Modes of engagement in foreign language writing: An activity theoretical perspective

Canadian Modern Language Review

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 301-332

  Haneda, Mari ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Activity theory; Foreign language writing; Literacy as social practice; Modes of engagement

Indexed keywords

EID: 41149167096     PISSN: 00084506     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3138/cmlr.64.2.297     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. American Council for the Teaching of Foreign Languages [ACTFL]. (1986). ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines. Hastings-on-Hudson, NY: ACTFL Materials Center.
2. ACTFL. (1999). ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines. Hastings-on-Hudson, NY: ACTFL Materials Center.
3. Bakhtin, M.M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
4. Bazerman, C., & Russell, D. (2002). Writing selves/writing societies: Research from activity perspectives. Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse.
5. Belcher, D. (1994). The apprenticeship approach to advanced academic literacy: Graduate students and their mentors. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 23-34.
6. Belcher, D., & Hirvela, A. (Eds.). (2001). Linking literacies: Perspectives on L2 reading-writing connections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
7. Byrnes, H. (1998). Constructing curricula in collegiate foreign language departments. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Learning foreign and second languages: Perspectives in research and scholarship (pp. 262-295). New York: MLA.
8. Byrnes, H., & Sprang, K. (2003). Fostering advanced literacy: Genre-based, cognitive approach. In H. Byrnes & H. Maxim (Eds.), Advanced foreign language learning: A challenge to college programs (pp. 47-85). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
9. Casanave, C. (2002). Writing games: Multicultural case studies of academic literacy practices in higher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Cumming, A. (1990). Metalinguistic and ideational thinking in second language composing. Written Communication, 7, 482-511.
12. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
13. ngestrom, Y. (1999). Communication, discourse and activity. Communication Review, 3(1/2), 165-185.
14. Engestrom, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theory reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-136.
15. Engestrom, Y. (2006). The activity system. University of Helsinki, Center for Activity Theory and Developmental Work Research. Retrieved December 17, 2006, from http://www.edu.helsinki.fi/activity/pages/chatanddwr/ activitysystem/
16. Engestrom, Y., Miettinen, R., & Pumaki, R.L. (Eds.). (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Gee, J.P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourse. London: Taylor & Francis.
18. Gillette, B. (1994). The role of learner goals in L2 success. In J .P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 195-214). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
19. Greenia, G. (1992). Why Johnny can't escribir. Composition and the foreign language curriculum. ADFL Bulletin, 24, 30-37.
20. Haneda, M. (2004). The joint construction of meaning in writing conferences. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 178-219.
21. Haneda, M. (2005). Investing in foreign-language writing: A study of two multicultural learners. journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 4(4), 269-290.
22. Heath, S.B. (1983). Ways with words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Heilenman, L. (1991). Writing in foreign language classrooms: Process and reality. In Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics (pp. 273-288). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
24. Hirvela, A., & Belcher, D. (2001). Coming back to voice: Multiple voices and identities of mature multilingual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 83-106.
25. Kern, R. (2000). Literacy and language teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Kern, R. (2003). Literacy and advanced foreign language learning: Rethinking the curriculum. In H. Byrnes & H. Maxim (Eds.), Advanced foreign language learning: A challenge to college programs (pp. 2-18). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
27. Kubota, R. (1997). Reevaluation of the uniqueness of Japanese written discourse: Implications to contrastive rhetoric. Written Communication, 14, 460-480.
28. Lantolf, J.P., & Pavlenko, A. (2001). (S)econd (L)anguage (A)ctivity: Understanding second language learners as people. In M. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 141-158). London: Longman.
29. Lantolf, J.P., & Thorne, S. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Leki, I. (2001). 'A narrow thinking system': Non-native English speaking students in group work projects across the curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 39-67.
31. Leki, I. (2007). Undergraduates in a second language: Challenges and complexities of academic literacy development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. Leont'ev, A.N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J.V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37-71). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
33. Marx, K. (1967). Theses on Feuerbach. In L.D. Easton & K.H. Guddat (Eds.), Writing of the young Marx on philosophy and society. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor. (Original work published 1845)
34. Morocco, G., & Soven, M. (1990). Writing across the curriculum in the foreign language class: developing a new pedagogy. Hispania, 73, 845-849.
35. Nardi, B.A. (Ed.). (1996). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60-92.
37. Omaggio, A. (1986). Teaching language in context: Proficiency-oriented instruction. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
38. Parks, S., & Macguire, M.H. (1999). Coping with on-the-job writing in ESL: A constructivist-semiotic perspective. Language Learning, 49,143-175.
39. Prior, P. (1998). Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
40. Prior, P. (2006). A sociocultural theory of writing. In C.A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), The Handbook of Writing Research (pp. 54-66). New York: Guilford Press.
41. Reichelt, M. (1999). Toward a more comprehensive view of L2 writing: Foreign language writing in the U.S. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 181-204.
42. Reichelt, M. (2001). A critical review of foreign language writing research on pedagogical approaches. Modern Language Journal, 85, 579-597.
43. Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (Eds.). (2005). Teaching together, learning together. New York: Peter Lang.
44. Roth, W.-M., Tobin, K., Elmesky, R., Carambo, C., McKnight, Y., & Beers, J. (2004). Re/making identities in the praxis of urban schooling: A cultural historical perspective. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 11, 48-69.
45. Russell, D. (1995). Activity theory and its implications for writing instruction. In J. Petraglia (Ed.), Reconceiving writing, rethinking writing instruction (pp. 51-78). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46. Russell, D. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14, 504-554.
47. Scott, V. (1996). Rethinking foreign language writing. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
48. Schieffelin, B.B., & Ochs, E. (Eds.). (1986). Language socialization across cultures. New York: Cambridge University Press.
49. Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50. Spack, R. (1997). The acquisition of academic literacy in a second language: A longitudinal case study. Written Communication, 14, 3-62.
51. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory and procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
52. Street, B. (1993). Cross-cultural approaches to literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Street, B. (2003). What's 'new' in New Literacy Studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5, 77-91.
54. Swaffar, J. (2003). A template for advanced learner tasks: Genre reading and cultural literacy through the précis. In H. Byrnes & H. Maxim (Eds.), Advanced foreign language learning: A challenge to college programs (pp. 19-46). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
55. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step toward second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 17,120-233.
56. Taylor, C. (1987). Interpretation and the sciences of man. In P. Rabinow & W.M. Sullivan (Eds.), Interpretive social sciences: A second look. Berkeley: University of California Press.
57. Terry, R. (1989). Teaching and evaluating writing as a communicative skill. Foreign Language Annals, 22, 43-54.
58. Uzawa, K., & Cumming, A. (1987). Writing strategies in Japanese as a foreign language: Lowering or keeping up the standards. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 46,178-194.
59. Valdés, G. (2001). Heritage language students: profiles and possibilities. In J. Peyton, D. Ranard, & S. McGinnis (Eds.), Heritage language learners in America: Preserving a national resource (pp. 37-77). McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.
60. Valdés, G., Haro, P., & Echevarriarza, M.P. (1992). The development of writing abilities in a foreign language: Contributions toward a general theory. Modern Language Journal, 76, 333-352.
61. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62. Wells, G. (2002). The role of dialogue in activity theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9, 43-66.
63. Wells, G. (in press). Mediating role of discourse in activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity.
64. Wertsch, J.V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65. Wertsch, J.V., Minick, N., & Arns, F.J. (1984). The creation of context in joint problem-solving. In J. Lave, & B. Rogoff (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 151-171). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66. Wertsch, J.V., Tulviste, P., & Hangstrom, F. (1993). A sociocultural approach to agency. In E.A. Forman, N. Minick, & C.A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 336-356). New York: Oxford University Press.