Conflict control in task conflict and response conflict

Psychological Research

Volumn 79, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 238-248

  Braverman, Ami ^a   Meiran, Nachshon ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CONFLICT; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84897224302     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-014-0565-5     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Akćay, C., & Hazeltine, E. (2008). Conflict adaptation depends on task structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,34, 958–973.
2. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review,108, 624–652.
3. Braver, T. S. (2012). The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,16, 106–113.
4. Braverman, A., & Meiran, N. (2010). Task conflict effect in task switching. Psychological Research,74, 568–578.
5. Crump, M. J. C., Gong, Z., & Milliken, B. (2006). The context-specific proportion of congruent Stroop effect: location as a contextual cue. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,13(2), 316–321.
6. Desmet, C., Fias, W., Hartstra, E., & Brass, M. (2011). Errors and conflict at the task level and the response level. The Journal of Neuroscience,31, 1366–1374.
7. Dreisbach, G., Goschke, T., & Haider, H. (2007). The role of task rules and stimulus-response mappings in the task switching paradigm. Psychological Research,71(4), 383–392.
8. Egner, T. (2008). Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,12(10), 374–380.
9. Eriksen, C. W. (1995). The flankers task and response competition: a useful tool for investigating a variety of cognitive problems. Visual Cognition,2, 101–118.
10. Funes, M. J., Lupiáñez, J., & Humphreys, G. (2010). Sustained vs. transient cognitive control: evidence of a behavioural dissociation. Cognition,114, 338–347.
11. Goldfarb, L., & Henik, A. (2007). Evidence for task conflict in the Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,33, 1170–1176.
12. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 450–480.
13. Jacoby, L. L., Lindsay, D. S., & Hessels, S. (2003). Item-specific control of automatic processes: stroop process dissociations. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,10, 638–644.
14. Kalanthroff, E., & Henik, A. (2013). Preparation time modulates pro-active control and enhances task conflict in task switching. Psychological Research, 78, 276-288.
15. Kalanthroff, E., Goldfarb, L., & Henik, A. (2012). Evidence for interaction between the stop signal and the Stroop task conflict. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(2), 579–592.
16. Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W, I. I. I., Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science,303, 1023–1026.
17. Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., et al. (2010). Control and interference in task switching––a review. Psychological Bulletin,136, 849–874.
18. Koch, I., Gade, M., Schuch, S., & Philipp, A. M. (2010). The role of inhibition in task switching: a review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,17, 1–14.
19. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility––a mode l and taxonomy. Psychological Review,97, 227–253.
20. Logan, G. D., & Zbrodoff, N. J. (1979). When it helps to be misled: facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory and Cognition,7, 166–174.
21. Lu, C. H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: a review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,2, 174–207.
22. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychological Bulletin,109, 163–203.
23. Meiran, N. (2010). Task switching: mechanisms underlying rigid vs. flexible self control. In R. Hassin, K. Ochsner, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Self control in society, mind and brain (pp. 202–220). New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Meiran, N., & Kessler, Y. (2008). The task rule congruency effect in task switching reflects activated long term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,34, 137–157.
25. Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,7, 134–140.
26. Monsell, S., Taylor, T., & Murphy, K. (2001). Naming the color of a word: is it responses or task sets that compete? Memory and Cognition,29, 115–137.
27. Notebaert, W., & Verguts, T. (2008). Cognitive control acts locally. Cognition, 106, 1071–1080.
28. Schmidt, J.R. (2013). Questioning conflict adaptation: proportion congruent and Gratton effects reconsidered. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20(4), 615–630.
29. Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2005). Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,134, 343–367. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.343.
30. Steinhauser, M., & Huebner, R. (2009). Distinguishing response conflict and task conflict in the Stroop task: evidence from ex Gaussian distribution analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,35, 1398–1412.
31. Sternberg, S. (1969). Memory scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. American Scientist,57, 421–457.
32. Torres-Quesada, M., Funes, M. J., & Lupiáñez, J. (2013). Dissociating proportion congruent and conflict adaptation effects in a Simon-Stroop procedure. Acta Psychologica,142, 203–210.
33. Townsend, J. T., & Nozawa, G. (1995). On the spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: an investigation on parallel, serial, and coactive theories. Journal of Mathematical Psychology,39, 321–359.
34. Tzelgov, J., Henik, A., & Berger, J. (1992). Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words. Memory and Cognition,20, 727–735.