The KMN protein network - Chief conductors of the kinetochore orchestra

Journal of Cell Science

Volumn 125, Issue 24, 2012, Pages 5927-5936

  Varma, Dileep ^a   Salmon, E D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Checkpoint; Kinetochore; KNL1; MIS12; Mitosis; NDC80

Indexed keywords

ISOPROTEIN; KMN PROTEIN; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEX; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CASC5 PROTEIN, HUMAN; MICROTUBULE ASSOCIATED PROTEIN; MIS12 PROTEIN, HUMAN; NDC80 PROTEIN, HUMAN; NUCLEAR PROTEIN;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; COMPLEX FORMATION; DROSOPHILA; MITOSIS SPINDLE; NONHUMAN; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; SISTER CHROMATID; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MICROTUBULE; SPINDLE APPARATUS;

HUMANS; KINETOCHORES; MICROTUBULE-ASSOCIATED PROTEINS; MICROTUBULES; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; SPINDLE APPARATUS;

EID: 84875599678     PISSN: 00219533     EISSN: 14779137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.093724     Document Type: Note

References (105)

1. Alushin, G. and Nogales, E. (2011). Visualizing kinetochore architecture. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 21, 661-669.
2. Alushin, G. M., Ramey, V. H., Pasqualato, S., Ball, D. A., Grigorieff, N., Musacchio, A. and Nogales, E. (2010). The Ndc80 kinetochore complex forms oligomeric arrays along microtubules. Nature 467, 805-810.
3. Alushin, G. M., Musinipally, V., Matson, D., Tooley, J., Stukenberg, P. T. and Nogales, E. (2012). Multimodal microtubule binding by the Ndc80 kinetochore complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 1161-1167.
4. Bock, L. J., Pagliuca, C., Kobayashi, N., Grove, R. A., Oku, Y., Shrestha, K., Alfieri, C., Golfieri, C., Oldani, A., Dal Maschio, M. et al. (2012). Cnn1 inhibits the interactions between the KMN complexes of the yeast kinetochore. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 614-624.
5. Bolanos-Garcia, V. M., Lischetti, T., Matak-Vinković, D., Cota, E., Simpson, P. J., Chirgadze, D. Y., Spring, D. R., Robinson, C. V., Nilsson, J. and Blundell, T. L. (2011). Structure of a Blinkin-BUBR1 complex reveals an interaction crucial for kinetochore-mitotic checkpoint regulation via an unanticipated binding Site. Structure 19, 1691-1700.
6. Chan, Y. W., Jeyaprakash, A. A., Nigg, E. A. and Santamaria, A. (2012). Aurora B controls kinetochore-microtubule attachments by inhibiting Ska complex-KMN network interaction. J. Cell Biol. 196, 563-571.
7. Cheeseman, I. M. and Desai, A. (2008). Molecular architecture of the kinetochoremicrotubule interface. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 33-46.
8. Cheeseman, I. M., Niessen, S., Anderson, S., Hyndman, F., Yates, J. R., 3rd, Oegema, K. and Desai, A. (2004). A conserved protein network controls assembly of the outer kinetochore and its ability to sustain tension. Genes Dev. 18, 2255-2268.
9. Cheeseman, I. M., Chappie, J. S., Wilson-Kubalek, E. M. and Desai, A. (2006). The conserved KMN network constitutes the core microtubule-binding site of the kinetochore. Cell 127, 983-997.
10. Cheeseman, I. M., Hori, T., Fukagawa, T. and Desai, A. (2008). KNL1 and the CENP-H/I/K complex coordinately direct kinetochore assembly in vertebrates. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 587-594.
11. Ciferri, C., Pasqualato, S., Screpanti, E., Varetti, G., Santaguida, S., Dos Reis, G., Maiolica, A., Polka, J., De Luca, J. G., De Wulf, P. et al. (2008). Implications for kinetochore-microtubule attachment from the structure of an engineered Ndc80 complex. Cell 133, 427-439.
12. Cimini, D., Wan, X., Hirel, C. B. and Salmon, E. D. (2006). Aurora kinase promotes turnover of kinetochore microtubules to reduce chromosome segregation errors. Curr. Biol. 16, 1711-1718.
13. Corbett, K. D., Yip, C. K., Ee, L. S., Walz, T., Amon, A. and Harrison, S. C. (2010). The monopolin complex crosslinks kinetochore components to regulate chromosomemicrotubule attachments. Cell 142, 556-567.
14. Daum, J. R., Wren, J. D., Daniel, J. J., Sivakumar, S., McAvoy, J. N., Potapova, T. A. and Gorbsky, G. J. (2009). Ska3 is required for spindle checkpoint silencing and the maintenance of chromosome cohesion in mitosis. Curr. Biol. 19, 1467-1472.
15. Davies, A. E. and Kaplan, K. B. (2010). Hsp90-Sgt1 and Skp1 target human Mis12 complexes to ensure efficient formation of kinetochore-microtubule binding sites. J. Cell Biol. 189, 261-274.
16. DeLuca, J. G. and Musacchio, A. (2012). Structural organization of the kinetochoremicrotubule interface. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 24, 48-56.
17. DeLuca, J. G., Gall, W. E., Ciferri, C., Cimini, D., Musacchio, A. and Salmon, E. D. (2006). Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and attachment stability are regulated by Hec1. Cell 127, 969-982.
18. Espeut, J., Cheerambathur, D. K., Krenning, L., Oegema, K. and Desai, A. (2012). Microtubule binding by KNL-1 contributes to spindle checkpoint silencing at the kinetochore. J. Cell Biol. 196, 469-482.
19. Essex, A., Dammermann, A., Lewellyn, L., Oegema, K. and Desai, A. (2009). Systematic analysis in Caenorhabditis elegans reveals that the spindle checkpoint is composed of two largely independent branches. Mol. Biol. Cell 20, 1252-1267.
20. Famulski, J. K. and Chan, G. K. (2007). Aurora B kinase-dependent recruitment of hZW10 and hROD to tensionless kinetochores. Curr. Biol. 17, 2143-2149.
21. Famulski, J. K., Vos, L., Sun, X. and Chan, G. (2008). Stable hZW10 kinetochore residency, mediated by hZwint-1 interaction, is essential for the mitotic checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 180, 507-520.
22. Foltz, D. R., Jansen, L. E., Black, B. E., Bailey, A. O., Yates, J. R., 3rd and Cleveland, D. W. (2006). The human CENP-A centromeric nucleosome-associated complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 458-469.
23. Gaitanos, T. N., Santamaria, A., Jeyaprakash, A. A., Wang, B., Conti, E. and Nigg, E. A. (2009). Stable kinetochore-microtubule interactions depend on the Ska complex and its new component Ska3/C13Orf3. EMBO J. 28, 1442-1452.
24. Gascoigne, K. E. and Cheeseman, I. M. (2011). Kinetochore assembly: if you build it, they will come. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 23, 102-108.
25. Gascoigne, K. E., Takeuchi, K., Suzuki, A., Hori, T., Fukagawa, T. and Cheeseman, I. M. (2011). Induced ectopic kinetochore assembly bypasses the requirement for CENP-A nucleosomes. Cell 145, 410-422.
26. Gassmann, R., Essex, A., Hu, J. S., Maddox, P. S., Motegi, F., Sugimoto, A., O'rourke, S. M., Bowerman, B., McLeod, I., Yates, J. R., 3rd et al. (2008). A new mechanism controlling kinetochore-microtubule interactions revealed by comparison of two dynein-targeting components: SPDL-1 and the Rod/Zwilch/Zw10 complex. Genes Dev. 22, 2385-2399.
27. Goshima, G. and Yanagida, M. (2000). Establishing biorientation occurs with precocious separation of the sister kinetochores, but not the arms, in the early spindle of budding yeast. Cell 100, 619-633.
28. Goshima, G., Saitoh, S. and Yanagida, M. (1999). Proper metaphase spindle length is determined by centromere proteins Mis12 and Mis6 required for faithful chromosome segregation. Genes Dev. 13, 1664-1677.
29. Griffis, E. R., Stuurman, N. and Vale, R. D. (2007). Spindly, a novel protein essential for silencing the spindle assembly checkpoint, recruits dynein to the kinetochore. J. Cell Biol. 177, 1005-1015.
30. Grishchuk, E. L., Efremov, A. K., Volkov, V. A., Spiridonov, I. S., Gudimchuk, N., Westermann, S., Drubin, D., Barnes, G., McIntosh, J. R. and Ataullakhanov, F. I. (2008). The Dam1 ring binds microtubules strongly enough to be a processive as well as energy-efficient coupler for chromosome motion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 15423-15428.
31. Guimaraes, G. J., Dong, Y., McEwen, B. F. and Deluca, J. G. (2008). Kinetochoremicrotubule attachment relies on the disordered N-terminal tail domain of Hec1. Curr. Biol. 18, 1778-1784.
32. Hanisch, A., Silljé, H. H. and Nigg, E. A. (2006). Timely anaphase onset requires a novel spindle and kinetochore complex comprising Ska1 and Ska2. EMBO J. 25, 5504-5515.
33. Hewitt, L., Tighe, A., Santaguida, S., White, A. M., Jones, C. D., Musacchio, A., Green, S. and Taylor, S. S. (2010). Sustained Mps1 activity is required in mitosis to recruit O-Mad2 to the Mad1-C-Mad2 core complex. J. Cell Biol. 190, 25-34.
34. Hori, T. and Fukagawa, T. (2012). Establishment of the vertebrate kinetochores. Chromosome Res. 20, 547-561.
35. Hori, T., Amano, M., Suzuki, A., Backer, C. B., Welburn, J. P., Dong, Y., McEwen, B. F., Shang, W. H., Suzuki, E., Okawa, K. et al. (2008). CCAN makes multiple contacts with centromeric DNA to provide distinct pathways to the outer kinetochore. Cell 135, 1039-1052.
36. Hornung, P., Maier, M., Alushin, G. M., Lander, G. C., Nogales, E. and Westermann, S. (2011). Molecular architecture and connectivity of the budding yeast Mtw1 kinetochore complex. J. Mol. Biol. 405, 548-559.
37. Hsu, K. S. and Toda, T. (2011). Ndc80 internal loop interacts with Dis1/TOG to ensure proper kinetochore-spindle attachment in fission yeast. Curr. Biol. 21, 214-220.
38. Jakopec, V., Topolski, B. and Fleig, U. (2012). Sos7, an essential component of the conserved Schizosaccharomyces pombe Ndc80-MIND-Spc7 complex, identifies a new family of fungal kinetochore proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 32, 3308-3320.
39. Jeyaprakash, A. A., Santamaria, A., Jayachandran, U., Chan, Y. W., Benda, C., Nigg, E. A. and Conti, E. (2012). Structural and functional organization of the Ska complex, a key component of the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Mol. Cell 46, 274-286.
40. Joglekar, A. P., Bloom, K. and Salmon, E. D. (2009). In vivo protein architecture of the eukaryotic kinetochore with nanometer scale accuracy. Curr. Biol. 19, 694-699.
41. Joglekar, A. P., Bloom, K. S. and Salmon, E. D. (2010). Mechanisms of force generation by end-on kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 22, 57-67.
42. Karess, R. (2005). Rod-Zw10-Zwilch: a key player in the spindle checkpoint. Trends Cell Biol. 15, 386-392.
43. Kasuboski, J. M., Bader, J. R., Vaughan, P. S., Tauhata, S. B., Winding, M., Morrissey, M. A., Joyce, M. V., Boggess, W., Vos, L., Chan, G. K. et al. (2011). Zwint-1 is a novel Aurora B substrate required for the assembly of a dynein-binding platform on kinetochores. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 3318-3330.
44. Kiyomitsu, T., Obuse, C. and Yanagida, M. (2007). Human Blinkin/AF15q14 is required for chromosome alignment and the mitotic checkpoint through direct interaction with Bub1 and BubR1. Dev. Cell 13, 663-676.
45. Kiyomitsu, T., Iwasaki, O., Obuse, C. and Yanagida, M. (2010). Inner centromere formation requires hMis14, a trident kinetochore protein that specifically recruits HP1 to human chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 188, 791-807.
46. Kiyomitsu, T., Murakami, H. and Yanagida, M. (2011). Protein interaction domain mapping of human kinetochore protein Blinkin reveals a consensus motif for binding of spindle assembly checkpoint proteins Bub1 and BubR1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31, 998-1011.
47. Kline, S. L., Cheeseman, I. M., Hori, T., Fukagawa, T. and Desai, A. (2006). The human Mis12 complex is required for kinetochore assembly and proper chromosome segregation. J. Cell Biol. 173, 9-17.
48. Kops, G. J. and Shah, J. V. (2012). Connecting up and clearing out: how kinetochore attachment silences the spindle assembly checkpoint. Chromosoma 121, 509-525.
49. Kops, G. J., Kim, Y., Weaver, B. A., Mao, Y., McLeod, I., Yates, J. R., 3rd, Tagaya, M. and Cleveland, D. W. (2005). ZW10 links mitotic checkpoint signaling to the structural kinetochore. J. Cell Biol. 169, 49-60.
50. Krenn, V., Wehenkel, A., Li, X., Santaguida, S. and Musacchio, A. (2012). Structural analysis reveals features of the spindle checkpoint kinase Bub1-kinetochore subunit Knl1 interaction. J. Cell Biol. 196, 451-467.
51. Lampert, F. and Westermann, S. (2011). A blueprint for kinetochores - new insights into the molecular mechanics of cell division. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 407-412.
52. Lin, Y. T., Chen, Y., Wu, G. and Lee, W. H. (2006). Hec1 sequentially recruits Zwint-1 and ZW10 to kinetochores for faithful chromosome segregation and spindle checkpoint control. Oncogene 25, 6901-6914.
53. Liu, D., Vleugel, M., Backer, C. B., Hori, T., Fukagawa, T., Cheeseman, I. M. and Lampson, M. A. (2010). Regulated targeting of protein phosphatase 1 to the outer kinetochore by KNL1 opposes Aurora B kinase. J. Cell Biol. 188, 809-820.
54. London, N., Ceto, S., Ranish, J. A. and Biggins, S. (2012). Phosphoregulation of Spc105 by Mps1 and PP1 regulates Bub1 localization to kinetochores. Curr. Biol. 22, 900-906.
55. Maciejowski, J., George, K. A., Terret, M. E., Zhang, C., Shokat, K. M. and Jallepalli, P. V. (2010). Mps1 directs the assembly of Cdc20 inhibitory complexes during interphase and mitosis to control M phase timing and spindle checkpoint signaling. J. Cell Biol. 190, 89-100.
56. Maresca, T. J. and Salmon, E. D. (2010). Welcome to a new kind of tension: translating kinetochore mechanics into a wait-anaphase signal. J Cell Sci. 123, 825-835.
57. Martin-Lluesma, S., Stucke, V. M. and Nigg, E. A. (2002). Role of Hec1 in spindle checkpoint signaling and kinetochore recruitment of Mad1/Mad2. Science 297, 2267-2270.
58. Maskell, D. P., Hu, X. W. and Singleton, M. R. (2010). Molecular architecture and assembly of the yeast kinetochore MIND complex. J. Cell Biol. 190, 823-834.
59. Matson, D. R. and Stukenberg, P. T. (2012). Cdt1 throws kinetochore-microtubule attachments for a loop. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 561-563.
60. Maure, J. F., Komoto, S., Oku, Y., Mino, A., Pasqualato, S., Natsume, K., Clayton, L., Musacchio, A. and Tanaka, T. U. (2011). The Ndc80 loop region facilitates formation of kinetochore attachment to the dynamic microtubule plus end. Curr. Biol. 21, 207-213.
61. Meadows, J. C., Shepperd, L. A., Vanoosthuyse, V., Lancaster, T. C., Sochaj, A. M., Buttrick, G. J., Hardwick, K. G. and Millar, J. B. (2011). Spindle checkpoint silencing requires association of PP1 to both Spc7 and kinesin-8 motors. Dev. Cell 20, 739-750.
62. Miller, S. A., Johnson, M. L. and Stukenberg, P. T. (2008). Kinetochore attachments require an interaction between unstructured tails on microtubules and Ndc80(Hec1). Curr. Biol. 18, 1785-1791.
63. Musacchio, A. and Salmon, E. D. (2007). The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 379-393.
64. Nilsson, J. (2012). Looping in on Ndc80-how does a protein loop at the kinetochore control chromosome segregation? Bioessays 34, 1070-1077.
65. Nishino, T., Takeuchi, K., Gascoigne, K. E., Suzuki, A., Hori, T., Oyama, T., Morikawa, K., Cheeseman, I. M. and Fukagawa, T. (2012). CENP-T-W-S-X forms a unique centromeric chromatin structure with a histone-like fold. Cell 148, 487-501.
66. Obuse, C., Iwasaki, O., Kiyomitsu, T., Goshima, G., Toyoda, Y. and Yanagida, M. (2004). A conserved Mis12 centromere complex is linked to heterochromatic HP1 and outer kinetochore protein Zwint-1. Nat. Cell Biol. 6, 1135-1141.
67. Okada, M., Cheeseman, I. M., Hori, T., Okawa, K., McLeod, I. X., Yates, J. R., 3rd, Desai, A. and Fukagawa, T. (2006). The CENP-H-I complex is required for the efficient incorporation of newly synthesized CENP-A into centromeres. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 446-457.
68. Perpelescu, M. and Fukagawa, T. (2011). The ABCs of CENPs. Chromosoma 120, 425-446.
69. Petrovic, A., Pasqualato, S., Dube, P., Krenn, V., Santaguida, S., Cittaro, D., Monzani, S., Massimiliano, L., Keller, J., Tarricone, A. et al. (2010). The MIS12 complex is a protein interaction hub for outer kinetochore assembly. J. Cell Biol. 190, 835-852.
70. Powers, A. F., Franck, A. D., Gestaut, D. R., Cooper, J., Gracyzk, B., Wei, R. R., Wordeman, L., Davis, T. N. and Asbury, C. L. (2009). The Ndc80 kinetochore complex forms load-bearing attachments to dynamic microtubule tips via biased diffusion. Cell 136, 865-875.
71. Przewloka, M. R. and Glover, D. M. (2009). The kinetochore and the centromere: a working long distance relationship. Annu. Rev. Genet. 43, 439-465.
72. Przewloka, M. R., Venkei, Z., Bolanos-Garcia, V. M., Debski, J., Dadlez, M. and Glover, D. M. (2011). CENP-C is a structural platform for kinetochore assembly. Curr. Biol. 21, 399-405.
73. Raaijmakers, J. A., Tanenbaum, M. E., Maia, A. F. and Medema, R. H. (2009). RAMA1 is a novel kinetochore protein involved in kinetochore-microtubule attachment. J. Cell Sci. 122, 2436-2445.
74. Rosenberg, J. S., Cross, F. R. and Funabiki, H. (2011). KNL1/Spc105 recruits PP1 to silence the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 21, 942-947.
75. Saitoh, H., Tomkiel, J., Cooke, C. A., Ratrie, H., 3rd, Maurer, M., Rothfield, N. F. and Earnshaw, W. C. (1992). CENP-C, an autoantigen in scleroderma, is a component of the human inner kinetochore plate. Cell 70, 115-125.
76. Sandall, S., Severin, F., McLeod, I. X., Yates, J. R., 3rd, Oegema, K., Hyman, A. and Desai, A. (2006). A Bir1-Sli15 complex connects centromeres to microtubules and is required to sense kinetochore tension. Cell 127, 1179-1191.
77. Santaguida, S. and Musacchio, A. (2009). The life and miracles of kinetochores. EMBO J. 28, 2511-2531.
78. Santaguida, S., Tighe, A., d'alise, A. M., Taylor, S. S. and Musacchio, A. (2010). Dissecting the role of MPS1 in chromosome biorientation and the spindle checkpoint through the small molecule inhibitor reversine. J. Cell Biol. 190, 73-87.
79. Schittenhelm, R. B., Heeger, S., Althoff, F., Walter, A., Heidmann, S., Mechtler, K. and Lehner, C. F. (2007). Spatial organization of a ubiquitous eukaryotic kinetochore protein network in Drosophila chromosomes. Chromosoma 116, 385-402.
80. Schittenhelm, R. B., Chaleckis, R. and Lehner, C. F. (2009). Intrakinetochore localization and essential functional domains of Drosophila Spc105. EMBO J. 28, 2374-2386.
81. Schleiffer, A., Maier, M., Litos, G., Lampert, F., Hornung, P., Mechtler, K. and Westermann, S. (2012). CENP-T proteins are conserved centromere receptors of the Ndc80 complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 604-613.
82. Schmidt, J. C., Arthanari, H., Boeszoermenyi, A., Dashkevich, N. M., Wilson-Kubalek, E. M., Monnier, N., Markus, M., Oberer, M., Milligan, R. A., Bathe, M. et al. (2012). The kinetochore-bound ska1 complex tracks depolymerizing microtubules and binds to curved protofilaments. Dev. Cell 23, 968-980.
83. Screpanti, E., De Antoni, A., Alushin, G. M., Petrovic, A., Melis, T., Nogales, E. and Musacchio, A. (2011). Direct binding of Cenp-C to the Mis12 complex joins the inner and outer kinetochore. Curr. Biol. 21, 391-398.
84. Shepperd, L. A., Meadows, J. C., Sochaj, A. M., Lancaster, T. C., Zou, J., Buttrick, G. J., Rappsilber, J., Hardwick, K. G. and Millar, J. B. (2012). Phosphodependent recruitment of Bub1 and Bub3 to Spc7/KNL1 by Mph1 kinase maintains the spindle checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 22, 891-899.
85. Starr, D. A., Saffery, R., Li, Z., Simpson, A. E., Choo, K. H., Yen, T. J. and Goldberg, M. L. (2000). HZwint-1, a novel human kinetochore component that interacts with HZW10. J. Cell Sci. 113, 1939-1950.
86. Sundin, L. J., Guimaraes, G. J. and Deluca, J. G. (2011). The NDC80 complex proteins Nuf2 and Hec1 make distinct contributions to kinetochore-microtubule attachment in mitosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 759-768.
87. Takeuchi, K. and Fukagawa, T. (2012). Molecular architecture of vertebrate kinetochores. Exp. Cell Res. 318, 1367-1374.
88. Theis, M., Slabicki, M., Junqueira, M., Paszkowski-Rogacz, M., Sontheimer, J., Kittler, R., Heninger, A. K., Glatter, T., Kruusmaa, K., Poser, I. et al. (2009). Comparative profiling identifies C13orf3 as a component of the Ska complex required for mammalian cell division. EMBO J. 28, 1453-1465.
89. Tooley, J. and Stukenberg, P. T. (2011). The Ndc80 complex: integrating the kinetochore's many movements. Chromosome Res. 19, 377-391.
90. Tooley, J. G., Miller, S. A. and Stukenberg, P. T. (2011). The Ndc80 complex uses a tripartite attachment point to couple microtubule depolymerization to chromosome movement. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 1217-1226.
91. Umbreit, N. T., Gestaut, D. R., Tien, J. F., Vollmar, B. S., Gonen, T., Asbury, C. L. and Davis, T. N. (2012). The Ndc80 kinetochore complex directly modulates microtubule dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16113-16118.
92. Varma, D., Chandrasekaran, S., Sundin, L. J., Reidy, K. T., Wan, X., Chasse, D. A., Nevis, K. R., DeLuca, J. G., Salmon, E. D. and Cook, J. G. (2012). Recruitment of the human Cdt1 replication licensing protein by the loop domain of Hec1 is required for stable kinetochore-microtubule attachment. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 593-603.
93. Venkei, Z., Przewloka, M. R. and Glover, D. M. (2011). Drosophila Mis12 complex acts as a single functional unit essential for anaphase chromosome movement and a robust spindle assembly checkpoint. Genetics 187, 131-140.
94. Vigneron, S., Prieto, S., Bernis, C., Labbé, J. C., Castro, A. and Lorca, T. (2004). Kinetochore localization of spindle checkpoint proteins: who controls whom? Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 4584-4596.
95. Vos, L. J., Famulski, J. K. and Chan, G. K. (2011). hZwint-1 bridges the inner and outer kinetochore: identification of the kinetochore localization domain and the hZw10-interaction domain. Biochem. J. 436, 157-168.
96. Wan, X., O'Quinn, R. P., Pierce, H. L., Joglekar, A. P., Gall, W. E., DeLuca, J. G., Carroll, C. W., Liu, S. T., Yen, T. J., McEwen, B. F. et al. (2009). Protein architecture of the human kinetochore microtubule attachment site. Cell 137, 672-684.
97. Wang, H., Hu, X., Ding, X., Dou, Z., Yang, Z., Shaw, A. W., Teng, M., Cleveland, D. W., Goldberg, M. L., Niu, L. et al. (2004). Human Zwint-1 specifies localization of Zeste White 10 to kinetochores and is essential for mitotic checkpoint signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 54590-54598.
98. Wang, H. W., Long, S., Ciferri, C., Westermann, S., Drubin, D., Barnes, G. and Nogales, E. (2008). Architecture and flexibility of the yeast Ndc80 kinetochore complex. J. Mol. Biol. 383, 894-903.
99. Wei, R. R., Al-Bassam, J. and Harrison, S. C. (2007). The Ndc80/HEC1 complex is a contact point for kinetochore-microtubule attachment. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 54-59.
100. Wei, R., Ngo, B., Wu, G. and Lee, W. H. (2011). Phosphorylation of the Ndc80 complex protein, HEC1, by Nek2 kinase modulates chromosome alignment and signaling of the spindle assembly checkpoint. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 3584-3594.
101. Welburn, J. P., Grishchuk, E. L., Backer, C. B., Wilson-Kubalek, E. M., Yates, J. R., 3rd and Cheeseman, I. M. (2009). The human kinetochore Ska1 complex facilitates microtubule depolymerization-coupled motility. Dev. Cell 16, 374-385.
102. Welburn, J. P., Vleugel, M., Liu, D., Yates, J. R., 3rd, Lampson, M. A., Fukagawa, T. and Cheeseman, I. M. (2010). Aurora B phosphorylates spatially distinct targets to differentially regulate the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Mol. Cell 38, 383-392.
103. Wilson-Kubalek, E. M., Cheeseman, I. M., Yoshioka, C., Desai, A. and Milligan, R. A. (2008). Orientation and structure of the Ndc80 complex on the microtubule lattice. J. Cell Biol. 182, 1055-1061.
104. Yamagishi, Y., Yang, C. H., Tanno, Y. and Watanabe, Y. (2012). MPS1/Mph1 phosphorylates the kinetochore protein KNL1/Spc7 to recruit SAC components. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 746-752.
105. Zhang, G., Kelstrup, C. D., Hu, X. W., Kaas Hansen, M. J., Singleton, M. R., Olsen, J. V. and Nilsson, J. (2012). The Ndc80 internal loop is required for recruitment of the Ska complex to establish end-on microtubule attachment to kinetochores. J. Cell Sci. 125, 3243-3253.