BUB1 and BUBR1: Multifaceted kinases of the cell cycle

Trends in Biochemical Sciences

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 141-150

  Bolanos Garcia, Victor M ^a   Blundell, Tom L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUB1 PROTEIN; BUB1 RELATED PROTEIN; BUB3 PROTEIN; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN 20; NUCLEIC ACID BINDING PROTEIN; PROTEIN MAD2; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ANAPHASE; ANEUPLOIDY; CANCER GROWTH; CELL CYCLE; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; COLORECTAL CANCER; EUKARYOTIC CELL; GENE DELETION; GENE MUTATION; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MITOSIS SPINDLE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEPHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STOMACH CANCER;

ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; HUMANS; MUTATION; NEOPLASMS; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 79952445057     PISSN: 09680004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2010.08.004     Document Type: Review

References (75)

1. Johnson V.L., et al. Bub1 is required for kinetochore localization of BubR1, Cenp-E, Cenp-F and Mad2, and chromosome congression. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117:1577-1589.
2. Meraldi P., Sorger P.K. A dual role for Bub1 in the spindle checkpoint and chromosome congression. EMBO J. 2005, 24:1621-1633.
3. McGuinness B.E., et al. Regulation of APC/C activity in oocytes by a Bub1-dependent spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:369-380.
4. Bernard P., et al. Fission yeast bub1 is a mitotic centromere protein essential for the spindle checkpoint and the preservation of correct ploidy through mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 1998, 143:1775-1787.
5. Warren C.D., et al. Distinct chromosome segregation roles for spindle checkpoint proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 2002, 13:3029-3041.
6. Reddy S.K., et al. Ubiquitination by the anaphase-promoting complex drives spindle checkpoint inactivation. Nature 2007, 446:921-925.
7. Nilsson J., et al. The APC/C maintains the spindle assembly checkpoint by targeting Cdc20 for destruction. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10:1411-1420.
8. Homer H., et al. A spindle assembly checkpoint protein functions in prophase I arrest and prometaphase progression. Science 2009, 326:991-994.
9. Royou A., et al. BubR1- and Polo-coated DNA tethers facilitate poleward segregation of acentric chromatids. Cell 2010, 140:235-245.
10. Bolanos-Garcia V.M., et al. The conserved N-terminal region of the mitotic checkpoint protein BUBR1: a putative TPR motif of high surface activity. Biophys. J. 2005, 89:2640-2649.
11. Schliekelman M., et al. Impaired Bub1 function in vivo compromises tension-dependent checkpoint function leading to aneuploidy and tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2009, 69:45-54.
12. Kiyomitsu T., et al. Human Blinkin/AF15q14 is required for chromosome alignment and the mitotic checkpoint through direct interaction with Bub1 and BubR1. Dev. Cell 2007, 13:663-676.
13. Klebig C., et al. Bub1 regulates chromosome segregation in a kinetochore-independent manner. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 185:841-858.
14. Bolanos-Garcia V.M., et al. The crystal structure of the N-terminal region of BUB1 provides insight into the mechanism of BUB1 recruitment to kinetochores. Structure 2009, 17:105-116.
15. D'Arcy S., et al. Defining the molecular basis of BubR1 kinetochore interactions and APC/C-Cdc20 inhibition. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285:14764-14776.
16. Scheufler C., et al. Structure of TPR domain-peptide complexes: critical elements in the assembly of the Hsp70-Hsp90 multichaperone machine. Cell 2000, 101:199-210.
17. Cliff M.J., et al. Conformational diversity in the TPR domain-mediated interaction of protein phosphatase 5 with Hsp90. Structure 2006, 14:415-426.
18. Gatto G.J., et al. Peroxisomal targeting signal-1 recognition by the TPR domains of human PEX5. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2000, 7:1091-1095.
19. Onuoha S.C., et al. Structural studies on the co-chaperone Hop and its complexes with Hsp90. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 379:732-744.
20. Tang Z., et al. Phosphorylation of Cdc20 by Bub1 provides a catalytic mechanism for APC/C inhibition by the spindle checkpoint. Mol. Cell 2004, 16:387-397.
21. Qi W., Yu H. KEN-box-dependent degradation of the Bub1 spindle checkpoint kinase by the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:3672-3679.
22. Rahmani Z., et al. Separating the spindle, checkpoint, and timer functions of BubR1. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 187:597-605.
23. Davenport J., et al. Spindle checkpoint function requires Mad2-dependent Cdc20 binding to the Mad3 homology domain of BubR1. Exp. Cell Res. 2006, 312:1831-1842.
24. Malureanu L.A., et al. BubR1N terminus acts as a soluble inhibitor of cyclin B degradation by APC/C(Cdc20) in interphase. Dev. Cell 2009, 16:118-131.
25. Burton J.L., Solomon M.J. Mad3p, a pseudosubstrate inhibitor of APCCdc20 in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Genes Dev. 2007, 21:655-667.
26. Sczaniecka M., et al. The spindle checkpoint functions of Mad3 and Mad2 depend on a Mad3 KEN box-mediated interaction with Cdc20-anaphase-promoting complex (APC/C). J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:23039-23047.
27. Elowe S., et al. Uncoupling of the spindle-checkpoint and chromosome-congression functions of BubR1. J Cell Sci. 2010, 123:84-94.
28. Imami K., et al. Automated phosphoproteome analysis for cultured cancer cells by two-dimensional nanoLC-MS using a calcined titania/C18 biphasic column. Anal. Sci. 2008, 24:161-166.
29. Choi E., et al. BubR1 acetylation at prometaphase is required for modulating APC/C activity and timing of mitosis. EMBO J. 2009, 28:2077-2089.
30. Harris L., et al. The mitotic checkpoint gene BUBR1 has two distinct functions in mitosis. Exp. Cell Res. 2005, 308:85-100.
31. Larsen N.A., et al. Structural analysis of Bub3 interactions in the mitotic spindle checkpoint. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104:1201-1206.
32. Zich J., Hardwick K.G. Getting down to the phosphorylated 'nuts and bolts' of spindle checkpoint signalling. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2010, 35:18-27.
33. Vanoosthuyse V., Hardwick K.G. A novel protein phosphatase 1-dependent spindle checkpoint silencing mechanism. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:1176-1181.
34. Mao Y., et al. Activating and silencing the mitotic checkpoint through CENP-E-dependent activation/inactivation of BubR1. Cell 2003, 114:87-98.
35. Chen R.H. Phosphorylation and activation of Bub1 on unattached chromosomes facilitate the spindle checkpoint. EMBO J. 2004, 23:3113-3121.
36. Zhang J., et al. BubR1 and APC/EB1 cooperate to maintain metaphase chromosome alignment. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 178:773-784.
37. Huang H., et al. Phosphorylation sites in BubR1 that regulate kinetochore attachment, tension, and mitotic exit. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 183:667-680.
38. Yamaguchi S., et al. Function of Cdc2p-dependent Bub1p phosphorylation and Bub1p kinase activity in the mitotic and meiotic spindle checkpoint. EMBO J. 2003, 22:1075-1087.
39. Fernius J., Hardwick K.G. Bub1 kinase targets Sgo1 to ensure efficient chromosome biorientation in budding yeast mitosis. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3:e213.
40. Suijkerbuijk S.J., et al. Molecular causes for BUBR1 dysfunction in the human cancer predisposition syndrome mosaic variegated aneuploidy. Cancer Res. 2010, 70:4891-4900.
41. Kawashima S.A., et al. Phosphorylation of H2A by Bub1 prevents chromosomal instability through localizing shugoshin. Science 2010, 327:172-177.
42. Perera D., Taylor S.S. Sgo1 establishes the centromeric cohesion protection mechanism in G2 before subsequent Bub1-dependent recruitment in mitosis. J. Cell Sci. 2010, 123:653-659.
43. Kwan Wong Oi., Fang G. Cdk1 phosphorylation of BubR1 controls spindle checkpoint arrest and Plk1-mediated formation of the 3F3/2 epitope. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 179:611-617.
44. Chen R.H. BubR1 is essential for kinetochore localization of other spindle checkpoint proteins and its phosphorylation requires Mad1. J. Cell Biol. 2002, 158:487-496.
45. Huang H., Yen T.J. BubR1 is an effector of multiple mitotic kinases that specifies kinetochore microtubule attachments and checkpoint. Cell Cycle 2009, 8:1164-1167.
46. Elowe S., et al. Tension-sensitive Plk1 phosphorylation on BubR1 regulates the stability of kinetochore microtubule interactions. Genes Dev. 2007, 21:2205-2219.
47. Kang J., et al. Structure and substrate recruitment of the human spindle checkpoint kinase Bub1. Mol. Cell 2008, 32:394-405.
48. Cahill D.P., et al. Mutations of mitotic checkpoint genes in human cancers. Nature 1998, 392:300-303.
49. Cahill D.P., et al. Characterization of MAD2B and other mitotic spindle checkpoint genes. Genomics 1999, 58:181-187.
50. Hernando E., et al. Molecular analyses of the mitotic checkpoint components HsMAD2, HBUB1 and HBUB3 in human cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2001, 95:223-227.
51. Gemma A., et al. Somatic mutation of the hBUB1 mitotic checkpoint gene in primary lung cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2000, 29:213-218.
52. Ru H.Y., et al. hBUB1 defects in leukaemia and lymphoma cells. Oncogene 2002, 21:4673-4679.
53. Shichiri M., et al. Genetic and epigenetic inactivation of mitotic checkpoint genes hBUB1 and hBUBR1 and their relationship to survival. Cancer Res. 2002, 62:13-17.
54. Hempen P.M., et al. A double missense variation of the BUB1 gene and a defective mitotic spindle checkpoint in the pancreatic cancer cell line Hs766T. Hum. Mutat. 2003, 21:445.
55. Doak S.H., et al. Differential expression of the MAD2, BUB1 and HSP27 genes in Barrett's oesophagus-their association with aneuploidy and neoplastic progression. Mutat. Res. 2004, 547:133-144.
56. Ouyang B., et al. Mechanisms of aneuploidy in thyroid cancer cell lines and tissues: evidence for mitotic checkpoint dysfunction without mutations in BUB1 and BUBR1. Clin.Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 2002, 56:341-350.
57. Sato M., et al. Infrequent mutation of the hBUB1 and hBUBR1 genes in human lung cancer. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 2000, 91:504-509.
58. Langerød A., et al. BUB1 infrequently mutated in human breast carcinomas. Human Mut. 2003, 22:420.
59. Hanks S., et al. Constitutional aneuploidy and cancer predisposition caused by biallelic mutations in BUB1B. Nat. Genet. 2004, 36:1159-1161.
60. Matsuura S., et al. Monoallelic BUB1B mutations and defective mitotic-spindle checkpoint in seven families with premature chromatid separation (PCS) syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2006, 140:358-367.
61. Ando K., et al. High expression of BUBR1 is one of the factors for inducing DNA aneuploidy and progression in gastric cancer. Cancer Sci. 2010, 101:639-645.
62. Yamamoto Y., et al. Overexpression of BUBR1 is associated with chromosomal instability in bladder cancer. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 2007, 174:42-47.
63. Gladhaug I.P., et al. Spindle proteins in resected pancreatic head adenocarcinomas: BubR1 is an independent prognostic factor in pancreatobiliary-type tumours. Histopathology 2010, 56:345-355.
64. Kops G.J., et al. On the road to cancer: aneuploidy and the mitotic checkpoint. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2005, 5:773-785.
65. Bolanos-Garcia V.M. Assessment of the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) as the target of anticancer therapies. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 2009, 9:131-141.
66. Xu H.Z., et al. Pharicin A, a novel natural ent-kaurene diterpenoid, induces mitotic arrest and mitotic catastrophe of cancer cells by interfering with BubR1 function. Cell Cycle 2010, 9:2897-2907.
67. Ohshima K., et al. Mutation analysis of mitotic checkpoint genes (hBUB1 and hBUBR1) and microsatellite instability in adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma. Cancer Lett. 2000, 158:141-150.
68. Saeki A., et al. Frequent impairment of the spindle assembly checkpoint in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 2002, 94:2047-2054.
69. Imai Y., et al. Mutational inactivation of mitotic checkpoint genes, hsMAD2 and hBUB1, is rare in sporadic digestive tract cancers. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 1999, 90:837-840.
70. Reis R.M., et al. Mutation analysis of hBUB1, hBUBR1 and hBUB3 genes in glioblastomas. Acta Neuropathol. 2001, 101:297-304.
71. Myrie K.A., et al. Mutation and expression analysis of human BUB1 and BUB1B in aneuploid breast cancer cell lines. Cancer Lett. 2000, 152:193-199.
72. Hanks S., et al. Comparative genomic hybridization and BUB1B mutation analyses in childhood cancers associated with mosaic variegated aneuploidy syndrome. Cancer Lett. 2006, 239:234-238.
73. Plaja A., et al. Variegated aneuploidy related to premature centromere division (PCD) is expressed in vivo and is a cancer-prone dis.ease. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2001, 98:216-223.
74. Sunyaev S., et al. Prediction of deleterious human alleles. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2001, 10:591-597.
75. Limwongse C., et al. Child with mosaic variegated aneuploidy and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1999, 82:20-24.