Different spindle checkpoint proteins monitor microtubule attachment and tension at kinetochores in Drosophila cells

Journal of Cell Science

Volumn 117, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 1757-1771

  Logarinho, Elsa ^a,b   Bousbaa, Hassan ^a,b   Dias, José Miguel ^a   Lopes, Carla ^a   Amorim, Isabel ^a,c   Antunes Martins, Ana ^a   Sunkel, Claudio E ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF HEALTH SCIENCES IUCS   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

3F3 2; Checkpoint; Kinetochore; Microtubule; Mitosis; Phosphoepitopes; Tension

Indexed keywords

BUB1 RELATED PROTEIN; BUB3 PROTEIN; CYANOGINOSIN; DROSOPHILA PROTEIN; PACLITAXEL; PROTEIN ANTIBODY; PROTEIN MAD2;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME; CONTROLLED STUDY; DROSOPHILA; METAPHASE; MICROTUBULE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHOSPHORYLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; SPINDLE CELL; TENSION;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; CARRIER PROTEINS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CELL LINE; COLCHICINE; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DROSOPHILA PROTEINS; KINETOCHORES; MICROCYSTINS; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; MICROTUBULES; MITOSIS; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PACLITAXEL; PEPTIDES, CYCLIC; PHOSPHORYLATION; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN KINASES; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 2342429609     PISSN: 00219533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.01033     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Amon, A. (1999). The spindle checkpoint. Curr Opin. Genet. Dev. 9, 69-75.
2. Basu, J., Bousbaa, H., Logarinho, E., Li, Z., Williams, B. C., Lopes, C., Sunkel, C. E. and Goldberg, M. L. (1999). Mutations in the essential spindle checkpoint gene bub1 cause chromosome missegregation and fail to block apoptosis in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol. 146, 13-28.
3. Basu, J., Logarinho, E., Herrmann, S., Bousbaa, H., Li, Z., Chan, G. K. T., Yen, T. J. and Sunkel, C. E. (1998). Localization of the Drosophila checkpoint control protein Bub3 to the kinetochores requires Bub1 but not Zw10 or Rod. Chromosoma 107, 376-385.
4. Biggins, S. and Murray, A. W. (2001). The budding yeast protein kinase Ip11/Aurora allows the absence of tension to activate the spindle checkpoint. Genes Dev. 15, 3118-3129.
5. Blower, M. D., Sullivan, B. A. and Karpen, G. H. (2001). Conserved organization of centromeric chromatin in flies and humans. Dev. Cell 2, 319-330.
6. Bousbaa, H., Correia, L., Gorbsky, G. J. and Sunkel, C. E. (1997). Mitotic phosphoepitopes are expressed in Kc cells, neuroblasts and isolated chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Cell Sci. 110, 1979-1988.
7. Campbell, M. S. and Gorbsky, G. J. (1995). Microinjection of mitotic cells with the 3F3/2 anti-phosphoepitope antibody delays the onset of anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 129, 1195-1204.
8. Campbell, M. S., Gersch, M. S., Daum J. and Gorbsky, G. J. (1995). Bound and soluble kinases can regenerate the 3F3/2 mitotic checkpoint phosphorylation at kinetochores in lysed cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 6 Supplement 6a (abstr).
9. Chan, G. K. T., Jablonski, S. A., Sudakin, V., Hittle, J. C. and Yen, T. J. (1999). Human BUBR1 is a mitotic checkpoint kinase that monitors CENP-E functions at kinetochores and binds the cyclosome/APC. J. Cell Biol. 146, 941-954.
10. Chen, R. H. (2002). BubR1 is essential for kinetochore localization of other spindle checkpoint proteins and its phosphorylation requires Mad1. J. Cell Biol. 158, 487-496.
11. Cyert, M. S., Scherson, T. and Kirschner, M. W. (1988). Monoclonal antibodies specific for thiophosphorylated proteins recognize Xenopus MPF. Dev. Biol. 129, 209-216.
12. Daum, J. R. and Gorbsky, G. J. (1998). Casein kinase II catalyzes a mitotic phosphorylation on threonine 1342 of human DNA topoisomerase IIalpha, which is recognized by the 3173/2 phosphoepitope antibody. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 30622-30629.
13. Daum, J. R., Tugendreich, S., Topper, L. M., Jorgens, P-M., Hoog, C., Hieter, P. and Gorbsky, G. J. (2000). The 3F3/2 anti-phosphoepitope antibody binds the mitotically phosphorylated anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome. Curr. Biol. 10, R850-R852.
14. Ditchfield, C., Johnson, V. L., Tighe, A., Ellston, R., Haworth, C., Mortlock, A., Keen, N. and Taylor, S. S. (2003). Aurora B couples chromosome alignment with anaphase by targeting BubR1, Mad2, and Cenp-E to kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 161, 267-280.
15. Fang, G. (2002). Checkpoint protein BubR1 acts synergistically with Mad2 to inhibit anaphase-promoting complex. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 755-766.
16. Fang, G., Yu, H. and Kirschner, M. W. (1998). The checkpoint protein MAD2 and the mitotic regulator CDC20 form a ternary complex with the anaphase-promoting complex to control anaphase initiation. Genes Dev. 12, 1871-1883.
17. Gorbsky, G. and Ricketts, W. A. (1993). Differential expression of phosphoepitope at the kinetochores of moving chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 122, 1311-1321.
18. Gorbsky, G. J. (1995). Kinetochores, microtubules and the metaphase checkpoint. Trends Cell Biol. 5, 143-148.
19. Gorbsky, G. J., Chen, R. H. and Murray, A. W. (1998). Microinjection of antibody to Mad2 protein into Mammalian cells in mitosis induces premature anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 141, 1193-1205.
20. Hanks, S. K. and Hunter, T. (1995). The eukaryotic protein kinase superfamily, kinase (catalytic) domain structure and classification. FASEB J. 9, 576-596.
21. Hauf, S., Cole, R. W., LaTerra, S., Zimmer, C., Schnapp, G., Walter, R., Heckel, A., van Meel, J., Rieder, C. L. and Peters, J. M. (2003). The small molecule Hesperadin reveals a role for Aurora B in correcting kinetochoremicrotubule attachment and in maintaining the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 161, 281-294.
22. Hoffman, D. B., Pearson, C. G., Yen, T. J., Howell, B. J. and Salmon, E. D. (2001). Microtubule-dependent changes in assembly of microtubule motor proteins and mitotic spindle checkpoint proteins at PtK1 kinetochores. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 1995-2009.
23. Howell, B. J., Hoffman, D. B., Fang, G., Murray, A. W. and Salmon, E. D. (2000). Visualization of Mad2 dynamics at kinetochores, along spindle fibers, and at spindle poles in living cells. J. Cell Biol. 150, 1233-1250.
24. Hoyt, M. A., Trotis, L. and Roberts, B. T. (1991). S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell 66, 507-517.
25. Hwang, L. H., Lau, L. F., Smith, D. L., Mistrot, C. A., Hardwick, K. G., Hwang, E. S., Amon, A. and Murray, A. W. (1998). Budding yeast Cdc20: a target of the spindle checkpoint. Science 279, 1041-1044.
26. Jablonski, S. A., Chan, G. K., Cooke, C. A., Earnshaw, W. C. and Yen, T. J. (1998). The hBUB1 and hBUBR1 kinases sequentially assemble onto kinetochores during prophase with hBUBR1 concentrating at the kinetochore plates in mitosis. Chromosoma 107, 386-396.
27. Kim, S. H., Lin, D. P., Matsumoto, S., Kitazono, A. and Matsumoto, T. (1998). Fission yeast Slp1, an effector of the Mad2-dependent spindle checkpoint. Science 279, 1045-1047.
28. King, J. M. and Nicklas, R. B. (2000). Tension on chromosomes increases the number of kinetochore microtubules but only within limits. J. Cell Sci. 113, 3815-3823.
29. Li, R. and Murray, A. W. (1991). Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 66, 519-531.
30. Li, X. and Nicklas, R. B. (1995). Mitotic forces control a cell-cycle checkpoint. Nature 373, 630-632.
31. Li, X. and Nicklas, R. B. (1997). Tension-sensitive kinetochore phosphorylation and the chromosome distribution checkpoint in praying mantid spermatocytes. J. Cell Sci. 110, 537-545.
32. Li, Y., Gorbea, C., Mahaffey, D., Rechsteiner, M. and Benezra, R. (1997). MAD2 associates with the cyclosome/anaphase-promoting complex and inhibits its activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 12431-12436.
33. Logarinho, E. and Sunkel, C. E. (1998). The Drosophila kinase POLO localizes to multiple compartments of the mitotic apparatus and is required for the phosphorylation of MPM2 reactive epitopes. J. Cell Sci. 111, 2897-2909.
34. Martinez-Exposito, M. J., Kaplan, K. B., Copeland, J. and Sorger, P. K. (1999). Retention of the Bub3 checkpoint protein on lagging chromosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 8493-8498.
35. McEwen, B. F., Heagle, A. B., Cassels, G. O., Buttle, K. F. and Rieder, C. L. (1997). Kinetochore fiber maturation in PtK1 cells and its implications for the mechanisms of chromosome congression and anaphase onset. J. Cell Biol. 137, 1567-1580.
36. Musacchio, A. and Hardwick, K. G. (2002). The spindle checkpoint, structural insights into dynamic signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 731-741.
37. Murray, A. W. (1994). Cell cycle checkpoints. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 6, 872-876.
38. Murray, A. W. and Marks, D. (2001). Can sequencing shed light on cell cycling? Nature 409, 844-846.
39. Nicklas, R. B. (1997). How cells get the right chromosomes. Science 275, 632-637.
40. Nicklas, R. B. and Koch, C. A. (1969). Chromosome micromanipulation. 3. Spindle fiber tension and the reorientation of mal-oriented chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 43, 40-50.
41. Nicklas, R. B. and Ward, S. C. (1994). Elements of error correction in mitosis: microtubule capture, release and tension. J. Cell Biol. 126, 1241-1253.
42. Nicklas, R. B., Campbell, M. S., Ward, S. C. and Gorbsky, G. J. (1998). Tension-sensitive kinetochore phosphorylation in vitro. J. Cell Sci. 111, 3189-3196.
43. Nicklas, R. B., Ward, S. C. and Gorbsky, G. J. (1995). Kinetochore chemistry is sensitive to tension and may link mitotic forces to a cell cycle checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 130, 929-939.
44. Rieder, C. L., Cole, R. W., Khodjakov, A. and Sluder, G. (1995). The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 130, 941-948.
45. Rieder, C. L., Schultz, A., Cole, R. and Sluder, G. (1994). Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle. J. Cell Biol. 127, 1301-1310.
46. Shannon, K. B., Canman, J. C. and Salmon, E. D. (2002). Mad2 and BubR1 function in a single checkpoint pathway that responds to a loss of tension. Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 3706-3719.
47. Sharp-Baker, H. and Chen, R. H. (2001). Spindle checkpoint protein Bub1 is required for kinetochore localization of Mad1, Mad2, Bub3, and CENP-E, independently of its kinase activity. J. Cell Biol. 153, 1239-1250.
48. Skibbens, R. V. and Hieter, P. (1998). Kinetochores and the checkpoint mechanism that monitors for defects in the chromosome segregation machinery. Annu. Rev. Genet. 32, 307-337.
49. Skoufias, D. A., Andreassen, P. R., Lacroix, F. B., Wilson, L. and Margolis, R. L. (2001). Mammalian Mad2 and Bub1/BubR1 recognize distinct spindle-attachment and kinetochore-tension checkpoints. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4492-4497.
50. Sudakin, V., Chan, G. K. and Yen, T. J. (2001). Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2. J. Cell Biol. 154, 925-936.
51. Tanaka, T. U., Rachidi, N., Janke, C., Pereira, G., Galova, M., Schiebel, E., Stark, M. J. and Nasmyth, K. (2002). Evidence that the Ip11-Sli15 (Aurora kinase-INCENP) complex promotes chromosome bi-orientation by altering kinetochore-spindle pole connections. Cell 108, 317-329.
52. Tang, Z., Bharadwaj, R., Li, B. and Yu, H. (2001). Mad2-Independent inhibition of APCCdc20 by the mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1. Dev. Cell 1, 227-237.
53. Taylor, S. S., Ha, E. and McKeon, F. (1998). The human homologue of Bub3 is required for kinetochore localization of Bub1 and Mad3/Bub1-related protein kinase. J. Cell Biol. 142, 1-11.
54. Taylor, S. S. and McKeon, F. (1997). Kinetochore localization of murine Bub1 is required for normal mitotic timing and checkpoint response to spindle damage. Cell 89, 727-735.
55. Taylor, S. S., Hussein, D., Wang, Y., Elderkin, S. and Morrow, C. J. (2001). Kinetochore localization and phosphorylation of the mitotic checkpoint components Bub1 and BubR1 are differentially regulated by spindle events in human cells. J. Cell Sci. 114, 4385-4395.
56. Waters, J. C., Chen, R.-H., Murray, A. W. and Salmon, E. D. (1998). Localization of Mad2 to kinetochores depends on microtubule attachment, not tension. J. Cell Biol. 141, 1181-1191.
57. Waters, J. C., Chen, R.-H., Murray, A. W., Gorbsky, G. J., Salmon, E. D. and Nicklas, R. B. (1999). Mad2 binding by phosphorylated kinetochores links error detection and checkpoint action in mitosis. Curr Biol. 9, 649-652.
58. Waters, J. C., Skibbens, R. V. and Salmon, E. D. (1996). Oscillating mitotic newt lung cell kinetochores are, on average, under tension and rarely push. J. Cell Sci. 109, 2823-2831.
59. Yu, H. G., Muszynski, M. G. and Dawe, R. K. (1999). The maize homolog of the cell cycle checkpoint protein MAD2 reveals kinetochore substructure and contrasting mitotic and meiotic localization patterns. J. Cell Biol. 145, 425-435.
60. Zhou, J., Panda, D., Landen, J. W., Wilson, L. and Joshi, H. C. (2002a). Minor alteration of microtubule dynamics causes loss of tension across kinetochore pairs and activates the spindle checkpoint. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 17200-17208.
61. Zhou, J., Yao, J. and Joshi, H. C. (2002b). Attachment and tension in the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Sci. 115, 3547-3555.