p31 comet-mediated extraction of Mad2 from the MCC promotes efficient mitotic exit

Journal of Cell Science

Volumn 124, Issue 22, 2011, Pages 3905-3916

  Westhorpe, Frederick G ^a   Tighe, Anthony ^a   Lara Gonzalez, Pablo ^a   Taylor, Stephen S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anaphase promoting complex; BubR1; Cdc20; Kinetochore; Mitosis; Spindle assembly checkpoint

Indexed keywords

BUB1 RELATED PROTEIN; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN 20; P31 COMET PROTEIN; PROTEIN; PROTEIN MAD2; RECOMBINANT PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CALCIUM BINDING PROTEIN; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; MAD2L1 PROTEIN, HUMAN; MAD2L1BP PROTEIN, HUMAN; MCC PROTEIN, HUMAN; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; REPRESSOR PROTEIN; SIGNAL TRANSDUCING ADAPTOR PROTEIN; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR PROTEIN;

ANAPHASE; ARTICLE; CENTROMERE; GENE OVEREXPRESSION; GENE SILENCING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; METAPHASE; MITOSIS; MITOSIS SPINDLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; RNA INTERFERENCE; CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; CELL LINE; CELLS; CYTOLOGY; GENETICS; METABOLISM;

ADAPTOR PROTEINS, SIGNAL TRANSDUCING; CALCIUM-BINDING PROTEINS; CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CELL LINE; CELLS; HUMANS; KINETOCHORES; MITOSIS; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PROTEIN BINDING; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR PROTEINS;

EID: 84856770507     PISSN: 00219533     EISSN: 14779137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.093286     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Campbell, M. S., Chan, G. K. and Yen, T. J. (2001). Mitotic checkpoint proteins HsMAD1 and HsMAD2 are associated with nuclear pore complexes in interphase. J. Cell Sci. 114, 953-963.
2. Chen, R. H., Shevchenko, A., Mann, M. and Murray, A. W. (1998). Spindle checkpoint protein Xmad1 recruits Xmad2 to unattached kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 143, 283-295.
3. Davenport, J., Harris, L. D. and Goorha, R. (2006). Spindle checkpoint function requires Mad2-dependent Cdc20 binding to the Mad3 homology domain of BubR1. Exp. Cell Res. 312, 1831-1842.
4. De Antoni, A., Pearson, C. G., Cimini, D., Canman, J. C., Sala, V., Nezi, L., Mapelli, M., Sironi, L., Faretta, M., Salmon, E. D. et al. (2005). The Mad1/Mad2 complex as a template for Mad2 activation in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 15, 214-225.
5. Gao, Y. F., Li, T., Chang, Y., Wang, Y. B., Zhang, W. N., Li, W. H., He, K., Mu, R., Zhen, C., Man, J. H. et al. (2011). Cdk1-phosphorylated CUEDC2 promotes spindle checkpoint inactivation and chromosomal instability. Nat. Cell Biol 13, 924-933.
6. Habu, T., Kim, S. H., Weinstein, J. and Matsumoto, T. (2002). Identification of a MAD2-binding protein, CMT2, and its role in mitosis. EMBO J. 21, 6419-6428.
7. He, X., Patterson, T. E. and Sazer, S. (1997). The Schizosaccharomyces pombe spindle checkpoint protein mad2p blocks anaphase and genetically interacts with the anaphase-promoting complex. Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 7965-7970.
8. Herzog, F. and Peters, J. M. (2005). Large-scale purification of the vertebrate anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome. Methods Enzymol. 398, 175-195.
9. Hewitt, L., Tighe, A., Santaguida, S., White, A. M., Jones, C. D., Musacchio, A., Green, S. and Taylor, S. S. (2010). Sustained Mps1 activity is required in mitosis to recruit O-Mad2 to the Mad1-C-Mad2 core complex. J. Cell Biol. 190, 25-34.
10. Holland, A. J., Bottger, F., Stemmann, O. and Taylor, S. S. (2007). Protein phosphatase 2A and separase form a complex regulated by separase autocleavage. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 24623-24632.
11. Howell, B. J., McEwen, B. F., Canman, J. C., Hoffman, D. B., Farrar, E. M., Rieder, C. L. and Salmon, E. D. (2001). Cytoplasmic dynein/dynactin drives kinetochore protein transport to the spindle poles and has a role in mitotic spindle checkpoint inactivation. J. Cell Biol. 155, 1159-1172.
12. Howell, B. J., Moree, B., Farrar, E. M., Stewart, S., Fang, G. and Salmon, E. D. (2004). Spindle checkpoint protein dynamics at kinetochores in living cells. Curr. Biol. 14, 953-964.
13. Hussein, D. and Taylor, S. S. (2002). Farnesylation of Cenp-F is required for G2/M progression and degradation after mitosis. J. Cell Sci. 115, 3403-3414.
14. Johnson, V. L., Scott, M. I., Holt, S. V., Hussein, D. and Taylor, S. S. (2004). Bub1 is required for kinetochore localization of BubR1, Cenp-E, Cenp-F and Mad2, and chromosome congression. J. Cell Sci. 117, 1577-1589.
15. Kulukian, A., Han, J. S. and Cleveland, D. W. (2009). Unattached kinetochores catalyze production of an anaphase inhibitor that requires a Mad2 template to prime Cdc20 for BubR1 binding. Dev. Cell 16, 105-117.
16. Li, Y., Gorbea, C., Mahaffey, D., Rechsteiner, M. and Benezra, R. (1997). MAD2 associates with the cyclosome/anaphase-promoting complex and inhibits its activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 12431-12436.
17. Luo, X., Tang, Z., Rizo, J. and Yu, H. (2002). The Mad2 spindle checkpoint protein undergoes similar major conformational changes upon binding to either Mad1 or Cdc20. Mol. Cell 9, 59-71.
18. Luo, X., Tang, Z., Xia, G., Wassmann, K., Matsumoto, T., Rizo, J. and Yu, H. (2004). The Mad2 spindle checkpoint protein has two distinct natively folded states. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 338-345.
19. Ma, H. T. and Poon, R. Y. (2011). Orderly Inactivation of the Key Checkpoint Protein Mitotic Arrest Deficient 2 (MAD2) during Mitotic Progression. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 13052-13059.
20. comet. EMBO J. 25, 1273-1284.
21. Mapelli, M., Massimiliano, L., Santaguida, S. and Musacchio, A. (2007). The Mad2 conformational dimer: structure and implications for the spindle assembly checkpoint. Cell 131, 730-743.
22. Meraldi, P., Draviam, V. M. and Sorger, P. K. (2004). Timing and checkpoints in the regulation of mitotic progression. Dev. Cell 7, 45-60.
23. Musacchio, A. and Salmon, E. D. (2007). The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 379-393.
24. Nilsson, J., Yekezare, M., Minshull, J. and Pines, J. (2008). The APC/C maintains the spindle assembly checkpoint by targeting Cdc20 for destruction. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 1411-1420.
25. Pante, N., Bastos, R., McMorrow, I., Burke, B. and Aebi, U. (1994). Interactions and three-dimensional localization of a group of nuclear pore complex proteins. J. Cell Biol. 126, 603-617.
26. Peters, J. M. (2006). The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome: a machine designed to destroy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 644-656.
27. Reddy, S. K., Rape, M., Margansky, W. A. and Kirschner, M. W. (2007). Ubiquitination by the anaphase-promoting complex drives spindle checkpoint inactivation. Nature 446, 921-925.
28. Rieder, C. L., Schultz, A., Cole, R. and Sluder, G. (1994). Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle. J. Cell Biol. 127, 1301-1310.
29. Rieder, C. L., Cole, R. W., Khodjakov, A. and Sluder, G. (1995). The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 130, 941-948.
30. Sironi, L., Mapelli, M., Knapp, S., De Antoni, A., Jeang, K. T. and Musacchio, A. (2002). Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1-Mad2 core complex: implications of a 'safety belt' binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint. EMBO J. 21, 2496-2506.
31. Sudakin, V., Chan, G. K. and Yen, T. J. (2001). Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2. J. Cell Biol. 154, 925-936.
32. Taylor, S. S., Hussein, D., Wang, Y., Elderkin, S. and Morrow, C. J. (2001). Kinetochore localisation and phosphorylation of the mitotic checkpoint components Bub1 and BubR1 are differentially regulated by spindle events in human cells. J. Cell Sci. 114, 4385-4395.
33. comet Promotes disassembly of the mitotic checkpoint complex in an ATP-dependent process. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 3187-3192.
34. Tighe, A., Johnson, V. L. and Taylor, S. S. (2004). Truncating APC mutations have dominant effects on proliferation, spindle checkpoint control, survival and chromosome stability. J. Cell Sci. 117, 6339-6353.
35. Vanoosthuyse, V. and Hardwick, K. G. (2009). A novel protein phosphatase 1-dependent spindle checkpoint silencing mechanism. Curr. Biol. 19, 1176-1181.
36. Waters, J. C., Chen, R. H., Murray, A. W. and Salmon, E. D. (1998). Localization of Mad2 to kinetochores depends on microtubule attachment, not tension. J. Cell Biol. 141, 1181-1191.
37. Westhorpe, F. G., Diez, M. A., Gurden, M. D., Tighe, A. and Taylor, S. S. (2010). Re-evaluating the role of Tao1 in the spindle checkpoint. Chromosoma 119, 371-379.
38. comet) antagonizes the function of Mad2 in the spindle checkpoint. EMBO J. 23, 3133-3143.
39. comet blocks Mad2 activation through structural mimicry. Cell 131, 744-755.
40. Yang, Z., Kenny, A. E., Brito, D. A. and Rieder, C. L. (2009). Cells satisfy the mitotic checkpoint in Taxol, and do so faster in concentrations that stabilize syntelic attachments. J. Cell Biol. 186, 675-684.