Regulatory mechanisms of kinetochore-microtubule interaction in mitosis

Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences

Volumn 70, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 559-579

  Tanaka, Kozo ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bi orientation; Chromosome segregation; Kinetochore; Microtubule; Mitosis; Spindle

Indexed keywords

AURORA B KINASE; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN 20; CELL PROTEIN; CENTROMERE PROTEIN A; CENTROMERE PROTEIN E; CENTROMERE PROTEIN F; CHECKPOINT KINASE 1; GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; MOLECULAR MOTOR; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; NUCLEOPORIN; PROTEIN DAM1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

CELL ADHESION; CELL INTERACTION; CELL MOTILITY; CELL MOTION; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL ULTRASTRUCTURE; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; DNA SEQUENCE; HUMAN; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REVIEW; UBIQUITINATION;

ANIMALS; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; HUMANS; KINETOCHORES; MICROTUBULES; MITOSIS; MODELS, MOLECULAR;

EID: 84873723524     PISSN: 1420682X     EISSN: 14209071     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00018-012-1057-7     Document Type: Review

References (232)

1. Flemming W (1879) Beitrage zur kenntnis der zelle und ihrer lebenserscheinungen. Arch Mikrosk Anat 18:302-436
2. McAinsh AD, Tytell JD, Sorger PK (2003) Structure, function, and regulation of budding yeast kinetochores. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 19:519-539
3. Cleveland DW, Mao Y, Sullivan KF (2003) Centromeres and kinetochores: from epigenetics to mitotic checkpoint signaling. Cell 112:407-421
4. Marshall OJ, Chueh AC, Wong LH, Choo KH (2008) Neocentromeres: new insights into centromere structure, disease development, and karyotype evolution. Am J Hum Genet 82:261-282
5. Black BE, Bassett EA (2008) The histone variant CENP-A and centromere specification. Curr Opin Cell Biol 20:91-100
6. Heun P, Erhardt S, Blower MD, Weiss S, Skora AD, Karpen GH (2006) Mislocalization of the Drosophila centromere-specific histone CID promotes formation of functional ectopic kinetochores. Dev Cell 10:303-315
7. Gascoigne KE, Takeuchi K, Suzuki A, Hori T, Fukagawa T, Cheeseman IM (2011) Induced ectopic kinetochore assembly bypasses the requirement for CENP-A nucleosomes. Cell 145:410-422
8. Coffman VC, Wu P, Parthun MR, Wu JQ (2011) CENP-A exceeds microtubule attachment sites in centromere clusters of both budding and fission yeast. J Cell Biol 195:563-572
9. Lawrimore J, Bloom KS, Salmon ED (2011) Point centromeres contain more than a single centromere-specific Cse4 (CENP-A) nucleosome. J Cell Biol 195:573-582
10. Blower MD, Sullivan BA, Karpen GH (2002) Conserved organization of centromeric chromatin in flies and humans. Dev Cell 2:319-330
11. Maddox PS, Oegema K, Desai A, Cheeseman IM (2004) "Holo"er than thou: chromosome segregation and kinetochore function in C. elegans. Chromosome Res 12:641-653
12. Rieder CL (1982) The formation, structure, and composition of the mammalian kinetochore and kinetochore fiber. Int Rev Cytol 79:1-58
13. Rieder CL, Salmon ED (1998) The vertebrate cell kinetochore and its roles during mitosis. Trends Cell Biol 8:310-318
14. Desai A, Mitchison TJ (1997) Microtubule polymerization dynamics. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 13:83-117
15. Winey M, Mamay CL, O'Toole ET, Mastronarde DN, Giddings TH Jr, McDonald KL, McIntosh JR (1995) Three-dimensional ultrastructural analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitotic spindle. J Cell Biol 129:1601-1615
16. O'Toole ET, Winey M, McIntosh JR (1999) High-voltage electron tomography of spindle pole bodies and early mitotic spindles in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 10:2017-2031
17. Ding R, McDonald KL, McIntosh JR (1993) Three-dimensional reconstruction and analysis of mitotic spindles from the yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Cell Biol 120:141-151
18. McEwen BF, Heagle AB, Cassels GO, Buttle KF, Rieder CL (1997) Kinetochore fiber maturation in PtK1 cells and its implications for the mechanisms of chromosome congression and anaphase onset. J Cell Biol 137:1567-1580
19. Dong Y, Vanden Beldt KJ, Meng X, Khodjakov A, McEwen BF (2007) The outer plate in vertebrate kinetochores is a flexible network with multiple microtubule interactions. Nat Cell Biol 9:516-522
20. McIntosh JR, Grishchuk EL, Morphew MK, Efremov AK, Zhudenkov K, Volkov VA, Cheeseman IM, Desai A, Mastronarde DN, Ataullakhanov FI (2008) Fibrils connect microtubule tips with kinetochores: a mechanism to couple tubulin dynamics to chromosome motion. Cell 135:322-333
21. Cheeseman IM, Desai A (2008) Molecular architecture of the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9:33-46
22. Joglekar AP, Bouck D, Finley K, Liu X, Wan Y, Berman J, He X, Salmon ED, Bloom KS (2008) Molecular architecture of the kinetochore-microtubule attachment site is conserved between point and regional centromeres. J Cell Biol 181:587-594
23. Johnston K, Joglekar A, Hori T, Suzuki A, Fukagawa T, Salmon ED (2010) Vertebrate kinetochore protein architecture: protein copy number. J Cell Biol 189:937-943
24. Wan X, O'Quinn RP, Pierce HL, Joglekar AP, Gall WE, DeLuca JG, Carroll CW, Liu ST, Yen TJ, McEwen BF, Stukenberg PT, Desai A, Salmon ED (2009) Protein architecture of the human kinetochore microtubule attachment site. Cell 137:672-684
25. Suzuki A, Hori T, Nishino T, Usukura J, Miyagi A, Morikawa K, Fukagawa T (2011) Spindle microtubules generate tension-dependent changes in the distribution of inner kinetochore proteins. J Cell Biol 193:125-140
26. Perpelescu M, Fukagawa T (2011) The ABCs of CENPs. Chromosoma 120:425-446
27. Tanaka TU, Stark MJ, Tanaka K (2005) Kinetochore capture and bi-orientation on the mitotic spindle. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6:929-942
28. Kawashima S, Nakabayashi Y, Matsubara K, Sano N, Enomoto T, Tanaka K, Seki M, Horikoshi M (2011) Global analysis of core histones reveals nucleosomal surfaces required for chromosome bi-orientation. EMBO J 30:3353-3367
29. Mitchison T, Kirschner M (1984) Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature 312:237-242
30. Kirschner M, Mitchison T (1986) Beyond self-assembly: from microtubules to morphogenesis. Cell 45:329-342
31. Akhmanova A, Steinmetz MO (2008) Tracking the ends: a dynamic protein network controls the fate of microtubule tips. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9:309-322
32. Moore A, Wordeman L (2004) The mechanism, function and regulation of depolymerizing kinesins during mitosis. Trends Cell Biol 14:537-546
33. Tanenbaum ME, Macurek L, van der Vaart B, Galli M, Akhmanova A, Medema RH (2011) A complex of Kif18b and MCAK promotes microtubule depolymerization and is negatively regulated by Aurora kinases. Curr Biol 21:1356-1365
34. Tulu US, Rusan NM, Wadsworth P (2003) Peripheral, non-centrosome- associated microtubules contribute to spindle formation in centrosome-containing cells. Curr Biol 13:1894-1899
35. Wollman R, Cytrynbaum EN, Jones JT, Meyer T, Scholey JM, Mogilner A (2005) Efficient chromosome capture requires a bias in the 'search-and-capture' process during mitotic-spindle assembly. Curr Biol 15:828-832
36. Clarke PR, Zhang C (2008) Spatial and temporal coordination of mitosis by Ran GTPase. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9:464-477
37. Carazo-Salas RE, Karsenti E (2003) Long-range communication between chromatin and microtubules in Xenopus egg extracts. Curr Biol 13:1728-1733
38. Tanaka TU (2010) Kinetochore-microtubule interactions: steps towards bi-orientation. EMBO J 29:4070-4082
39. Tulu US, Fagerstrom C, Ferenz NP, Wadsworth P (2006) Molecular requirements for kinetochore-associated microtubule formation in mammalian cells. Curr Biol 16:536-541
40. Mishra RK, Chakraborty P, Arnaoutov A, Fontoura BM, Dasso M (2010) The Nup107-160 complex and gamma-TuRC regulate microtubule polymerization at kinetochores. Nat Cell Biol 12:164-169
41. Maiato H, Rieder CL, Khodjakov A (2004) Kinetochore-driven formation of kinetochore fibers contributes to spindle assembly during animal mitosis. J Cell Biol 167:831-840
42. Winey M, O'Toole ET (2001) The spindle cycle in budding yeast. Nat Cell Biol 3:E23-E27
43. Kitamura E, Tanaka K, Kitamura Y, Tanaka TU (2007) Kinetochore microtubule interaction during S phase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev 21:3319-3330
44. Tanaka K, Mukae N, Dewar H, van Breugel M, James EK, Prescott AR, Antony C, Tanaka TU (2005) Molecular mechanisms of kinetochore capture by spindle microtubules. Nature 434:987-994
45. Kitamura E, Tanaka K, Komoto S, Kitamura Y, Antony C, Tanaka TU (2010) Kinetochores generate microtubules with distal plus ends: their roles and limited lifetime in mitosis. Dev Cell 18:248-259
46. Vorozhko VV, Emanuele MJ, Kallio MJ, Stukenberg PT, Gorbsky GJ (2008) Multiple mechanisms of chromosome movement in vertebrate cells mediated through the Ndc80 complex and dynein/dynactin. Chromosoma 117:169-179
47. Alexander SP, Rieder CL (1991) Chromosome motion during attachment to the vertebrate spindle: initial saltatory-like behavior of chromosomes and quantitative analysis of force production by nascent kinetochore fibers. J Cell Biol 113:805-815
48. Yang Z, Tulu US, Wadsworth P, Rieder CL (2007) Kinetochore dynein is required for chromosome motion and congression independent of the spindle checkpoint. Curr Biol 17:973-980
49. Gandhi SR, Gierlinski M, Mino A, Tanaka K, Kitamura E, Clayton L, Tanaka TU (2011) Kinetochore-dependent microtubule rescue ensures their efficient and sustained interactions in early mitosis. Dev Cell 21:920-933
50. McDonald HB, Stewart RJ, Goldstein LS (1990) The kinesin-like ncd protein of Drosophila is a minus end-directed microtubule motor. Cell 63:1159-1165
51. Endow SA, Komma DJ (1996) Centrosome and spindle function of the Drosophila Ncd microtubule motor visualized in live embryos using Ncd-GFP fusion proteins. J Cell Sci 109(Pt 10):2429-2442
52. Tanaka K, Kitamura E, Kitamura Y, Tanaka TU (2007) Molecular mechanisms of microtubule-dependent kinetochore transport toward spindle poles. J Cell Biol 178:269-281
53. Meraldi P, Sorger PK (2005) A dual role for Bub1 in the spindle checkpoint and chromosome congression. EMBO J 24:1621-1633
54. Logarinho E, Resende T, Torres C, Bousbaa H (2008) The human spindle assembly checkpoint protein Bub3 is required for the establishment of efficient kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Mol Biol Cell 19:1798-1813
55. Goshima G, Mayer M, Zhang N, Stuurman N, Vale RD (2008) Augmin: a protein complex required for centrosome-independent microtubule generation within the spindle. J Cell Biol 181:421-429
56. Lawo S, Bashkurov M, Mullin M, Ferreria MG, Kittler R, Habermann B, Tagliaferro A, Poser I, Hutchins JR, Hegemann B, Pinchev D, Buchholz F, Peters JM, Hyman AA, Gingras AC, Pelletier L (2009) HAUS, the 8-subunit human Augmin complex, regulates centrosome and spindle integrity. Curr Biol 19:816-826
57. Uehara R, Nozawa RS, Tomioka A, Petry S, Vale RD, Obuse C, Goshima G (2009) The augmin complex plays a critical role in spindle microtubule generation for mitotic progression and cytokinesis in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:6998-7003
58. Tooley J, Stukenberg PT (2011) The Ndc80 complex: integrating the kinetochore's many movements. Chromosome Res 19:377-391
59. Kiyomitsu T, Obuse C, Yanagida M (2007) Human Blinkin/AF15q14 is required for chromosome alignment and the mitotic checkpoint through direct interaction with Bub1 and BubR1. Dev Cell 13:663-676
60. Cheeseman IM, Chappie JS, Wilson-Kubalek EM, Desai A (2006) The conserved KMN network constitutes the core microtubule-binding site of the kinetochore. Cell 127:983-997
61. Screpanti E, De Antoni A, Alushin GM, Petrovic A, Melis T, Nogales E, Musacchio A (2011) Direct binding of Cenp-C to the Mis12 complex joins the inner and outer kinetochore. Curr Biol 21:391-398
62. Przewloka MR, Venkei Z, Bolanos-Garcia VM, Debski J, Dadlez M, Glover DM (2011) CENP-C is a structural platform for kinetochore assembly. Curr Biol 21:399-405
63. Nishino T, Takeuchi K, Gascoigne KE, Suzuki A, Hori T, Oyama T, Morikawa K, Cheeseman IM, Fukagawa T (2012) CENP-T-W-S-X forms a unique centromeric chromatin structure with a histone-like fold. Cell 148:487-501
64. Buttrick GJ, Millar JB (2011) Ringing the changes: emerging roles for DASH at the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Chromosome Res 19:393-407
65. Maure JF, Komoto S, Oku Y, Mino A, Pasqualato S, Natsume K, Clayton L, Musacchio A, Tanaka TU (2011) The Ndc80 loop region facilitates formation of kinetochore attachment to the dynamic microtubule plus end. Curr Biol 21:207-213
66. Cheeseman IM, Brew C, Wolyniak M, Desai A, Anderson S, Muster N, Yates JR, Huffaker TC, Drubin DG, Barnes G (2001) Implication of a novel multiprotein Dam1p complex in outer kinetochore function. J Cell Biol 155:1137-1145
67. Cheeseman IM, Enquist-Newman M, Muller-Reichert T, Drubin DG, Barnes G (2001) Mitotic spindle integrity and kinetochore function linked by the Duo1p/Dam1p complex. J Cell Biol 152:197-212
68. Asbury CL, Gestaut DR, Powers AF, Franck AD, Davis TN (2006) The Dam1 kinetochore complex harnesses microtubule dynamics to produce force and movement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:9873-9878
69. Franck AD, Powers AF, Gestaut DR, Gonen T, Davis TN, Asbury CL (2007) Tension applied through the Dam1 complex promotes microtubule elongation providing a direct mechanism for length control in mitosis. Nat Cell Biol 9:832-837
70. Sanchez-Perez I, Renwick SJ, Crawley K, Karig I, Buck V, Meadows JC, Franco-Sanchez A, Fleig U, Toda T, Millar JB (2005) The DASH complex and Klp5/Klp6 kinesin coordinate bipolar chromosome attachment in fission yeast. EMBO J 24:2931-2943
71. Hanisch A, Sillje HH, Nigg EA (2006) Timely anaphase onset requires a novel spindle and kinetochore complex comprising Ska1 and Ska2. EMBO J 25:5504-5515
72. Daum JR, Wren JD, Daniel JJ, Sivakumar S, McAvoy JN, Potapova TA, Gorbsky GJ (2009) Ska3 is required for spindle checkpoint silencing and the maintenance of chromosome cohesion in mitosis. Curr Biol 19:1467-1472
73. Gaitanos TN, Santamaria A, Jeyaprakash AA, Wang B, Conti E, Nigg EA (2009) Stable kinetochore-microtubule interactions depend on the Ska complex and its new component Ska3/C13Orf3. EMBO J 28:1442-1452
74. Raaijmakers JA, Tanenbaum ME, Maia AF, Medema RH (2009) RAMA1 is a novel kinetochore protein involved in kinetochore-microtubule attachment. J Cell Sci 122:2436-2445
75. Welburn JP, Grishchuk EL, Backer CB, Wilson-Kubalek EM, Yates JR 3rd, Cheeseman IM (2009) The human kinetochore Ska1 complex facilitates microtubule depolymerization-coupled motility. Dev Cell 16:374-385
76. Loncarek J, Kisurina-Evgenieva O, Vinogradova T, Hergert P, La Terra S, Kapoor TM, Khodjakov A (2007) The centromere geometry essential for keeping mitosis error free is controlled by spindle forces. Nature 450:745-749
77. Indjeian VB, Murray AW (2007) Budding yeast mitotic chromosomes have an intrinsic bias to biorient on the spindle. Curr Biol 17:1837-1846
78. Kapoor TM, Lampson MA, Hergert P, Cameron L, Cimini D, Salmon ED, McEwen BF, Khodjakov A (2006) Chromosomes can congress to the metaphase plate before biorientation. Science 311:388-391
79. Lampson MA, Cheeseman IM (2011) Sensing centromere tension: Aurora B and the regulation of kinetochore function. Trends Cell Biol 21:133-140
80. Ciferri C, Pasqualato S, Screpanti E, Varetti G, Santaguida S, Dos Reis G, Maiolica A, Polka J, De Luca JG, De Wulf P, Salek M, Rappsilber J, Moores CA, Salmon ED, Musacchio A (2008) Implications for kinetochore-microtubule attachment from the structure of an engineered Ndc80 complex. Cell 133:427-439
81. Nicklas RB (1997) How cells get the right chromosomes. Science 275:632-637
82. Dewar H, Tanaka K, Nasmyth K, Tanaka TU (2004) Tension between two kinetochores suffices for their bi-orientation on the mitotic spindle. Nature 428:93-97
83. Biggins S, Murray AW (2001) The budding yeast protein kinase Ipl1/Aurora allows the absence of tension to activate the spindle checkpoint. Genes Dev 15:3118-3129
84. Tanaka TU, Rachidi N, Janke C, Pereira G, Galova M, Schiebel E, Stark MJ, Nasmyth K (2002) Evidence that the Ipl1-Sli15 (Aurora kinase-INCENP) complex promotes chromosome bi-orientation by altering kinetochore-spindle pole connections. Cell 108:317-329
85. Hauf S, Cole RW, LaTerra S, Zimmer C, Schnapp G, Walter R, Heckel A, van Meel J, Rieder CL, Peters JM (2003) The small molecule Hesperadin reveals a role for Aurora B in correcting kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in maintaining the spindle assembly checkpoint. J Cell Biol 161:281-294
86. Lampson MA, Renduchitala K, Khodjakov A, Kapoor TM (2004) Correcting improper chromosome-spindle attachments during cell division. Nat Cell Biol 6:232-237
87. Liu D, Vader G, Vromans MJ, Lampson MA, Lens SM (2009) Sensing chromosome bi-orientation by spatial separation of aurora B kinase from kinetochore substrates. Science 323:1350-1353
88. Wang E, Ballister ER, Lampson MA (2011) Aurora B dynamics at centromeres create a diffusion-based phosphorylation gradient. J Cell Biol 194:539-549
89. Welburn JP, Vleugel M, Liu D, Yates JR 3rd, Lampson MA, Fukagawa T, Cheeseman IM (2010) Aurora B phosphorylates spatially distinct targets to differentially regulate the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Mol Cell 38:383-392
90. Liu D, Vleugel M, Backer CB, Hori T, Fukagawa T, Cheeseman IM, Lampson MA (2010) Regulated targeting of protein phosphatase 1 to the outer kinetochore by KNL1 opposes Aurora B kinase. J Cell Biol 188:809-820
91. Cimini D, Wan X, Hirel CB, Salmon ED (2006) Aurora kinase promotes turnover of kinetochore microtubules to reduce chromosome segregation errors. Curr Biol 16:1711-1718
92. Knowlton AL, Lan W, Stukenberg PT (2006) Aurora B is enriched at merotelic attachment sites, where it regulates MCAK. Curr Biol 16:1705-1710
93. Nicklas RB, Ward SC (1994) Elements of error correction in mitosis: microtubule capture, release, and tension. J Cell Biol 126:1241-1253
94. Bakhoum SF, Thompson SL, Manning AL, Compton DA (2009) Genome stability is ensured by temporal control of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics. Nat Cell Biol 11:27-35
95. Salimian KJ, Ballister ER, Smoak EM, Wood S, Panchenko T, Lampson MA, Black BE (2011) Feedback control in sensing chromosome biorientation by the Aurora B kinase. Curr Biol 21:1158-1165
96. Andrews PD, Ovechkina Y, Morrice N, Wagenbach M, Duncan K, Wordeman L, Swedlow JR (2004) Aurora B regulates MCAK at the mitotic centromere. Dev Cell 6:253-268
97. Lan W, Zhang X, Kline-Smith SL, Rosasco SE, Barrett-Wilt GA, Shabanowitz J, Hunt DF, Walczak CE, Stukenberg PT (2004) Aurora B phosphorylates centromeric MCAK and regulates its localization and microtubule depolymerization activity. Curr Biol 14:273-286
98. Ohi R, Sapra T, Howard J, Mitchison TJ (2004) Differentiation of cytoplasmic and meiotic spindle assembly MCAK functions by Aurora B-dependent phosphorylation. Mol Biol Cell 15:2895-2906
99. Oguchi Y, Uchimura S, Ohki T, Mikhailenko SV, Ishiwata S (2011) The bidirectional depolymerizer MCAK generates force by disassembling both microtubule ends. Nat Cell Biol 13:846-852
100. Ganem NJ, Upton K, Compton DA (2005) Efficient mitosis in human cells lacking poleward microtubule flux. Curr Biol 15:1827-1832
101. Cheeseman IM, Anderson S, Jwa M, Green EM, Kang J, Yates JR 3rd, Chan CS, Drubin DG, Barnes G (2002) Phospho-regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments by the Aurora kinase Ipl1p. Cell 111:163-172
102. Lampert F, Hornung P, Westermann S (2010) The Dam1 complex confers microtubule plus end-tracking activity to the Ndc80 kinetochore complex. J Cell Biol 189:641-649
103. Tien JF, Umbreit NT, Gestaut DR, Franck AD, Cooper J, Wordeman L, Gonen T, Asbury CL, Davis TN (2010) Cooperation of the Dam1 and Ndc80 kinetochore complexes enhances microtubule coupling and is regulated by aurora B. J Cell Biol 189:713-723
104. Chan YW, Jeyaprakash AA, Nigg EA, Santamaria A (2012) Aurora B controls kinetochore-microtubule attachments by inhibiting Ska complex-KMN network interaction. J Cell Biol 196:563-571
105. Kawashima SA, Yamagishi Y, Honda T, Ishiguro K, Watanabe Y (2010) Phosphorylation of H2A by Bub1 prevents chromosomal instability through localizing shugoshin. Science 327:172-177
106. Wang F, Dai J, Daum JR, Niedzialkowska E, Banerjee B, Stukenberg PT, Gorbsky GJ, Higgins JM (2010) Histone H3 Thr-3 phosphorylation by Haspin positions Aurora B at centromeres in mitosis. Science 330:231-235
107. Kelly AE, Ghenoiu C, Xue JZ, Zierhut C, Kimura H, Funabiki H (2010) Survivin reads phosphorylated histone H3 threonine 3 to activate the mitotic kinase Aurora B. Science 330:235-239
108. Yamagishi Y, Honda T, Tanno Y, Watanabe Y (2010) Two histone marks establish the inner centromere and chromosome bi-orientation. Science 330:239-243
109. Salic A, Waters JC, Mitchison TJ (2004) Vertebrate shugoshin links sister centromere cohesion and kinetochore microtubule stability in mitosis. Cell 118:567-578
110. Dai J, Sultan S, Taylor SS, Higgins JM (2005) The kinase haspin is required for mitotic histone H3 Thr 3 phosphorylation and normal metaphase chromosome alignment. Genes Dev 19:472-488
111. Huang H, Feng J, Famulski J, Rattner JB, Liu ST, Kao GD, Muschel R, Chan GK, Yen TJ (2007) Tripin/hSgo2 recruits MCAK to the inner centromere to correct defective kinetochore attachments. J Cell Biol 177:413-424
112. Jelluma N, Brenkman AB, van den Broek NJ, Cruijsen CW, van Osch MH, Lens SM, Medema RH, Kops GJ (2008) Mps1 phosphorylates Borealin to control Aurora B activity and chromosome alignment. Cell 132:233-246
113. Hewitt L, Tighe A, Santaguida S, White AM, Jones CD, Musacchio A, Green S, Taylor SS (2010) Sustained Mps1 activity is required in mitosis to recruit O-Mad2 to the Mad1-C-Mad2 core complex. J Cell Biol 190:25-34
114. Maciejowski J, George KA, Terret ME, Zhang C, Shokat KM, Jallepalli PV (2010) Mps1 directs the assembly of Cdc20 inhibitory complexes during interphase and mitosis to control M phase timing and spindle checkpoint signaling. J Cell Biol 190:89-100
115. Santaguida S, Tighe A, D'Alise AM, Taylor SS, Musacchio A (2010) Dissecting the role of MPS1 in chromosome biorientation and the spindle checkpoint through the small molecule inhibitor reversine. J Cell Biol 190:73-87
116. Indjeian VB, Stern BM, Murray AW (2005) The centromeric protein Sgo1 is required to sense lack of tension on mitotic chromosomes. Science 307:130-133
117. Maure JF, Kitamura E, Tanaka TU (2007) Mps1 kinase promotes sister-kinetochore bi-orientation by a tension-dependent mechanism. Curr Biol 17:2175-2182
118. Nigg EA (2001) Mitotic kinases as regulators of cell division and its checkpoints. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2:21-32
119. Barr FA, Sillje HH, Nigg EA (2004) Polo-like kinases and the orchestration of cell division. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5:429-440
120. Carmena M, Pinson X, Platani M, Salloum Z, Xu Z, Clark A, Macisaac F, Ogawa H, Eggert U, Glover DM, Archambault V, Earnshaw WC (2012) The chromosomal passenger complex activates polo kinase at centromeres. PLoS Biol 10:e1001250
121. O'Regan L, Blot J, Fry AM (2007) Mitotic regulation by NIMA-related kinases. Cell Div 2:25
122. Du J, Cai X, Yao J, Ding X, Wu Q, Pei S, Jiang K, Zhang Y, Wang W, Shi Y, Lai Y, Shen J, Teng M, Huang H, Fei Q, Reddy ES, Zhu J, Jin C, Yao X (2008) The mitotic checkpoint kinase NEK2A regulates kinetochore microtubule attachment stability. Oncogene 27:4107-4114
123. Wei R, Ngo B, Wu G, Lee WH (2011) Phosphorylation of the Ndc80 complex protein, HEC1, by Nek2 kinase modulates chromosome alignment and signaling of the spindle assembly checkpoint. Mol Biol Cell 22:3584-3594
124. Kitajima TS, Sakuno T, Ishiguro K, Iemura S, Natsume T, Kawashima SA, Watanabe Y (2006) Shugoshin collaborates with protein phosphatase 2A to protect cohesin. Nature 441:46-52
125. Riedel CG, Katis VL, Katou Y, Mori S, Itoh T, Helmhart W, Galova M, Petronczki M, Gregan J, Cetin B, Mudrak I, Ogris E, Mechtler K, Pelletier L, Buchholz F, Shirahige K, Nasmyth K (2006) Protein phosphatase 2A protects centromeric sister chromatid cohesion during meiosis I. Nature 441:53-61
126. Tang Z, Shu H, Qi W, Mahmood NA, Mumby MC, Yu H (2006) PP2A is required for centromeric localization of Sgo1 and proper chromosome segregation. Dev Cell 10:575-585
127. Foley EA, Maldonado M, Kapoor TM (2011) Formation of stable attachments between kinetochores and microtubules depends on the B56-PP2A phosphatase. Nat Cell Biol 13:1265-1271
128. Kim Y, Holland AJ, Lan W, Cleveland DW (2010) Aurora kinases and protein phosphatase 1 mediate chromosome congression through regulation of CENP-E. Cell 142:444-455
129. Posch M, Khoudoli GA, Swift S, King EM, Deluca JG, Swedlow JR (2010) Sds22 regulates aurora B activity and microtubule-kinetochore interactions at mitosis. J Cell Biol 191:61-74
130. Meadows JC, Shepperd LA, Vanoosthuyse V, Lancaster TC, Sochaj AM, Buttrick GJ, Hardwick KG, Millar JB (2011) Spindle checkpoint silencing requires association of PP1 to both Spc7 and kinesin-8 motors. Dev Cell 20:739-750
131. Bakhoum SF, Genovese G, Compton DA (2009) Deviant kinetochore microtubule dynamics underlie chromosomal instability. Curr Biol 19:1937-1942
132. Magidson V, O'Connell CB, Loncarek J, Paul R, Mogilner A, Khodjakov A (2011) The spatial arrangement of chromosomes during prometaphase facilitates spindle assembly. Cell 146:555-567
133. Cai S, O'Connell CB, Khodjakov A, Walczak CE (2009) Chromosome congression in the absence of kinetochore fibres. Nat Cell Biol 11:832-838
134. Tokai N, Fujimoto-Nishiyama A, Toyoshima Y, Yonemura S, Tsukita S, Inoue J, Yamamota T (1996) Kid, a novel kinesin-like DNA binding protein, is localized to chromosomes and the mitotic spindle. EMBO J 15:457-467
135. Levesque AA, Compton DA (2001) The chromokinesin Kid is necessary for chromosome arm orientation and oscillation, but not congression, on mitotic spindles. J Cell Biol 154:1135-1146
136. Kitajima TS, Ohsugi M, Ellenberg J (2011) Complete kinetochore tracking reveals error-prone homologous chromosome biorientation in mammalian oocytes. Cell 146:568-581
137. Musacchio A, Salmon ED (2007) The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8:379-393
138. Luo X, Tang Z, Rizo J, Yu H (2002) The Mad2 spindle checkpoint protein undergoes similar major conformational changes upon binding to either Mad1 or Cdc20. Mol Cell 9:59-71
139. Sironi L, Mapelli M, Knapp S, De Antoni A, Jeang KT, Musacchio A (2002) Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1-Mad2 core complex: implications of a 'safety belt' binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint. EMBO J 21:2496-2506
140. Fava LL, Kaulich M, Nigg EA, Santamaria A (2011) Probing the in vivo function of Mad1:C-Mad2 in the spindle assembly checkpoint. EMBO J 30:3322-3336
141. Pinsky BA, Kung C, Shokat KM, Biggins S (2006) The Ipl1-Aurora protein kinase activates the spindle checkpoint by creating unattached kinetochores. Nat Cell Biol 8:78-83
142. Maresca TJ, Salmon ED (2010) Welcome to a new kind of tension: translating kinetochore mechanics into a wait-anaphase signal. J Cell Sci 123:825-835
143. Maldonado M, Kapoor TM (2011) Constitutive Mad1 targeting to kinetochores uncouples checkpoint signalling from chromosome biorientation. Nat Cell Biol 13:475-482
144. Santaguida S, Vernieri C, Villa F, Ciliberto A, Musacchio A (2011) Evidence that Aurora B is implicated in spindle checkpoint signalling independently of error correction. EMBO J 30:1508-1519
145. Saurin AT, van der Waal MS, Medema RH, Lens SM, Kops GJ (2011) Aurora B potentiates Mps1 activation to ensure rapid checkpoint establishment at the onset of mitosis. Nat Commun 2:316
146. Gregan J, Polakova S, Zhang L, Tolic-Norrelykke IM, Cimini D (2011) Merotelic kinetochore attachment: causes and effects. Trends Cell Biol 21:374-381
147. Cimini D, Cameron LA, Salmon ED (2004) Anaphase spindle mechanics prevent mis-segregation of merotelically oriented chromosomes. Curr Biol 14:2149-2155
148. Thompson SL, Compton DA (2011) Chromosome missegregation in human cells arises through specific types of kinetochore-microtubule attachment errors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:17974-17978
149. Thompson SL, Compton DA (2008) Examining the link between chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in human cells. J Cell Biol 180:665-672
150. Karess R (2005) Rod-Zw10-Zwilch: a key player in the spindle checkpoint. Trends Cell Biol 15:386-392
151. Barisic M, Geley S (2011) Spindly switch controls anaphase: spindly and RZZ functions in chromosome attachment and mitotic checkpoint control. Cell Cycle 10:449-456
152. Mansfeld J, Collin P, Collins MO, Choudhary JS, Pines J (2011) APC15 drives the turnover of MCC-CDC20 to make the spindle assembly checkpoint responsive to kinetochore attachment. Nat Cell Biol 13:1234-1243
153. Varetti G, Guida C, Santaguida S, Chiroli E, Musacchio A (2011) Homeostatic control of mitotic arrest. Mol Cell 44:710-720
154. Westhorpe FG, Tighe A, Lara-Gonzalez P, Taylor SS (2011) p31comet-mediated extraction of Mad2 from the MCC promotes efficient mitotic exit. J Cell Sci 124:3905-3916
155. Jia L, Li B, Warrington RT, Hao X, Wang S, Yu H (2011) Defining pathways of spindle checkpoint silencing: functional redundancy between Cdc20 ubiquitination and p31(comet). Mol Biol Cell 22:4227-4235
156. Gao YF, Li T, Chang Y, Wang YB, Zhang WN, Li WH, He K, Mu R, Zhen C, Man JH, Pan X, Chen L, Yu M, Liang B, Chen Y, Xia Q, Zhou T, Gong WL, Li AL, Li HY, Zhang XM (2011) Cdk1-phosphorylated CUEDC2 promotes spindle checkpoint inactivation and chromosomal instability. Nat Cell Biol 13:924-933
157. Garnett MJ, Mansfeld J, Godwin C, Matsusaka T, Wu J, Russell P, Pines J, Venkitaraman AR (2009) UBE2S elongates ubiquitin chains on APC/C substrates to promote mitotic exit. Nat Cell Biol 11:1363-1369
158. Summers MK, Pan B, Mukhyala K, Jackson PK (2008) The unique N terminus of the UbcH10 E2 enzyme controls the threshold for APC activation and enhances checkpoint regulation of the APC. Mol Cell 31:544-556
159. Williamson A, Wickliffe KE, Mellone BG, Song L, Karpen GH, Rape M (2009) Identification of a physiological E2 module for the human anaphase-promoting complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:18213-18218
160. Wu T, Merbl Y, Huo Y, Gallop JL, Tzur A, Kirschner MW (2010) UBE2S drives elongation of K11-linked ubiquitin chains by the anaphase-promoting complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:1355-1360
161. Lesage B, Qian J, Bollen M (2011) Spindle checkpoint silencing: PP1 tips the balance. Curr Biol 21:R898-R903
162. Vanoosthuyse V, Hardwick KG (2009) A novel protein phosphatase 1-dependent spindle checkpoint silencing mechanism. Curr Biol 19:1176-1181
163. Pinsky BA, Nelson CR, Biggins S (2009) Protein phosphatase 1 regulates exit from the spindle checkpoint in budding yeast. Curr Biol 19:1182-1187
164. Rosenberg JS, Cross FR, Funabiki H (2011) KNL1/Spc105 recruits PP1 to silence the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr Biol 21:942-947
165. Espeut J, Cheerambathur DK, Krenning L, Oegema K, Desai A (2012) Microtubule binding by KNL-1 contributes to spindle checkpoint silencing at the kinetochore. J Cell Biol 196:469-482
166. Maresca TJ, Salmon ED (2009) Intrakinetochore stretch is associated with changes in kinetochore phosphorylation and spindle assembly checkpoint activity. J Cell Biol 184:373-381
167. Uchida KS, Takagaki K, Kumada K, Hirayama Y, Noda T, Hirota T (2009) Kinetochore stretching inactivates the spindle assembly checkpoint. J Cell Biol 184:383-390
168. Kiermaier E, Woehrer S, Peng Y, Mechtler K, Westermann S (2009) A Dam1-based artificial kinetochore is sufficient to promote chromosome segregation in budding yeast. Nat Cell Biol 11:1109-1115
169. Lacefield S, Lau DT, Murray AW (2009) Recruiting a microtubule-binding complex to DNA directs chromosome segregation in budding yeast. Nat Cell Biol 11:1116-1120
170. Ashar HR, James L, Gray K, Carr D, Black S, Armstrong L, Bishop WR, Kirschmeier P (2000) Farnesyl transferase inhibitors block the farnesylation of CENP-E and CENP-F and alter the association of CENP-E with the microtubules. J Biol Chem 275:30451-30457
171. Hussein D, Taylor SS (2002) Farnesylation of Cenp-F is required for G2/M progression and degradation after mitosis. J Cell Sci 115:3403-3414
172. Schafer-Hales K, Iaconelli J, Snyder JP, Prussia A, Nettles JH, El-Naggar A, Khuri FR, Giannakakou P, Marcus AI (2007) Farnesyl transferase inhibitors impair chromosomal maintenance in cell lines and human tumors by compromising CENP-E and CENP-F function. Mol Cancer Ther 6:1317-1328
173. Maffini S, Maia AR, Manning AL, Maliga Z, Pereira AL, Junqueira M, Shevchenko A, Hyman A, Yates JR 3rd, Galjart N, Compton DA, Maiato H (2009) Motor-independent targeting of CLASPs to kinetochores by CENP-E promotes microtubule turnover and poleward flux. Curr Biol 19:1566-1572
174. Sardar HS, Luczak VG, Lopez MM, Lister BC, Gilbert SP (2010) Mitotic kinesin CENP-E promotes microtubule plus-end elongation. Curr Biol 20:1648-1653
175. Varis A, Salmela AL, Kallio MJ (2006) Cenp-F (mitosin) is more than a mitotic marker. Chromosoma 115:288-295
176. Yang Z, Guo J, Chen Q, Ding C, Du J, Zhu X (2005) Silencing mitosin induces misaligned chromosomes, premature chromosome decondensation before anaphase onset, and mitotic cell death. Mol Cell Biol 25:4062-4074
177. Holt SV, Vergnolle MA, Hussein D, Wozniak MJ, Allan VJ, Taylor SS (2005) Silencing Cenp-F weakens centromeric cohesion, prevents chromosome alignment and activates the spindle checkpoint. J Cell Sci 118:4889-4900
178. Bomont P, Maddox P, Shah JV, Desai AB, Cleveland DW (2005) Unstable microtubule capture at kinetochores depleted of the centromere-associated protein CENP-F. EMBO J 24:3927-3939
179. Laoukili J, Kooistra MR, Bras A, Kauw J, Kerkhoven RM, Morrison A, Clevers H, Medema RH (2005) FoxM1 is required for execution of the mitotic programme and chromosome stability. Nat Cell Biol 7:126-136
180. Vergnolle MA, Taylor SS (2007) Cenp-F links kinetochores to Ndel1/Nde1/Lis1/dynein microtubule motor complexes. Curr Biol 17:1173-1179
181. Feng J, Huang H, Yen TJ (2006) CENP-F is a novel microtubule-binding protein that is essential for kinetochore attachments and affects the duration of the mitotic checkpoint delay. Chromosoma 115:320-329
182. Lampson MA, Kapoor TM (2005) The human mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1 regulates chromosome-spindle attachments. Nat Cell Biol 7:93-98
183. Logarinho E, Bousbaa H (2008) Kinetochore-microtubule interactions "in check" by Bub1, Bub3 and BubR1: the dual task of attaching and signalling. Cell Cycle 7:1763-1768
184. Bolanos-Garcia VM, Blundell TL (2011) BUB1 and BUBR1: multifaceted kinases of the cell cycle. Trends Biochem Sci 36:141-150
185. Elowe S (2011) Bub1 and BubR1: at the interface between chromosome attachment and the spindle checkpoint. Mol Cell Biol 31:3085-3093
186. Kabeche L, Compton DA (2012) Checkpoint-independent stabilization of kinetochore-microtubule attachments by Mad2 in human cells. Curr Biol 22:638-644
187. Morrison EE (2007) Action and interactions at microtubule ends. Cell Mol Life Sci 64:307-317
188. Tanenbaum ME, Galjart N, van Vugt MA, Medema RH (2006) CLIP-170 facilitates the formation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments. EMBO J 25:45-57
189. Li H, Liu XS, Yang X, Wang Y, Turner JR, Liu X (2010) Phosphorylation of CLIP-170 by Plk1 and CK2 promotes timely formation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments. EMBO J 29:2953-2965
190. Maiato H, Fairley EA, Rieder CL, Swedlow JR, Sunkel CE, Earnshaw WC (2003) Human CLASP1 is an outer kinetochore component that regulates spindle microtubule dynamics. Cell 113:891-904
191. Pereira AL, Pereira AJ, Maia AR, Drabek K, Sayas CL, Hergert PJ, Lince-Faria M, Matos I, Duque C, Stepanova T, Rieder CL, Earnshaw WC, Galjart N, Maiato H (2006) Mammalian CLASP1 and CLASP2 cooperate to ensure mitotic fidelity by regulating spindle and kinetochore function. Mol Biol Cell 17:4526-4542
192. Manning AL, Bakhoum SF, Maffini S, Correia-Melo C, Maiato H, Compton DA (2010) CLASP1, astrin and Kif2b form a molecular switch that regulates kinetochore-microtubule dynamics to promote mitotic progression and fidelity. EMBO J 29:3531-3543
193. Green RA, Wollman R, Kaplan KB (2005) APC and EB1 function together in mitosis to regulate spindle dynamics and chromosome alignment. Mol Biol Cell 16:4609-4622
194. Draviam VM, Shapiro I, Aldridge B, Sorger PK (2006) Misorientation and reduced stretching of aligned sister kinetochores promote chromosome missegregation in EB1- or APC-depleted cells. EMBO J 25:2814-2827
195. Mayr MI, Hummer S, Bormann J, Gruner T, Adio S, Woehlke G, Mayer TU (2007) The human kinesin Kif18A is a motile microtubule depolymerase essential for chromosome congression. Curr Biol 17:488-498
196. Stumpff J, von Dassow G, Wagenbach M, Asbury C, Wordeman L (2008) The kinesin-8 motor Kif18A suppresses kinetochore movements to control mitotic chromosome alignment. Dev Cell 14:252-262
197. Jaqaman K, King EM, Amaro AC, Winter JR, Dorn JF, Elliott HL, McHedlishvili N, McClelland SE, Porter IM, Posch M, Toso A, Danuser G, McAinsh AD, Meraldi P, Swedlow JR (2010) Kinetochore alignment within the metaphase plate is regulated by centromere stiffness and microtubule depolymerases. J Cell Biol 188:665-679
198. Stumpff J, Du Y, English CA, Maliga Z, Wagenbach M, Asbury CL, Wordeman L, Ohi R (2011) A tethering mechanism controls the processivity and kinetochore-microtubule plus-end enrichment of the kinesin-8 Kif18A. Mol Cell 43:764-775
199. Weaver LN, Ems-McClung SC, Stout JR, LeBlanc C, Shaw SL, Gardner MK, Walczak CE (2011) Kif18A uses a microtubule binding site in the tail for plus-end localization and spindle length regulation. Curr Biol 21:1500-1506
200. Ye F, Tan L, Yang Q, Xia Y, Deng LW, Murata-Hori M, Liou YC (2011) HURP regulates chromosome congression by modulating kinesin Kif18A function. Curr Biol 21:1584-1591
201. Bader JR, Vaughan KT (2010) Dynein at the kinetochore: timing, interactions and functions. Semin Cell Dev Biol 21:269-275
202. Chatel G, Fahrenkrog B (2011) Nucleoporins: leaving the nuclear pore complex for a successful mitosis. Cell Signal 23:1555-1562
203. Zuccolo M, Alves A, Galy V, Bolhy S, Formstecher E, Racine V, Sibarita JB, Fukagawa T, Shiekhattar R, Yen T, Doye V (2007) The human Nup107-160 nuclear pore subcomplex contributes to proper kinetochore functions. EMBO J 26:1853-1864
204. Platani M, Santarella-Mellwig R, Posch M, Walczak R, Swedlow JR, Mattaj IW (2009) The Nup107-160 nucleoporin complex promotes mitotic events via control of the localization state of the chromosome passenger complex. Mol Biol Cell 20:5260-5275
205. Wozniak R, Burke B, Doye V (2010) Nuclear transport and the mitotic apparatus: an evolving relationship. Cell Mol Life Sci 67:2215-2230
206. Koffa MD, Casanova CM, Santarella R, Kocher T, Wilm M, Mattaj IW (2006) HURP is part of a Ran-dependent complex involved in spindle formation. Curr Biol 16: 743-754
207. Ribbeck K, Groen AC, Santarella R, Bohnsack MT, Raemaekers T, Kocher T, Gentzel M, Gorlich D, Wilm M, Carmeliet G, Mitchison TJ, Ellenberg J, Hoenger A, Mattaj IW (2006) NuSAP, a mitotic RanGTP target that stabilizes and cross-links microtubules. Mol Biol Cell 17:2646-2660
208. Wong J, Fang G (2006) HURP controls spindle dynamics to promote proper interkinetochore tension and efficient kinetochore capture. J Cell Biol 173:879-891
209. Joseph J, Tan SH, Karpova TS, McNally JG, Dasso M (2002) SUMO-1 targets RanGAP1 to kinetochores and mitotic spindles. J Cell Biol 156:595-602
210. Arnaoutov A, Azuma Y, Ribbeck K, Joseph J, Boyarchuk Y, Karpova T, McNally J, Dasso M (2005) Crm1 is a mitotic effector of Ran-GTP in somatic cells. Nat Cell Biol 7:626-632
211. Joseph J, Liu ST, Jablonski SA, Yen TJ, Dasso M (2004) The RanGAP1-RanBP2 complex is essential for microtubule-kinetochore interactions in vivo. Curr Biol 14:611-617
212. Zachos G, Black EJ, Walker M, Scott MT, Vagnarelli P, Earnshaw WC, Gillespie DA (2007) Chk1 is required for spindle checkpoint function. Dev Cell 12:247-260
213. Petsalaki E, Akoumianaki T, Black EJ, Gillespie DA, Zachos G (2011) Phosphorylation at serine 331 is required for Aurora B activation. J Cell Biol 195:449-466
214. Giunta S, Jackson SP (2011) Give me a break, but not in mitosis: the mitotic DNA damage response marks DNA double-strand breaks with early signaling events. Cell Cycle 10:1215-1221
215. Giunta S, Belotserkovskaya R, Jackson SP (2010) DNA damage signaling in response to double-strand breaks during mitosis. J Cell Biol 190:197-207
216. Choi E, Park PG, Lee HO, Lee YK, Kang GH, Lee JW, Han W, Lee HC, Noh DY, Lekomtsev S, Lee H (2012) BRCA2 fine-tunes the spindle assembly checkpoint through reinforcement of BubR1 acetylation. Dev Cell 22:295-308
217. Schmidt JC, Kiyomitsu T, Hori T, Backer CB, Fukagawa T, Cheeseman IM (2010) Aurora B kinase controls the targeting of the Astrin-SKAP complex to bioriented kinetochores. J Cell Biol 191:269-280
218. Dunsch AK, Linnane E, Barr FA, Gruneberg U (2011) The astrin-kinastrin/SKAP complex localizes to microtubule plus ends and facilitates chromosome alignment. J Cell Biol 192:959-968
219. Yasuda S, Oceguera-Yanez F, Kato T, Okamoto M, Yonemura S, Terada Y, Ishizaki T, Narumiya S (2004) Cdc42 and mDia3 regulate microtubule attachment to kinetochores. Nature 428:767-771
220. Cheng L, Zhang J, Ahmad S, Rozier L, Yu H, Deng H, Mao Y (2011) Aurora B regulates formin mDia3 in achieving metaphase chromosome alignment. Dev Cell 20:342-352
221. Porter IM, McClelland SE, Khoudoli GA, Hunter CJ, Andersen JS, McAinsh AD, Blow JJ, Swedlow JR (2007) Bod1, a novel kinetochore protein required for chromosome biorientation. J Cell Biol 179:187-197
222. Emanuele MJ, Stukenberg PT (2007) Xenopus Cep57 is a novel kinetochore component involved in microtubule attachment. Cell 130:893-905
223. Itoh G, Kanno S, Uchida KS, Chiba S, Sugino S, Watanabe K, Mizuno K, Yasui A, Hirota T, Tanaka K (2011) CAMP (C13orf8, ZNF828) is a novel regulator of kinetochore-microtubule attachment. EMBO J 30:130-144
224. Kikuchi K, Niikura Y, Kitagawa K, Kikuchi A (2010) Dishevelled, a Wnt signalling component, is involved in mitotic progression in cooperation with Plk1. EMBO J 29:3470-3483
225. Mondal G, Ohashi A, Yang L, Rowley M, Couch FJ (2012) Tex14, a Plk1-regulated protein, is required for kinetochore-microtubule attachment and regulation of the spindle assembly checkpoint. Mol Cell 45:680-695
226. Montembault E, Dutertre S, Prigent C, Giet R (2007) PRP4 is a spindle assembly checkpoint protein required for MPS1, MAD1, and MAD2 localization to the kinetochores. J Cell Biol 179:601-609
227. Amin MA, Matsunaga S, Uchiyama S, Fukui K (2008) Nucleophosmin is required for chromosome congression, proper mitotic spindle formation, and kinetochore-microtubule attachment in HeLa cells. FEBS Lett 582:3839-3844
228. Ohta S, Bukowski-Wills JC, Sanchez-Pulido L, Alves Fde L, Wood L, Chen ZA, Platani M, Fischer L, Hudson DF, Ponting CP, Fukagawa T, Earnshaw WC, Rappsilber J (2010) The protein composition of mitotic chromosomes determined using multiclassifier combinatorial proteomics. Cell 142:810-821
229. Gascoigne KE, Cheeseman IM (2011) Kinetochore assembly: if you build it, they will come. Curr Opin Cell Biol 23:102-108
230. Kitagawa K, Skowyra D, Elledge SJ, Harper JW, Hieter P (1999) SGT1 encodes an essential component of the yeast kinetochore assembly pathway and a novel subunit of the SCF ubiquitin ligase complex. Mol Cell 4:21-33
231. Davies AE, Kaplan KB (2010) Hsp90-Sgt1 and Skp1 target human Mis12 complexes to ensure efficient formation of kinetochore-microtubule binding sites. J Cell Biol 189:261-274
232. Thompson SL, Compton DA (2011) Chromosomes and cancer cells. Chromosome Res 19:433-444