New insights into the role of BubR1 in mitosis and beyond

International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology

Volumn 306, Issue , 2013, Pages 223-273

  Karess, Roger E ^a   Wassmann, Katja ^b   Rahmani, Zohra ^a  

^a INSTITUT JACQUES MONOD   (France)

^b Sorbonne Universités   (France)

Author keywords

Aneuploidy; BubR1; Checkpoints; Kinetochore; Meiosis; Microtubules; Mitosis

Indexed keywords

AURORA B KINASE; BRCA2 PROTEIN; BUB1 RELATED PROTEIN; BUB3 PROTEIN; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN 20; HISTONE ACETYLTRANSFERASE PCAF; NDC80 COMPLEX; NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE ADENOSINE DIPHOSPHATE RIBOSYLTRANSFERASE 1; PROTEIN MAD1; PROTEIN MAD2; PROTEIN P53;

ACETYLATION; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; BLADDER CANCER; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CELL AGING; CELL CYCLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CENTROMERE; CENTROSOME; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; COLON TUMOR; COLORECTAL CANCER; DEPOLYMERIZATION; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM CANCER; DNA DAMAGE; DNA DAMAGE CHECKPOINT; EUKARYOTIC FLAGELLUM; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMAN; LEUKEMIA; LIVER CELL CARCINOMA; LIVER METASTASIS; LUNG CANCER; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; MEIOSIS; MEIOTIC PROPHASE I; MISSENSE MUTATION; MITOSIS; NEPHROBLASTOMA; NONHUMAN; POINT MUTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMETAPHASE; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; RHABDOMYOSARCOMA; SISTER CHROMATID; SUMOYLATION; SURVIVAL RATE; SYNAPTONEMAL COMPLEX; T CELL LEUKEMIA; TETRATRICOPEPTIDE REPEAT; THROMBOCYTOPOIESIS; THYROID CANCER; UBIQUITINATION;

ANEUPLOIDY; BUBR1; CHECKPOINTS; KINETOCHORE; MEIOSIS; MICROTUBULES; MITOSIS;

AGING; ANIMALS; HUMANS; MEIOSIS; MITOSIS; NEOPLASMS; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES;

EID: 84883526960     PISSN: 19376448     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-407694-5.00006-7     Document Type: Chapter

References (198)

1. Abrieu A., Kahana J.A., Wood K.W., Cleveland D.W. CENP-E as an essential component of the mitotic checkpoint in vitro. Cell 2000, 102:817-826.
2. Ando K., Kakeji Y., Kitao H., Iimori M., Zhao Y., et al. High expression of BUBR1 is one of the factors for inducing DNA aneuploidy and progression in gastric cancer. Cancer Sci. 2010, 101:639-645.
3. Andrews P.D., Ovechkina Y., Morrice N., Wagenbach M., Duncan K., et al. Aurora B regulates MCAK at the mitotic centromere. Dev. Cell 2004, 6:253-268.
4. Baker D.J., Jeganathan K.B., Cameron J.D., Thompson M., Juneja S., et al. BubR1 insufficiency causes early onset of aging-associated phenotypes and infertility in mice. Nat. Genet. 2004, 36:744-749.
5. Basu J., Logarinho E., Herrmann S., Bousbaa H., Li Z., et al. Localization of the Drosophila checkpoint control protein Bub3 to the kinetochore requires Bub1 but not Zw10 or Rod. Chromosoma 1998, 107:376-385.
6. Bie L., Zhao G., Cheng P., Rondeau G., Porwollik S., et al. The accuracy of survival time prediction for patients with glioma is improved by measuring mitotic spindle checkpoint gene expression. PLoS One 2011, 6:e25631.
7. Bolanos-Garcia V.M., Lischetti T., Matak-Vinkovic D., Cota E., Simpson P.J., et al. Structure of a Blinkin-BUBR1 complex reveals an interaction crucial for kinetochore-mitotic checkpoint regulation via an unanticipated binding site. Structure 2011, 19:1691-1700.
8. Boyarchuk Y., Salic A., Dasso M., Arnaoutov A. Bub1 is essential for assembly of the functional inner centromere. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 176:919-928.
9. Brunet S., Pahlavan G., Taylor S., Maro B. Functionality of the spindle checkpoint during the first meiotic division of mammalian oocytes. Reproduction 2003, 126:443-450.
10. Buffin E., Lefebvre C., Huang J., Gagou M.E., Karess R.E. Recruitment of Mad2 to the kinetochore requires the Rod/Zw10 complex. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15:856-861.
11. Buffin E., Emre D., Karess R.E. Flies without a spindle checkpoint. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9:565-572.
12. Burton J.L., Solomon M.J. Mad3p, a pseudosubstrate inhibitor of APCCdc20 in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Genes Dev. 2007, 21:655-667.
13. Burum-Auensen E., DeAngelis P.M., Schjølberg A.R., Røislien J., Andersen S.N., Clausen O.P.F. Spindle proteins Aurora A and BUB1B, but not Mad2, are aberrantly expressed in dysplastic mucosa of patients with longstanding ulcerative colitis. J. Clin. Pathol. 2007, 60:1403-1408.
14. Cahill D.P., Lengauer C., Yu J., Riggins G.J., Willson J.K., et al. Mutations of mitotic checkpoint genes in human cancers. Nature 1998, 392:300-303.
15. Chabalier C., Lamare C., Racca C., Privat M., Valette A., Larminat F. BRCA1 downregulation leads to premature inactivation of spindle checkpoint and confers paclitaxel resistance. Cell Cycle 2006, 5:1001-1007.
16. Chan G.K., Schaar B.T., Yen T.J. Characterization of the kinetochore binding domain of CENP-E reveals interactions with the kinetochore proteins CENP-F and hBUBR1. J. Cell Biol. 1998, 143:49-63.
17. Chan G.K., Jablonski S.A., Sudakin V., Hittle J.C., Yen T.J. Human BUBR1 is a mitotic checkpoint kinase that monitors CENP-E functions at kinetochores and binds the cyclosome/APC. J. Cell Biol. 1999, 146:941-954.
18. Chang P., Jacobson M.K., Mitchison T.J. Poly(ADP-ribose) is required for spindle assembly and structure. Nature 2004, 432:645-649.
19. Chao W.C., Kulkarni K., Zhang Z., Kong E.H., Barford D. Structure of the mitotic checkpoint complex. Nature 2012, 484:208-213.
20. Cheeseman I.M., Chappie J.S., Wilson-Kubalek E.M., Desai A. The conserved KMN network constitutes the core microtubule-binding site of the kinetochore. Cell 2006, 127:983-997.
21. Chen R.H. BubR1 is essential for kinetochore localization of other spindle checkpoint proteins and its phosphorylation requires Mad1. J. Cell Biol. 2002, 158:487-496.
22. Choi E., Choe H., Min J., Choi J.Y., Kim J., Lee H. BubR1 acetylation at prometaphase is required for modulating APC/C activity and timing of mitosis. EMBO J. 2009, 28:2077-2089.
23. Choi E., Park P.G., Lee H.O., Lee Y.K., Kang G.H., et al. BRCA2 fine-tunes the spindle assembly checkpoint through reinforcement of BubR1 acetylation. Dev. Cell 2012, 22:295-308.
24. Clift D., Marston A.L. The role of shugoshin in meiotic chromosome segregation. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2011, 133:234-242.
25. Clute P., Pines J. Temporal and spatial control of cyclin B1 destruction in metaphase. Nat. Cell Biol. 1999, 1:82-87.
26. Dai W., Wang Q., Liu T., Swamy M., Fang Y., et al. Slippage of mitotic arrest and enhanced tumor development in mice with BubR1 haploinsufficiency. Cancer Res. 2004, 64:440-445.
27. D'Andrea L.D., Regan L. TPR proteins: the versatile helix. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2003, 28:655-662.
28. D'Arcy S., Davies O.R., Blundell T.L., Bolanos-Garcia V.M. Defining the molecular basis of BubR1 kinetochore interactions and APC/C-CDC20 inhibition. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285:14764-14776.
29. Davenport J., Harris L.D., Goorha R. Spindle checkpoint function requires Mad2-dependent Cdc20 binding to the Mad3 homology domain of BubR1. Exp. Cell Res. 2006, 312:1831-1842.
30. De Antoni A., Pearson C.G., Cimini D., Canman J.C., Sala V., et al. The Mad1/Mad2 complex as a template for Mad2 activation in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15:214-225.
31. de Lange T. Shelterin: the protein complex that shapes and safeguards human telomeres. Genes Dev. 2005, 19:2100-2110.
32. DeLuca J.G., Musacchio A. Structural organization of the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2011, 24:48-56.
33. DeLuca J.G., Gall W.E., Ciferri C., Cimini D., Musacchio A., Salmon E.D. Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and attachment stability are regulated by Hec1. Cell 2006, 127:969-982.
34. de Reynies A., Assie G., Rickman D.S., Tissier F., Groussin L., et al. Gene expression profiling reveals a new classification of adrenocortical tumors and identifies molecular predictors of malignancy and survival. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009, 27:1108-1115.
35. Diaz-Rodríguez E., Sotillo R., Schvartzman J.-M., Benezra R. Hec1 overexpression hyperactivates the mitotic checkpoint and induces tumor formation in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:16719-16724.
36. Ditchfield C., Johnson V.L., Tighe A., Ellston R., Haworth C., et al. Aurora B couples chromosome alignment with anaphase by targeting BubR1, Mad2, and Cenp-E to kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 161:267-280.
37. Dorn J.F., Maddox P.S. Kinetochore dynamics: how protein dynamics affect chromosome segregation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2012, 24:57-63.
38. Draviam V.M., Shapiro I., Aldridge B., Sorger P.K. Misorientation and reduced stretching of aligned sister kinetochores promote chromosome missegregation in EB1- or APC-depleted cells. EMBO J. 2006, 25:2814-2827.
39. Elowe S., Hummer S., Uldschmid A., Li X., Nigg E.A. Tension-sensitive Plk1 phosphorylation on BubR1 regulates the stability of kinetochore microtubule interactions. Genes Dev. 2007, 21:2205-2219.
40. Elowe S., Dulla K., Uldschmid A., Li X., Dou Z., Nigg E.A. Uncoupling of the spindle-checkpoint and chromosome-congression functions of BubR1. J. Cell Sci. 2010, 123:84-94.
41. Espeut J., Cheerambathur D.K., Krenning L., Oegema K., Desai A. Microtubule binding by KNL-1 contributes to spindle checkpoint silencing at the kinetochore. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 196:469-482.
42. Fang G. Checkpoint protein BubR1 acts synergistically with Mad2 to inhibit anaphase-promoting complex. Mol. Biol. Cell 2002, 13:755-766.
43. Fang Y., Liu T., Wang X., Yang Y.M., Deng H., et al. BubR1 is involved in regulation of DNA damage responses. Oncogene 2006, 25:3598-3605.
44. Ferrand A., Chevrier V., Chauvin J.P., Birnbaum D. Ajuba: a new microtubule-associated protein that interacts with BUBR1 and Aurora B at kinetochores in metaphase. Biol. Cell 2009, 101:221-235.
45. Foley E.A., Kapoor T.M. Microtubule attachment and spindle assembly checkpoint signalling at the kinetochore. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013, 14:25-37.
46. Foley E.A., Maldonado M., Kapoor T.M. Formation of stable attachments between kinetochores and microtubules depends on the B56-PP2A phosphatase. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:1265-1271.
47. Fraschini R., Beretta A., Sironi L., Musacchio A., Lucchini G., Piatti S. Bub3 interaction with Mad2, Mad3 and Cdc20 is mediated by WD40 repeats and does not require intact kinetochores. EMBO J. 2001, 20:6648-6659.
48. Fraune J., Schramm S., Alsheimer M., Benavente R. The mammalian synaptonemal complex: protein components, assembly and role in meiotic recombination. Exp. Cell Res. 2012, 318:1340-1346.
49. Gladhaug I.P., Westgaard A., Schjolberg A.R., Burum-Auensen E., Pomianowska E., Clausen O.P. Spindle proteins in resected pancreatic head adenocarcinomas: BubR1 is an independent prognostic factor in pancreatobiliary-type tumours. Histopathology 2010, 56:345-355.
50. Gladstone M.N., Obeso D., Chuong H., Dawson D.S. The synaptonemal complex protein Zip1 promotes bi-orientation of centromeres at meiosis I. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000771.
51. Grabsch H., Takeno S., Parsons W.J., Pomjanski N., Boecking A., et al. Overexpression of the mitotic checkpoint genes BUB1, BUBR1, and BUB3 in gastric cancer-association with tumour cell proliferation. J. Pathol. 2003, 200:16-22.
52. Green R.A., Wollman R., Kaplan K.B. APC and EB1 function together in mitosis to regulate spindle dynamics and chromosome alignment. Mol. Biol. Cell 2005, 16:4609-4622.
53. Guntani A., Matsumoto T., Kyuragi R., Iwasa K., Onohara T., et al. Reduced proliferation of aged human vascular smooth muscle cells-role of oxygen-derived free radicals and BubR1 expression. J. Surg. Res. 2011, 170:143-149.
54. Guo Y., Kim C., Ahmad S., Zhang J., Mao Y. CENP-E-dependent BubR1 autophosphorylation enhances chromosome alignment and the mitotic checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 198:205-217.
55. Gupta A., Inaba S., Wong O.K., Fang G., Liu J. Breast cancer-specific gene 1 interacts with the mitotic checkpoint kinase BubR1. Oncogene 2003, 22:7593-7599.
56. Ha G.H., Baek K.H., Kim H.S., Jeong S.J., Kim C.M., et al. p53 activation in response to mitotic spindle damage requires signaling via BubR1-mediated phosphorylation. Cancer Res. 2007, 67:7155-7164.
57. Hached K., Xie S.Z., Buffin E., Cladiere D., Rachez C., et al. Mps1 at kinetochores is essential for female mouse meiosis I. Development 2011, 138:2261-2271.
58. Hanks S., Coleman K., Reid S., Plaja A., Firth H., et al. Constitutional aneuploidy and cancer predisposition caused by biallelic mutations in BUB1B. Nat. Genet. 2004, 36:1159-1161.
59. Hardwick K.G., Johnston R.C., Smith D.L., Murray A.W. MAD3 encodes a novel component of the spindle checkpoint which interacts with Bub3p, Cdc20p, and Mad2p. J. Cell Biol. 2000, 148:871-882.
60. Harris L., Davenport J., Neale G., Goorha R. The mitotic checkpoint gene BubR1 has two distinct functions in mitosis. Exp. Cell Res. 2005, 308:85-100.
61. Haruki N., Saito H., Harano T., Nomoto S., Takahashi T., et al. Molecular analysis of the mitotic checkpoint genes BUB1, BUBR1 and BUB3 in human lung cancers. Cancer Lett. 2001, 162:201-205.
62. Hassold T., Hunt P. To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2001, 2:280-291.
63. Hauf S., Cole R.W., LaTerra S., Zimmer C., Schnapp G., et al. The small molecule Hesperadin reveals a role for Aurora B in correcting kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in maintaining the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 161:281-294.
64. Herzog F., Primorac I., Dube P., Lenart P., Sander B., et al. Structure of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome interacting with a mitotic checkpoint complex. Science 2009, 323:1477-1481.
65. Hoffman D.B., Pearson C.G., Yen T.J., Howell B.J., Salmon E.D. Microtubule-dependent changes in assembly of microtubule motor proteins and mitotic spindle checkpoint proteins at PtK1 kinetochores. Mol. Biol. Cell 2001, 12:1995-2009.
66. Holt J.E., Lane S.I., Jennings P., Garcia-Higuera I., Moreno S., Jones K.T. APC(FZR1) prevents nondisjunction in mouse oocytes by controlling meiotic spindle assembly timing. Mol. Biol. Cell 2012, 23:3970-3981.
67. Homer H.A., McDougall A., Levasseur M., Murdoch A.P., Herbert M. Mad2 is required for inhibiting securin and cyclin B degradation following spindle depolymerisation in meiosis I mouse oocytes. Reproduction 2005, 130:829-843.
68. Homer H., Gui L., Carroll J. A spindle assembly checkpoint protein functions in prophase I arrest and prometaphase progression. Science 2009, 326:991-994.
69. Howell B.J., McEwen B.F., Canman J.C., Hoffman D.B., Farrar E.M., et al. Cytoplasmic dynein/dynactin drives kinetochore protein transport to the spindle poles and has a role in mitotic spindle checkpoint inactivation. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 155:1159-1172.
70. Howell B.J., Moree B., Farrar E.M., Stewart S., Fang G., Salmon E.D. Spindle checkpoint protein dynamics at kinetochores in living cells. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14:953-964.
71. Huang H., Hittle J., Zappacosta F., Annan R.S., Hershko A., Yen T.J. Phosphorylation sites in BubR1 that regulate kinetochore attachment, tension, and mitotic exit. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 183:667-680.
72. Huber A., Bai P., de Murcia J.M., de Murcia G. PARP-1, PARP-2 and ATM in the DNA damage response: functional synergy in mouse development. DNA Repair (Amst.) 2004, 3:1103-1108.
73. Izumi H., Matsumoto Y., Ikeuchi T., Saya H., Kajii T., Matsuura S. BubR1 localizes to centrosomes and suppresses centrosome amplification via regulating Plk1 activity in interphase cells. Oncogene 2009, 28:2806-2820.
74. Jablonski S.A., Chan G.K., Cooke C.A., Earnshaw W.C., Yen T.J. The hBUB1 and hBUBR1 kinases sequentially assemble onto kinetochores during prophase with hBUBR1 concentrating at the kinetochore plates in mitosis. Chromosoma 1998, 107:386-396.
75. Johnson V.L., Scott M.I., Holt S.V., Hussein D., Taylor S.S. Bub1 is required for kinetochore localization of BubR1, Cenp-E, Cenp-F and Mad2, and chromosome congression. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117:1577-1589.
76. Kallio M.J., McCleland M.L., Stukenberg P.T., Gorbsky G.J. Inhibition of Aurora B kinase blocks chromosome segregation, overrides the spindle checkpoint, and perturbs microtubule dynamics in mitosis. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12:900-905.
77. Kim S., Park S.Y., Yong H., Famulski J.K., Chae S., et al. HBV X protein targets hBubR1, which induces dysregulation of the mitotic checkpoint. Oncogene 2008, 27:3457-3464.
78. King E.M., van der Sar S.J., Hardwick K.G. Mad3 KEN boxes mediate both Cdc20 and Mad3 turnover, and are critical for the spindle checkpoint. PLoS One 2007, 2:e342.
79. Kiyomitsu T., Obuse C., Yanagida M. Human Blinkin/AF15q14 is required for chromosome alignment and the mitotic checkpoint through direct interaction with Bub1 and BubR1. Dev. Cell 2007, 13:663-676.
80. Kiyomitsu T., Murakami H., Yanagida M. Protein interaction domain mapping of human kinetochore protein Blinkin reveals a consensus motif for binding of spindle assembly checkpoint proteins Bub1 and BubR1. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 31:998-1011.
81. Kline-Smith S.L., Khodjakov A., Hergert P., Walczak C.E. Depletion of centromeric MCAK leads to chromosome congression and segregation defects due to improper kinetochore attachments. Mol. Biol. Cell 2004, 15:1146-1159.
82. Knowlton A.L., Lan W., Stukenberg P.T. Aurora B is enriched at merotelic attachment sites, where it regulates MCAK. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:1705-1710.
83. Kops G.J., Shah J.V. Connecting up and clearing out: how kinetochore attachment silences the spindle assembly checkpoint. Chromosoma 2012, 121:509-525.
84. Kops G.J., Foltz D.R., Cleveland D.W. Lethality to human cancer cells through massive chromosome loss by inhibition of the mitotic checkpoint. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:8699-8704.
85. Krenn V., Wehenkel A., Li X., Santaguida S., Musacchio A. Structural analysis reveals features of the spindle checkpoint kinase Bub1-kinetochore subunit Knl1 interaction. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 196:451-467.
86. Kruse T., Zhang G., Larsen M.S., Lischetti T., Streicher W., et al. Direct binding between BubR1 and B56-PP2A phosphatase complexes regulate mitotic progression. J. Cell Sci. 2013, 126:1086-1092.
87. Kulukian A., Han J.S., Cleveland D.W. Unattached kinetochores catalyze production of an anaphase inhibitor that requires a Mad2 template to prime Cdc20 for BubR1 binding. Dev. Cell 2009, 16:105-117.
88. Lampson M.A., Cheeseman I.M. Sensing centromere tension: Aurora B and the regulation of kinetochore function. Trends Cell Biol. 2011, 21:133-140.
89. Lampson M.A., Kapoor,T.M., 2005. The human mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1 regulates chromosome-spindle attachments. Nat. Cell Biol. 2005, 7:93-98.
90. Lan W., Zhang X., Kline-Smith S.L., Rosasco S.E., Barrett-Wilt G.A., et al. Aurora B phosphorylates centromeric MCAK and regulates its localization and microtubule depolymerization activity. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14:273-286.
91. Lara-Gonzalez, P., Scott M.I., Diez M., Sen O., Taylor S.S. BubR1 blocks substrate recruitment to the APC/C in a KEN-box-dependent manner. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 124:4332-4345.
92. Lara-Gonzalez P., Westhorpe F.G., Taylor S.S. The spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22:R966-R980.
93. Larsen N.A., Al-Bassam J., Wei R.R., Harrison S.C. Structural analysis of Bub3 interactions in the mitotic spindle checkpoint. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:1201-1206.
94. Lee J., Lee C.G., Lee K.W., Lee C.W. Cross-talk between BubR1 expression and the commitment to differentiate in adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Exp. Mol. Med. 2009, 41:873-879.
95. Lee Y.K., Choi E., Kim M.A., Park P.G., Park N.H., Lee H. BubR1 as a prognostic marker for recurrence-free survival rates in epithelial ovarian cancers. Br. J. Cancer 2009, 101:504-510.
96. Lens S.M., Wolthuis R.M., Klompmaker R., Kauw J., Agami R., et al. Survivin is required for a sustained spindle checkpoint arrest in response to lack of tension. EMBO J. 2003, 22:2934-2947.
97. Li X., Nicklas R.B. Mitotic forces control a cell-cycle checkpoint. Nature 1995, 373:630-632.
98. Li M., Li S., Yuan J., Wang Z.B., Sun S.C., et al. Bub3 is a spindle assembly checkpoint protein regulating chromosome segregation during mouse oocyte meiosis. PLoS One 2009, 4:e7701.
99. Lira R.C., Miranda F.A., Guimaraes M.C., Simoes R.T., Donadi E.A., et al. BUBR1 expression in benign oral lesions and squamous cell carcinomas: correlation with human papillomavirus. Oncol. Rep. 2010, 23:1027-1036.
100. Liu A.W., Cai J., Zhao X.L., Xu A.M., Fu H.Q., et al. The clinicopathological significance of BUBR1 overexpression in hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Clin. Pathol. 2009, 62:1003-1008.
101. Logarinho E., Bousbaa H., Dias J.M., Lopes C., Amorim I., et al. Different spindle checkpoint proteins monitor microtubule attachment and tension at kinetochores in Drosophila cells. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117:1757-1771.
102. London N., Ceto S., Ranish J.A., Biggins S. Phosphoregulation of Spc105 by Mps1 and PP1 regulates Bub1 localization to kinetochores. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22:900-906.
103. Lydall D. Hiding at the ends of yeast chromosomes: telomeres, nucleases and checkpoint pathways. J. Cell Sci. 2003, 116:4057-4065.
104. Maciejowski J., George K.A., Terret M.E., Zhang C., Shokat K.M., Jallepalli P.V. Mps1 directs the assembly of Cdc20 inhibitory complexes during interphase and mitosis to control M phase timing and spindle checkpoint signaling. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 190:89-100.
105. Malmanche N., Owen S., Gegick S., Steffensen S., Tomkiel J.E., Sunkel C.E. Drosophila BubR1 is essential for meiotic sister-chromatid cohesion and maintenance of synaptonemal complex. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:1489-1497.
106. Malureanu L.A., Jeganathan K.B., Hamada M., Wasilewski L., Davenport J., van Deursen J.M. BubR1 N terminus acts as a soluble inhibitor of cyclin B degradation by APC/C(Cdc20) in interphase. Dev. Cell 2009, 16:118-131.
107. Mao Y., Abrieu A., Cleveland D.W. Activating and silencing the mitotic checkpoint through CENP-E-dependent activation/inactivation of BubR1. Cell 2003, 114:87-98.
108. Mao Y., Desai A., Cleveland D.W. Microtubule capture by CENP-E silences BubR1-dependent mitotic checkpoint signaling. J. Cell Biol. 2005, 170:873-880.
109. Mapelli M., Filipp F.V., Rancati G., Massimiliano L., Nezi L., et al. Determinants of conformational dimerization of Mad2 and its inhibition by p31comet. EMBO J. 2006, 25:1273-1284.
110. Marangos P., Carroll J. Securin regulates entry into M-phase by modulating the stability of cyclin B. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10:445-451.
111. Marangos P., Verschuren E.W., Chen R., Jackson P.K., Carroll J. Prophase I arrest and progression to metaphase I in mouse oocytes are controlled by Emi1-dependent regulation of APC(Cdh1). J. Cell Biol. 2007, 176:65-75.
112. Matsumura S., Toyoshima F., Nishida E. Polo-like kinase 1 facilitates chromosome alignment during prometaphase through BubR1. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:15217-15227.
113. Matsuura S., Matsumoto Y., Morishima K., Izumi H., Matsumoto H., et al. Monoallelic BUB1B mutations and defective mitotic-spindle checkpoint in seven families with premature chromatid separation (PCS) syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2006, 140:358-367.
114. McGuinness B.E., Anger M., Kouznetsova A., Gil-Bernabe A.M., Helmhart W., et al. Regulation of APC/C activity in oocytes by a Bub1-dependent spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:369-380.
115. Meraldi P., Draviam V.M., Sorger P.K. Timing and checkpoints in the regulation of mitotic progression. Dev. Cell 2004, 7:45-60.
116. Millband D.N., Hardwick K.G. Fission yeast Mad3p is required for Mad2p to inhibit the anaphase-promoting complex and localizes to kinetochores in a Bub1p-, Bub3p-, and Mph1p-dependent manner. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002, 22:2728-2742.
117. Miyamoto T., Porazinski S., Wang H., Borovina A., Ciruna B., et al. Insufficiency of BUBR1, a mitotic spindle checkpoint regulator, causes impaired ciliogenesis in vertebrates. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2011, 20:2058-2070.
118. Munoz P., Blanco R., de Carcer G., Schoeftner S., Benetti R., et al. TRF1 controls telomere length and mitotic fidelity in epithelial homeostasis. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 29:1608-1625.
119. Murata-Hori M., Wang Y.-L. The kinase activity of Aurora B is required for kinetochore-microtubule interactions during mitosis. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12:894-899.
120. Musacchio A., Salmon E.D. The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8:379-393.
121. Musaro M., Ciapponi L., Fasulo B., Gatti M., Cenci G. Unprotected Drosophila melanogaster telomeres activate the spindle assembly checkpoint. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40:362-366.
122. Myrie K.A., Percy M.J., Azim J.N., Neeley C.K., Petty E.M. Mutation and expression analysis of human BUB1 and BUB1B in aneuploid breast cancer cell lines. Cancer Lett. 2000, 152:193-199.
123. Nagai Y., Asaoka Y., Namae M., Saito K., Momose H., et al. The LIM protein Ajuba is required for ciliogenesis and left-right axis determination in medaka. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 396:887-893.
124. Nagaoka S.I., Hassold T.J., Hunt P.A. Human aneuploidy: mechanisms and new insights into an age-old problem. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13:493-504.
125. Newnham L., Jordan P., Rockmill B., Roeder G.S., Hoffmann E. The synaptonemal complex protein, Zip1, promotes the segregation of nonexchange chromosomes at meiosis I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:781-785.
126. Niault T., Hached K., Sotillo R., Sorger P.K., Maro B., et al. Changing Mad2 levels affects chromosome segregation and spindle assembly checkpoint control in female mouse meiosis I. PLoS One 2007, 2:e1165.
127. Nigg E.A., Raff J.W. Centrioles, centrosomes, and cilia in health and disease. Cell 2009, 139:663-678.
128. Nilsson J., Yekezare M., Minshull J., Pines J. The APC/C maintains the spindle assembly checkpoint by targeting Cdc20 for destruction. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10:1411-1420.
129. Ohshima K., Haraoka S., Yoshioka S., Hamasaki M., Fujiki T., et al. Mutation analysis of mitotic checkpoint genes (hBUB1 and hBUBR1) and microsatellite instability in adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma. Cancer Lett. 2000, 158:141-150.
130. Oikawa T., Okuda M., Ma Z., Goorha R., Tsujimoto H., et al. Transcriptional control of BubR1 by p53 and suppression of centrosome amplification by BubR1. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 25:4046-4061.
131. Okaz E., Arguello-Miranda O., Bogdanova A., Vinod P.K., Lipp J.J., et al. Meiotic prophase requires proteolysis of M phase regulators mediated by the meiosis-specific APC/C-Ama1. Cell 2012, 151:603-618.
132. Olesen S.H., Thykjaer T., Ørntoft T.F. Mitotic checkpoint genes hBUB1, hBUB1B, hBUB3 and TTK in human bladder cancer, screening for mutations and loss of heterozygosity. Carcinogenesis 2001, 22:813-815.
133. Ouyang B., Knauf J.A., Ain K., Nacev B., Fagin J.A. Mechanisms of aneuploidy in thyroid cancer cell lines and tissues: evidence for mitotic checkpoint dysfunction without mutations in BUB1 and BUBR1. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 2002, 56:341-350.
134. Park H.Y., Jeon Y.K., Shin H.J., Kim I.J., Kang H.C., et al. Differential promoter methylation may be a key molecular mechanism in regulating BubR1 expression in cancer cells. Exp. Mol. Med. 2007, 39:195-204.
135. Pesin J.A., Orr-Weaver T.L. Regulation of APC/C activators in mitosis and meiosis. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2008, 24:475-499.
136. Peters J.-M. The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome: a machine designed to destroy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7:644-656.
137. Petronczki M., Siomos M.F., Nasmyth K. Un menage a quatre: the molecular biology of chromosome segregation in meiosis. Cell 2003, 112:423-440.
138. Pfleger C.M., Kirschner M.W. The KEN box: an APC recognition signal distinct from the D box targeted by Cdh1. Genes Dev. 2000, 14:655-665.
139. Pinsky B.A., Biggins S. The spindle checkpoint: tension versus attachment. Trends Cell Biol. 2005, 15:486-493.
140. Przewloka M.R., Glover D.M. The kinetochore and the centromere: a working long distance relationship. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2009, 43:439-465.
141. Rahmani Z., Gagou M.E., Lefebvre C., Emre D., Karess R.E. Separating the spindle, checkpoint, and timer functions of BubR1. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 187:597-605.
142. Rao C.V., Yang Y.M., Swamy M.V., Liu T., Fang Y., et al. Colonic tumorigenesis in BubR1+/-ApcMin/+ compound mutant mice is linked to premature separation of sister chromatids and enhanced genomic instability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:4365-4370.
143. Reis A., Chang H.Y., Levasseur M., Jones K.T. APCcdh1 activity in mouse oocytes prevents entry into the first meiotic division. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8:539-540.
144. Rieder C.L., Alexander S.P. Kinetochores are transported poleward along a single astral microtubule during chromosome attachment to the spindle in newt lung cells. J. Cell Biol. 1990, 110:81-95.
145. Rieder C., Cole R., Khodjakov A., Sluder G. The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 1995, 130:941-948.
146. Rischitor P.E., May K.M., Hardwick K.G. Bub1 is a fission yeast kinetochore scaffold protein, and is sufficient to recruit other spindle checkpoint proteins to ectopic sites on chromosomes. PLoS One 2007, 2:e1342.
147. Rong Y.S., Titen S.W., Xie H.B., Golic M.M., Bastiani M., et al. Targeted mutagenesis by homologous recombination in D. melanogaster. Genes Dev. 2002, 16:1568-1581.
148. Royou A., Macias H., Sullivan W. The Drosophila Grp/Chk1 DNA damage checkpoint controls entry into anaphase. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15:334-339.
149. Royou A., Gagou M.E., Karess R., Sullivan W. BubR1- and Polo-coated DNA tethers facilitate poleward segregation of acentric chromatids. Cell 2010, 140:235-245.
150. Sabino D., Brown N.H., Basto R. Drosophila Ajuba is not an Aurora-A activator but is required to maintain Aurora-A at the centrosome. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 124:1156-1166.
151. Saeki A., Tamura S., Ito N., Kiso S., Matsuda Y., et al. Frequent impairment of the spindle assembly checkpoint in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 2002, 94:2047-2054.
152. Santaguida S., Musacchio A. The life and miracles of kinetochores. EMBO J. 2009, 28:2511-2531.
153. Santaguida S., Vernieri C., Villa F., Ciliberto A., Musacchio A. Evidence that Aurora B is implicated in spindle checkpoint signalling independently of error correction. EMBO J. 2011, 30:1508-1519.
154. Saurin A.T., van der Waal M.S., Medema R.H., Lens S.M.A., Kops G.J.P.L. Aurora B potentiates Mps1 activation to ensure rapid checkpoint establishment at the onset of mitosis. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2:316.
155. Saxena A., Saffery R., Wong L.H., Kalitsis P., Choo K.H.A. Centromere proteins Cenpa, Cenpb, and Bub3 interact with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 protein and are poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277:26921-26926.
156. Schittenhelm R.B., Chaleckis R., Lehner C.F. Intrakinetochore localization and essential functional domains of Drosophila Spc105. EMBO J. 2009, 28:2374-2386.
157. Sczaniecka M., Feoktistova A., May K.M., Chen J.S., Blyth J., et al. The spindle checkpoint functions of Mad3 and Mad2 depend on a Mad3 KEN box-mediated interaction with Cdc20-anaphase-promoting complex (APC/C). J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:23039-23047.
158. Sharp-Baker H., Chen R.H. Spindle checkpoint protein Bub1 is required for kinetochore localization of Mad1, Mad2, Bub3, and CENP-E, independently of its kinase activity. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 153:1239-1250.
159. Shepperd L.A., Meadows J.C., Sochaj A.M., Lancaster T.C., Zou J., et al. Phosphodependent recruitment of Bub1 and Bub3 to Spc7/KNL1 by Mph1 kinase maintains the spindle checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22:891-899.
160. Shichiri M., Yoshinaga K., Hisatomi H., Sugihara K., Hirata Y. Genetic and epigenetic inactivation of mitotic checkpoint genes hBUB1 and hBUBR1 and their relationship to survival. Cancer Res. 2002, 62:13-17.
161. Shin H.J., Baek K.H., Jeon A.H., Park M.T., Lee S.J., et al. Dual roles of human BubR1, a mitotic checkpoint kinase, in the monitoring of chromosomal instability. Cancer Cell 2003, 4:483-497.
162. Sironi L., Mapelli M., Knapp S., De Antoni A., Jeang K.T., Musacchio A. Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1-Mad2 core complex: implications of a 'safety belt' binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint. EMBO J. 2002, 21:2496-2506.
163. Skoufias D.A., Andreassen P.R., Lacroix F.B., Wilson L., Margolis R.L. Mammalian mad2 and bub1/bubR1 recognize distinct spindle-attachment and kinetochore-tension checkpoints. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98:4492-4497.
164. Sotillo R., Hernando E., Díaz-Rodríguez E., Teruya-Feldstein J., Cordón-Cardo C., et al. Mad2 overexpression promotes aneuploidy and tumorigenesis in mice. Cancer Cell 2007, 11:9-23.
165. Sudakin V., Chan G.K., Yen T.J. Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 154:925-936.
166. Suijkerbuijk S.J., van Osch M.H., Bos F.L., Hanks S., Rahman N., Kops G.J. Molecular causes for BUBR1 dysfunction in the human cancer predisposition syndrome mosaic variegated aneuploidy. Cancer Res. 2010, 70:4891-4900.
167. Suijkerbuijk S.J., van Dam T.J., Karagoz G.E., von Castelmur E., Hubner N.C., et al. The vertebrate mitotic checkpoint protein BUBR1 is an unusual pseudokinase. Dev. Cell 2012, 22:1321-1329.
168. Suijkerbuijk S.J., Vleugel M., Teixeira A., Kops G.J. Integration of kinase and phosphatase activities by BUBR1 ensures formation of stable kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Dev. Cell 2012, 23:745-755.
169. Takeo S., Hawley R.S. Rumors of its disassembly have been greatly exaggerated: the secret life of the synaptonemal complex at the centromeres. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8:e1002807.
170. Takeo S., Lake C.M., Morais-de-Sa E., Sunkel C.E., Hawley R.S. Synaptonemal complex-dependent centromeric clustering and the initiation of synapsis in Drosophila oocytes. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21:1845-1851.
171. Tanaka T.U., Desai A. Kinetochore-microtubule interactions: the means to the end. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2008, 20:53-63.
172. Tanaka K., Mohri Y., Ohi M., Yokoe T., Koike Y., et al. Mitotic checkpoint genes, hsMAD2 and BubR1, in oesophageal squamous cancer cells and their association with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin-based radiochemotherapy. Clin. Oncol. 2008, 20:639-646.
173. Tang Z., Bharadwaj R., Li B., Yu H. Mad2-independent inhibition of APCCdc20 by the mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1. Dev. Cell 2001, 1:227-237.
174. Taylor S.S., Ha E., McKeon F. The human homologue of Bub3 is required for kinetochore localization of Bub1 and a Mad3/Bub1-related protein kinase. J. Cell Biol. 1998, 142:1-11.
175. Taylor S.S., Hussein D., Wang Y., Elderkin S., Morrow C.J. Kinetochore localisation and phosphorylation of the mitotic checkpoint components Bub1 and BubR1 are differentially regulated by spindle events in human cells. J. Cell Sci. 2001, 114:4385-4395.
176. Tian W., Li B., Warrington R., Tomchick D.R., Yu H., Luo X. Structural analysis of human Cdc20 supports multisite degron recognition by APC/C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:18419-18424.
177. Tomasini R., Tsuchihara K., Tsuda C., Lau S.K., Wilhelm M., et al. TAp73 regulates the spindle assembly checkpoint by modulating BubR1 activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:797-802.
178. Touati S.A., Cladiere D., Lister L.M., Leontiou I., Chambon J.P., et al. Cyclin A2 is required for sister chromatid segregation, but not separase control, in mouse oocyte meiosis. Cell Reprod. 2012, 2:1077-1087.
179. Tsurumi C., Hoffmann S., Geley S., Graeser R., Polanski Z. The spindle assembly checkpoint is not essential for CSF arrest of mouse oocytes. J. Cell Biol. 2004, 167:1037-1050.
180. Varma D., Salmon E.D. The KMN protein network-chief conductors of the kinetochore orchestra. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125:5927-5936.
181. Wang X., Babu J.R., Harden J.M., Jablonski S.A., Gazi M.H., et al. The mitotic checkpoint protein hBUB3 and the mRNA export factor hRAE1 interact with GLE2p-binding sequence (GLEBS)-containing proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276:26559-26567.
182. Wang Q., Liu T., Fang Y., Xie S., Huang X., et al. BUBR1 deficiency results in abnormal megakaryopoiesis. Blood 2004, 103:1278-1285.
183. Wassmann K., Niault T., Maro B. Metaphase I arrest upon activation of the Mad2-dependent spindle checkpoint in mouse oocytes. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13:1596-1608.
184. Weaver B.A., Bonday Z.Q., Putkey F.R., Kops G.J., Silk A.D., Cleveland D.W. Centromere-associated protein-E is essential for the mammalian mitotic checkpoint to prevent aneuploidy due to single chromosome loss. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 162:551-563.
185. Wei R.R., Al-Bassam J., Harrison S.C. The Ndc80/HEC1 complex is a contact point for kinetochore-microtubule attachment. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007, 14:54-59.
186. Wei L., Liang X.W., Zhang Q.H., Li M., Yuan J., et al. BubR1 is a spindle assembly checkpoint protein regulating meiotic cell cycle progression of mouse oocyte. Cell Cycle 2010, 9:1112-1121.
187. Welburn J.P., Vleugel M., Liu D., Yates J.R., Lampson M.A., et al. Aurora B phosphorylates spatially distinct targets to differentially regulate the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Mol. Cell 2010, 38:383-392.
188. Wojcik E., Basto R., Serr M., Scaerou F., Karess R., Hays T. Kinetochore dynein: its dynamics and role in the transport of the rough deal checkpoint protein. Nat. Cell Biol. 2001, 3:1001-1007.
189. Wong O.K., Fang G. Cdk1 phosphorylation of BubR1 controls spindle checkpoint arrest and Plk1-mediated formation of the 3F3/2 epitope. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 179:611-617.
190. Yamagishi Y., Yang C.H., Tanno Y., Watanabe Y. MPS1/Mph1 phosphorylates the kinetochore protein KNL1/Spc7 to recruit SAC components. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012, 14:746-752.
191. Yamamoto Y., Matsuyama H., Chochi Y., Okuda M., Kawauchi S., et al. Overexpression of BUBR1 is associated with chromosomal instability in bladder cancer. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 2007, 174:42-47.
192. Yang M., Li B., Liu C.-J., Tomchick D.R., Machius M., et al. Insights into Mad2 regulation in the spindle checkpoint revealed by the crystal structure of the symmetric Mad2 dimer. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6:e50.
193. Yang F., Hu L., Chen C., Yu J., O'Connell C.B., et al. BubR1 is modified by sumoylation during mitotic progression. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287:4875-4882.
194. Yang F., Huang Y., Dai W. Sumoylated BubR1 plays an important role in chromosome segregation and mitotic timing. Cell Cycle 2012, 11:797-806.
195. Yin S., Wang Q., Liu J.H., Ai J.S., Liang C.G., et al. Bub1 prevents chromosome misalignment and precocious anaphase during mouse oocyte meiosis. Cell Cycle 2006, 5:2130-2137.
196. Yuan B., Xu Y., Woo J.-H., Wang Y., Bae Y.K., et al. Increased expression of mitotic checkpoint genes in breast cancer cells with chromosomal instability. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006, 12:405-410.
197. Zhang J., Ahmad S., Mao Y. BubR1 and APC/EB1 cooperate to maintain metaphase chromosome alignment. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 178:773-784.
198. Zhou J., Yao J., Joshi H.C. Attachment and tension in the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Sci. 2002, 115:3547-3555.