Structure of the mitotic checkpoint complex

Nature

Volumn 484, Issue 7393, 2012, Pages 208-213

  Chao, William C H ^a   Kulkarni, Kiran ^a   Zhang, Ziguo ^a   Kong, Eric H ^a   Barford, David ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF CANCER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APC; BUB1 RELATED PROTEIN; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN 20; CELL PROTEIN; PROTEIN MAD2; PROTEIN P31; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

CATALYSIS; CHEMICAL BINDING; CHROMOSOME; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; CYTOLOGY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENOME; INHIBITION; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX; PROTEIN; YEAST;

ANAPHASE; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; CHROMATID; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; GENOME; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; MITOSIS; MITOSIS SPINDLE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN INTERACTION; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

AMINO ACID MOTIFS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; HUMANS; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, QUATERNARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE PROTEINS; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY; UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASE COMPLEXES;

SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE;

EID: 84862776998     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature10896     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Musacchio, A. & Salmon, E. D. The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 379-393 (2007).
2. Kim, S. & Yu, H. Mutual regulation between the spindle checkpoint and APC/C. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol., (2011).
3. Hoyt, M. A., Totis, L & Roberts, B. J. S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell 66, 507-517 (1991).
4. Li, R. & Murray, A. W. Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 66, 519-531 (1991).
5. Li, Y., Gorbea, C, Mahaffey, D., Rechsteiner, M. & Benezra, R. MAD2 associates with the cyclosome/anaphase-promoting complex and inhibits its activity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 12431-12436 (1997).
6. Fang, G., Yu, H. & Kirschner, M. W. The checkpoint protein MAD2 and the mitotic regulator CDC20 form a ternary complex with the anaphase-promoting complex to control anaphase initiation. Genes Dev. 12, 1871-1883 (1998).
7. Hwang, L H. et al. Buddingyeast Cdc20: a target of the spindle checkpoint. Science 279, 1041-1044 (1998).
8. Kim, S. H, Lin, D. P., Matsumoto, S., Kitazono, A. & Matsumoto, T. Fission yeast Slpl: an effector of the Mad2-dependent spindle checkpoint. Science 279, 1045-1047 (1998).
9. Kallio, M., Weinstein, J., Daum, J. R., Burke, D. J. & Gorbsky, G. J. Mammalian p55CDC mediates association of the spindle checkpoint protein Mad2 with the cyclosome/anaphase-promotingcomplex, and is involved in regulatinganaphase onset and late mitotic events. J. Cell Biol. 141, 1393-1406(1998).
10. Hardwick, K. G. Johnston, R. C, Smith, D. L & Murray, A. W. MAD3 encodes a novel component of the spindle checkpoint which interacts with Bub3p, Cdc20p, and Mad2p. J. Cell Biol. 148, 871-882 (2000).
11. Tang, Z., Bharadwaj, R., Li, B. & Yu, H. Mad2-lndependent inhibition of APCCdc20 by the mitotic checkpoint protein BubRl. Dev. Cell 1, 227-237 (2001).
12. Fang, G. Checkpoint protein BubRl acts synergistically with Mad2 to inhibit anaphase-promoting complex. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 755-766 (2002).
13. Sudakin, V., Chan, G. K. & Yen, T. J. Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2. J. Cell Biol. 154, 925-936 (2001).
14. Herzog, F. et al. Structure of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome nteractingwith a mitotic checkpoint complex. Science 323, 1477-1481 (2009).
15. Cdc2° in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Genes Dev. 21, 655-667 (2007).
16. Davenport, J., Harris, L D. & Goorha, R. Spindle checkpoint function requires Mad2-dependent Cdc20 binding to the Mad3 homology domain of BubRl. Exp. Cell Res. 312, 1831-1842 (2006).
17. Kulukian, A., Han, J. S. & Cleveland, D. W. Unattached kinetochores catalyze production of an anaphase inhibitor that requires a Mad2 template to prime Cdc20 for BubRl binding. Dev. Cell 16, 105-117(2009).
18. Nilsson, J., Yekezare, M., Minshull, J. & Pines, J. The APC/C maintains the spindle assembly checkpoint by targeting Cdc20 for destruction. Nature Cell Biol. 10, 1411-1420(2008).
19. Luo, X. & Yu, H. Protein metamorphosis: the two-state behavior of Mad2. Structure 16, 1616-1625 (2008).
20. Luo, X. et al. Structure of the Mad2 spindle assembly checkpoint protein and its nteraction with Cdc20. Nature Struct. Biol. 7, 224-229 (2000).
21. Luo, X., Tang, Z., Rizo, J. & Yu, H. The Mad2 spindle checkpoint protein undergoes similar major conformational changes upon binding to either Madl or Cdc20. Mol. Cell 9, 59-71 (2002).
22. Sironi, L et al. Crystal structure of the tetrameric Madl-Mad2 core complex: mplicationsof a 'safety belt' binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint. EMBOJ. 21, 2496-2506 (2002).
23. De Antoni, A. et al. The Madl/Mad2 complex as a template for Mad2 activation in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 15, 214-225 (2005).
24. Barford, D. Structure, function and mechanism of the anaphase promoting complex (APC/C). Q. Rev. Biophys. 44, 153-190 (2011).
25. Glotzer, M., Murray, A. W. & Kirschner, M. W. Cyclin is degraded by the ubiquitin pathway. Nature 349, 132-138 (1991).
26. Pfleger, C. M. & Kirschner, M. W. The KEN box: an APC recognition signal distinct from the D box targeted by Cdh 1. Genes Dev. 14, 655-665 (2000).
27. King, E. M., van derSar, S. J. & Hardwick, K. G. Mad3 KEN boxes mediate both Cdc20 and Mad3 turnover, and are critical for the spindle checkpoint. PLoS ONE 2, e342 (2007).
28. Sczaniecka, M. et al. The spindle checkpoint functions of Mad3 and Mad2 depend on a Mad3 KEN box-mediated interaction with Cdc20-anaphase-promoting complex (APC/C). J. Biol. Chem. 283, 23039-23047 (2008).
29. Pan, J. & Chen, R. H. Spindle checkpoint regulates Cdc20p stability in Saccharomycesce revisiae. Genes Dev. 18, 1439-1451 (2004).
30. Habu, T, Kim, S. H., Weinstein, J. & Matsumoto, T. Identification of a MAD2-binding protein, CMT2, and its role in mitosis. EMBOJ. 21, 6419-6428 (2002).
31. comet blocks Mad2 activation through structural mimicry. Cell 131, 744-755 (2007).
32. Reddy, S. K, Rape, M., Margansky, W. A. & Kirschner, M. W. Ubiquitination by the anaphase-promoting complex drives spindle checkpoint inactivation. Nature 446, 921-925 (2007).
33. D'Arcy, S., Davies, O. R., Blundell, T. L & Bolanos-Garcia, V. M. Defining the molecular basis of BubRl kinetochore interactions and APC/C-CDC20 inhibition. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 14764-14776 (2010).
34. Malureanu, LA. et al. BubRl N terminus acts as a soluble inhibitor of cyclin B degradation by APC/C(Cdc20) in interphase. Dev. Cell 16, 118-131 (2009).
35. Schwab, M., Neutzner, M., Mocker, D. & Seufert, W. Yeast Hctl recognizes the mitotic cyclin Clb2 and other substrates of the ubiquitin ligase APC. EMBOJ. 20, 5165-5175 (2001).
36. Vodermaier, H. C, Gieffers, C, Maurer-Stroh, S., Eisenhaber, F. & Peters, J. M. TPR subunits of the anaphase-promoting complex mediate binding to the activator protein CDH1. Curr. Biol. 13, 1459-1468 (2003).
37. Mapelli, M., Massimiliano, L, Santaguida, S. & Musacchio, A. The Mad2 conformational dimer: structure and implications for the spindle assembly checkpoint. Cell 131, 730-743 (2007).
38. Tipton, A. R. et al. BUBR1 andclosed MAD2(C-MAD2) interact directly to assemble afunctional mitotic checkpoint complex. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 21173-21179 (2011).
39. Kraft, C, Vodermaier, H. C, Maurer-Stroh, S., Eisenhaber, F. & Peters, J. M. The WD40 propeller domain of Cdh 1 functions as a destruction box receptor for APC/C substrates. Mol. Cell 18, 543-553 (2005).
40. Carroll, C. W., Enquist-Newman, M. & Morgan, D. O. The APC subunit Docl promotes recognition of the substrate destruction box. Curr. Biol. 15, 11-18 (2005).
41. da Fonseca, P. C. et al. Structures of APC/C(Cdhl) with substrates identify Cdh 1 and ApclOas the D-box co-receptor. Nature 470, 274-278(2011).
42. King, R. W., Glotzer, M. & Kirschner, M. W. Mutagenic analysis of the destruction signal of mitotic cyclins and structural characterization of ubiquitinated ntermediates. Mol. Biol. Cell 7, 1343-1357 (1996).
43. Choi, E., Dial, J. M., Jeong, D. E. & Hall, M. C. Unique D boxand KEN box sequences imit ubiquitination of Acml and promote pseudosubstrate inhibition of the anaphase-promoting complex. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 23701-23710(2008).
44. Ostapenko, D., Burton, J. L, Wang, R. & Solomon, M. J. Pseudosubstrate inhibition of the anaphase-promoting complex by Acml: regulation by proteolysis and Cdc28 phosphorylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 4653-4664 (2008).
45. Kimata, Y. et al. A mutual inhibition between APC/C and its substrate Mesl required for meiotic progression in fission yeast. Dev. Cell 14, 446-454 (2008).
46. Schreiber, A. et al. Structural basis for the subunit assembly of the anaphase-promoting complex. Nature 470, 227-232 (2011).
47. Zhang, Y. & Lees, E. Identification of an overlapping binding domain on Cdc20for Mad2 and anaphase-promoting complex: model for spindle checkpoint regulation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 5190-5199 (2001).
48. Kimata, Y., Baxter, J. E., Fry, A. M. & Yamano, H. A role for the Fizzy/Cdc20 family of proteins in activation of the APC/C distinct from substrate recruitment. Mol. Cell 32, 576-583 (2008).
49. Xia, G. et al. Conformation-specific binding of p31(comet) antagonizes the function of Mad2 in the spindle checkpoint. EMBOJ. 23, 3133-3143 (2004).
50. Westhorpe, F. G., Tighe, A., Lara-Gonzalez, P. & Taylor, S. S. p31 comet-mediated extraction of Mad2 from the MCC promotes efficient mitotic exit. J. Cell Sci. 124, 3905-3916(2011).
51. Berger, I., Fitzgerald, D. J. & Richmond, T. J. Baculovirus expression system for heterologous multiprotein complexes. Nature Biotechnol. 22, 1583-1587 (2004).
52. Sironi, L. et al. Mad2 binding to Mad1 and Cdc20, rather than oligomerization, is required for the spindle checkpoint. EMBO J. 20, 6371-6382 (2001).
53. Evans, P. Scaling and assessment of data quality. Acta Crystallogr. D 62, 72-82 (2006).
54. Navaza, J. Implementation ofmolecular replacement in AMoRe. Acta Crystallogr. D 57, 1367-1372 (2001).
55. Yang, M. et al. Insights into mad2 regulation in the spindle checkpoint revealed by the crystal structure of the symmetric mad2 dimer. PLoS Biol. 6, e50 (2008).
56. Song, J. J. & Kingston, R. E. WDR5 interacts with mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) protein via the histone H3-binding pocket. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 35258-35264 (2008).
57. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2126-2132 (2004).
58. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: building new software for automated crystallographic structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D 58, 1948-1954 (2002).
59. Painter, J. & Merritt, E. A. Optimal description of a protein structure in terms of multiple groups undergoing TLS motion. Acta Crystallogr. D 62, 439-450 (2006).
60. Davis, I. W. et al. MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W375-W383 (2007).
61. Passmore, L. A., Barford, D. & Harper, J. W. Purification and assay of the budding yeast anaphase-promoting complex. Methods Enzymol. 398, 195-219 (2005).