Attachment and tension in the spindle assembly checkpoint

Journal of Cell Science

Volumn 115, Issue 18, 2002, Pages 3547-3555

  Zhou, Jun ^a   Yao, Joyce ^a   Joshi, Harish C ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Attachment; Chromosome; Kinetochore; Microtubule; Mitosis; Spindle assembly checkpoint; Tension

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN MAD1; PROTEIN MAD2;

ANAPHASE; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MICROTUBULE ASSEMBLY; MITOSIS; MITOSIS SPINDLE; NONHUMAN; PRESSURE AND TENSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SISTER CHROMATID; SPINDLE POLE BODY;

ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; EUKARYOTIC CELLS; GENES, CDC; HUMANS; KINETOCHORES; MICROTUBULES; MITOSIS; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0037106616     PISSN: 00219533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.00029     Document Type: Article

References (112)

1. Amon, A. (1999). The spindle checkpoint. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 69-75.
2. Basto, R., Gomes, R. and Karess, R. E. (2000). Rough deal and Zw10 are required for the metaphase checkpoint in Drosophila. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 939-943.
3. Basu, J., Logarinho, E., Herrmann, S., Bousbaa, H., Li, Z., Chan, G. K., Yen, T. J., Sunkel, C. E. and Goldberg, M. L. (1998). Localization of the Drosophila checkpoint control protein Bub3 to the kinetochore requires Bub1 but not Zw10 or Rod. Chromosoma 107, 376-385.
4. Basu, J., Bousbaa, H., Logarinho, E., Li, Z., Williams, B. C., Lopes, C., Sunkel, C. E. and Goldberg, M. L. (1999). Mutations in the essential spindle checkpoint gene bub1 cause chromosome missegregation and fail to block apoptosis in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol. 146, 13-28.
5. Bernard, P., Hardwick, K. and Javerzat, J. P. (1998). Fission yeast bub1 is a mitotic centromere protein essential for the spindle checkpoint and the preservation of correct ploidy through mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 143, 1775-1787.
6. Biggins, S. and Murray, A. W. (2001). The budding yeast protein kinase Ipl1/Aurora allows the absence of tension to activate the spindle checkpoint. Genes Dev. 15, 3118-3129.
7. Cahill, D. P., Lengauer, C., Yu, J., Riggins, G. J., Willson, J. K., Markowitz, S. D., Kinzler, K. W. and Vogelstein, B. (1998). Mutations of mitotic checkpoint genes in human cancers. Nature 392, 300-303.
8. Campbell, M. S. and Gorbsky, G. J. (1995). Microinjection of mitotic cells with the 3F3/2 anti-phosphoepitope antibody delays the onset of anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 129, 1195-1204.
9. Chan, G. K., Jablonski, S. A., Starr, D. A., Goldberg, M. L. and Yen, T. J. (2000). Human Zw10 and ROD are mitotic checkpoint proteins that bind to kinetochores. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 944-947.
10. Chan, G. K., Jablonski, S. A., Sudakin, V., Hittle, J. C. and Yen, T. J. (1999). Human BUBR1 is a mitotic checkpoint kinase that monitors CENP-E functions at kinetochores and binds the cyclosome/APC. J. Cell Biol. 146, 941-954.
11. Chan, G. K., Schaar, B. T. and Yen, T. J. (1998). Characterization of the kinetochore binding domain of CENP-E reveals interactions with the kinetochore proteins CENP-F and hBUBR1. J. Cell Biol. 143, 49-63.
12. Chen, R. H., Brady, D. M., Smith, D., Murray, A. W. and Hardwick, K. G. (1999). The spindle checkpoint of budding yeast depends on a tight complex between the Mad1 and Mad2 proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 2607-2618.
13. Chen, R. H., Waters, J. C., Salmon, E. D. and Murray, A. W. (1996). Association of spindle assembly checkpoint component XMAD2 with unattached kinetochores. Science 274, 242-246.
14. Chen, R. H., Shevchenko, A., Mann, M. and Murray, A. W. (1998). Spindle checkpoint protein Xmad1 recruits Xmad2 to unattached kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 143, 283-295.
15. Ciosk, R., Zachariae, W., Michaelis, C., Shevchenko, A., Mann, M. and Nasmyth, K. (1998). An ESP1/PDS1 complex regulates loss of sister chromatid cohesion at the metaphase to anaphase transition in yeast. Cell 93, 1067-1076.
16. Cohen-Fix, O., Peters, J. M., Kirschner, M. W. and Koshland, D. (1996). Anaphase initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by the APC-dependent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p. Genes Dev. 10, 3081-3093.
17. Cooke, C. A., Schaar, B., Yen, T. J. and Earnshaw, W. C. (1997). Localization of CENP-E in the fibrous corona and outer plate of mammalian kinetochores from prometaphase through anaphase. Chromosoma 106, 446-455.
18. Fang, G. (2002). Checkpoint protein BubR1 acts synergistically with Mad2 to inhibit anaphase-promoting complex. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 755-766.
19. Fang, G., Yu, H. and Kirschner, M. W. (1998a). Direct binding of CDC20 protein family members activates the anaphase-promoting complex in mitosis and G1. Mol. Cell 2, 163-171.
20. Fang, G., Yu, H. and Kirschner, M. W. (1998b). The checkpoint protein MAD2 and the mitotic regulator CDC20 form a ternary complex with the anaphase-promoting complex to control anaphase initiation. Genes Dev. 12, 1871-1883.
21. Fang, G., Yu, H. and Kirschner, M. W. (1999). Control of mitotic transitions by the anaphase-promoting complex. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 354, 1583-1590.
22. Funabiki, H., Yamano, H., Kumada, K., Nagao, K., Hunt, T. and Yangida, M. (1996). Cut2 proteolysis required for sister-chromatid separation in fission yeast. Nature 381, 438-441.
23. Gorbsky, G. J. (1995). Kinetochores, microtubules and the metaphase checkpoint. Trends Cell Biol. 5, 143-148.
24. Gorbsky, G. J. and Ricketts, W. A. (1993). Differential expression of a phosphoepitope at the kinetochores of moving chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 122, 1311-1321.
25. Goshima, G. and Yanagida, M. (2000). Establishing biorientation occurs with precocious separation of the sister kinetochores, but not the arms, in the early spindle of budding yeast. Cell 100, 619-633.
26. Guacci, V., Koshland, D. and Strunnikov, A. (1997). A direct link between sister chromatid cohesion and chromosome condensation revealed through the analysis of MCD1 in S. cerevisiae. Cell 91, 47-57.
27. Hartwell, L. H. and Weinert, T. A. (1989). Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events. Science 246, 629-634.
28. Hauf, S., Waizenegger, I. C. and Peters, J. M. (2001). Cohesion cleavage by separase required for anaphase and cytokinesis in human cells. Science 293, 1320-1323.
29. He, X., Asthana, S. and Sorger, P. K. (2000). Transient sister chromatid separation and elastic deformation of chromosomes during mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 101, 763-775.
30. He, X., Patterson, T. and Sazer, S. (1997). The Schizosaccharomyces pombe spindle checkpoint protein mad2p blocks anaphase and genetically interacts with the anaphase-promoting complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 7965-7970.
31. He, X., Jones, M. H., Winey, M. and Sazer, S. (1998). mph 1, a member of the Mps1-like family of dual specificity protein kinases, is required for the spindle checkpoint in S. pombe. J. Cell Sci. 111, 1635-1647.
32. Hoffman, D. B., Pearson, C. G., Yen, T. J., Howell, B. J. and Salmon, E. D. (2001). Microtubule-dependent changes in assembly of microtubule motor proteins and mitotic spindle checkpoint proteins at PtK1 kinetochores. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 1995-2009.
33. Hoyt, M. A., Totis, L. and Roberts, B. T. (1991). S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell 66, 507-517.
34. Howell, B. J., Hoffman, D. B., Fang, G., Murray, A. W. and Salmon, E. D. (2000). Visualization of Mad2 dynamics at kinetochores, along spindle fibers, and at spindle poles in living cells. J. Cell Biol. 150, 1233-1250.
35. Howell, B. J., McEwen, B. F., Canman, J. C., Hoffman, D. B., Farrar, E. M., Rieder, C. L. and Salmon, E. D. (2001). Cytoplasmic dynein/dynactin drives kinetochore protein transport to the spindle poles and has a role in mitotic spindle checkpoint inactivation. J. Cell Biol. 155, 1159-1172.
36. Hwang, L. H., Lau, L. F., Smith, D. L., Mistrot, C. A., Hardwick, K. G., Hwang, E. S., Amon, A. and Murray, A. W. (1998). Budding yeast Cdc20: a target of the spindle checkpoint. Science 279, 1041-1044.
37. Jin, D. Y., Spencer, F. and Jeang, K. T. (1998). Human T cell leukemia virus type 1 oncoprotein Tax targets the human mitotic checkpoint protein MAD1. Cell 93, 81-91.
38. Kim, S. H., Lin, D. P., Matsumoto, S., Kitazono, A. and Matsumoto, T. (1998). Fission yeast Slp1: an effector of the Mad2-dependent spindle checkpoint. Science 279, 1045-1047.
39. King, J. M. and Nicklas, R. B. (2000). Tension on chromosomes increases the number of kinetochore microtubules but only within limits. J. Cell Sci. 113, 3815-3823.
40. King, R. W., Peters, J. M., Tugendreich, S., Rolfe, M., Hieter, P. and Kirschner, M. W. (1995). A 20S complex containing CDC27 and CDC16 catalyzes the mitosis-specific conjugation of ubiquitin to cyclin B. Cell 81, 279-288.
41. Kitagawa, R. and Rose, A. M. (1999). Components of the spindle-assembly checkpoint are essential in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat. Cell Biol. 1, 514-521.
42. Lee, H., Trainer, A. H., Friedman, L. S., Thistlethwaite, F. C., Evans, M. J., Ponder, B. A. J. and Venkitaraman, A. R. (1999). Mitotic checkpoint inactivation fosters transformation in cells lacking the breast cancer susceptibility gene, Brca2. Mol. Cell 4, 1-10.
43. Li, R. and Murray, A. W. (1991). Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 66, 519-531.
44. Li, X. and Nicklas, R. B. (1995). Mitotic forces control a cell-cycle checkpoint. Nature 373, 630-632.
45. Li, X. and Nicklas, R. B. (1997). Tension-sensitive kinetochore phosphorylation and the chromosome distribution checkpoint in praying mantid spermatocytes. J. Cell Sci. 110, 537-545.
46. Li, Y. and Benezra, R. (1996). Identification of a human mitotic checkpoint gene:hsMAD2. Science 274, 246-248.
47. Li, Y., Gorbea, C., Mahaffey, D., Rechsteiner, M. and Benezra, R. (1997). MAD2 associates with the cyclosome/anaphase-promoting complex and inhibits its activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 12431-12436.
48. Lombillo, V. A., Nislow, C., Yen, T. J., Gelfand, V. I. and McIntosh, J. R. (1995). Antibodies to the kinesin motor domain and CENP-E inhibit microtubule depolymerization-dependent motion of chromosomes in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 128, 107-115.
49. Manchester, K. L. (1995). Boveri, Theodor and the origin of malignant-tumors. Trends Cell Biol. 5, 384-387.
50. Martinez-Exposito, M. J., Kaplan, K. B., Copeland, J. and Sorger, P. K. (1999). Retention of the BUB3 checkpoint protein on tagging chromosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 8493-8498.
51. Mazia, D. (1961). Mitosis. In The Cell Vol. 3 (ed. J. Brachet and A. E. Mirsky), pp. 77-142. New York: Academic Press.
52. McEwen, B. F., Chan, G. K. T., Zubrowski, B., Savoian, M. S., Sauer, M. T. and Yen, T. J. (2001). CENP-E is essential for reliable bioriented spindle attachment, but chromosome alignment can be achieved via redundant mechanisms in mammalian cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 2776-2789.
53. McIntosh, J. R. (1984). Mechanisms of mitosis. Trends Biochem. Sci. 9, 195-198.
54. McIntosh, J. R. (1991). Structural and mechanical control of mitotic progression. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 56, 613-619.
55. Michaelis, C., Ciosk, R. and Nasmyth, K. (1997). Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids. Cell 91, 35-45.
56. Michel, L. S., Liberal, V., Chatterjee, A., Kirchwegger, R., Pasche, B., Gerald, W., Dobles, M., Sorger, P. K., Murty, V. V. and Benezra, R. (2001). MAD2 haplo-insufficiency causes premature anaphase and chromosome instability in mammalian cells. Nature 409, 355-359.
57. Millband, D. N. and Hardwick, K. G. (2002). Fission yeast mad3p is required for mad2p to inhibit the anaphase-promoting complex and localizes to kinetochores in a bub1p-, bub3p-, and mph1p-dependent manner. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 2728-2742.
58. Mitchison, T. J. (1989). Polewards microtubule flux in the mitotic spindle: evidence from photoactivation of fluorescence. J. Cell Biol. 109, 637-652.
59. Mitchison, T. J. and Salmon, E. D. (1992). Poleward kinetochore fiber movement occurs during both metaphase and anaphase-A in newt lung cell mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 119, 569-582.
60. Nicklas, R. B. (1988a). The forces that move chromosomes in mitosis. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 17, 431-449.
61. Nicklas, R. B. (1988b). Chance encounters and precision in mitosis. J. Cell Sci. 89, 283-285.
62. Nicklas, R. B. (1997). How cells get the right chromosomes. Science 275, 632-637.
63. Nicklas, R. B. and Koch, C. A. (1969). Chromosome manipulation III. Induced reorientation and the experimental control of segregation in meiosis. J. Cell Biol. 43, 40-50.
64. Nicklas, R. B. and Ward, S. C. (1994). Elements of error correction in mitosis: microtubule capture, release, and tension. J. Cell Biol. 126, 1241-1253.
65. Nicklas, R. B., Ward, S. C. and Gorbsky, G. J. (1995). Kinetochore chemistry is sensitive to tension and may link mitotic forces to a cell cycle checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 130, 929-939.
66. Nicklas, R. B., Waters, J. C., Salmon, E. D. and Ward, S. C. (2001). Checkpoint signals in grasshopper meiosis are sensitive to microtubule attachment, but tension is still essential. J. Cell Sci. 114, 4173-4183.
67. Pfarr, C. M., Coue, M., Grissom, P. M., Hays, T. S., Porter, M. E. and McIntosh, J. R. (1990). Cytoplasmic dynein is localized to kinetochores during mitosis. Nature 345, 263-265.
68. Rieder, C. L. (1982). The formation, structure, and composition of the mammalian kinetochore and kinetochore fiber. Int. Rev. Cytol. 79, 1-58.
69. Rieder, C. L. and Khodjakov, A. (1997). Mitosis and checkpoints that control progression through mitosis in vertebrate somatic cells. Prog. Cell Cycle Res. 3, 301-312.
70. Rieder, C. L. and Salmon, E. D. (1994). Motile kinetochores and polar ejection forces dictate chromosome position on the vertebrate mitotic spindle. J. Cell Biol. 124, 223-233.
71. Rieder, C. L. and Salmon, E. D. (1998). The vertebrate cell kinetochore and its roles during mitosis. Trends Cell Biol. 8, 310-318.
72. Rieder, C. L., Schultz, A., Cole, R. and Sluder, G. (1994). Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle. J. Cell Biol. 127, 1301-1310.
73. Rieder, C. L., Cole, R. W., Khodjakov, A. and Sluder, G. (1995). The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 130, 941-948.
74. Rudner, A. D. and Murray, A. W. (1996). The spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8, 773-780.
75. Shan, J. V. and Cleveland, D. W. (2000). Waiting for anaphase: Mad2 and the spindle assembly checkpoint. Cell 103, 997-1000.
76. Shelby, R. D., Hahn, K. M. and Sullivan, K. F. (1996). Dynamic elastic behavior of alpha-satellite DNA domains visualized in situ in living human cells. J. Cell Biol. 135, 545-557.
77. Shirayama, M., Zachariae, W., Ciosk, R. and Nasmyth, K. (1998). The Polo-like kinase Cdc5p and the WD-repeat protein Cdc20/fizzy are regulators and substrates of the anaphase promoting complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 17, 1336-1349.
78. Shonn, M. A., McCarroll, R. and Murray, A. W. (2000). Requirement of the spindle checkpoint for proper chromosome segregation in budding yeast meiosis. Science 289, 300-303.
79. Sironi, L., Melixetian, M., Faretta, M., Prosperini, E., Helin, K. and Musacchio, A. (2001). Mad2 binding to Mad1 and Cdc20, rather than oligomerization, is required for the spindle checkpoint. EMBO J. 20, 6371-6382.
80. Skibbens, R. V., Skeen, V. P. and Salmon, E. D. (1993). Directional instability of kinetochore motility during chromosome congression and segregation in mitotic newt lung cells: a push-pull mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 122, 859-875.
81. Skoufias, D. A., Andreassen, P. R., Lacroix, F. B., Wilson, L. and Margolis, R. L. (2001). Mammalian mad2 and bub1/bubR1 recognize distinct spindle-attachment and kinetochore-tension checkpoints. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4492-4497.
82. Sluder, G. and McCollum, D. (2000). The mad ways of meiosis. Science 289, 254-255.
83. Stern, B. M. and Murray, A. W. (2001). Lack of tension at kinetochores activates the spindle checkpoint in budding yeast. Curr. Biol. 11, 1462-1467.
84. Steuer, E. R., Wordeman, L., Schroer, T. A. and Sheetz, M. P. (1990). Localization of cytoplasmic dynein to mitotic spindles and kinetochores. Nature 345, 266-268.
85. Straight, A. F., Belmont, A. S., Robinett, C. C. and Murray, A. W. (1996). GFP tagging of budding yeast chromosomes reveals that protein-protein interactions can mediate sister chromatid cohesion. Curr. Biol. 6, 1599-1608.
86. Sudakin, V., Chan, G. K. T. and Yen, T. J. (2001). Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, MAD2. J. Cell Biol. 154, 925-936.
87. Takahashi, T., Haruki, N., Nomoto, S., Masuda, A., Saji, S. and Osada, H. (1999). Identification of frequent impairment of the mitotic checkpoint and molecular analysis of the mitotic checkpoint genes, hsMAD2 and p55CDC, in human lung cancers. Oncogene 18, 4295-4300.
88. Tanaka, T., Fuchs, J., Loidl, J. and Nasmyth, K. (2000). Cohesin ensures bipolar attachment of microtubules to sister centromeres and resists their precocious separation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 492-499.
89. Tanaka, T. U., Rachidi, N., Janke, C., Pereira, G., Galova, M., Schiebel, E., Stark, M. J. and Nasmyth, K. (2002). Evidence that the Ipl1-Sli15 (Aurora kinase-INCENP) complex promotes chromosome bi-orientation by altering kinetochore-spindle pole connections. Cell 108, 317-329.
90. Tang, Z., Bharadwaj, R., Li, B. and Yu, H. (2001). Mad2-independent inhibition of APCCdc20 by the mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1. Dev. Cell 1, 227-237.
91. Taylor, S. S. and McKeon, F. (1997). Kinetochore localization of murine Bub1 is required for normal mitotic timing and checkpoint response to spindle damage. Cell 89, 727-735.
92. Taylor, S. S., Ha, E. and McKeon, F. (1998). The human homologue of Bub3 is required for kinetochore localization and a Mad3/Bub1-related protein kinase. J. Cell Biol. 142, 1-11.
93. Taylor, S. S., Hussein, D., Wang, Y., Elderkin, S. and Morrow, C. J. (2001). Kinetochore localisation and phosphorylation of the mitotic checkpoint components Bub1 and BubR1 are differentially regulated by spindle events in human cells. J. Cell Sci. 114, 4385-4395.
94. Uhlmann, F., Lottspeich, F. and Nasmyth, K. (1999). Sister-chromatid separation at anaphase onset is promoted by cleavage of the cohesin subunit Scc1. Nature 400, 37-42.
95. Uhlmann, F., Wernek, W., Poupart, M. A., Koonin, E. and Nasmyth, K. (2000). Cleavage of cohesin by the CD clan protease separin triggers anaphase in yeast. Cell 103, 375-386.
96. Visintin, R., Prinz, S. and Amon, A. (1997). CDC20 and CDH1: A family of substrate-specific activators of APC-dependent proteolysis. Science 278, 460-463.
97. Wang, X., Jin, D. Y., Ng, R. W., Feng, H., Wong, Y. C., Cheung, A. L. and Tsao, S. W. (2002). Significance of MAD2 expression to mitotic checkpoint control in ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Res. 62, 1662-1668.
98. Waters, J. C., Chen, R. H., Murray, A. W. and Salmon, E. D. (1998). Localization of Mad2 to kinetochores depends on microtubule attachment, not tension. J. Cell Biol. 141, 1181-1191.
99. Waters, J. C., Mitchison, T. J., Rieder, C. L. and Salmon, E. D. (1996a). The kinetochore microtubule minus-end disassembly associated with poleward flux produces a force that can do work. Mol. Biol. Cell 7, 1547-1558.
100. Waters, J. C., Skibbens, R. V. and Salmon, E. D. (1996b). Oscillating mitotic newt lung cell kinetochores are, on average, under tension and rarely push. J. Cell Sci. 109, 2823-2831.
101. Weiss, E. and Winey, M. (1996). The S. cerevisiae SPB duplication gene MPS1 is part of a mitotic checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 132, 111-123.
102. Wells, W. A. E. (1996). The spindle-assembly checkpoint: Aiming for a perfect mitosis, every time. Trends Cell Biol. 6, 228-234.
103. Winey, M., Mamay, C. L., O'Toole, E. T., Mastronarde, D. N., Giddings, T. H., Jr, McDonald, K. L. and McIntosh, J. R. (1995). Three-dimensional ultrastructural analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitotic spindle. J. Cell Biol. 129, 1601-1615.
104. Wu, H., Lan, Z., Li, W., Wu, S., Weinstein, J., Sakamoto, K. M. and Dai, W. (2000). p55CDC/hCDC20 is associated with BUBR1 and may be a downstream target of the spindle checkpoint kinase. Oncogene 19, 4557-4562.
105. Yamamoto, A., Guacci, V. and Koshland, D. (1996). Pds1p, an inhibitor of anaphase in budding yeast, plays a critical role in the APC and checkpoint pathway(s). J. Cell Biol. 133, 99-110.
106. Yao, X., Anderson, K. L. and Cleveland, D. W. (1997). The microtubule-dependent motor centromere-associated protein E (CENP-E) is an integral component of kinetochore corona fibers that link centromeres to spindle microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 139, 435-447.
107. Yen, T. J., Li, G., Schaar, B. T., Szilak, I. and Cleveland, D. W. (1992). CENP-E is a putative kinetochore motor that accumulates just before mitosis. Nature 359, 536-539.
108. Yu, H. G., Muszynski, M. G. and Kelly Dawe, R. (1999). The maize homologue of the cell cycle checkpoint protein MAD2 reveals kinetochore substructure and contrasting mitotic and meiotic localization patterns. J. Cell Biol. 145, 425-435.
109. Zachariae, W. and Nasmyth, K. (1999). Whose end is destruction: cell division and the anaphase-promoting complex. Genes Dev. 13, 2039-2058.
110. Zhai, Y., Kronebusch, P. J. and Borisy, G. G. (1995). Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and the metaphase-anaphase transition. J. Cell Biol. 131, 721-734.
111. Zhou, J., Panda, D., Landen, J. W., Wilson, L. and Joshi, H. C. (2002). Minor alteration of microtubule dynamics causes loss of tension across kinetochore pairs and activates the spindle checkpoint. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 17200-17208.
112. Zou, H., McGarry, T. J., Bernal, T. and Kirschner, M. W. (1999). Identification of a vertebrate sister-chromatid separation inhibitor involved in transformation and tumorigenesis. Science 285, 418-422.