Sociocultural Theory in Second Language Education: An Introduction through Narratives

Sociocultural Theory in Second Language Education: An Introduction through Narratives

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 1-184

  Swain, Merrill ^a   Kinnear, Penny ^a   Steinman, Linda ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85113308721     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (265)

1. Ableeva, R. (2008). The effects of dynamic assessment on L2 listening comprehension. In J. P. Lantolf & M. E. Poehner (Eds), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 57-86). London: Equinox Publishing.
2. Ableeva, R. & Lantolf, J. P. (2011). Mediated dialogue and the microgenesis of second language listening comprehension. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(2), 133-149. doi: 10.1080/0969594X.2011.555330
3. Agar, M. (1994). Language shock: Understanding the culture of conversation. New York: William Morrow & Co.
4. Aljaafreh, A. & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465-483. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02064.x
5. Antón, M. (2009). Dynamic assessment of advanced second language learners. Foreign Language Annals, 42(3), 576-598. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01030.x
6. Atkinson, D. (Ed.). (2011). Alternative approaches to second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.
7. Bachman, L. F. (2002a). Alternative interpretations of alternative assessments. Some validity issues in educational performance assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 21(1), 5-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2002.tb00095.x
8. Bachman, L. F. (2002b). Some refl ections on task-based language performance assessment. Annual Language Testing Research Colloquium. 2000, Vancouver, Canada; Language Testing, 19(4), 453-476. doi: 10.1191/0265532202lt240oa
9. Bailey, K. & Nunan, D. (1996). Voices from the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Bailey, K. M. (1991). Diary studies of classroom language learning: The doubting game and the believing game. In E. Sadtono (Ed.), Language acquisition and the second/foreign language classroom (pp. 60-102). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Center.
11. Baker, M. (2006). Translation and confl ict: A narrative account. London: Routledge.
12. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans. Vol. 1). Austin: University of Texas Press.
13. Bamberg, M. (1997). Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1-4), 335-342.
14. Barkhuizen, G. (2011). Narrative Research in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 45(3).
15. Barton, D. & Hamilton, M. (2005). Literacy reifi cation and the dynamics of social interaction. In D. Barton & K. Tusting (Eds), Beyond communities of practice: Language, power, and social context (pp. 14-35). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Behan, L., Turnbull, M. & Spek, J. (1997). The profi ciency gap in late immersion (extended French): Language use in collaborative tasks. Le journal d’immersion, 20, 41-42.
17. Bell, J. (2002). Narrative inquiry: More than just telling stories. TESOL Quarterly, 36(2), 207-213. doi: 10.2307/3588331
18. Belmont, J. (1995). A view from the empiricist’s window. Educational Psychologist, 30(2), 99-102. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3002_7
19. Benson, P. & Nunan, D. (2004). Learner stories: Difference and diversity in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Bernstein, B. (1999). Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 157-173. doi: 10.1080/01425699995380
21. Besemeres, M. (2006). Language and emotional experience: The voice of translingual memoir. In A. Pavlenko (Ed.), Bilingual minds: Emotional experience, expression and representation (pp. 34-58). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
22. Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
23. Borer, L. (2005). Speaking to the self and to others: The role of private and social speech in the retention of second language vocabulary by adult academic learners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, OISE/University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
24. Brooks, L. (2009). Interacting in pairs in a test of oral profi ciency: Co-constructing a better performance. Language Testing, 26(3), 341-366. doi: 10.1177/0265532209104666
25. Brooks, L. (in preparation). Oral proficiency testing: To interact in pairs or not? Doctoral dissertation. OISE/University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
26. Brooks, L., Swain, M., Lapkin, S. & Knouzi, I. (2010). Mediating between scientifi c and spontaneous concepts through languaging. Language Awareness, 19(2), 89-110. doi: 10.1080/09658410903440755
27. Brostrom, S. (1999). Drama games with 6-year-old children: Possibilities and limitations. In Y. Engestrom, R. Miettinen & R.-L. Punamaki (Eds), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 250-263). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Brown, A. (2003). Interviewer variation and the co-construction of speaking profi ciency. Language Testing, 20(1), 1-25. doi: 10.1191/0265532203lt242oa
29. Brown, A. (2005). Interviewer variability in language profi ciency interviews. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
30. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
31. Campbell, E. (2008). Teaching and learning through lived experience. Curriculum Inquiry, 38(1), 1-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-873X.2007.00395.x
32. Carter, K. (1993). The place of story in the study of teaching and teacher education. Educational Researcher, 22(1), 5-12.
33. Casey, K. (1996). The new narrative research in education. Review of Research in Education, 21, 211-253.
34. Centeno-Cortés, B. & Jimenez, A. F. J. (2004). Problem-solving tasks in a foreign language: The importance of the L1 in private verbal thinking. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 7-35.
35. Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev & S. M. Miller (Eds), Vygotsky’s education theory in cultural context (pp. 39-64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Chalhoub-Deville, M. (2003). Second language interaction: Current perspectives and future trends. Language Testing, 20(4), 369-383. doi: 10.1191/0265532203lt264oa
37. Cole, M. (1995). Sociocultural historical psychology: Some general remarks and a proposal for a new kind of cultural-genetic methodology. In J. Wertsch, P. del Rio & A. Alvarez (Eds), Sociocultural Studies of Mind (pp. 187-215). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39. Cole, M. (2009). The perils of translation: A fi rst step in reconsidering Vygotsky’s theory of development in relation to formal education. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 16(4), 291-295. doi: 10.1080/10749030902795568
40. Colter, C., Michael, C. & Poynor, L. (2007). Storytelling as pedagogy: An unexpected outcome of narrative inquiry. Curriculum Inquiry, 37(2), 103-122.
41. Cook, G. (2000). Language play, language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Cross, R. (2010). Language teaching as sociocultural activity: Rethinking language teacher practice. The Modern Language Journal, 94(3), 434-452. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01058.x0026-7902/10/434-452
43. Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfi re (Vol. 23). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
44. Cummins, J. (2001). Instructional conditions for trilingual development. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 4(1), 61-75. doi: 10.1080/13670050108667719
45. Cummins, J. (2006). Identity texts: The imaginative construction of self through multiliteracies pedagogy. In O. Garcia, T. Skutnabb-Kangas & M. E. Torres-Guzmån (Eds), Imagining multilingual schools: Languages in education and glocalization (pp. 51-68). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
46. Daiute, C. & Lightfoot, C. (Eds). (2004). Narrative analysis: Studying the development of individuals in society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
47. Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt Inc.
48. Daniels, H. (1996). An introduction to Vygtosky. London: Routledge.
49. Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. London: Routledge.
50. Davies, B. & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x
51. Davin, K. J. (2013). Integration of dynamic assessment and instructional conversations to promote development and improve assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 17(3), 303-322. doi: 10.1177/1362168813482934.
52. Davydov, V. V. (1999). The content and unsolved problems of activity theory. In Y. Engestrom, R. Miettinen & R.-L. Punamaki (Eds), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 39-53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. de Guerrero, M. C. M. (2005). Inner speech-L2: Thinking words in a second language. New York: Springer.
54. de Guerrero, M. C. M. & Commander, M. (2013). Shadow reading: Affordances for imitation in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 17(4), 433-453 doi: 10.1177/1362168813494125
55. del Rio, P. & Alvarez, A. (2002). From activity to directivity: The question of involvement in education. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds), Learning for life in the 21st century (pp. 59-72). Oxford: Blackwell.
56. del Rio, P. & Alvarez, A. (2007). Inside and outside the zone of proximal development: An ecofunctional reading of Vygotsky. In H. Daniels, M. Cole & J. V. Wertsch (Eds), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 276-303). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. Deters, P. (2011). Identity, agency, and the acquisition of professional language and culture. London: Continuum.
58. Dewaele, J. M. (2006). Investigating the psychological and emotional dimensions in instructed language learning: Obstacles and possibilities. The Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 376-380.
59. DiPardo, A. & Potter, C. (2003). Beyond cognition: Vygotskian perspective on emotionality and teachers’ professional lives. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev & S. Miller (Eds), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 317-345). New York: Cambridge University Press.
60. Dobao, A. F. (2014). Attention to form in collaborative writing tasks: Comparing pair and small group interaction. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 70(2), 158-187. doi: 10.1353/cml.2014.0017
61. Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
62. Donato, R. & Lantolf, J. P. (1990). The dialogic origins of L2 monitoring. In L. F. Bouton & Y. Kachru (Eds), Pragmatics and language learning (Vol. 1; pp. 83-97). Urbana, Illinois: Division of English as an International Language [and] Intensive English Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
63. Dorfman, A. (1998). Heading south, looking north. New York: Penguin.
64. Dorfman, A. (2004). Footnotes to a double life. In W. Lesser (Ed.), The genius of language: Fifteen writers reflect on their mother tongues (pp. 206-214). New York: Pantheon.
65. Dunn, W. E. & Lantolf, J. P. (1998). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development and Krashen’s i + 1: Incommensurable constructs; incommensurable theories. Language Learning, 48(3), 411-442. doi: 10.1111/0023-8333.00048
66. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
67. Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engestrom, R. Miettinen & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68. Erben, T., Ban, R. & Summers, R. (2008). Changing examination structures within a college of education: The application of dynamic assessment in pre-service ESOL endorsement courses in Florida. In J. P. Lantolf & M. E. Poehner (Eds), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 87-114). London: Equinox.
69. Erdosy, M. U. (2004). Exploring variability in judging writing ability in a second language: A study of four experienced raters of ESL compositions. (No.RR-03-17). Princeton, New Jersey: ETS.
70. Erikson, E.H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
71. Fernández Doboa, A. (2014). Vocabulary learning in collaborative tasks: A comparison of pair and small group work. Language Teaching Research, 18(4), 497-520. doi: 10.1177/1362168813519730
72. Fernandez, M., Wegerif, R., Mercer, N. & Rojas-Drummond, S. M. (2001). Re-conceptualising scaffolding and the zone of proximal development in the context of symmetrical collaborative learning. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 36(2), 40-54.
73. Feuerstein, R., Falik, L., Rand, Y. & Feurstein, R. S. (2003). Dynamic assessment of cognitive modifi ability. Jerusalem, Israel: ICELP Press.
74. Fishman, J. (1977). What is ethnicity? In H. Giles (Ed.), Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations (pp. 15-52). London: Academic Press.
75. Flavell, J. H. (1966). Le langage privé. Bulletin de psychologie, 19, 698-701.
76. Fleer, M. (2009). Understanding the dialectical relations between everyday concept and scientific concepts within play-based programs. Research in Science Education, 39, 281-306. doi: 10.1007/s11165-008-9085-x
77. Frawley, W. & Lantolf, J. P. (1985). Second language discourse: A Vygotskyan perspective. Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 19-44.
78. Fulcher, G. & Davidson, F. (2007). Language testing and assessment: An advanced resource book. London: Routledge.
79. Gajdamaschko, N. (1999). Lev Semenovich Vygotsky. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritker (Eds), The encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 601-697). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
80. García, O. & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
81. Georgakopoulou, A. (2008). Thinking big with small stories in narrative and identity analysis. http://www.clarku.edu/~mbamberg/Papers/Alex%20Georgakopoulou.doc
82. Gibbes, M. & Carson, L. (2014). Project-based language learning: An activity theory analysis. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 171-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2013.793689
83. Gibbons, P. (1991). Learning to learn in a second language. Newtown, NSW: Primary English Teaching Association.
84. Gibbons, P. (2003). Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 247-273. doi: 10.2307/3588504
85. Gipps, C. (1999). Socio-cultural aspects of assessment. Review of Research in Education, 24, 355-392.
86. Golombek, P. & Doran, M. (2014). Unifying cognition, emotion, and activity in language teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 39, 102-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.01.002
87. Grevisse, M. (1980). Le bon usage (onzième edition). Brussels: Ducolot.
88. Guk, I. & Kellogg, D. (2007). The ZPD and whole class teaching: Teacher-led and student-led interactional mediation of tasks. Language Teaching Research, 11(3), 281-299. doi: 10.1177/1362168807077561
89. Gullberg, M. (2006). Some reasons for studying gesture and second language acquisition (Hommage à Adam Kendon). IRAL, 44(2), 103-124. doi: 10.1515/IRAL.2006.004
90. Gullberg, M. & McCafferty, S. G. (2008). Introduction to gesture and SLA: Toward an integrated approach. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(2), 133-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263108080285
91. Gutiérrez, A. G. (2008). Microgenesis, method and object: A study of collaborative activity in a Spanish as a foreign language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 120-148. doi: 10.1093/applin/ammo032
92. Haenen, J., Schrijnemakers, H. & Stufkens, J. (2003). Sociocultural theory and the practice of teaching historical concepts. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev & S. M. Miller (Eds), Vygotsky’s education theory in cultural context (pp. 246-266). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
93. Hall, J. K. & Verplaetse, L. S. (Eds). (2000). Second and foreign language through classroom interaction. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
94. Halliday, M. A. K. (2002a). Language structure and language function. In J. J. Webster (Ed.), On grammar (Vol. 1, pp. 173-195). London: Continuum.
95. Halliday, M. A. K. (2002b). Modes of meaning and modes of expression: Types of grammatical structure and their determination by different semantic functions. In J. J. Webster (Ed.), On grammar (Vol. 1, pp. 196-218). London: Continuum.
96. Haneda, M. (2007). Modes of engagement in foreign language writing: An activity theoretical perspective. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(2), 301-332.
97. Harris, T. (2003). Listening with your eyes: The importance of speech-related gestures in the language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 36, 180-187. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2003.tb01468.x
98. Haywood, H. C. & Lidz, C. S. (2007). Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
99. Heath, C. & Heath, D. (2007). Made to stick: Why some ideas survive and others die. New York: Random House.
100. Holland, D. & Lachicotte, W. Jr. (2007). Vygotsky, Mead and the new sociocultural studies of identity. In H. Daniels, M. Cole & J. Wertsch (Eds), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 101-135). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
101. Holland, D., Lachicotte, W. Jr., Skinner, D. & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
102. Holzman, L. (2002). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development: The human activity zone. http://eastsideinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Vygostskys-Zone-of-Proximal-Development.pdf
103. Holzman, L. (2009). Vygotsky at work and play. London: Routledge.
104. Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Price & J. Holmes (Eds), Sociolinguistics. London: Penguin.
105. Imai, Y. (2010). Emotions in SLA: New insights from collaborative learning for an EFL classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 94(2), 278-292.
106. Jang, E.-Y. & Iddings, A. C. D. (2010). The social genesis of self-regulation: The case of two Korean adolescents learning English as a second language. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 17(4), 350-366. doi: 10.1080/10749030903362707
107. John-Steiner, V. (1985). Notebooks of the mind. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
108. John-Steiner, V. & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3-4), 191-206. doi: 10.1080/00461520.1996.9653266
109. John-Steiner, V., Meehan, T. M. & Mahn, H. (1998). A functional systems approach to concept development. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5(2), 127-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0502_6
110. Johnson, K. E. (2009). Second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.
111. Juffs, A. & Friedline, B. E. (2014). Sociocultural infl uences on the use of a web-based tool for learning English vocabulary. System, 42(2), 48-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.10.015
112. Kapantzoglou, M., Restrepo, M. A. & Thompson, M. S. (2012). Dynamic assessment of word learning skills: Identifying language impairment in bilingual children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 43(1), 81-96. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2011/10-0095)
113. Karpov, Y. V. (2003). Vygotsky’s doctrine of scientifi c concepts: Its role for contemporary education. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev & S. M. Miller (Eds), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 65-82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
114. Kinginger, C. (2002). Defi ning the zone of proximal development in US foreign language education. Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 240-261. doi: 10.1093/applin/23.2.240
115. Kinnear, P. (2004). Through writing for publication, a biracial, bicultural, bilingual adolescent explores identity and normalcy: Sarah in her own words. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, OISE/University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
116. Knouzi, I., Swain, M., Lapkin, S. & Brooks, L. (2010). Self-scaffolding mediated by languaging: Microgenetic analysis of high and low performers. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 23-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00227.x
117. Kowal, U. M. (1997). French immersion students’ language growth in French: Perceptions, patterns and programming. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, OISE/University of Toronto, Ontario, Toronto.
118. Kowal, U. M. & Swain, M. (1997). From semantic to syntactic processing: How can we promote it in the immersion classroom? In R. K. Johnson & M. Swain (Eds), Immersion education: International perspectives (pp. 284-309). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
119. Kozulin, A. (1986). Vygotsky in context (A. Kozulin, Trans.). In A. Kozulin (Ed.), L. S. Vygotsky: Thought and language (pp. xi-lvi) (revised ed.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
120. Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
121. Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman.
122. Lantolf, J. P. (1997). The function of language play in the acquisition of L2 Spanish. In W. R. Glass & A. T. Perex-Leroux (Eds), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish. Vol 2: Production, processing and comprehension (pp. 3-24). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
123. Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Introducing sociocultural theory. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 1-26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
124. Lantolf, J. P. (2009). Dynamic assessment: The dialectic integration of instruction and assessment. Language Teaching, 42(3), 355-368. doi:10.1017/S0261444808005569
125. Lantolf, J. P. (Ed.). (2014). Language and Sociocultural Theory (journal). London: Equinox.
126. Lantolf, J. P. & Appel, G. (1998). Theoretical framework: An introduction to Vygotskian approaches to second language research. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 1-32). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Company.
127. Lantolf, J. P. & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 49-72.
128. Lantolf, J. P. & Poehner, M. E. (2007). Dynamic assessment in the foreign language classroom. A teacher’s guide. University Park, PA: CALPER.
129. Lantolf, J. P. & Poehner, M. E. (Eds). (2008). Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages. London: Equinox.
130. Lantolf, J. P. & Poehner, M. E. (2011). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for L2 development. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 11-33. doi: 10.1177/1362168810383328
131. Lantolf, J. P. & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide. New York: Routledge.
132. Lantolf, J. P. & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
133. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquistion. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141-165.
134. Larsen-Freeman, D. & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/applin/18.2.141
135. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
136. Laviosa, S. (Ed.). (2015). Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://benjamins.com/#catalog/journals/ttmc/main
137. Lee, J. (2008). Gesture and private speech in second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(2), 169-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263108080303
138. Lee, J. S. (2006). Exploring the relationship between electronic literacy and heritage language maintenance. Language Learning & Technology, 10(2), 93-113.
139. Lei, X. (2008). Exploring a sociocultural approach to writing strategy research: Mediated actions in writing activities. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 217-236. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2008.04.001
140. Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology, 37-71.
141. Lesser, W. (2004). The genius of language. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
142. Lidz, C. S. (1987). Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
143. Lidz, C. S. & Elliott, J. G. (Eds). (2000). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (Vol. 6). New York, NY: Elsevier Science.
144. Long, M. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 377-393). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
145. Lowe, V. (2008). Lev Vygotsky [DVD]. In V. Lowe (Producer): PHD Lowe Productions. http://www. vygotskydocumentary.com/
146. Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
147. Luria, A. R. (1961). Study of the abnormal child. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 31(1), 1-16.
148. Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
149. MacIntyre, P. D. (1998). Language anxiety: A review of the research for language teachers. In D. J.Young (Ed.), Affect in foreign language and second language learning (pp. 24-45). Boston: McGraw Hill.
150. MacIntyre, P. D. & Gardner, R. C. (1994). The subtle effects of language anxiety on cognitive processing in the second language. Language Learning, 44(2), 283-305. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01103.x
151. MacIntyre, P. D., Noels, K. A. & Clément, R. (1997). Biases in self-ratings of second language profi ciency: The role of language anxiety. Language Learning, 47(2), 265-287.
152. Magnan, S. S. (2008). The unfulfi lled promise of teaching for communicative competence: Insights from sociocultural theory. In J. P. Lantolf & M. E. Poehner (Eds), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 351-381). London: Equinox.
153. Mahn, H. (2008). A dialogic approach to teaching L2 writing. In J. P. Lantolf & M. Poehner (Eds), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 115-138). London: Equinox.
154. Mahn, H. & John-Steiner, V. (2000). Developing the affective ZPD. www.fae.unicamp.br/br2000/trabs/1410.doc
155. Mahn, H. & John-Steiner, V. (2002). The gift of confi dence: A Vygotskian view of emotions. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds), Learning for life in the 21st century (pp. 46-58). Oxford: Blackwell.
156. Matusov, E. (2007). Applying Bakhtin scholarship on discourse in education: A critical review essay. Educational Theory, 57(2), 215-237. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2007.00253.x
157. McCafferty, S. & Stam, G. (Eds). (2008). Gesture: Second language acquisition and classroom research. London: Routledge.
158. McNamara, T. F. (1997). Interaction in second language performance assessment: Whose performance? Applied Linguistics, 18(4), 446-466. doi: 10.1093/applin/18.4.446
159. Mead, G. H. (1962). Mind, self and society. C. W. Morris (Ed.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
160. Mead, G. H. (1982). The individual and the social self: Unpublished essays by G.H. Mead. D. L. Miller (Ed.), Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
161. Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.
162. Mercer, N. (2002). Developing dialogues. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds), Learning for life in the 21st century (pp. 141-153). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
163. Minick, N. (1996). The development of Vygotsky’s thought: An introduction to Thinking and Speech. In H. Daniels (Ed.), An introduction to Vygotsky (pp. 28-52). London: Routledge.
164. Moll, L. C. (2014). L. S. Vygotsky and education. New York: Routledge.
165. Moll, L. C. & Whitmore, K. F. (1993). Vygotsky in classroom practice: Moving from individual transmission to social transaction. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick & C. A. Stone (Eds), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children’s development (pp. 19-42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
166. Moran, S. & John-Steiner, V. (2003). Creativity in the making: Vygotsky’s contemporary contribution to the dialectic of creativity and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
167. Nassaji, H. & Swain, M. (2000). A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness, 9, 34-51. doi: 10.1080/09658410008667135
168. Negueruela, E. (2008). Revolutionary pedagogies: Learning that leads (to) second language development. In J. P. Lantolf & M. E. Poehner (Eds), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 189-227). London: Equinox.
169. Negueruela, E. & Lantolf, J. P. (2005). Concept-based instruction: Teaching grammar in an intermediate-advanced Spanish L2 university classroom. http://calper.la.psu.edu/publication.php?page=wps3
170. Negueruela-Azarola, E. (2011). Beliefs as conceptualizing activity: A dialectical approach for the second language classroom. System, 39(3), 359-369. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2011.07.008
171. Nelson, C. P. & Kim, M.-K. (2001). Contradictions, appropriation, and transformation: An activity theory approach to L2 writing and classroom practices. Texas Papers in Foreign Language Education, 6(1), 37-62.
172. Newman, F. & Holzman, L. (1993). Lev Vygotsky: Revolutionary scientist. London: Routledge.
173. Newman, R. (2003). What do I need to do to succeed when I don’t know what I’m doing? In A. Wigfi eld & J. Eccles (Eds), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 285-303). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
174. Northedge, A. (2002). Organizing excursions into specialist discourse communities: A sociocultural account of university teaching. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds), Learning for life in the 21st century (pp. 252-264). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
175. Nunan, D. & Choi, J. (Eds). (2010). Language and culture: Refl ective narratives and the emergence of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
176. Ohta, A. S. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese: Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2003.tb01468.x
177. Pavlenko, A. (1998). Second language learning by adults: Testimonies of bilingual writers. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 3-19.
178. Pavlenko, A. (2005). Emotions and multilingualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
179. Pavlenko, A. (2006). Bilingual Selves. In A. Pavlenko (Ed.), Bilingual minds: Emotional experience, expression and representation (pp. 1-33). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
180. Penuel, W. R. & Wertsch, J. V. (1995). Vygotsky and identity formation: A sociocultural approach. Educational Psychologist, 30(2), 83-92. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3002_5
181. Piaget, J. (1981). Intelligence and affectivity: Their relationship during child development (T. A. Brown & C. E. Kaegi, Trans.). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews Inc.
182. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes and outcomes. Language Learning, 44, 493-527. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01115.x
183. Pinar, W. (1994). Autobiography politics and sexuality: Essays in curriculum theory 1972-1992. New York: Peter Lang.
184. Poehner, M. (2008). Both sides of the conversation. In J. P. Lantolf & M. Poehner (Eds), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 33-56). London: Equinox.
185. Poehner, M. E. (2009). Group dynamic assessment: Mediation for the L2 classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 471-491. doi: 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00245.x
186. Poehner, M. E. (2011a). Validity and interaction in the ZPD: Interpreting learner development through L2 Dynamic Assessment. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 21(2), 244-263. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-4192.2010.00277.x
187. Poehner, M. E. (2011b). Dynamic Assessment: Fairness through the prism of mediation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(2), 99-112. doi: 10.1080/0969594X.2011.567090
188. Poehner, M. E. & Lantolf, J. P. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 233-265. doi: 10.1191/1362168805lr166oa
189. Poehner, M. E. & Lantolf, J. P. (2010). Vygotsky’s teaching-assessment dialectic and L2 education: The case for dynamic assessment. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 17(4), 312-330. doi: 10.1080/10749030903338509
190. Razfar, A., Khisty, L. L., Chval, K. (2011). Re-mediating second language acquisition: A sociocultural perspective for language development. Mind, Culture and Activity, 18(3),195-215. doi: 10.1080/10749030903494427
191. Roth, W.-M. & Tobin, K. (2002). Redesigning an ‘urban’ teacher education program: An activity theory perspective. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9(2), 108-131.
192. Roth, W.-M. & Radford, L. (2010). Re/thinking the zone of proximal development (symmetrically). Mind, Culture and Activity, 17(4), 299-307. doi: 10.1080/10749031003775038
193. Russell, D. R. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society. Written Communication, 14(4), 504-554. doi: 10.1177/0741088397014004004
194. Ryle, A. (1999). Object relations theory and activity theory: A proposed link by way of the procedural sequence model. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 407-418). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
195. Santiago, E. (1993). When I was Puerto Rican. Toronto: Random House.
196. Saville-Troike, M. (1988). Private speech: Evidence for second language learning strategies during the silent period. Child Language, 15, 567-590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900012575
197. Schalm, S. (2009, Sept 19). Who’s reading what? The Globe and Mail, p. 13.
198. Schumann, J. H. (1998). The neurobiology of affect in language learning. Language Learning, 48 (1).
199. Shepardson, D. P. (1999). Learning science in a fi rst grade science activity: A Vygotskian perspective. Science Education, 83(5), 621-638. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199909)83:5<621::AID-SCE7>3.0.CO;2-T
200. Siekmann, S. & Charles, W. (2011). Upingakuneng (when they are ready): Dynamic assessment in a third semester Yugtun class. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(2), 151-168. doi: 10.1080/0969594X.2011.565463
201. Somers, M. (1992). Narrativity, narrative identity, and social action: Rethinking English working-class formation. Social Science History, 16(4), 591-630.
202. Somers, M. (1997). Deconstructing and reconstructing class formation theory: Narrativity, relational analysis, and social theory. In J. R. Hall (Ed.), Reworking class (pp. 73-105). Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.
203. Somers, M. & Gibson, G. D. (1994). Reclaiming the epistemological ‘other’: Narrative and the social constitution of identity. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Social theory and the politics of identity (pp. 37-99). Cambridge MA and Oxford: Blackwell.
204. Steinman, L. (2004). Language learner narratives: Bridge to SLA literature and SLA pedagogy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, OISE/University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
205. Steinman, L. (2007). Personal points of communicative practice. Paper presented at the Canadian Association of Applied Linguistics (ACLA/CAAL), University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon.
206. Sternberg, R. J. & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential (Anonymous Ed.). Cambridge University Press, New York, NY: US.
207. Stetsenko, A. & Arievitch, I. (2002). Teaching, learning, and development: A post-Vygotskian perspective. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds), Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspective on the future of education (pp. 84-96). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
208. Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119-158. doi: 10.1111/1467-9922.00179
209. Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
210. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cool & B. Seidlhofer (Eds), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
211. Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J.P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
212. Swain, M. (2001). Examining dialogue: Another approach to content specifi cation and to drawing inferences from test scores. Language Testing, 18(3), 275-302. doi: 10.1177/026553220101800302
213. Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320-337. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.x
214. Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research (Special issue on the role of interaction in instructed language learning), 37, 285-304. doi: 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00006-5
215. Swain, M., Lapkin, S., Knouzi, I., Suzuki, W. & Brooks, L. (2009). Languaging: University students learn the grammatical concept of voice in French. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 5-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00825.x
216. Taniguchi, S. (2009). Becoming bilingual: Exploring language and literacy learning through the lens of narrative. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.
217. Taylor, L. (2000). Investigating the paired speaking test format. Cambridge ESOL Research Notes, 2, 14-15.
218. Taylor, L. (2001). The paired speaking test format: Recent studies. Cambridge ESOL Research Notes, 6, 15-17.
219. Taylor, L. & Wigglesworth, G. (2009). Are two heads better than one? Pair work in L2 assessment contexts. Language Testing, 26(3), 325-339. doi: 10.1177/0265532209104665?
220. Thiong’o, N. W. (2004). Recovering the original. In W. Lesser (Ed.), The genius of language: Fifteen writers refl ect on their mother tongues (pp. 102-110). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
221. Thomas, U., Tiplady, L. & Wall, K. (2014). Stories of practitioner enquiry: Using narrative interviews to explore teachers’ perspectives of learning to learn. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(3), 397-411. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2013.771224
222. Thorne, S. L. (2000). Second language acquisition theory and the truth(s) about relativity. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 219-243). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
223. Tocalli-Beller, A. & Swain, M. (2007). Riddles and puns in the ESL classroom: Adults talk to learn. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 143-167). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
224. Toth, P. D. (2004). When grammar instruction undermines cohesion in L2 Spanish classroom discourse. The Modern Language Journal, 88(1), 14-30. doi: 10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.00216.x
225. Towsey, P. M. & Macdonald, C. A. (2009). Wolves in sheep’s clothing and other Vygotskian constructs. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 16, 234-262.
226. Trivedi, H. (2004). Ngugi wa Thiong’o with Harish Trivedi (2003). In S. Nasta (Ed.), Writing across worlds: Contemporary writers talk (pp. 327-339). London: Routledge.
227. Turnbull, M. & Dailey-O’Cain, J. (Eds). (2009). First language use in second and foreign language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
228. Tusting, K. (2005). Language and power in communities of practice. In D. Barton & K. Tusting (Eds), Beyond communities of practice: Language, power and social context (pp. 36-54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
229. Vail, P. L. (1994). Emotion: The on off switch for learning. Rosemont, NJ: Modern Learning Press.
230. Valsiner, J. & Veer, R. v. d. (2000). The social mind: Construction of the idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
231. van Compernolle, R. A. (2013). Concept appropriation and the emergence of L2 sociostylistic variation. Language Teaching Research, 17(3), 343-362. doi: 10.1177/1362168813482937
232. van der Veer, R. (2007). Vygotsky in context: 1900-1935. In H. Daniels, M. Cole & J. V. Wertsch (Eds), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 21-49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
233. van der Veer, R. & Valsiner, J. (2003). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Oxford: Blackwell.
234. van Lier, L. (1988). The classroom and the language learner. London: Longman.
235. van Lier, L. (1989). Reeling, writhing, drawling, stretching and fainting in coils: Oral proficiency interviews as conversations. TESOL Quarterly, 23(3), 489-508. doi: 10.2307/3586922
236. van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245-259). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
237. van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective (Vol. 3). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
238. Verenikina, I. (2003). Understanding scaffolding and the ZPD in educational research. 2008 (July 23, 2008), Conference paper. http://ro.uow.edu.au/edupapers/43/
239. Verity, D. P. (2000). Side affects: The strategic development of professional satisfaction. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 179-197). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
240. Vocate, D. R. (1994). Self-talk and inner speech: Understanding the uniquely human aspects of intrapersonal communication. In D. R. Vocate (Ed.), Intrapersonal communication, different voices, different minds (pp. 3-32). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
241. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
242. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech (N. Minick, Trans.). In R. W. Reiber (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 3, pp. 37-285). New York: Plenum.
243. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
244. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Volume 1. Problems of general psychology including the volume Thinking and Speech (N. Minick, Trans. R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton Eds). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
245. Vygotsky, L. S. (1993). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky: Volume 2. Fundamentals of defectology (Abnormal psychology and learning disabilities) (J. E. Knox & C. B. Stevens, Trans. R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton Eds). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
246. Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). The problem of the environment. In R. v. d. Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds), The Vygotsky Reader (pp. 338-354). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
247. Vygotsky, L. S. (1997a). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Volume 3. Problems of the theory and history of psychology (R. W. Rieber & J. Wollock Eds). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
248. Vygotsky, L. S. (1997b). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Volume 4. The history of the development of higher mental functions (M. J. Hall, Trans. R. W. Rieber Ed.). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
249. Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Volume 5. Child psychology (R. W. Rieber Ed.). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
250. Vygotsky, L. S. (1999). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Volume 6. Scientifi c legacy (M. J. Hall, Trans. R. W. Rieber Ed. Vol. 6). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers
251. Vygotsky, L. S. (2000). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
252. Vygotsky, L. S. & Luria, A. (1994). Tool and symbol in child development. In R. v. d. Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 99-174). Oxford: Blackwell.
253. Wajnryb, R. (1990). Grammar dictation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
254. Wardekker, W. L. (1998). Scientifi c concepts and refl ection. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5(2), 143-153. doi: 10.1207/s15327884mca0502_8
255. Watanabe, Y. & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of profi ciency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 121-142. doi: 10.1177/136216880607074599
256. Wells, G. (1999a). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
257. Wells, G. (1999b). Using L1 to master L2: A response to Anton and DiCamillas’s ‘Sociocognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom’. The Modern Language Journal, 83(2), 248-254.
258. Wells, G. (2002). The role of dialogue in activity theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9(1), 43-66. doi: 10.1207/S15327884MCA0901_04
259. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
260. Wertsch, J. V. (1980). The signifi cance of dialogue in Vygotsky’s account of social, egocentric, and inner speech. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 5, 150-162. doi: 10.1016/0361-476X(80)90036-3
261. Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
262. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
263. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
264. Wertsch, J. V., Tulviste, P. & Hagstrom, F. (1993). A sociocultural approach to agency. In E. A. Forman, N. Minnick & C. A. Stone (Eds), Context for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children’s development (pp. 336-356). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
265. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S. & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2) 89-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x