Spindly switch controls anaphase: Spindly and RZZ functions in chromosome attachment and mitotic checkpoint control

Cell Cycle

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 449-456

  Barisic, Marin ^a   Geley, Stephan ^a  

^a INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

Author keywords

CCDC99; Dynein; Kinetochore; Microtubule attachment; Mitosis; RZZ; Spindle; Spindle assembly checkpoint; Spindly

Indexed keywords

DYNEIN ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; PROTEIN RZZ; PROTEIN SPINDLY; REGULATOR PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANAPHASE; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME; COMPLEX FORMATION; CYTOPLASM; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS SPINDLE; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REVIEW;

EID: 79851481719     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.10.3.14759     Document Type: Review

References (105)

1. Cheeseman IM, Desai A. Molecular architecture of the kinetochore- microtubule interface. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008; 9:33-46.
2. Santaguida S, Musacchio A. The life and miracles of kinetochores. EMBO J 2009; 28:2511-31.
3. Ris H, Witt PL. Structure of the mammalian kinetochore. Chromosoma 1981; 82:153-70. (Pubitemid 11119053)
4. Brinkley BR, Stubblefield E. The fine structure of the kinetochore of a mammalian cell in vitro. Chromosoma 1966; 19:28-43.
5. McAinsh AD, Tytell JD, Sorger PK. Structure, function and regulation of budding yeast kinetochores. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2003; 19:519-39. (Pubitemid 37487359)
6. Westermann S, Drubin DG, Barnes G. Structures and functions of yeast kinetochore complexes. Annu Rev Biochem 2007; 76:563-91.
7. Meraldi P, McAinsh AD, Rheinbay E, Sorger PK. Phylogenetic and structural analysis of centromeric DNA and kinetochore proteins. Genome Biol 2006; 7:23.
8. Joglekar AP, Bouck D, Finley K, Liu X, Wan Y, Berman J, et al. Molecular architecture of the kinetochore-microtubule attachment site is conserved between point and regional centromeres. J Cell Biol 2008; 181:587-94. (Pubitemid 351717506)
9. Zinkowski RP, Meyne J, Brinkley BR. The centromere-kinetochore complex: a repeat subunit model. J Cell Biol 1991; 113:1091-110. (Pubitemid 21909741)
10. Cheeseman IM, Chappie JS, Wilson-Kubalek EM, Desai A. The conserved KMN network constitutes the core microtubule-binding site of the kinetochore. Cell 2006; 127:983-97. (Pubitemid 44792248)
11. Welburn JP, Grishchuk EL, Backer CB, Wilson-Kubalek EM, Yates JR, 3rd, Cheeseman IM. The human kinetochore Ska1 complex facilitates microtubule depolymerization-coupled motility. Dev Cell 2009; 16:374-85.
12. Gaitanos TN, Santamaria A, Jeyaprakash AA, Wang B, Conti E, Nigg EA. Stable kinetochore-microtubule interactions depend on the Ska complex and its new component Ska3/C13Orf3. EMBO J 2009; 28:1442-52.
13. Theis M, Slabicki M, Junqueira M, Paszkowski-Rogacz M, Sontheimer J, Kittler R, et al. Comparative profiling identifies C13orf3 as a component of the Ska complex required for mammalian cell division. EMBO J 2009; 28:1453-65.
14. Liu D, Lampson MA. Regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments by Aurora B kinase. Biochem Soc Trans 2009; 37:976-80.
15. Ruchaud S, Carmena M, Earnshaw WC. Chromosomal passengers: conducting cell division. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8:798-812. (Pubitemid 47462135)
16. Karess R. Rod-Zw10-Zwilch: a key player in the spindle checkpoint. Trends Cell Biol 2005; 15:386-92. (Pubitemid 40943528)
17. Maiato H, DeLuca J, Salmon ED, Earnshaw WC. The dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interface. J Cell Sci 2004; 117:5461-77. (Pubitemid 40012194)
18. Wan X, O'Quinn RP, Pierce HL, Joglekar AP, Gall WE, DeLuca JG, et al. Protein architecture of the human kinetochore microtubule attachment site. Cell 2009; 137:672-84.
19. DeLuca JG, Dong Y, Hergert P, Strauss J, Hickey JM, Salmon ED, et al. Hec1 and nuf2 are core components of the kinetochore outer plate essential for organizing microtubule attachment sites. Mol Biol Cell 2005; 16:519-31. (Pubitemid 40165552)
20. Alushin GM, Ramey VH, Pasqualato S, Ball DA, Grigorieff N, Musacchio A, et al. The Ndc80 kinetochore complex forms oligomeric arrays along microtubules. Nature 2010; 467:805-10.
21. Tanaka TU, Desai A. Kinetochore-microtubule interactions: the means to the end. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2008; 20:53-63.
22. Kirschner M, Mitchison T. Beyond self-assembly: from microtubules to morphogenesis. Cell 1986; 45:329-42. (Pubitemid 16014983)
23. Wollman R, Cytrynbaum EN, Jones JT, Meyer T, Scholey JM, Mogilner A. Efficient chromosome capture requires a bias in the 'search-and-capture' process during mitotic-spindle assembly. Curr Biol 2005; 15:828-32.
24. Hook P, Vallee RB. The dynein family at a glance. J Cell Sci 2006; 119:4369-71. (Pubitemid 44830635)
25. Burgess SA, Walker ML, Sakakibara H, Knight PJ, Oiwa K. Dynein structure and power stroke. Nature 2003; 421:715-8. (Pubitemid 36227616)
26. Kardon JR, Vale RD. Regulators of the cytoplasmic dynein motor. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10:854-65.
27. Pfarr CM, Coue M, Grissom PM, Hays TS, Porter ME, McIntosh JR. Cytoplasmic dynein is localized to kinetochores during mitosis. Nature 1990; 345:263-5.
28. Steuer ER, Wordeman L, Schroer TA, Sheetz MP. Localization of cytoplasmic dynein to mitotic spindles and kinetochores. Nature 1990; 345:266-8.
29. Mao Y, Varma D, Vallee R. Emerging functions of force-producing kinetochore motors. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:715-9.
30. Whyte J, Bader JR, Tauhata SB, Raycroft M, Hornick J, Pfister KK, et al. Phosphorylation regulates targeting of cytoplasmic dynein to kinetochores during mitosis. J Cell Biol 2008; 183:819-34.
31. Starr DA, Williams BC, Hays TS, Goldberg ML. ZW10 helps recruit dynactin and dynein to the kinetochore. J Cell Biol 1998; 142:763-74. (Pubitemid 28381493)
32. Barisic M, Sohm B, Mikolcevic P, Wandke C, Rauch V, Ringer T, et al. Spindly/CCDC99 is required for efficient chromosome congression and mitotic checkpoint regulation. Mol Biol Cell 2010; 21:1968-81.
33. Chan YW, Fava LL, Uldschmid A, Schmitz MH, Gerlich DW, Nigg EA, et al. Mitotic control of kinetochore-associated dynein and spindle orientation by human Spindly. J Cell Biol 2009; 185:859-74.
34. Gassmann R, Essex A, Hu JS, Maddox PS, Motegi F, Sugimoto A, et al. A new mechanism controlling kinetochore-microtubule interactions revealed by comparison of two dynein-targeting components: SPDL-1 and the Rod/Zwilch/Zw10 complex. Genes Dev 2008; 22:2385-99.
35. Griffis ER, Stuurman N, Vale RD. Spindly, a novel protein essential for silencing the spindle assembly checkpoint, recruits dynein to the kinetochore. J Cell Biol 2007; 177:1005-15. (Pubitemid 46955705)
36. Tanaka K, Mukae N, Dewar H, van Breugel M, James EK, Prescott AR, et al. Molecular mechanisms of kinetochore capture by spindle microtubules. Nature 2005; 434:987-94. (Pubitemid 40586041)
37. Rieder CL, Alexander SP. Kinetochores are transported poleward along a single astral microtubule during chromosome attachment to the spindle in newt lung cells. J Cell Biol 1990; 110:81-95.
38. Sharp DJ, Rogers GC, Scholey JM. Cytoplasmic dynein is required for poleward chromosome movement during mitosis in Drosophila embryos. Nat Cell Biol 2000; 2:922-30.
39. Yang Z, Tulu US, Wadsworth P, Rieder CL. Kinetochore dynein is required for chromosome motion and congression independent of the spindle checkpoint. Curr Biol 2007; 17:973-80.
40. Stukenberg PT, Foltz DR. Kinetochores: orchestrating the chromosomal minuet. Curr Biol 2010; 20:522-5.
41. Wojcik E, Basto R, Serr M, Scaerou F, Karess R, Hays T. Kinetochore dynein: its dynamics and role in the transport of the Rough deal checkpoint protein. Nat Cell Biol 2001; 3:1001-7. (Pubitemid 34428745)
42. King JM, Hays TS, Nicklas RB. Dynein is a transient kinetochore component whose binding is regulated by microtubule attachment, not tension. J Cell Biol 2000; 151:739-48.
43. Bader JR, Vaughan KT. Dynein at the kinetochore: Timing, Interactions and Functions. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2010; 21:269-75.
44. Nasmyth K, Peters JM, Uhlmann F. Splitting the chromosome: cutting the ties that bind sister chromatids. Science 2000; 288:1379-85.
45. Fung TK, Poon RY. A roller coaster ride with the mitotic cyclins. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2005; 16:335-42.
46. Peters JM. The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome: a machine designed to destroy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006; 7:644-56.
47. Yu H. Cdc20: a WD40 activator for a cell cycle degradation machine. Mol Cell 2007; 27:3-16. (Pubitemid 46991390)
48. Hayes MJ, Kimata Y, Wattam SL, Lindon C, Mao G, Yamano H, et al. Early mitotic degradation of Nek2A depends on Cdc20-independent interaction with the APC/C. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8:607-14. (Pubitemid 43827354)
49. Geley S, Kramer E, Gieffers C, Gannon J, Peters JM, Hunt T. Anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome-dependent proteolysis of human cyclin A starts at the beginning of mitosis and is not subject to the spindle assembly checkpoint. J Cell Biol 2001; 153:137-48.
50. De Antoni A, Pearson CG, Cimini D, Canman JC, Sala V, Nezi L, et al. The Mad1/Mad2 complex as a template for Mad2 activation in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr Biol 2005; 15:214-25.
51. Nasmyth K. How do so few control so many? Cell 2005; 120:739-46.
52. Rieder CL, Cole RW, Khodjakov A, Sluder G. The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores. J Cell Biol 1995; 130:941-8.
53. Musacchio A, Salmon ED. The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8:379-93.
54. Nezi L, Musacchio A. Sister chromatid tension and the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2009; 21:785-95.
55. Maresca TJ, Salmon ED. Welcome to a new kind of tension: translating kinetochore mechanics into a wait-anaphase signal. J Cell Sci 2010; 123:825-35.
56. Howell BJ, McEwen BF, Canman JC, Hoffman DB, Farrar EM, Rieder CL, et al. Cytoplasmic dynein/dynactin drives kinetochore protein transport to the spindle poles and has a role in mitotic spindle checkpoint inactivation. J Cell Biol 2001; 155:1159-72. (Pubitemid 34286267)
57. Ditchfield C, Johnson VL, Tighe A, Ellston R, Haworth C, Johnson T, et al. Aurora B couples chromosome alignment with anaphase by targeting BubR1, Mad2 and Cenp-E to kinetochores. J Cell Biol 2003; 161:267-80. (Pubitemid 36529846)
58. Hauf S, Cole RW, LaTerra S, Zimmer C, Schnapp G, Walter R, et al. The small molecule Hesperadin reveals a role for Aurora B in correcting kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in maintaining the spindle assembly checkpoint. J Cell Biol 2003; 161:281-94. (Pubitemid 36529847)
59. Cimini D, Wan X, Hirel CB, Salmon ED. Aurora kinase promotes turnover of kinetochore microtubules to reduce chromosome segregation errors. Curr Biol 2006; 16:1711-8.
60. Lampson MA, Renduchitala K, Khodjakov A, Kapoor TM. Correcting improper chromosome-spindle attachments during cell division. Nat Cell Biol 2004; 6:232-7. (Pubitemid 38344361)
61. Andrews PD, Ovechkina Y, Morrice N, Wagenbach M, Duncan K, Wordeman L, et al. Aurora B regulates MCAK at the mitotic centromere. Dev Cell 2004; 6:253-68. (Pubitemid 38190365)
62. Gadea BB, Ruderman JV. Aurora B is required for mitotic chromatin-induced phosphorylation of Op18/Stathmin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:4493-8.
63. Knowlton AL, Vorozhko VV, Lan W, Gorbsky GJ, Stukenberg PT. ICIS and Aurora B coregulate the microtubule depolymerase Kif2a. Curr Biol 2009; 19:758-63.
64. Ciferri C, Pasqualato S, Screpanti E, Varetti G, Santaguida S, Dos Reis G, et al. Implications for kinetochore-microtubule attachment from the structure of an engineered Ndc80 complex. Cell 2008; 133:427-39. (Pubitemid 351622013)
65. Maresca TJ, Salmon ED. Intrakinetochore stretch is associated with changes in kinetochore phosphorylation and spindle assembly checkpoint activity. J Cell Biol 2009; 184:373-81.
66. Uchida KS, Takagaki K, Kumada K, Hirayama Y, Noda T, Hirota T. Kinetochore stretching inactivates the spindle assembly checkpoint. J Cell Biol 2009; 184:383-90.
67. Liu D, Vader G, Vromans MJ, Lampson MA, Lens SM. Sensing chromosome bi-orientation by spatial separation of aurora B kinase from kinetochore substrates. Science 2009; 323:1350-3.
68. Nicklas RB, Ward SC. Elements of error correction in mitosis: microtubule capture, release and tension. J Cell Biol 1994; 126:1241-53. (Pubitemid 24266556)
69. King JM, Nicklas RB. Tension on chromosomes increases the number of kinetochore microtubules but only within limits. J Cell Sci 2000; 113:3815-23.
70. Akiyoshi B, Sarangapani KK, Powers AF, Nelson CR, Reichow SL, Arellano-Santoyo H, et al. Tension directly stabilizes reconstituted kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Nature 2010; 468:576-9.
71. Karess RE, Glover DM. rough deal: a gene required for proper mitotic segregation in Drosophila. J Cell Biol 1989; 109:2951-61. (Pubitemid 20011921)
72. Williams BC, Li Z, Liu S, Williams EV, Leung G, Yen TJ, et al. Zwilch, a new component of the ZW10/ROD complex required for kinetochore functions. Mol Biol Cell 2003; 14:1379-91. (Pubitemid 36547408)
73. Williams BC, Goldberg ML. Determinants of Drosophila zw10 protein localization and function. J Cell Sci 1994; 107:785-98. (Pubitemid 24119339)
74. Williams BC, Gatti M, Goldberg ML. Bipolar spindle attachments affect redistributions of ZW10, a Drosophila centromere/kinetochore component required for accurate chromosome segregation. J Cell Biol 1996; 134:1127-40. (Pubitemid 26300160)
75. Kops GJ, Kim Y, Weaver BA, Mao Y, McLeod I, Yates JR, 3rd, et al. ZW10 links mitotic checkpoint signaling to the structural kinetochore. J Cell Biol 2005; 169:49-60. (Pubitemid 40562913)
76. Obuse C, Iwasaki O, Kiyomitsu T, Goshima G, Toyoda Y, Yanagida M. A conserved Mis12 centromere complex is linked to heterochromatic HP1 and outer kinetochore protein Zwint-1. Nat Cell Biol 2004; 6:1135-41. (Pubitemid 39468016)
77. Cheeseman IM, Niessen S, Anderson S, Hyndman F, Yates JR, 3rd, Oegema K, et al. A conserved protein network controls assembly of the outer kinetochore and its ability to sustain tension. Genes Dev 2004; 18:2255-68. (Pubitemid 39209574)
78. Lin YT, Chen Y, Wu G, Lee WH. Hec1 sequentially recruits Zwint-1 and ZW10 to kinetochores for faithful chromosome segregation and spindle checkpoint control. Oncogene 2006; 25:6901-14. (Pubitemid 44684831)
79. Starr DA, Saffery R, Li Z, Simpson AE, Choo KH, Yen TJ, et al. HZwint-1, a novel human kinetochore component that interacts with HZW10. J Cell Sci 2000; 113:1939-50. (Pubitemid 30386498)
80. Wang H, Hu X, Ding X, Dou Z, Yang Z, Shaw AW, et al. Human Zwint-1 specifies localization of Zeste White 10 to kinetochores and is essential for mitotic checkpoint signaling. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:54590-8. (Pubitemid 40053202)
81. Famulski JK, Vos L, Sun X, Chan G. Stable hZW10 kinetochore residency, mediated by hZwint-1 interaction, is essential for the mitotic checkpoint. J Cell Biol 2008; 180:507-20. (Pubitemid 351240700)
82. Famulski JK, Chan GK. Aurora B kinase-dependent recruitment of hZW10 and hROD to tensionless kinetochores. Curr Biol 2007; 17:2143-9. (Pubitemid 350236865)
83. Varma D, Dujardin DL, Stehman SA, Vallee RB. Role of the kinetochore/cell cycle checkpoint protein ZW10 in interphase cytoplasmic dynein function. J Cell Biol 2006; 172:655-62.
84. Hirose H, Arasaki K, Dohmae N, Takio K, Hatsuzawa K, Nagahama M, et al. Implication of ZW10 in membrane trafficking between the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi. EMBO J 2004; 23:1267-78. (Pubitemid 38524999)
85. Arasaki K, Taniguchi M, Tani K, Tagaya M. RINT-1 regulates the localization and entry of ZW10 to the syntaxin 18 complex. Mol Biol Cell 2006; 17:2780-8. (Pubitemid 43825513)
86. Schmitt HD. Dsl1p/Zw10: common mechanisms behind tethering vesicles and microtubules. Trends Cell Biol 2010; 20:257-68.
87. Civril F, Wehenkel A, Giorgi FM, Santaguida S, Di Fonzo A, Grigorean G, et al. Structural analysis of the RZZ complex reveals common ancestry with multisubunit vesicle tethering machinery. Structure 2010; 18:616-26.
88. Aoki T, Ichimura S, Itoh A, Kuramoto M, Shinkawa T, Isobe T, et al. Identification of the neuroblastoma-amplified gene product as a component of the syntaxin 18 complex implicated in Golgi-to-endoplasmic reticulum retrograde transport. Mol Biol Cell 2009; 20:2639-49.
89. Zhang QH, Wei L, Tong JS, Qi ST, Li S, Ou XH, et al. Localization and function of mSpindly during mouse oocyte meiotic maturation. Cell Cycle 2010; 9.
90. Yamamoto TG, Watanabe S, Essex A, Kitagawa R. SPDL-1 functions as a kinetochore receptor for MDF-1 in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol 2008; 183:187-94.
91. Przewloka MR, Glover DM. The kinetochore and the centromere: a working long distance relationship. Annu Rev Genet 2009; 43:439-65.
92. Goshima G, Vale RD. The roles of microtubule-based motor proteins in mitosis: comprehensive RNAi analysis in the Drosophila S2 cell line. J Cell Biol 2003; 162:1003-16. (Pubitemid 37174184)
93. Varma D, Monzo P, Stehman SA, Vallee RB. Direct role of dynein motor in stable kinetochore-microtubule attachment, orientation and alignment. J Cell Biol 2008; 182:1045-54.
94. Gassmann R, Holland AJ, Varma D, Wan X, Civril F, Cleveland DW, et al. Removal of Spindly from microtubule-attached kinetochores controls spindle checkpoint silencing in human cells. Genes Dev 2010; 24:957-71.
95. Sivaram MV, Wadzinski TL, Redick SD, Manna T, Doxsey SJ. Dynein light intermediate chain 1 is required for progress through the spindle assembly checkpoint. EMBO J 2009; 28:902-14.
96. Meraldi P, Sorger PK. A dual role for Bub1 in the spindle checkpoint and chromosome congression. EMBO J 2005; 24:1621-33. (Pubitemid 40646451)
97. Lampson MA, Kapoor TM. The human mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1 regulates chromosome-spindle attachments. Nat Cell Biol 2005; 7:93-8. (Pubitemid 40123388)
98. Johnson VL, Scott MI, Holt SV, Hussein D, Taylor SS. Bub1 is required for kinetochore localization of BubR1, Cenp-E, Cenp-F and Mad2, and chromosome congression. J Cell Sci 2004; 117:1577-89. (Pubitemid 38559832)
99. Hewitt L, Tighe A, Santaguida S, White AM, Jones CD, Musacchio A, et al. Sustained Mps1 activity is required in mitosis to recruit O-Mad2 to the Mad1-C-Mad2 core complex. J Cell Biol 2010; 190:25-34.
100. Jelluma N, Dansen TB, Sliedrecht T, Kwiatkowski NP, Kops GJ. Release of Mps1 from kinetochores is crucial for timely anaphase onset. J Cell Biol 2010; 191:281-90.
101. Santaguida S, Tighe A, D'Alise AM, Taylor SS, Musacchio A. Dissecting the role of MPS1 in chromosome biorientation and the spindle checkpoint through the small molecule inhibitor reversine. J Cell Biol 2010; 190:73-87.
102. Maciejowski J, George KA, Terret ME, Zhang C, Shokat KM, Jallepalli PV. Mps1 directs the assembly of Cdc20 inhibitory complexes during interphase and mitosis to control M phase timing and spindle checkpoint signaling. J Cell Biol 2010; 190:89-100.
103. Tighe A, Staples O, Taylor S. Mps1 kinase activity restrains anaphase during an unperturbed mitosis and targets Mad2 to kinetochores. J Cell Biol 2008; 181:893-901. (Pubitemid 351846823)
104. Maure JF, Kitamura E, Tanaka TU. Mps1 kinase promotes sister-kinetochore bi-orientation by a tension-dependent mechanism. Curr Biol 2007; 17:2175-82. (Pubitemid 350236864)
105. Jelluma N, Brenkman AB, van den Broek NJ, Cruijsen CW, van Osch MH, Lens SM, et al. Mps1 phosphorylates Borealin to control Aurora B activity and chromosome alignment. Cell 2008; 132:233-46. (Pubitemid 351172430)