Concept appropriation and the emergence of L2 sociostylistic variation

Language Teaching Research

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 343-362

  van Compernolle, Rémi A ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Concept based instruction; French; language teaching; negation; sociocultural theory; sociostylistic variation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878937444     PISSN: 13621688     EISSN: 14770954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1362168813482937     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Armstrong N.Variable deletion of French ne: A cross-stylistic perspective.Language Sciences. 2002;24:153-173.
2. Celce-Murcia M.Intercultural language use and language learning. Alcón Soler E.Safont Jordà M.P., ed. Berlin: Springer; 2007:41-57.
3. Davydov V.V.Problems of developmental instruction: A theoretical and experimental psychological study. Moscow: Akademyia Press; 2004:.
4. Dewaele J.-M.Retention or omission of the ne in advanced French interlanguage: The variable effect of extralinguistic factors.Journal of Sociolinguistics. 2004;8:433-450.
5. Di Pietro R.J.The open-ended scenario: A new approach to conversation.TESOL Quarterly. 1982;16:15-20.
6. Di Pietro R.J.Strategic interaction: Learning languages through scenarios. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987:.
7. Eckert P.Variation and the indexical field.Journal of Sociolinguistics. 2008;12:453-476.
8. Etienne C.,Sax K.Stylistic variation in French: Bridging the gap between research and textbooks.Modern Language Journal. 2009;93:584-606.
9. FerreiraM. (2005). A concept-based approach to writing instruction: From the abstract concept to the concrete performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
10. Fonseca-Greber B.The emergence of emphatic ne in conversational Swiss French.Journal of French Language Studies. 2007;17:249-275.
11. Galperin P.I.Organization of mental activity and the effectiveness of learning.Soviet Psychology. 1989;27:45-65.
12. Galperin P.I.Stage-by-stage formation as a method of psychological investigation.Journal of Russian and East European Psychology. 1992;30:60-80.
13. Hansen A.B.,Malderez I.Le ne de négation en région parisienne: Une étude en temps réel.Langage & Société. 2004;107:5-30.
14. Hymes D.Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. Gumperz J.J.Hymes D., ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston; 1972:35-71.
15. Kinginger C.Language learning in study abroad: Case studies of Americans in France.Modern Language Journal. 2008;92:.
16. Labov W.Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1972:.
17. Lantolf J.P.,Thorne S.L.Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006:.
18. Lyster R.The effect of functional-analytic teaching on aspects of French immersion students' sociolinguistic competence.Applied Linguistics. 1994;15:263-287.
19. Mougeon R.,Nadasdi T.,Rehner K.The sociolinguistic competence of immersion students. Bristol: Multilingual Matters; 2010:.
20. NegueruelaE. (2003). A sociocultural approach to teaching and researching second language: Systemic-theoretical instruction and second language development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
21. Negueruela E.Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages. Lantolf J.P.Poehner M.E., ed. London: Equinox; 2008:189-227.
22. Negueruela E.,Lantolf J.P.The art of teaching Spanish: Second language acquisition from research to practice. Salaberry R.Lafford B.A., ed. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2006:79-102.
23. Poehner M.E.Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting second language development. Berlin: Springer Publishing; 2008:.
24. Poehner M.E.,van Compernolle R.A.Frames of interaction in dynamic assessment: Developmental diagnoses of second language learning.Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice. 2011;18:183-198.
25. Regan V.,Howard M.,Lemée I.The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence in a study abroad context. Bristol: Multilingual Matters; 2009:.
26. SaxK. (2003). The acquisition of stylistic variation by American learners of French. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
27. Serrano-López M.,Poehner M.E.Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages. Lantolf J.P.Poehner M.E., ed. London: Equinox; 2008:321-346.
28. Silverstein M.Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life.Language and Communication. 2003;23:193-229.
29. Stetsenko A.,Arievitch I.M.The sociocultural turn in psychology: The contextual emergence of mind and self. Kirschner S.R.Martin J., ed. New York: Columbia University Press; 2010:231-252.
30. Swain M.,Lapkin S.,Knouzi I.,Suzuki W.,Brooks L.Languaging: University students learn the grammatical concept of voice in French.Modern Language Journal. 2009;93:5-29.
31. van Compernolle R.A.Developing a sociocultural orientation to variation in language.Language and Communication. 2011a;31:86-94.
32. van Compernolle R.A.Developing second language sociopragmatic knowledge through concept-based instruction: A microgenetic case study.Journal of Pragmatics. 2011b;43:3267-3283.
33. van CompernolleR.A. (2012). Developing sociopragmatic capacity in a second language through concept-based instruction. Unpublished dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
34. van Compernolle R.A.Sociocultural theory and L2 instructional pragmatics. Bristol: Multilingual Matters; forthcoming:.
35. van Compernolle R.A.,Williams L.Variable omission of ne in real-time French chat: A corpus-driven comparison of educational and non-educational contexts.Canadian Modern Language Review. 2009;65:413-440.
36. van Compernolle R.A.,Williams L.Metalinguistic explanations and self-reports as triangulation data for interpreting L2 sociolinguistic performance.International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2011;21:26-50.
37. van Compernolle R.A.,Williams L.Reconceptualizing sociolinguistic competence as mediated action: Identity, meaning-making, agency.Modern Language Journal. 2012a;96:234-250.
38. van Compernolle R.A.,Williams L.Teaching, learning, and developing L2 French sociolinguistic competence: A sociocultural perspective.Applied Linguistics. 2012b;33:184-205.
39. Vygotsky L.S.Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1986:.
40. Vygotsky L.S.Educational psychology. Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press; 1997:.
41. Yáñez-PrietoM.-C. (2008). On literature and the secret art of (im) possible worlds: Teaching literature-through-language. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.