pervasive immutable response-selection bottlenecks. Acta Psychologica, 90, 163-190.
38. Monsell, S. (1996). Control of mental processes. In V. Bruce (Ed.), Unsolved mysteries of the mind (Vol. 8, pp. 93-148). Hove, England: Erlbaum.
39. Navon, D., & Miller, J. (2002). Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 193-251.
40. Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. Davidson, G. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 4, pp. 1-18). New York: Plenum.
42. Partiot, A., Grafman, J., Sadato, N., Flitman, S., & Wild, K. (1996). Brain activation during script event processing. Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 761-766.
43. Pashler, H. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 358-377.
44. Pashler, H. (1990). Do response modality effects support multiprocessor models of divided attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 826-842.
45. Pashler, H. (1994a). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
46. Pashler, H. (1994b). Graded capacity-sharing in dual task interference? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 300-342.
47. Pashler, H. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
48. Pashler, H. (2000). Task switching and multitask performance. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 277-309). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 19-45.
50. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
51. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
52. Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E., & Evans, J. E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 763-797.
53. Ruthruff, E., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (2001). Switching between simple cognitive tasks: The interaction of top-down and bottom-up factors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1404-1419.
54. Schneider, W. (1995). MEL Professional [Computer program]. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychological Software Tools.
55. Schumacher, E. H., Lauber, E. J., Glass, J. M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Gmeindl, L., Kieras, D. E., & Meyer, D. E. (1999). Concurrent response selection in dual task performance: Evidence for adaptive executive control of task scheduling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 791-814.
56. Schwartz, M. F., Reed, E. S., Montgomery, M., Palmer, C., & Mayer, N. H. (1991). The quantitative description of action disorganization syndrome after brain damage: A case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 381-414.
57. Shaffer, L. E. (1965). Choice reaction with variable S-R mapping, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 284-288.
58. Sirigu, A., Zalla, T., Pillon, B., Grafman, J., Agid, Y., & Dubois, B. (1995). Selective impairments in managerial knowledge following pre-frontal cortex damage. Cortex, 31, 301-316.
59. Sohn, M. H., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Task preparation and task repetition: Two component model of task switching, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 764-778.
60. Sohn, M. H., & Carlson, R. A. (2000). Effects of repetition and foreknowledge in task-set reconfiguration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1445-1460.
61. Spector, A., & Biederman, I. (1976). Mental set and mental shift revisited. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 669-679.
62. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 220-231.
63. Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571-590.
64. Tombu, M., & Jolicœur, P. (2000, November). Can the central bottleneck be eliminated? Structural versus strategic accounts of the PRP effect. Poster session presented at the 41st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans, LA.
65. Van Seist, M., Ruthruff, E., & Johnston, J. C. (1999). Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1268-1283.
66. Welford, A. T. (1952). The "psychological refractory period" and the timing of high-speed performance: A review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology, 43, 2-19.
67. Wenger, J. L., & Carlson, R. A. (1995). Learning and the coordination of sequential information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 170-182.
68. Wenger, J. L., & Carlson, R. A. (1996). Cognitive sequence knowledge: What is learned? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 599-619.