The APC/C maintains the spindle assembly checkpoint by targeting Cdc20 for destruction

Nature Cell Biology

Volumn 10, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 1411-1420

  Nilsson, Jakob ^a   Yekezare, Mona ^a   Minshull, Jeremy ^b   Pines, Jonathon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b DNA20 Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANAPHASE PROMOTING COMPLEX; BUB1 RELATED PROTEIN; BUB3 PROTEIN; CARRIER PROTEIN; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN 20; PROTEIN MAD2; SPINDLE ASSEMBLY CHECKPOINT PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE ARREST; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MITOSIS INHIBITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; UBIQUITINATION;

AMINO ACID MOTIFS; CALCIUM-BINDING PROTEINS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMATOGRAPHY, GEL; HELA CELLS; HUMANS; LYSINE; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; MUTANT PROTEINS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASE COMPLEXES; UBIQUITINATION;

EID: 57049097535     PISSN: 14657392     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncb1799     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Pines, J. Mitosis: A matter of getting rid of the right protein at the right time. Trends Cell Biol. 16, 55-63 (2006).
2. Musacchio, A. & Salmon, E. D. The spindle assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 379-393 (2007).
3. Hwang, L. H. et al. Budding yeast Cdc20: A target of the spindle checkpoint. Science 279, 1041-1044 (1998).
4. Kim, S. H., Lin, D. P., Matsumoto, S., Kitazono, A. & Matsumoto, T. Fission yeast Slpl: An effector of the Mad2-dependent spindle checkpoint. Science 279, 1045-1047 (1998).
5. Peters, J. M. The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome: A machine designed to destroy. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 644-656 (2006).
6. Sironi, L. et al. Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1-Mad2 core complex: Implications of a 'safety belt' binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint. EMBO J. 21, 2496-2506 (2002).
7. Mapelli, M., Massimiliano, L., Santaguida, S. & Musacchio, A. The mad2 conformational dimer: Structure and implications for the spindle assembly checkpoint. Cell 131, 730-743 (2007).
8. Lao, X., Tang, Z., Rizo, J. & Yu, H. The Mad2 spindle checkpoint protein undergoes similar major conformational changes upon binding to either Mad1 or Cdc20. Mol. Cell 9, 59-71. (2002).
9. Tang, Z., Bharadwaj, R., Li, B. & Yu, H. Mad2-Independent inhibition of APCCdc20 by the mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1. Dev. Cell 1 227-237. (2001).
10. Fang, G. Checkpoint protein BubR1 acts synergistically with Mad2 to inhibit anaphase-promoting complex. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 755-766 (2002).
11. Reddy, S. K., Rape, M., Margansky, W. A. & Kirschner, M. W. Ubiquitination by the anaphase-promoting complex drives spindle checkpoint inactivation. Nature 446, 921-925 (2007).
12. Stegmeier, F. et al. Anaphase initiation is regulated by antagonistic ubiquitination and deu biquitination activities. Nature 446, 876-881 (2007).
13. Pan, J. & Chen, R. H. Spindle checkpoint regulates Cdc20p stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 18, 1439-1451 (2004).
14. King, E. M., van der Sar, S. J. & Hardwick, K. G. Mad3 KEN boxes mediate both Cdc20 and Mad3 turnover, and are critical for the spindle checkpoint. PLoS ONE 2, e342 (2007).
15. Clute, P. & Pines, J. Temporal and spatial control of cyclin B1 destruction in metaphase. Nature Cell Biol. 1, 82-87 (1999).
16. Brito, D. A. & Rieder, C. L. Mitotic checkpoint slippage in humans occurs via cyclin B destruction in the presence of an active checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 16, 1194-1200 (2006).
17. Kallio, M. J., Beardmore, V. A., Weinstein, J. & Gorbsky, G. J. Rapid microtubule-independent dynamics of Cdc20 at kinetochores and centrosomes in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 158, 841-847 (2002).
18. Howell, B. J. et al. Spindle checkpoint protein dynamics at kinetochores in living cells. Curr. Biol. 14, 953-964 (2004).
19. den Elzen, N. & Pines, J. Cyclin A is destroyed in prometaphase and can delay chromosome alignment and anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 153, 121-136. (2001).
20. Geley, S. et al. Anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome-dependent proteolysis of human cyclin A starts at the beginning of mitosis and is not subject to the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 153, 137-148 (2001).
21. Hayes, M. J. et al. Early mitotic degradation of Nek2A depends on Cdc20-independent interaction with the APC/C. Nature Cell Biol. 8, 607-614 (2006).
22. Schwab, M., Neutzner, M., Mocker, D. & Seufert, W. Yeast Hct1 recognizes the mitotic cyclin Clb2 and other substrates of the ubiquitin ligase APC. EMBO J. 20, 5165-5175. (2001).
23. Vodermaier, H. C., Gieffers, C., Maurer-Strohi, S., Eisenhaber, F. & Peters, J. M. TPR subunits of the anaphase-promoting complex mediate binding to the activator protein CDH1. Curr. Biol. 13, 1459-1468 (2003).
24. Sudakin, V., Chan, G. K. & Yen, T. J. Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2. J. Cell Biol. 154, 925-936. (2001).
25. Camasses, A., Bogdanova, A., Shevchenko, A. & Zachariae, W. The CCT chaperonin promotes activation of the anaphase-promoting complex through the generation of functional Cdc20. Mol. Cell 12, 87-100 (2003).
26. Ditchfield, C. et al. Aurora B couples chromosome alignment with anaphase by targeting BubR1, Mad2, and Cenp-E to kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 161, 267-280 (2003).
27. Hardwick, K. G., Johnston, R. C., Smith, D. L. & Murray, A. W. MAD3 encodes a novel component of the spindle checkpoint which interacts with Bub3p, Cdc20p, and Mad2p. J. Cell Biol. 148, 871-882. (2000).
28. Wolthuis, R. et al. Cdc20 and Cks direct the spindle checkpoint-independent destruction of cyclin a. Mol. Cell 30 290-302 (2008).
29. Acquaviva, C., Herzog, F., Kraft, C. & Pines, J. The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome is recruited to centromeres by the spindle assembly checkpoint. Nature Cell Biol. 6, 892-898 (2004).
30. Davenport, J., Harris, L. D. & Goorha, R. Spindle checkpoint function requires Mad2-dependent Cdc20 binding to the Mad3 homology domain of BubR1. Exp. Cell Res. 312, 1831-1842 (2006).
31. Millband, D. N. & Hardwick, K. G. Fission yeast Mad3p is required for Mad2p to inhibit the anaphase-promoting complex and localizes to kinetochores in a Bub1p-, Bub3p-, and Mph1p-dependent manner. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 2728-2742 (2002).
32. Garci-Higuera, I. et al. Genomic stability and tumour suppression by the APC/C cofactor Cdh1. Nature Cell Biol. 10, 802-811 (2008).
33. Meraldi, P., Draviam, V. M. & Sorger, P. K. Timing and checkpoints in the regulation of mitotic progression. Dev. Cell 7, 45-60 (2004).
34. Brito, D. A., Yang, Z. & Rieder, C. L. Microtubules do not promote mitotic slippage when the spindle assembly checkpoint cannot be satisfied. J. Cell Biol. (2008).
35. Di Fiore, B. & Pines, J. Emi1 is needed to couple DNA replication with mitosis but does not regulate activation of the mitotic APC/C. J. Cell Biol. 177, 425-437 (2007).
36. Kodumal, S. J. et al. Total synthesis of long DNA sequences: synthesis of a contiguous 32-kb polyketide synthase gene cluster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 15573-15578 (2004).
37. Villalobos, A., Ness, J. E., Gustafsson, C., Minshull, J. & Govindarajan, S. Gene Designer: A synthetic biology tool for constructing artificial DNA segments. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 285 (2006).