Response Selection and Response Execution in Task Switching: Evidence From a Go-Signal Paradigm

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1062-1075

  Philipp, Andrea M ^a   Jolicoeur, Pierre ^b   Falkenstein, Michael ^c   Koch, Iring ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c LEIBNIZ RESEARCH CENTRE FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS   (Germany)

Author keywords

go no go; inhibition; response execution; response selection; task switching

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; MALE; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUE;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 36048936907     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1062     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Allain S., Carbonnell L., Falkenstein M., Burle B., and Vidal F. The modulation of the Ne-like wave on correct responses foreshadows errors. Neuroscience Letters 372 (2004) 161-166
2. Allport D.A., Styles E.A., and Hsieh S. Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In: Umiltà C., and Moscovitch M. (Eds). Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (1994), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 421-452
3. Altmann E.M. Comparing switch costs: Alternating runs and explicit cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Memory, Learning, and Cognition 33 (2007) 475-483
4. Arbuthnott K.D. The influence of cue type on backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31 (2005) 1030-1042
5. Arbuthnott K., and Frank J. Executive control in set switching: Residual shift cost and task-set inhibition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 54 (2000) 33-41
6. Arbuthnott K.D., and Woodward T.S. The influence of cue-task association and location on switch cost and alternating-switch cost. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (2002) 18-29
7. Botvinick M.M., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Carter C.S., and Cohen J.D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review 108 (2001) 624-652
8. Brass M., Ruge H., Meiran N., Rubin O., Koch I., Zysset S., et al. When the same response has different meanings: Recoding the response meaning in the lateral prefrontal cortex. NeuroImage 20 (2003) 1026-1031
9. Brown J.W., Reynolds J.R., and Braver T.S. A computational model of fractionated conflict-control mechanisms in task-switching. Cognitive Psychology 55 (2007) 37-85
10. De Jong R. An intention-activation account of residual switch costs. In: Monsell S., and Driver J. (Eds). Attention & performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 357-376
11. Falkenstein M., Hoormann J., Christ S., and Hohnsbein J. ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: A tutorial. Biological Psychology 51 (2000) 87-107
12. Gade M., and Koch I. Linking inhibition to activation in the control of task sequences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12 (2005) 530-534
13. Gade, M., & Koch, I. (in press). The influence of overlapping response sets on task inhibition. Memory & Cognition
14. Gilbert S.J., and Shallice T. Task switching: A PDP model. Cognitive Psychology 44 (2002) 297-337
15. Holroyd C.B., and Coles M.G. The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review 109 (2002) 679-709
16. Hommel B. The cognitive representation of action: Automatic integration of perceived action effects. Psychological Research 59 (1996) 176-186
17. Hsieh S., and Liu L.-C. The nature of switch cost: Task set configuration or carry-over effect?. Cognitive Brain Research 22 (2005) 165-175
18. Hübner R., and Druey M. Response execution, selection, or activation: What is sufficient for response-related repetition effects under task shifting?. Psychological Research 70 (2006) 245-261
19. Hübner R., Futterer T., and Steinhauser M. On attentional control as a source of residual shift costs: Evidence from two-component task shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27 (2001) 640-653
20. Kleinsorge T., Gajewski P.D., and Heuer H. Task sets under reconstruction: Effects of partially incorrect precues. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 58 A (2005) 521-546
21. Koch I., Gade M., and Philipp A.M. Inhibition of response mode in task switching. Experimental Psychology 51 (2004) 52-58
22. Koch I., and Philipp A.M. Effects of response selection on the task-repetition benefit in task switching. Memory & Cognition 33 (2005) 624-634
23. Logan G.D. On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A user's guide to the stop signal paradigm. In: Dagenbach D., and Carr T.H. (Eds). Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (1994), Academic Press, San Diego 189-239
24. Los S.A., and Van Den Heuvel C.E. Intentional and unintentional contributions to nonspecific preparation during reaction time foreperiods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 (2001) 370-386
25. Masson M.E., Bub D.N., Woodward T.S., and Chan J.C. Modulation of word-reading processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132 (2003) 400-418
26. Mayr U. Inhibition of action rules. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9 (2002) 93-99
27. Mayr U., Diedrichsen J., Ivry R., and Keele S.W. Dissociating task-set selection from task-set inhibition in the prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18 (2006) 14-21
28. Mayr U., and Keele S.W. Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129 (2000) 4-26
29. Meiran N. Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22 (1996) 1423-1442
30. Meiran N. Modeling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychological Research 63 (2000) 234-249
31. Meiran N., and Chorev Z. Phasic alertness and the residual task-switching cost. Experimental Psychology 52 (2005) 109-124
32. Milan E.G., Gonzalez A., Sanabria D., Pereda A., and Hochel M. The nature of residual cost in regular switch response factors. Acta Psychologica 122 (2006) 45-57
33. Monsell S. Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (2003) 134-140
34. Philipp A.M., Gade M., and Koch I. Inhibitory processes in language switching: Evidence from switching language-defined response sets. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 19 (2007) 395-416
35. Philipp A.M., and Koch I. Switching of response modalities. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 58 A (2005) 1325-1338
36. Philipp A.M., and Koch I. Task inhibition and task repetition in task switching. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 18 (2006) 624-639
37. Rogers R.D., and Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 124 (1995) 207-231
38. Schuch S., and Koch I. The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29 (2003) 92-105
39. Schuch S., and Koch I. The costs of changing the representation of action: Response repetition and response-response compatibility in dual tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30 (2004) 566-582
40. Schuch S., and Koch I. Task switching and action sequencing. Psychological Research 70 (2006) 526-540
41. Steinhauser M., and Hübner R. Response-based strengthening in task shifting: Evidence from shift effects produced by errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32 (2006) 517-534
42. Verbruggen F., Liefooghe B., Szmalec A., and Vandierendonck A. Inhibiting responses when switching: Does it matter?. Experimental Psychology 52 (2005) 125-130
43. Verbruggen F., Liefooghe B., and Vandierendonck A. Selective stopping in task switching: The role of response selection and response execution. Experimental Psychology 53 (2006) 48-57
44. Verbruggen F., Liefooghe B., Vandierendonck A., and Demanet J. Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: A recipe to diminish the residual switch cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Memory, Learning, and Cognition 33 (2007) 342-356
45. Wylie G., and Allport A. Task switching and the measurement of "switch costs.". Psychological Research 63 (2000) 212-233