Protein interaction domain mapping of human kinetochore protein blinkin reveals a consensus motif for binding of spindle assembly checkpoint proteins Bub1 and BubR1

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 998-1011

  Kiyomitsu, Tomomi ^a,b   Murakami, Hiroaki ^a   Yanagida, Mitsuhiro ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUB1 RELATED PROTEIN; MUTANT PROTEIN; NDC80 COMPLEX;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CARCINOGENESIS; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MUTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN MOTIF; RNA INTERFERENCE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BINDING SITES; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; HELA CELLS; HUMANS; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; KINETOCHORES; MICROTUBULE-ASSOCIATED PROTEINS; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES;

EID: 79952269227     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: 10985549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00815-10     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bolanos-Garcia, V. M., et al. 2009. The crystal structure of the N-terminal region of BUB1 provides insight into the mechanism of BUB1 recruitment to kinetochores. Structure 17:105-116.
2. Cheeseman, I. M., J. S. Chappie, E. M. Wilson-Kubalek, and A. Desai. 2006. The conserved KMN network constitutes the core microtubule-binding site of the kinetochore. Cell 127:983-997. (Pubitemid 44792248)
3. Cheeseman, I. M., and A. Desai. 2008. Molecular architecture of the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9:33-46.
4. Cheeseman, I. M., et al. 2004. A conserved protein network controls assembly of the outer kinetochore and its ability to sustain tension. Genes Dev. 18:2255-2268. (Pubitemid 39209574)
5. Ciferri, C., et al. 2008. Implications for kinetochore-microtubule attachment from the structure of an engineered Ndc80 complex. Cell 133:427-439. (Pubitemid 351622013)
6. Cleveland, D. W., Y. Mao, and K. F. Sullivan. 2003. Centromeres and kinetochores: from epigenetics to mitotic checkpoint signaling. Cell 112:407-421.
7. D'Arcy, S., O. R. Davies, T. L. Blundell, and V. M. Bolanos-Garcia. 2010. Defining the molecular basis of BubR1 kinetochore interactions and APC/C-CDC20 inhibition. J. Biol. Chem. 285:14764-14776.
8. Desai, A., et al. 2003. KNL-1 directs assembly of the microtubule-binding interface of the kinetochore in C. elegans. Genes Dev. 17:2421-2435. (Pubitemid 37214790)
9. Ditchfield, C., et al. 2003. Aurora B couples chromosome alignment with anaphase by targeting BubR1, Mad2, and Cenp-E to kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 161:267-280. (Pubitemid 36529846)
10. Goshima, G., T. Kiyomitsu, K. Yoda, and M. Yanagida. 2003. Human centromere chromatin protein hMis12, essential for equal segregation, is independent of CENP-A loading pathway. J. Cell Biol. 160:25-39. (Pubitemid 36091714)
11. Goshima, G., S. Saitoh, and M. Yanagida. 1999. Proper metaphase spindle length is determined by centromere proteins Mis12 and Mis6 required for faithful chromosome segregation. Genes Dev. 13:1664-1677. (Pubitemid 29325872)
12. Haraguchi, T., T. Kaneda, and Y. Hiraoka. 1997. Dynamics of chromosomes and microtubules visualized by multiple-wavelength fluorescence imaging in living mammalian cells: effects of mitotic inhibitors on cell cycle progression. Genes Cells 2:369-380. (Pubitemid 127688587)
13. Hauf, S., et al. 2003. The small molecule Hesperadin reveals a role for Aurora B in correcting kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in maintaining the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 161:281-294. (Pubitemid 36529847)
14. Hayashi, T., et al. 2004. Mis16 and Mis18 are required for CENP-A loading and histone deacetylation at centromeres. Cell 118:715-729. (Pubitemid 39221731)
15. Kerres, A., V. Jakopec, and U. Fleig. 2007. The conserved Spc7 protein is required for spindle integrity and links kinetochore complexes in fission yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 18:2441-2454.
16. Kiyomitsu, T., O. Iwasaki, C. Obuse, and M. Yanagida. 2010. Inner centromere formation requires hMis14, a trident kinetochore protein that specifically recruits HP1 to human chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 188:791-807.
17. Kiyomitsu, T., C. Obuse, and M. Yanagida. 2007. Human Blinkin/AF15q14 is required for chromosome alignment and the mitotic checkpoint through direct interaction with Bub1 and BubR1. Dev. Cell 13:663-676. (Pubitemid 350019284)
18. Kline, S. L., I. M. Cheeseman, T. Hori, T. Fukagawa, and A. Desai. 2006. The human Mis12 complex is required for kinetochore assembly and proper chromosome segregation. J. Cell Biol. 173:9-17.
19. Kuefer, M. U., et al. 2003. Characterization of the MLL partner gene AF15q14 involved in t(11;15)(q23;q14). Oncogene 22:1418-1424.
20. Liu, D., et al. 2010. Regulated targeting of protein phosphatase 1 to the outer kinetochore by KNL1 opposes Aurora B kinase. J. Cell Biol. 188:809-820.
21. Liu, X., I. McLeod, S. Anderson, J. R. Yates, 3rd, and X. He. 2005. Molecular analysis of kinetochore architecture in fission yeast. EMBO J. 24:2919-2930. (Pubitemid 43079895)
22. Meraldi, P., A. D. McAinsh, E. Rheinbay, and P. K. Sorger. 2006. Phylogenetic and structural analysis of centromeric DNA and kinetochore proteins. Genome Biol. 7:R23.
23. Musacchio, A., and E. D. Salmon. 2007. The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8:379-393.
24. Nekrasov, V. S., M. A. Smith, S. Peak-Chew, and J. V. Kilmartin. 2003. Interactions between centromere complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 14:4931-4946.
25. Obuse, C., et al. 2004. A conserved Mis12 centromere complex is linked to heterochromatic HP1 and outer kinetochore protein Zwint-1. Nat. Cell Biol. 6:1135-1141.
26. Petrovic, A. 2010. The MIS12 complex is a protein interaction hub for outer kinetochore assembly. J. Cell Biol. 190:835-852.
27. Przewloka, M. R., and D. M. Glover. 2009. The kinetochore and the centromere: a working long distance relationship. Annu. Rev. Genet. 43:439-465.
28. Przewloka, M. R., et al. 2007. Molecular analysis of core kinetochore composition and assembly in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One 2:e478.
29. Schittenhelm, R. B., R. Chaleckis, and C. F. Lehner. 2009. Intrakinetochore localization and essential functional domains of Drosophila Spc105. EMBO J. 28:2374-2386.
30. Takahashi, K., H. Yamada, and M. Yanagida. 1994. Fission yeast minichromosome loss mutants mis cause lethal aneuploidy and replication abnormality. Mol. Biol. Cell 5:1145-1158.
31. Takimoto, M., et al. 2002. Frequent expression of new cancer/testis gene D40/AF15q14 in lung cancers of smokers. Br. J. Cancer 86:1757-1762. (Pubitemid 34716236)
32. Taylor, S. S., D. Hussein, Y. Wang, S. Elderkin, and C. J. Morrow. 2001. Kinetochore localisation and phosphorylation of the mitotic checkpoint components Bub1 and BubR1 are differentially regulated by spindle events in human cells. J. Cell Sci. 114:4385-4395. (Pubitemid 34082859)
33. Welburn, J. P., et al. 2010. Aurora B phosphorylates spatially distinct targets to differentially regulate the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Mol. Cell 38:383-392.
34. Yanagida, M. 2005. Basic mechanism of eukaryotic chromosome segregation. Philos Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360:609-621.
35. Yokoyama, A., M. Lin, A. Naresh, I. Kitabayashi, and M. L. Cleary. 2010. A higher-order complex containing AF4 and ENL family proteins with P-TEFb facilitates oncogenic and physiologic MLL-dependent transcription. Cancer Cell 17:198-212.