CENP-E-dependent bubr1 autophosphorylation enhances chromosome alignment and the mitotic checkpoint

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 198, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 205-217

  Guo, Yige ^a   Kim, Christine ^a   Ahmad, Sana ^a   Zhang, Jiayin ^a   Mao, Yinghui ^a  

^a Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AURORA B KINASE; BUB1 RELATED PROTEIN; CENTROMERE PROTEIN E; NDC80 COMPLEX;

ARTICLE; AUTOPHOSPHORYLATION; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME LOSS; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; METAPHASE CHROMOSOME; MICROTUBULE; PHOSPHORYLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DEPLETION;

CELL LINE; CHROMOSOMAL PROTEINS, NON-HISTONE; CHROMOSOMES; HUMANS; KINETOCHORES; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; METAPHASE; MUTATION; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES;

EID: 84864980660     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 15408140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201202152     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Abrieu, A., J.A. Kahana, K.W. Wood, and D.W. Cleveland. 2000. CENP-E as an essential component of the mitotic checkpoint in vitro. Cell. 102:817-826. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00070-2
2. Bolanos-Garcia, V.M., and T.L. Blundell. 2011. BUB1 and BUBR1: multifaceted kinases of the cell cycle. Trends Biochem. Sci. 36:141-150. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2010.08.004
3. Chan, G.K., B.T. Schaar, and T.J. Yen. 1998. Characterization of the kinetochore binding domain of CENP-E reveals interactions with the kinetochore proteins CENP-F and hBUBR1. J. Cell Biol. 143:49-63. http://dx.doi .org/10.1083/jcb.143.1.49
4. Chan, G.K., S.A. Jablonski, V. Sudakin, J.C. Hittle, and T.J. Yen. 1999. Human BUBR1 is a mitotic checkpoint kinase that monitors CENP-E functions at kinetochores and binds the cyclosome/APC. J. Cell Biol. 146:941-954. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.146.5.941
5. Cheeseman, I.M., J.S. Chappie, E.M. Wilson-Kubalek, and A. Desai. 2006. The conserved KMN network constitutes the core microtubule-binding site of the kinetochore. Cell. 127:983-997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j .cell.2006.09.039
6. Chen, R.-H. 2002. BubR1 is essential for kinetochore localization of other spindle checkpoint proteins and its phosphorylation requires Mad1. J. Cell Biol. 158:487-496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200204048
7. Chen, R.-H., A. Shevchenko, M. Mann, and A.W. Murray. 1998. Spindle checkpoint protein Xmad1 recruits Xmad2 to unattached kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 143:283-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.143.2.283
8. Cheng, L., J. Zhang, S. Ahmad, L. Rozier, H. Yu, H. Deng, and Y. Mao. 2011. Aurora B regulates formin mDia3 in achieving metaphase chromosome alignment. Dev. Cell. 20:342-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel .2011.01.008
9. Cleveland, D.W., Y. Mao, and K.F. Sullivan. 2003. Centromeres and kinetochores: from epigenetics to mitotic checkpoint signaling. Cell. 112:407-421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00115-6
10. De Antoni, A., C.G. Pearson, D. Cimini, J.C. Canman, V. Sala, L. Nezi, M. Mapelli, L. Sironi, M. Faretta, E.D. Salmon, and A. Musacchio. 2005.The Mad1/Mad2 complex as a template for Mad2 activation in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 15:214-225. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.038
11. DeLuca, J.G., W.E. Gall, C. Ciferri, D. Cimini, A. Musacchio, and E.D. Salmon. 2006. Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and attachment stability are regulated by Hec1. Cell. 127:969-982. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell .2006.09.047
12. Ditchfield, C., V.L. Johnson, A. Tighe, R. Ellston, C. Haworth, T. Johnson, A. Mortlock, N. Keen, and S.S. Taylor. 2003. Aurora B couples chromosome alignment with anaphase by targeting BubR1, Mad2, and Cenp-E to kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 161:267-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/ jcb.200208091
13. Elowe, S., S. Hümmer, A. Uldschmid, X. Li, and E.A. Nigg. 2007. Tension-sensitive Plk1 phosphorylation on BubR1 regulates the stability of kinetochore microtubule interactions. Genes Dev. 21:2205-2219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.436007
14. Elowe, S., K. Dulla, A. Uldschmid, X. Li, Z. Dou, and E.A. Nigg. 2010. Uncoupling of the spindle-checkpoint and chromosome-congression functions of BubR1. J. Cell Sci. 123:84-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.056507
15. Fang, G. 2002. Checkpoint protein BubR1 acts synergistically with Mad2 to inhibit anaphase-promoting complex. Mol. Biol. Cell. 13:755-766. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.01-09-0437
16. Hartwell, L.H., and M.B. Kastan. 1994. Cell cycle control and cancer. Science. 266:1821-1828. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.7997877
17. Hegemann, B., J.R. Hutchins, O. Hudecz, M. Novatchkova, J. Rameseder, M.M. Sykora, S. Liu, M. Mazanek, P. Lénárt, J.K. Hériché, et al. 2011. Systematic phosphorylation analysis of human mitotic protein complexes. Sci. Signal. 4:rs12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2001993
18. Huang, H., J. Hittle, F. Zappacosta, R.S. Annan, A. Hershko, and T.J. Yen. 2008. Phosphorylation sites in BubR1 that regulate kinetochore attachment, tension, and mitotic exit. J. Cell Biol. 183:667-680. http://dx.doi .org/10.1083/jcb.200805163
19. Joglekar, A.P., K.S. Bloom, and E.D. Salmon. 2010. Mechanisms of force generation by end-on kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 22:57-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2009.12.010
20. Kang, J., M. Yang, B. Li, W. Qi, C. Zhang, K.M. Shokat, D.R. Tomchick, M. Machius, and H. Yu. 2008. Structure and substrate recruitment of the human spindle checkpoint kinase Bub1. Mol. Cell. 32:394-405. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.017
21. Kapoor, T.M., M.A. Lampson, P. Hergert, L. Cameron, D. Cimini, E.D. Salmon, B.F. McEwen, and A. Khodjakov. 2006. Chromosomes can congress to the metaphase plate before biorientation. Science. 311:388-391. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1122142
22. Kim, Y., J.E. Heuser, C.M. Waterman, and D.W. Cleveland. 2008. CENP-E combines a slow, processive motor and a flexible coiled coil to produce an essential motile kinetochore tether. J. Cell Biol. 181:411-419. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200802189
23. Kim, Y., A.J. Holland, W. Lan, and D.W. Cleveland. 2010. Aurora kinases and protein phosphatase 1 mediate chromosome congression through regulation of CENP-E. Cell. 142:444-455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell .2010.06.039
24. Kops, G.J., D.R. Foltz, and D.W. Cleveland. 2004. Lethality to human cancer cells through massive chromosome loss by inhibition of the mitotic checkpoint. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101:8699-8704. http://dx.doi .org/10.1073/pnas.0401142101
25. Kulukian, A., J.S. Han, and D.W. Cleveland. 2009. Unattached kinetochores catalyze production of an anaphase inhibitor that requires a Mad2 template to prime Cdc20 for BubR1 binding. Dev. Cell. 16:105-117. http://dx.doi .org/10.1016/j.devcel.2008.11.005
26. Lampson, M.A., and I.M. Cheeseman. 2011. Sensing centromere tension: Aurora B and the regulation of kinetochore function. Trends Cell Biol. 21:133-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2010.10.007
27. Lampson, M.A., and T.M. Kapoor. 2005. The human mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1 regulates chromosome-spindle attachments. Nat. Cell Biol. 7:93-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1208
28. Liu, D., M. Vleugel, C.B. Backer, T. Hori, T. Fukagawa, I.M. Cheeseman, and M.A. Lampson. 2010. Regulated targeting of protein phosphatase 1 to the outer kinetochore by KNL1 opposes Aurora B kinase. J. Cell Biol. 188:809-820. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201001006
29. Luo, X., Z. Tang, G. Xia, K. Wassmann, T. Matsumoto, J. Rizo, and H. Yu. 2004. The Mad2 spindle checkpoint protein has two distinct natively folded states. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11:338-345. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nsmb748
30. Malureanu, L.A., K.B. Jeganathan, M. Hamada, L. Wasilewski, J. Davenport, and J.M. van Deursen. 2009. BubR1 N terminus acts as a soluble inhibitor of cyclin B degradation by APC/C(Cdc20) in interphase. Dev. Cell. 16:118-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2008.11.004
31. Mao, Y. 2011. FORMIN a link between kinetochores and microtubule ends. Trends Cell Biol. 21:625-629. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2011.08 .005
32. Mao, Y., A. Abrieu, and D.W. Cleveland. 2003. Activating and silencing the mitotic checkpoint through CENP-E-dependent activation/inactivation of BubR1. Cell. 114:87-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03) 00475-6
33. Mao, Y., A. Desai, and D.W. Cleveland. 2005. Microtubule capture by CENP-E silences BubR1-dependent mitotic checkpoint signaling. J. Cell Biol. 170:873-880. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200505040
34. Martin-Lluesma, S., V.M. Stucke, and E.A. Nigg. 2002. Role of Hec1 in spindle checkpoint signaling and kinetochore recruitment of Mad1/Mad2. Science. 297:2267-2270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1075596
35. Matsumura, S., F. Toyoshima, and E. Nishida. 2007. Polo-like kinase 1 facilitates chromosome alignment during prometaphase through BubR1. J. Biol. Chem. 282:15217-15227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M611053200
36. McEwen, B.F., G.K. Chan, B. Zubrowski, M.S. Savoian, M.T. Sauer, and T.J. Yen. 2001. CENP-E is essential for reliable bioriented spindle attachment, but chromosome alignment can be achieved via redundant mechanisms in mammalian cells. Mol. Biol. Cell. 12:2776-2789.
37. Murray, A.W. 1991. Cell cycle extracts. Methods Cell Biol. 36:581-605. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0091-679X(08)60298-8
38. Musacchio, A. 2011. Spindle assembly checkpoint: the third decade. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 366:3595-3604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/ rstb.2011.0072
39. Putkey, F.R., T. Cramer, M.K. Morphew, A.D. Silk, R.S. Johnson, J.R. McIntosh, and D.W. Cleveland. 2002. Unstable kinetochore-microtubule capture and chromosomal instability following deletion of CENPE. Dev. Cell. 3:351-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1534-5807(02) 00255-1
40. Rahmani, Z., M.E. Gagou, C. Lefebvre, D. Emre, X and R.E. Karess. 2009. Separating the spindle, checkpoint, and timer functions of BubR1. J. Cell Biol. 187:597-605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200905026
41. Rosenberg, J.S., F.R. Cross, and H. Funabiki. 2011. KNL1/Spc105 recruits PP1 to silence the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 21:942-947. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.011
42. Santaguida, S., and A. Musacchio. 2009. The life and miracles of kinetochores. EMBO J. 28:2511-2531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.173
43. Shah, J.V., E. Botvinick, Z. Bonday, F. Furnari, M. Berns, and D.W. Cleveland. 2004. Dynamics of centromere and kinetochore proteins; implications for checkpoint signaling and silencing. Curr. Biol. 14:942-952.
44. Sudakin, V., G.K. Chan, and T.J. Yen. 2001. Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/ C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2. J. Cell Biol. 154:925-936. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200102093
45. Suijkerbuijk, S.J., M.H. van Osch, F.L. Bos, S. Hanks, N. Rahman, and G.J. Kops. 2010. Molecular causes for BUBR1 dysfunction in the human cancer predisposition syndrome mosaic variegated aneuploidy. Cancer Res. 70:4891-4900. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4319
46. Vink, M., M. Simonetta, P. Transidico, K. Ferrari, M. Mapelli, A. De Antoni, L. Massimiliano, A. Ciliberto, M. Faretta, E.D. Salmon, and A. Musacchio. 2006. In vitro FRAP identifies the minimal requirements for Mad2 kinetochore dynamics. Curr. Biol. 16:755-766. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.057
47. Weaver, B.A., Z.Q. Bonday, F.R. Putkey, G.J. Kops, A.D. Silk, and D.W. Cleveland. 2003. Centromere-associated protein-E is essential for the mammalian mitotic checkpoint to prevent aneuploidy due to single chromosome loss. J. Cell Biol. 162:551-563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200303167
48. Weaver, B.A., A.D. Silk, C. Montagna, P. Verdier-Pinard, and D.W. Cleveland. 2007. Aneuploidy acts both oncogenically and as a tumor suppressor. Cancer Cell. 11:25-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2006.12.003
49. Welburn, J.P., E.L. Grishchuk, C.B. Backer, E.M. Wilson-Kubalek, J.R. Yates III, and I.M. Cheeseman. 2009. The human kinetochore Ska1 complex facilitates microtubule depolymerization-coupled motility. Dev. Cell. 16:374-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2009.01.011
50. Wong, O.K., and G. Fang. 2007. Cdk1 phosphorylation of BubR1 controls spindle checkpoint arrest and Plk1-mediated formation of the 3F3/2 epitope. J. Cell Biol. 179:611-617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200708044
51. Yao, X., A. Abrieu, Y. Zheng, K.F. Sullivan, and D.W. Cleveland. 2000. CENP-E forms a link between attachment of spindle microtubules to kinetochores and the mitotic checkpoint. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:484-491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35019518
52. Yardimci, H., M. van Duffelen, Y. Mao, S.S. Rosenfeld, and P.R. Selvin. 2008. The mitotic kinesin CENP-E is a processive transport motor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 105:6016-6021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas .0711314105
53. Yen, T.J., G. Li, B.T. Schaar, I. Szilak, and D.W. Cleveland. 1992. CENP-E is a putative kinetochore motor that accumulates just before mitosis. Nature. 359:536-539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/359536a0
54. Zhang, J., S. Ahmad, and Y. Mao. 2007. BubR1 and APC/EB1 cooperate to maintain metaphase chromosome alignment. J. Cell Biol. 178:773-784. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200702138