APC15 drives the turnover of MCC-CDC20 to make the spindle assembly checkpoint responsive to kinetochore attachment

Nature Cell Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1234-1243

  Mansfeld, Jörg ^a   Collin, Philippe ^a   Collins, Mark O ^b   Choudhary, Jyoti S ^b   Pines, Jonathon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL CYCLE PROTEIN 20; CYCLIN B1; MITOTIC CHECKPOINT PROTEIN COMPLEX; NUCLEIC ACID BINDING PROTEIN; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE; PROTEIN APC15; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANAPHASE; ARTICLE; CENTROMERE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; MICROTUBULE ASSEMBLY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN METABOLISM; PROTEIN SECRETION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPINDLE ASSEMBLY CHECKPOINT; UBIQUITINATION;

CALCIUM-BINDING PROTEINS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CYCLIN B1; HELA CELLS; HUMANS; KINETOCHORES; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; MITOSIS; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; RNA INTERFERENCE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TIME FACTORS; TRANSFECTION; UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASE COMPLEXES; UBIQUITINATION;

EID: 80053561641     PISSN: 14657392     EISSN: 14764679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncb2347     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Sudakin, V., Chan, G.K. & Yen, T.J. Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2. J. Cell Biol. 154, 925-936 (2001). (Pubitemid 34286173)
2. Zeng, X. et al. Pharmacologic inhibition of the anaphase-promoting complex induces a spindle checkpoint-dependent mitotic arrest in the absence of spindle damage. Cancer Cell 18, 382-395 (2010).
3. Visconti, R., Palazzo, L. & Grieco, D. Requirement for proteolysis in spindle assembly checkpoint silencing. Cell Cycle 9, 564-569 (2010).
4. Reddy, S. K., Rape, M., Margansky, W. A. & Kirschner, M. W. Ubiquitination by the anaphase-promoting complex drives spindle checkpoint inactivation. Nature 446, 921-925 (2007). (Pubitemid 46633168)
5. Nilsson, J., Yekezare, M., Minshull, J. & Pines, J. The APC/C maintains the spindle assembly checkpoint by targeting Cdc20 for destruction. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 1411-1420 (2008).
6. Yoon, H. J. et al. Proteomics analysis identifies new components of thefission and budding yeast anaphase-promoting complexes. Curr. Biol. 12, 2048-2054 (2002).
7. Hall, M. C., Torres, M. P., Schroeder, G. K. & Borchers, C. H. Mnd2 and Swm1 are core subunits of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae anaphase-promoting complex. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 16698-16705 (2003). (Pubitemid 36799534)
8. Schreiber, A. et al. Structural basis for the subunit assembly of the anaphase-promoting complex. Nature 470, 227-232 (2011).
9. Penkner, A. M., Prinz, S., Ferscha, S. & Klein, F. Mnd2, an essential antagonist of the anaphase-promoting complex during meiotic prophase. Cell 120, 789-801 (2005). (Pubitemid 40568797)
10. Hubner, N. C. et al. Quantitative proteomics combined with BAC TransgeneOmics reveals in vivo protein interactions. J. Cell Biol. 189, 739-754 (2010).
11. Clute, P. & Pines, J. Temporal and spatial control of cyclin B1 destruction in metaphase. Nat. Cell Biol. 1, 82-87 (1999). (Pubitemid 129501948)
12. Thornton, B. R. et al. An architectural map of the anaphase-promoting complex. Genes Dev. 20, 449-460 (2006). (Pubitemid 43244399)
13. Izawa, D. & Pines, J. How APC/C-Cdc20 changes its substrate specificity in mitosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 223-233 (2011).
14. Di Fiore, B. & Pines, J. How cyclin A destruction escapes the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 190, 501-509 (2010).
15. Ge, S., Skaar, J. R. & Pagano, M. APC/C-and Mad2-mediated degradation of Cdc20 during spindle checkpoint activation. Cell Cycle 8, 167-171 (2009).
16. Pan, J. & Chen, R. H. Spindle checkpoint regulates Cdc20p stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 18, 1439-1451 (2004). (Pubitemid 38780630)
17. Kulukian, A., Han, J. S. & Cleveland, D. W. Unattached kinetochores catalyze production of an anaphase inhibitor that requires a Mad2 template to prime Cdc20 for BubR1 binding. Dev. Cell 16, 105-117 (2009).
18. Meraldi, P., Draviam, V. M. & Sorger, P. K. Timing and checkpoints in the regulation of mitotic progression. Dev. Cell 7, 45-60 (2004). (Pubitemid 39172687)
19. Dobles, M., Liberal, V., Scott, M. L., Benezra, R. & Sorger, P. K. Chromosome missegregation and apoptosis in mice lacking the mitotic checkpoint protein Mad2. Cell 101, 635-645 (2000).
20. Santaguida, S., Tighe, A., D'Alise, A. M., Taylor, S. S. & Musacchio, A. Dissecting the role of MPS1 in chromosome biorientation and the spindle checkpoint through the small molecule inhibitor reversine. J. Cell Biol. 190, 73-87 (2010).
21. Carroll, C. W. & Morgan, D. O. The Doc1 subunit is a processivity factor for the anaphase-promoting complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 880-887 (2002). (Pubitemid 35331363)
22. Garnett, M. J. et al. UBE2S elongates ubiquitin chains on APC/C substrates to promote mitotic exit. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 1363-1369 (2009).
23. Yang, M. et al. p31 (comet) blocks mad2 activation through structural mimicry. Cell 131, 744-755 (2007). (Pubitemid 350087196)
24. Xia, G. et al. Conformation-specific binding of p31 (comet) antagonizes the function of Mad2 in the spindle checkpoint. EMBO J. 23, 3133-3143 (2004). (Pubitemid 39093607)
25. Mapelli, M. et al. Determinants of conformational dimerization of Mad2 and its inhibition by p31 comet. EMBO J. 25, 1273-1284 (2006).
26. Habu, T., Kim, S. H., Weinstein, J. & Matsumoto, T. Identification of a MAD2-binding protein, CMT2, and its role in mitosis. EMBO J. 21, 6419-6428 (2002). (Pubitemid 35448420)
27. Herzog, F. et al. Structure of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome interacting with a mitotic checkpoint complex. Science 323, 1477-1481 (2009).
28. Gascoigne, K. E. & Taylor, S. S. Cancer cells display profound intra-and interline variation following prolonged exposure to antimitotic drugs. Cancer Cell 14, 111-122 (2008).
29. Huang, H. C., Shi, J., Orth, J. D. & Mitchison, T. J. Evidence that mitotic exit is a better cancer therapeutic target than spindle assembly. Cancer Cell 16, 347-358 (2009).
30. Brito, D. A. & Rieder, C. L. Mitotic checkpoint slippage in humans occurs via cyclin B destruction in the presence of an active checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 16, 1194-1200 (2006). (Pubitemid 43867292)
31. Ditchfield, C. et al. Aurora B couples chromosome alignment with anaphase by targeting BubR1, Mad2, and Cenp-E to kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 161, 267-280 (2003). (Pubitemid 36529846)
32. Nezi, L. & Musacchio, A. Sister chromatid tension and the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 785-795 (2009).
33. Miniowitz-Shemtov, S., Teichner, A., Sitry-Shevah, D. & Hershko, A. ATP is required for the release of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome from inhibition by the mitotic checkpoint. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 5351-5356 (2010).
34. Ma, H. T. & Poon, R. Y. Orderly inactivation of the key checkpoint protein mitotic arrest deficient 2 (MAD2) during mitotic progression. J. Biol. Chem. 15, 13052-13059 (2011).
35. Danielsen, J. M. et al. Mass spectrometric analysis of lysine ubiquitylation reveals promiscuity at site level. Mol. Cell Proteomics 10, M110.003590 (2011).
36. Gmachl, M., Gieffers, C., Podtelejnikov, A. V., Mann, M. & Peters, J. M. The RING-H2 finger protein APC11 and the E2 enzyme UBC4 are sufficient to ubiquitinate substrates of the anaphase-promoting complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 8973-8978 (2000). (Pubitemid 30626658)
37. Leverson, J. D. et al. The APC11 RING-H2 finger mediates E2-dependent ubiquitination. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 2315-2325 (2000). (Pubitemid 30489916)
38. Williamson, A. et al. Identification of a physiological E2 module for the human anaphase-promoting complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 18213-18218 (2009).
39. Walker, A., Acquaviva, C., Matsusaka, T., Koop, L. & Pines, J. UbcH10 has a rate-limiting role in G1 phase but might not act in the spindle checkpoint or as part of an autonomous oscillator. J. Cell Sci. 121, 2319-2326 (2008).
40. Stegmeier, F. et al. Anaphase initiation is regulated by antagonistic ubiquitination and deubiquitination activities. Nature 446, 876-881 (2007).
41. Choi, E. et al. BubR1 acetylation at prometaphase is required for modulating APC/C activity and timing of mitosis. EMBO J. 28, 2077-2089 (2009).
42. Oelschlaegel, T. et al. The yeast APC/C subunit Mnd2 prevents premature sister chromatid separation triggered by the meiosis-specific APC/C-Ama1. Cell 120, 773-788 (2005). (Pubitemid 40568796)
43. Maciejowski, J. et al. Mps1 directs the assembly of Cdc20 inhibitory complexes during interphase and mitosis to control M phase timing and spindle checkpoint signaling. J. Cell Biol. 190, 89-100 (2010).
44. Berdougo, E., Terret, M. E. & Jallepalli, P. V. Functional dissection of mitotic regulators through gene targeting in human somatic cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 545, 21-37 (2009).