Mps1 Kinase Promotes Sister-Kinetochore Bi-orientation by a Tension-Dependent Mechanism

Current Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 24, 2007, Pages 2175-2182

  Maure, Jean François ^a   Kitamura, Etsushi ^a   Tanaka, Tomoyuki U ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

CELLBIO; CELLCYCLE

Indexed keywords

IPL1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; MPS1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; PROTEIN KINASE; PROTEIN SERINE THREONINE KINASE; PROTEIN TYROSINE KINASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CENTROMERE; METABOLISM; METAPHASE; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS SPINDLE; PHYSIOLOGY; SACCHAROMYCES;

KINETOCHORES; METAPHASE; MICROTUBULES; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; PROTEIN KINASES; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; PROTEIN-TYROSINE KINASES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 36849091065     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.032     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Nicklas R.B. How cells get the right chromosomes. Science 275 (1997) 632-637
2. Tanaka T.U., Stark M.J., and Tanaka K. Kinetochore capture and bi-orientation on the mitotic spindle. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6 (2005) 929-942
3. Tanaka T.U., Rachidi N., Janke C., Pereira G., Galova M., Schiebel E., Stark M.J., and Nasmyth K. Evidence that the Ipl1-Sli15 (Aurora kinase-INCENP) complex promotes chromosome bi-orientation by altering kinetochore-spindle pole connections. Cell 108 (2002) 317-329
4. Hauf S., Cole R.W., LaTerra S., Zimmer C., Schnapp G., Walter R., Heckel A., Van Meel J., Rieder C.L., and Peters J.M. The small molecule Hesperadin reveals a role for Aurora B in correcting kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in maintaining the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 161 (2003) 281-294
5. Lampson M.A., Renduchitala K., Khodjakov A., and Kapoor T.M. Correcting improper chromosome-spindle attachments during cell division. Nat. Cell Biol. 6 (2004) 232-237
6. Dewar H., Tanaka K., Nasmyth K., and Tanaka T.U. Tension between two kinetochores suffices for their bi-orientation on the mitotic spindle. Nature 428 (2004) 93-97
7. Winey M., and Huneycutt B.J. Centrosomes and checkpoints: the MPS1 family of kinases. Oncogene 21 (2002) 6161-6169
8. Jones M.H., Huneycutt B.J., Pearson C.G., Zhang C., Morgan G., Shokat K., Bloom K., and Winey M. Chemical genetics reveals a role for Mps1 kinase in kinetochore attachment during mitosis. Curr. Biol. 15 (2005) 160-165
9. Bishop A.C., Ubersax J.A., Petsch D.T., Matheos D.P., Gray N.S., Blethrow J., Shimizu E., Tsien J.Z., Schultz P.G., Rose M.D., et al. A chemical switch for inhibitor-sensitive alleles of any protein kinase. Nature 407 (2000) 395-401
10. Michaelis C., Ciosk R., and Nasmyth K. Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids. Cell 91 (1997) 35-45
11. Nasmyth K., Peters J.M., and Uhlmann F. Splitting the chromosome: cutting the ties that bind sister chromatids. Science 288 (2000) 1379-1385
12. Goshima G., and Yanagida M. Establishing biorientation occurs with precocious separation of the sister kinetochores, but not the arms, in the early spindle of budding yeast. Cell 100 (2000) 619-633
13. He X., Asthana S., and Sorger P.K. Transient sister chromatid separation and elastic deformation of chromosomes during mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 101 (2000) 763-775
14. Tanaka T., Fuchs J., Loidl J., and Nasmyth K. Cohesin ensures bipolar attachment of microtubules to sister centromeres and resists their precocious separation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2 (2000) 492-499
15. Pearson C.G., Maddox P.S., Salmon E.D., and Bloom K. Budding yeast chromosome structure and dynamics during mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 152 (2001) 1255-1266
16. Musacchio A., and Salmon E.D. The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8 (2007) 379-393
17. Tanaka K., Mukae N., Dewar H., van Breugel M., James E.K., Prescott A.R., Antony C., and Tanaka T.U. Molecular mechanisms of kinetochore capture by spindle microtubules. Nature 434 (2005) 987-994
18. Tanaka K., Kitamura E., Kitamura Y., and Tanaka T.U. Molecular mechanisms of microtubule-dependent kinetochore transport toward spindle poles. J. Cell Biol. 178 (2007) 269-281
19. Hill A., and Bloom K. Genetic manipulation of centromere function. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7 (1987) 2397-2405
20. Winey M., Goetsch L., Baum P., and Byers B. MPS1 and MPS2: novel yeast genes defining distinct steps of spindle pole body duplication. J. Cell Biol. 114 (1991) 745-754
21. Straight A.F., Belmont A.S., Robinett C.C., and Murray A.W. GFP tagging of budding yeast chromosomes reveals that protein-protein interactions can mediate sister chromatid cohesion. Curr. Biol. 6 (1996) 1599-1608
22. Kitamura E., Tanaka K., Kitamura Y., and Tanaka T.U. Kinetochore-microtubule interaction during S phase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. (2007) in press
23. Nicklas R.B., and Koch C.A. Chromosome micromanipulation. 3. Spindle fiber tension and the reorientation of mal-oriented chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 43 (1969) 40-50
24. Biggins S., Severin F.F., Bhalla N., Sassoon I., Hyman A.A., and Murray A.W. The conserved protein kinase Ipl1 regulates microtubule binding to kinetochores in budding yeast. Genes Dev. 13 (1999) 532-544
25. Kotwaliwale C.V., Frei S.B., Stern B.M., and Biggins S. A pathway containing the Ipl1/Aurora protein kinase and the spindle midzone protein Ase1 regulates yeast spindle assembly. Dev. Cell 13 (2007) 433-445
26. Cheeseman I.M., Anderson S., Jwa M., Green E.M., Kang J., Yates III J.R., Chan C.S., Drubin D.G., and Barnes G. Phospho-regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments by the Aurora kinase Ipl1p. Cell 111 (2002) 163-172
27. Shimogawa M.M., Graczyk B., Gardner M.K., Francis S.E., White E.A., Ess M., Molk J.N., Ruse C., Niessen S., Yates III J.R., et al. Mps1 phosphorylation of Dam1 couples kinetochores to microtubule plus ends at metaphase. Curr. Biol. 16 (2006) 1489-1501