Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide

Sociocultural Theory and the Pedagogical Imperative in L2 Education: Vygotskian Praxis and the Research/Practice Divide

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1-252

  Lantolf, James P ^a   Poehner, Matthew E ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909096306     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203813850     Document Type: Book

References (346)

1. Ableeva, R. (2010). Dynamic assessment of listening comprehension in L2 French. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
2. Ableeva, R., & Lantolf, J. P. (2011). Mediated dialogue and the microgenesis of second language listening comprehension. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18, 133-149.
3. ACTFL Foreign Language Teacher Standards Writing Team. (2002). American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL) program standards for the preparation of foreign language teachers. Available at www.actfl.org. Retrieved November 19, 2008.
4. Agar, M. (1994). Language shock. Understanding the culture of conversation. New York: Morrow.
5. Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the Zone of Proximal Development. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 465-483.
6. Allen, D., & Blythe, T. (2004). The facilitator’s hook of questions: Tools for looking together at student and teacher work. New York: Teachers College Press.
7. Allwright, D. (2005). From teaching points to learning opportunities and beyond. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 9-31.
8. Anton, M. (2009). Dynamic assessment of advanced language learners. Foreign Language Annals, 42, 576-598.
9. Arbib, M. A. (2002). The mirror system, imitation, and the evolution of language. In K. Dautenhahn & C. L. Nehaniv (Eds.), Imitation in animals and artifacts (Complex adaptive systems) (pp. 229—280). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Arievitch, I. M., & Haenen, J. P. P. (2005). Connecting sociocultural theory and educational practice: Galperins approach. Educational Psychologist, 40, 155-165.
11. Arievitch, I. M., & Stetsenko, A. (2000). The quality of cultural tools and cognitive development: Galperins perspective and its implications. Human Development, 43, 69-92.
12. Atkinson, D. (2002). Toward a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 86, 525-545.
13. Atkinson, D. (2012). Introduction: Cognitivism and second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 1-23). Oxford: Routledge.
14. Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47-89). New York: Academic Press.
15. Bakhurst. D. (1991). Consciousness and revolution in Soviet philosophy. From the Bolsheviks to Evald Ilyenkov. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Baldwin, J. M. (1915). Mental development in the child and the race. New York: Macmillan.
17. Belcher, D. (2007). A bridge too far? TESOL Quarterly, 41, 396-399.
18. Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (2007). Tools of the mind. The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
19. Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S. (2008). From empirical findings to pedagogical practice. In Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp. 375-394). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
20. Boivin, N. (2008). Material cultures, material minds.The impact of things on human thought, society and evolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Bonilla, C. (2012). Testing process ability theory in L2 Spanish: Can readiness or markedness predict development? Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
22. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513-531.
23. Brooks, L., & Swain, M. (2009). Languaging in collaborative writing: Creating of and response to expertise. In A. Mac key & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction. Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 58—89). New York: Routledge.
24. Biichel, F. P., & Scharnhorst, U. (1993). The Learning Potential Assessment Device (LPAD): Discussion of theoretical and methodological problems. In J. H. M Hamers, K. Sijtsma, & A. J. J. M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.), Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological and practical issues (pp. 83-111). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
25. Budoff, M. (1968). Learning potential as a supplementary testing procedure. In J. Hellmuth (Ed.), Learning disorders. Vol. 3. Seattle, WA: Special Child.
26. Budoff, M. (1987).The validity of learning potential assessment. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 53-81). New York: Guilford Press.
27. Budoff, M., & Friedman, M. (1964).“Learning potential” as an assessment approach to the adolescent mentally retarded. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 28, 434-439.
28. Bull, W. E., & Lamadrid, E. E. (1971). Our grammar rules are hurting us. Modern Language Journal, 55, 449-454.
29. Burgess, R.V. (2000). Reuven Feuerstein: Propelling the change, promoting continuity. In Kozulin &Y. Rand (Eds.), Experience of mediated learning: An impact of Feuerstein’s theory in education and psychology (pp. 3-20). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
30. Bygate, M. (2005). Applied linguistics: A pragmatic discipline, a generic discipline? Applied Linguistics, 26, 568-581.
31. Calero, M. D., & E. Navarro. (2004). Relationship between plasticity, mild cognitive impairment and cognitive decline. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 653-660.
32. {Zone of Proximal Development’ (pp. 77-91). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33. Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H. (1992). Principles of Dynamic Assessment: The application of a specific model. Learning and Individual Differences, 4, 153-166.
34. Carroll, S., & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 357-386.
35. Casasanto, D., & Jasmin, K. (2012). The hands of time: Temporal gestures in English speakers. Cognitive Linguistics, 23, 643-674.
36. Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher’s course (2nd ed.). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
37. Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 39-64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Chapelle, C. (2007). Pedagogical implications in TESOL Quarterly? Yes, please. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 404-406.
39. Clark, A. (2008). Where brain, body, and world collide. In C. Knappett & L. Malafouris (Eds.), Material agency (pp. 1-18). Boston: Springer.
40. Clarke, M. A. (1994). The dysfunctions of theory/practice discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 9-26.
41. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research in the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press.
42. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknapp Press.
43. Cole, M. (2009). The perils of translation: A first step in reconsidering Vygotsky’s theory of development in relation to formal education. Mind, Culture, Activity: An International Journal, 16, 291-295.
44. Cole, M., Levitin, K., & Luria, A. (2006). Autobiography of Alexander Luria: A dialogue with the making of mind. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
45. Corder, S. P. (1973). Introducing applied linguistics. New York: Penguin Books.
46. Corder, S. P. (1978). Learner language and teacher talk. Audio-Visual Language Journal, 16, 5-13.
47. Courtin, C. (2000). The impact of sign language on the cognitive development of Deaf children. The case of theories of mind.Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 266-276.
48. Crookes, G. (1998). On the relationship between second and foreign language teachers and research. TESOL Journal, 7(3), 6-11.
49. Dana, N. F., & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2009). The reflective educator’s guide to classroom research: Learning to teach and teaching to learn through practitioner inquiry (2nd ed.).Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
50. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
51. Darling-Hammond, L., Hammerness, K., Grossman, P., Rust, F., & Shulman, L. (2005). The design of teacher education programs. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 390-441). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
52. Davin, K. J. (2011). Group Dynamic Assessment in an early foreign language learning program: Tracking movement through the Zone of Proximal Development. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
53. Davydov, V. V. (1997). Introduction: Lev Vygotsky and educational psychology. In Educational psychology, L. S.Vygotsky (pp. xxi—xxxix). Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press.
54. Davydov, V. V. (2004). Problems of developmental instruction. A theoretical and experimental psychological study. Moscow: Akademiya.
55. DeKeyser, R. M. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In C.J. Doughty &J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in second language acquisition (pp. 42-63). New York: Cambridge University Press.
56. DeKeyser, R. M. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C.J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language learning (pp. 313-348). Oxford: Blackwell.
57. DeKeyser, R. M. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition. An introduction (pp. 97-114). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
58. DeKeyser, R. M., & Criado, R. (2013a). Automatization, skill acquisition, and practice in second language acquisition. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. London: Blackwell, doi: 10.1002/978140519843l.wbeal0067.
59. DeKeyser, R. M., & Criado, R. (2013b). Practice in second language instruction. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. London: Blackwell, doi: 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0925.
60. Di Pietro, R. J. (1987). Strategic interaction. Learning languages through scenarios. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. Egan, K. (1983). Education and psychology: Plato, Piaget, and scientific psychology. New York: Teachers College Press.
62. Elkonin, D. (1998). Epilogue. In R. W Rieber (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 5. Child psychology. New York: Plenum.
63. Ellis, N. (2009). Optimizing the input: Frequency and sampling in usage-based and form- focused learning. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 139-158). Malden, M A: Wiley-Blackwell.
64. Ellis, R. (1989). Are classroom and naturalistic acquisition the same? A study of the classroom acquisition of German word order rules. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 303-328.
65. Ellis, R. (1997). SLA and language pedagogy: An educational perspective. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 69-92.
66. Ellis, R. (2005a). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 141-172.
67. Ellis, R. (2005b). Principles of instructed language learning. System, 33, 209-224.
68. Ellis, R. (2006). Modeling learning difficulty and second language proficiency: The differential contributions of implicit and explicit knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 27, 431-463.
69. Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
70. Ellis, R. (2010). Second language acquisition, teacher education, and language pedagogy. Language Teaching, 43, 182-201.
71. Ellis, R. (2012). Language teaching research and language pedagogy. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
72. Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analysing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
73. Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Reinders, H. (2009). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
74. Erlam, R. (2008). What do researchers know about language teaching? Bridging the gap between SLA research and language pedagogy. Innovations in Language Learning and Teaching, 2, 253-267.
75. Evans, G. W., & Schamberg, M. A. (2009). Childhood poverty, chronic stress, and adult working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(16), 6545-6549.
76. Farley, A., & McCollam, K. (2004). Learner readiness and L2 production in Spanish: Processability theory on trial. Estudios de lingmstica aplicada, 40, 47-69.
77. Felix, S. W. (1981). The effect of formal instruction on second language acquisition. Language Learning, 31, 87-112.
78. Ferreira, M. (2005). A concept-based approach to writing instruction: From the abstract concept to the concrete performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
79. Feuerstein, R., Falik, L., Rand, Y., & Feuerstein, R. S. (2003). Dynamic assessment of cognitive modifiability. Jerusalem: ICELP Press.
80. Feuerstein, R., Feuerstein, R. S., & Falik, L. H. (2010). Beyond smarter: Mediated learning and the brain’s capacity for change. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
81. Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M. B. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore: University Park Press.
82. Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Rynders, J. E. (1988). Don’t accept me as I am. Helping retarded performers excel. New York: Plenum.
83. Fogel, A. (1991). Developing through relationships: Origins of communication, self and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
84. Fulcher, G. (2010). Practical language teaching. London: Hodder Education.
85. Gallego, M., & Vasquez, O. A. (2011). Praxis-in-dis-coordination. In P. R. Portes & S. Salas (Eds.), Vygotsky in 21st century society. Advances in cultural historical theory and praxis with non-dominant communities (pp. 214-228). New York: Peter Lang.
86. Galperin, P. Ya. (1957). An experimental study in the formation of mental actions. In Simon (Ed.), Psychology in the Soviet Union (pp. 213-225). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
87. Galperin, P. (1967) On the notion of internalization. Soviet Psychology, 5, 28-33.
88. Galperin, P. Ya. (1969). Stages in the development of mental acts. In M. Cole & I.Maltzman (Eds.), A handbook of contemporary Soviet psychology (pp. 249-272). New York: Basic Books.
89. Galperin, P. Ya. (1970). An experimental study in the formation of mental actions. In E. Stones (Ed.), Readings in educational psychology. Learning and teaching (pp. 142-154). London: Methuen.
90. Galperin, P. Ya. (1979). The role of orientation in thought. Soviet Psychology, 18, 19-45.
91. GaTperin, P. Ya. (1989). Mental actions as a basis for the formation of thoughts and images. Soviet Psychology, 27(2), 45-64.
92. GaTperin, P. Ya. (1992). Stage-by-stage formation as a method of psychological investigation. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 30(4), 60-80.
93. Ganem-Gutierrez, G. A., & Harun, H. (2011). Verbalisation as a mediational tool for understanding tense-aspect marking in English: An application of Concept-Based Instruction. Language Awareness, 20, 99-119.
94. Gao, X. D. (2005). Noun phrase morphemes and topic development in L2 Mandarin Chinese: A processability perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wellington, Victoria, NZ.
95. Garcia, P. (2012). Verbalizing in the second language classroom: The development of the grammatical concept of aspect. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
96. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2007). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In B.VanPatten &J.Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition. An introduction (pp. 175-200). New York: Routledge.
97. Gass, S.M., & Mackey, A. (Eds.). (2012). The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.
98. Gattegno, C. (1963). Teaching foreign languages in schools: The silent way. New York: Educational Solutions.
99. Gergen, K., & Gergen, M. (2002). Toward a cultural constructionist psychology. In M. Hildebrand-Nilshon, C-W. Kim, & D. Papadopoulos (Eds.), Kultur in der Psychologie (pp. 47-64). Heidelberg, Germany: Asanger Verlag.
100. Gibbs, R.W., Jr. (2005). Embodiment and cognitive sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
101. Gillon Dowens, M., Vergara, M., Barber, H. A., & Carreiras, M. (2009). Morphosyntactic processing in late second-language learners. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(8), 1870-1887.
102. Glutting, J. J., & McDermott, P. A. (1990). Principles and problems in learning potential. In C. R. Reynolds & R.W. Kamphaus (Eds.), Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children. Intelligence and achievement (pp. 277-295). New York: Guilford.
103. Goldman, A. I. (2005). Imitation, mind reading, and simulation. In S. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation. From neuroscience to social sciences. Volume 2. Imitation, human development, and culture (pp. 79-94). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
104. Greenwood, J. (2003). Wundt, Volkerpsychologie, and experimental social psychology. Historical Psychology, 6, 70-88.
105. Guthke, J. (1992). Learning tests—The concept, main research findings, problems, and trends. Learning and Individual Differences, 4, 137-151.
106. Guthke, J., & Beckmann, J. F. (2000). The learning test concept and its applications in practice. In C. S. Lidz & J. G. Elliott (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 17-69). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
107. Haenen, J. (1996). Piotr QaVperin: Psychologist in Vygotsky’s footsteps. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
108. Haenen, J. (2001). Outlining the teaching—learning process: Piotr Galperins contribution. Learning and Instruction, 11, 157-170.
109. Hall, J. K. (2001). Methods for teaching foreign languages: Creating a community of learners in the classroom. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
110. Han, Z. (2007). Pedagogical implications: Genuine and pretentious. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 387-393.
111. Harre, R. (2009). Saving critical realism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 39, 129-143.
112. Hatch, E. (1978). Apply with caution. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2, 123-143.
113. Haywood, H. C., & Lidz, C. S. (2007). Dynamic assessment in practice. Clinical and educational applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
114. Holme, R. (2009). Cognitive linguistics and language teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
115. Holmes, J., Gathercole, S. E., & Dunning, D. L. (2009). Adaptive training leads to sustained enhancement of poor working memory in children. Developmental Science, 22(4), F9-F15.
116. Holodynski, M. (2013). The internalization theory of emotions: A cultural historical approach to the development of emotions. Mind, Culture, and Activity: An International Journal, 20, 4-38.
117. Holzman, L. (2009). Vygotsky at work and play. New York: Roudedge.
118. Holzman, L. (2010). Without creating ZPDs there is no creativity. In M. C. Connery, V. P. John-Steiner, & A. Marjanovic-Shane (Eds.), Vygotsky and creativity: A cultural- historical approach to play, meaning making, and the arts (pp. 27—40). New York: Peter Lang.
119. Hopper, P. (1997). Discourse and the category ‘verb’ in English. Language & Communication, 17, 93-102.
120. Hulstijn, J. H. (2002). Towards a unified account of the representation, processing and acquisition of second language knowledge. Second Language Research, 18, 193—223.
121. Hurley, S., & Chater, N. (2005a). Introduction: The importance of imitation. In S. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation. From neuroscience to social sciences. Volume 2. Imitation, human development, and culture (pp. 1—52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
122. Hurley, S., & Chater, N. (Eds.). (2005b). Perspectives on imitation. From neuroscience to social science. Volume 1: Mechanisms of imitation and imitation in animals. Volume 2: Imitation, human development, and culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
123. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
124. Ilyenkov, E. (1977). Dialectical logic. Essays on its history and theory. Moscow: Progress Press.
125. Ilyenkov, E. (2012). Dialectics of the ideal (2009). Historical Materialism, 20, 149—193.
126. In’nami, Y., & Koizumi, R. (2009). A meta-analysis of test format effects on reading and listening test performance: Focus on multiple-choice and open-ended formats. Language Testing, 26, 219—244.
127. Jacobs, E. L. (2001). The effects of adding Dynamic Assessment components to a computerized preschool language screening test. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 22(4), 217-226.
128. Jakobovits, L. A., & Gordon, B. (1974). The context of foreign language teaching. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
129. Jansen, L. (2008). Acquisition of German word order in tutored learners: A cross-sectional study in a wider theoretical context. Language Learning, 58, 185—231.
130. John-Steiner, V. (1985). The road to competence in an alien land: A Vygotskian perspective on bilingualism. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition. Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 348—371). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
131. John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31, 191—206.
132. Johnson, K. E. (2009). Second language teacher education. A sociocultural perspective. New York: Routledge.
133. Johnson, R. E. (1970). Recall of prose as a function of the structural importance of the linguistic units. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 12—20.
134. Johnston, M. (1995). Stages of acquisition of Spanish as a second language. University of Western Sydney, Macarthur. The National Languages and Literacy Institute of Australia, Language Acquisition Research Centre.
135. Jordan, G. (2004). Theory construction of second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
136. Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1995). Student achievement through staff development: Fundamentals of school renewal. New York: Longman.
137. Karpov, Y. V. (2003). Vygotsky’s doctrine of scientific concepts: Its role for contemporary education. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 65—82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
138. Karpov, Y. V. (2005). The neo-Vygotskian approach to child development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
139. Karpov, Y. V., & Haywood, H. C. (1998). Two ways to elaborate Vygotsky s concept of mediation. American Psychologist, 53, 27—36.
140. Kim, J. (2013). Developing conceptual understanding of sarcasm in a second language through concept-based instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
141. Klein, K., & Boals, A. (2001). The relationship of life event stress and working memory capacity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 565—579.
142. Klingberg, T. (2010). Training and plasticity of working memory. Trends in Cognitive Science, 14, 317-324.
143. Kozulin, A. (1998). Psychological tools: A sociocultural approach to education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
144. Kozulin, A. (2003). Psychological tools and mediated learning. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 15—38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
145. Kozulin, A. (2009). New reference points for Dynamic Assessment (DA): A commentary on Karpov and Tzuriel. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 8, 242—245.
146. Kozulin, A. (2011). Learning potential and cognitive modifiability. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(2), 169—181.
147. Kozulin, A., & Garb, E. (2002). Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension of at-risk students. School Psychology International, 23, 112—127.
148. Kozulin, A., & Gindis, B. (2007). Sociocultural theory and education of children with special needs: From defectology to remedial pedagogy. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 332—361). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
149. Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. New York: Pergamon Press.
150. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press.
151. Kuk, I., & Kellogg, D. (2007).The ZPD and whole class teaching: Teacher-led and student- led interactional mediation of tasks. Language Teaching Research, 11, 281—299.
152. Lai, W. (2012). Concept-based foreign language pedagogy: Teaching the Chinese temporal system. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
153. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
154. Lantolf, J. P. (2006). Sociocultural theory and L2. State of the art. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 67—109.
155. Lantolf, J. P. (2008). Praxis and L2 classroom development. ELIA: Estudios de lingmstica ingles a aplicada, 8, 13—44.
156. Lantolf, J. P. (2009). Dynamic assessment: The dialectical integration of instruction and assessment. Language Teaching, 42, 355—368.
157. Lantolf, J. P., & Appel, G. (1994). Theoretical framework: An introduction. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 1—32). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Press.
158. Lantolf, J. P., & Beckett, T. (2009). Research timeline for sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 42, 459—475.
159. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic Assessment: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 49—74.
160. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2006). Dynamic Assessment in the foreign language classroom. A teachers guide. Center for Advanced Language Proficiency Education and Research, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. [149 pp. & video DVD. Version 1.0]
161. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2008). Introduction to sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages. In J. P. Lantolf & M. E. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 1—32). London: Equinox Press.
162. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2011a). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for L2 development. Language Teaching Research, 15, 11—33.
163. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2011b). Dynamic Assessment in the foreign language classroom. A teachers guide (2nd ed.). Center for Advanced Language Proficiency Education and Research, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. [200 pp. & video DVD]
164. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2013). The unfairness of equal treatment: Objectivity in L2 testing and Dynamic Assessment. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19, 141—157.
165. Lantolf, J. P., & Sunderman, G. (2001). Foreign languages in the school curriculum: The struggle for a place in the sun. Modern Language Journal, 85, 5—25.
166. Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
167. Lapkin, S., Swain, M., & Knouzi, I. (2008). French as a second language: University students learn the grammatical concept of voice: Study design, materials development, and pilot data. In J. P. Lantolf & M. E. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 228—255). London: Equinox.
168. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1990). On the need for a theory of language teaching. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University round table on language and linguistics. Linguistics, language teaching and language acquisition: The interdependence of theory, practice, and research (pp. 261— 270).Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
169. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
170. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
171. Lee, H. (2012). Concept-based approach to second language teaching and learning: Cognitive linguistics-inspired instruction of English phrasal verbs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
172. Leontiev, A. A. (1981). Psychology and the language learning process. London: Pergamon.
173. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
174. Lidz, C. S. (1991). Practitioner’s guide to dynamic assessment. New York: Guilford.
175. Lidz, C. S., & Elliott, J. G. (2000). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
176. Lightbown, P. (1985). Great expectations: Second language acquisition research and classroom teaching. Applied Linguistics, 6, 173—189.
177. Lightbown, P. (2000). Anniversary article: Classroom SLA research and language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 21, 431—462.
178. Littlemore, J. (2010). Applying cognitive linguistics to second language learning and teaching. Houndsmills, UK: Palgrave.
179. Liu, G. (1991). Interaction and second language acquisition: A case study of a Chinese child’s acquisition of English as a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, LaTrobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
180. Long, M. H. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
181. Long, M. H. (2009). Methodological principles for language teaching. In M. H. Long & J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 373—394). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
182. Long, M. H., & Doughty, C. J. (2003). SLA and cognitive science. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 866—870). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
183. Luria, A. R. (1961). Study of the abnormal child. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. A Journal of Human Behavior, 31, 1—16.
184. Luria, A. R. (1973). The working brain. New York: Basic Books.
185. Luria, A. R. (1976). Cognitive development. Its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
186. Luria, A. R. (1979). The making of mind: A personal account of Soviet psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
187. Luria, A. R. (1982). Language and cognition. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
188. Luria, A. R., & Vygotsky, L. S. (1992). Ape, primitive man, and child: Essays in the history of behavior. Orlando, FL: Paul M. Deutsch Press.
189. Mac key, A. (1999). Input, interaction and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557-587.
190. Magnan, S. (2007). Gauging the scholarly value of connecting research to teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 47, 400—404.
191. Mahn, H. (2009). Vygotsky s methodological approach. A blueprint for the future of psychology. In A. Toomela & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? (pp. 297—323). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publisher.
192. Mansouri, F. (Ed.). (2007). Second language acquisition research: Theory-construction and testing. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
193. Marx, K. (1978a).The Grundrisse. In R. C.Tucker (Ed.), The Marx—Engels reader (2nd ed., pp. 221-293). New York: W. W. Norton.
194. Marx, K. (1978b). Theses on Feuerbach. In R. C. Tucker (Ed.), The Marx—Engels reader. (2nd ed., pp. 143—145). New York: W.W. Norton.
195. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1978). The Marx-Engels reader (2nd ed.). R. C. Tucker (Ed.). New York: W.W Norton.
196. Meltzoff, A. N. (2002). Elements of a developmental theory of imitation. In A. N. Meltzoff & W. Prinz (Eds.), The imitative mind: Development, evolution, and brain bases (pp. 19—41). New York: Cambridge University Press.
197. Meltzoff, A. N., & Gopnik, A. (1989). On linking nonverbal imitation, representation, and language learning in the first two years of life. In G. E. Speidel & K. E. Nelson (Eds.), The many faces of imitation in language learning (pp. 23—52). New York: Springer Verlag.
198. Mezzacappa, E., & Buckner, J. C. (2010). Working memory training for children with attention problems or hyperactivity: A school-based pilot study. School Mental Health, 2, 202-208.
199. Miller, R. (2011). Vygotsky in perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
200. Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (1998). Second language learning theories. London: Edward Arnold.
201. Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (2004). Second language learning theories (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
202. Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (2013). Second language learning theories (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
203. Moll, H., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Cooperation and human cognition: The Vygotskian intelligence hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of Britain, 362, 639-648.
204. Moss, P. A. (2003). Reconceptualizing validity for classroom assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 13—25.
205. Nassaji, H., & Swain, M. (2000). AVygotskyan perspective towards corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random vs. negotiated help on the acquisition of English articles. Language Awareness, 9, 34—51.
206. National Council on Teacher Quality. (2013). Teacher prep review: A review of the nation’s teacher preparation programs. http://www.nctq.org/dmsStage/Teacher_Prep_Review_2013_Report.
207. Navarro, E., & Calero, M. D. (2009). Estimation of cognitive plasticity in old adults using Dynamic Assessment techniques. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 5(1), 38-51.
208. Negueruela, E. (2003). A sociocultural approach to the teaching and learning of second languages: Systemic-theoretical instruction and L2 development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
209. Negueruela, E. (2008). Revolutionary pedagogies: Learning that leads (to) second language development. In J. P. Lantolf & M. E. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 189—227). London: Equinox.
210. Negueruela, E. (2011). Beliefs as conceptualizing activity: A dialectical approach for the second language classroom. System, 39, 359—369.
211. Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
212. Nickerson, R. S. (1993). On the distribution of cognition: Some reflections. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions. Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 229—261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
213. Novack, G. (1978). Polemics in Marxist philosophy. Essays on Sartre, Plekanov, Lukacs, Engels, Kolakowsi, Trotsky, Timpanaro, Colletti. New York: Pathfinder.
214. Ohta, A. S. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
215. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension- fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
216. Palincsar, A. S., Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1993). First-grade dialogues for knowledge acquisition. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children’s development (pp. 43—57). New York: Oxford University Press.
217. Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
218. Pass, S. (2004). Parallel paths to constructivism. Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
219. Perkins, D. N. (1993). Person-plus: A distributed view of thinking and learning. In Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions. Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 88—110). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
220. Pienemann, M. (1984). Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 186—214.
221. Pienemann, M. (1987). Determining the influence of instruction on L2 speech processing. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 83—113.
222. Pienemann, M. (1989). Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 10, 52—79.
223. Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
224. Pienemann, M. (2003). Language processing capacity. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 679—714). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
225. Pienemann, M. (Ed.). (2005). Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
226. Pienemann, M. (2007). Processability theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 137—154). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
227. Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S. (2005). Extending processability theory. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory (pp. 199—252). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
228. Pienemann, M., & Kessler, J-U. (2011). Studying processability theory: An introductory textbook (Processability approaches to language acquisition research & teaching). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
229. Pineda, J. A. (Ed.). (2010). Mirror neuron systems. The role of mirroring processes in social cognition. New York: Humana Press.
230. Poehner, M. E. (2005). Dynamic assessment of advanced L2 learners of French. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
231. Poehner, M. E. (2007). Beyond the test: L2 Dynamic Assessment and the transcendence of mediated learning. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 323—340.
232. Poehner, M. E. (2008a). Both sides of the conversation: The interplay between mediation and learner reciprocity in Dynamic Assessment. In J. P. Lantolf & M. E. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 33—56). London: Equinox Publishing.
233. Poehner, M. E. (2008b). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting second language development. Berlin: Springer.
234. Poehner, M. E. (2009a). Dynamic Assessment as a dialectic framework for classroom activity: Evidence from second language (L2) learners. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 8(3), 252—268.
235. Poehner, M. E. (2009b). Group Dynamic Assessment: Mediation for the L2 classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 471-491.
236. Poehner, M. E. (2011).Validity and interaction in the ZPD: Interpreting learner development through L2 Dynamic Assessment. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 21(2), 244-263.
237. Poehner, M. E. (in preparation). Dynamic Assessment: A casebook. Center for Advanced Language Proficiency Education and Research, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
238. Poehner, M. E., & Davin, K. (2013). Learning to teach ‘reactively’ through Dynamic Assessment. Annual Meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics. Dallas, TX. March.
239. Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 9, 233—265.
240. Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J.P. (2013). Bringing the ZPD into the equation: Capturing L2 development during computerized Dynamic Assessment. Language Teaching Research, 17(3), 323-342.
241. Poehner, M. E., & Rea-Dickins, P. (Eds.). (2013). Addressing issues of access and fairness in education through dynamic assessment. London: Roudedge (special issues as books program).
242. Poehner, M. E., & van Compernolle, R. A. (2011). Frames of interaction in Dynamic Assessment: Developmental diagnoses of second language learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18(2), 183—198.
243. Poehner, M. E., & van Compernolle, R.A. (in press). L2 development around tests. Learner response processes and Dynamic Assessment. International Review of Applied Linguistics.
244. Polizzi, M-C. (2013). The development of Spanish aspect in the second language classroom: Concept-based pedagogy and dynamic assessment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
245. Ratner, C. (2002). Cultural psychology. Theory and method. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
246. Ratner, C. (2006). Cultural psychology: A perspective on psychological functioning and cultural reform. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
247. Ratner, C. (2012). Macro cultural psychology. A political philosophy of mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
248. Rea-Dickins, P., & Gardner, S. (2000). Snares and silver bullets: Disentangling the construct of formative assessment. Language Testing, 17, 215—243.
249. Rieber, R.W., & Robinson, D. K. (2004). Problems of the theory and history of psychology. Crisis in psychology. In R. W. Rieber & D. K. Robinson (Eds.), The essential Vygotsky (pp. 221—225). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
250. Rizzolatti, G. (2005).The mirror neuron system and imitation. In S. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation. From neuroscience to social science. Volume 1: Mechanisms of imitation and imitation in animals (pp. 55—76). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
251. Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (2003). Word power: Phrasal verbs and compounds. A cognitive approach. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
252. Salaberry, M. R. (2001). The development of past tense morphology in L2 Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
253. Salaberry, M. R., & Shirai, Y. (2002). L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), Tense-aspect morphology in L2 acquisition (pp. 1—20). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
254. Saville-Troike, M. (1988). Private speech: Evidence for second language learning strategies during the ‘silent period. Journal of Child Language, 15, 567—590.
255. Schon, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
256. Schumann, J. H., Crowell, S. E., Jones, N. E., Lee, N., Schuchert, S. A., & Wood, L. A. (2004). The neurobiology of learning. Perspectives from second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
257. Scribner, S. (1997). Mind and social practice: Selected writings of Sylvia Scribner. Eds. E.Tobach, R. J. Falmange, M. B. Parlee, M. M.W. Martin, A. S. Kapelman. New York: Cambridge University Press.
258. Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
259. Shamir, A., & Tzuriel, D. (2004). Childrens mediational teaching style as a function of intervention for cross-age peer-mediation. School Psychology International, 25, 58—97.
260. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1—22.
261. Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication, 23, 193—229.
262. Slobin, D. I. (1996). From ‘thought and language’ to ‘thinking for speaking.’ In S. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70—96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
263. Slobin, D. I. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 157—192). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
264. Sowell, T. (2009). Intellectuals in society. New York: Basic Books.
265. Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (1999). Instruction, first language influence, and developmental readiness in second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 83, 1—22.
266. Speidel, G. E. (1989). Imitation: A bootstrap for language to speak ? In G. E. Speidel & K. E. Nelson (Eds.), The many faces of imitation in language learning (pp. 151—180). New York: Springer Verlag.
267. Speidel, G. E., & Nelson, K. E. (1989). A fresh look at imitation in language learning. In G. E. Speidel & K. E. Nelson (Eds.), The many faces of imitation in language learning (pp. 1—22). New York: Springer Verlag.
268. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797—985.
269. Stern, H. H. (1983). Fundamental concepts of language teaching: Historical and interdisciplinary perspectives on applied linguistics research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
270. Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing. The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
271. Stetsenko, A. (2010). Teaching—learning and development as activist projects of historical becoming: Expanding Vygotsky’s approach to pedagogy. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 5, 6—16.
272. Stetsenko, A., & Arievitch, I. M. (2004). Vygotskian collaborative project of social transformation. History, politics, and practice in knowledge construction. International Journal of Critical Psychology, 12, 58—80.
273. Stetsenko, A., & Vianna, E. (2009). Bridging developmental theory and educational practice. Lessons from the Vygotskian project. In O. A. Barbarin & B. H. Wasik (Eds.), Handbook of child development and early education (pp. 38—54). New York: Guilford Press.
274. Stewart, T. (2006).Teacher—researcher collaboration or teachers’research? TESOL Quarterly, 40, 421-430.
275. Stone, C. A. (1993). What’s missing in the metaphor of scaffolding? In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts of learning: Sociocultural dynamics of children’s development (pp. 169—183). New York: Oxford University Press.
276. Sutton, J. (2008). Material agency, skills and history: Distributed cognition and the archaeology of memory. In C. Knappet & L. Malafouris (Eds.), Material agency (pp. 37—55). Boston: Springer.
277. Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95—108). London: Continuum.
278. Swain, M., Kinnear, P., & Steinman, L. (2011). Sociocultural theory in second language education: An introduction through narratives. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
279. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2007). The distributed nature of second language learning: A case study. In S. Fotos & H. Nassaji (Eds.), Focus on form and teacher education: Studies in honor of Rod Ellis (pp. 73—84). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
280. Swain, M., Lapkin, S., Knouzi, I., Suzuki, W, & Brooks, L. (2009). Languaging: University students learn the grammatical concept of voice in French. Modern Language Journal, 93, 5-29.
281. Talyzina, N. (1981). The psychology of learning. Theories of learning and programed instruction. Moscow: Progress Press.
282. Tarone, E. (2007). Sociolinguistic approaches to second language acquisition research— 1997—2007. Modern Language Journal, 91, 837—348.
283. Tarone, E., & Liu, G. (1995). Situational context, variation, and second language acquisition theory. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in second language acquisition (pp. 107—124). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
284. Tarone, E., Swain, M., & Fathman, A. (1976). Some limitations to the classroom applications of current second language acquisition research. TESOL Quarterly, 10, 19—32.
285. Teasdale, A., & Leung, C. (2000). Teacher assessment and psychometric theory: A case of paradigm crossing? Language Testing, 17(2), 163—184.
286. Tharp, R. G., & Gall i more, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning and schooling in social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
287. Thorne, S. L., & Lantolf, J. P. (2006). A linguistics of communicative activity. In S. Makoni & A. Pennycook (Eds.), Disinventing and reconstituting languages (pp. 170—195). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
288. Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
289. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
290. Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675-735.
291. Torrance, H. (1995).Teacher involvement in new approaches to assessment. In H.Torrance (Ed.), Evaluating authentic assessment (pp. 44—56). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
292. Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (1998). Investigating formative assessment: Teaching, learning and assessment in the classroom. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
293. Tulviste, P. (1991). The cultural-historical development of verbal thinking. Commack, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
294. Turner, M. (1996). The literary mind. The origins of thought and language. New York: Oxford University Press.
295. Tyler, A. (2012). Cognitive linguistics and second language learning: Theoretical basics and experimental evidence. New York: Routledge.
296. Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2001). Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: The case of over. Language, 77, 724-765.
297. Tzuriel, D. (2011). Revealing the effects of cognitive education programmes through Dynamic Assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(2), 113-131.
298. Tzuriel, D., & Alfassi, M. (1994). Cognitive and motivational modifiability as a function of the Instrumental Enrichment (IE) program. Special Services in the Schools, 8, 91-128.
299. Tzuriel, D., & Shamir, A. (2002). The effects of mediation in computer assisted dynamic assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 21-32.
300. Tzuriel, D., & Shamir, A. (2007). The effects of peer mediation with young children (PMYC) on childrens cognitive modifiability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 143-165.
301. Ullman, M.T. (2005). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The Declarative /Procedural Model. In C. Sanz (Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory, and practice (pp. 141—178). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
302. Ullman, M. T. (2012). The declarative/procedural model. In P. Robinson (Ed.), The Routledge encyclopedia of second language acquisition (pp. 160—164). New York: Routledge.
303. Ur, P. (2012). Grammar teaching: Theory, practice and English teaching education. In J. Huttner, B. Mehlmauer-Larcher, S. Reichel, & B. Schiftner (Eds.), Theory and practice in EFL teacher education. Bridging the gap (pp. 83—99). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
304. Valsiner, J. (2012). A guided science. History of psychology in the mirror of its making. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publications.
305. Valsiner, J., & van derVeer, R. (2000). The social mind. Construction of the idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
306. van Compernolle, R. A. (2012). Developing sociopragmatic capacity in a second language through concept-based instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
307. van derVeer, J., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Oxford: Blackwell.
308. VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
309. Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
310. Veresov, N. N. (1999). Undiscovered Vygotsky. Etudes on the pre-history of cultural-historical psychology. Frankfurt-am Main: Peter Lang.
311. Vocate, D. (1994). Self-talk and inner speech: Understanding the uniquely human aspects of intrapersonal communication. In D.Vocate (Ed.), Intrapersonal communication. Different voices, different minds (pp. 3—32). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
312. Voloshinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. Translated by L. Matejka & I. R.Titunik. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
313. Vygotsky, L. S. (1935).The question of multilingual children. In L. S.Vygotsky (Ed.), Mental development of children in the process of schooling. Moscow-Leningrad: State Publishing House. [Republished in Vygotsky (1997b, pp. 253—259).]
314. Vygotsky, L. S. (1971). The psychology of art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
315. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
316. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Translation newly revised and edited by A. Kozulin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
317. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 1: Problems of general psychology, including the volume Thinking and speech. R.W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.). New York: Plenum.
318. Vygotsky, L. S. (1990). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 2: The fundamentals of defectology (abnormal psychology and learning disabilities). R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.). New York: Plenum.
319. Vygotsky, L. S. (1994a). The development of academic concepts in the school-aged child. In J. van derVeer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 355—370). Oxford: Blackwell.
320. Vygotsky, L. S. (1994b). The problem of the environment. In J. van derVeer & J.Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 338—354). Oxford: Blackwell.
321. Vygotsky, L. S. (1997a). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 3: Problems of the theory and history of psychology. R.W. Rieber & J.Wollock (Eds.). New York: Plenum.
322. Vygotsky, L. S. (1997b). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 4: The history of the development of higher mental functions. R.W. Rieber (Ed.). New York: Plenum.
323. Vygotsky, L. S. (1997c). Educational psychology. Boca Raton, FL: Nova Science.
324. Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 5: Child psychology. R.W. Rieber (Ed.). New York: Plenum.
325. Vygotsky, L. S. (1999). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 6: Scientific Legacy. R.W. Rieber (Ed.). New York: Plenum.
326. Vygotsky, L. S. (2004/1926). The historical meaning of the crisis in psychology: A methodological investigation. In R.W. Rieber & D. K. Robinson (Eds.), The essential Vygotsky (pp. 227—344). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
327. Wang, X. (2011). Grammatical development among Chinese L2 learners: From a processability account. Newcastle: Newcastle University, UK.
328. Wells, G. (1994). The complementary contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky to a “language-based theory of learning.” Linguistics and Education, 6, 41-90.
329. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a socio-cultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
330. Wertsch, J. V. (1984). The zone of proximal development: Some conceptual issues. In B. Rogoff & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), Children’s learning in the “zone of proximal development.” (pp. 7—18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
331. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
332. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
333. Wertsch, J. V., del Rio, P. & Alvarez, A. (1995). Sociocultural studies: History, action, and mediation. In J. V. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 1—36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
334. Wertsch, J.V., Minick, N., & Arns, F. J. (1984). The creation of context in joint problem solving. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social contexts (pp. 151—171). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
335. Widdowson, H. G. (1990). Aspects of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
336. Williams, J. N. (2012). Working memory and SLA. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 427—441). New York: Routledge.
337. Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
338. Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89—100.
339. Wundt, W. (1904a). Principles of physiological psychology. Volume 1. London: Sonnenschein.
340. Wundt, W. (1904b). Volkerpsychologie: Eine Untersuchung der Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache, Mythus und Sitte. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.
341. Yanez-Prieto, M. C. (2008). On literature and the secret art of invisible words: Teaching literature through language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
342. Yus, F. (1998). Irony: Context accessibility and processing effort. Pragmalinguistica, 5—6, 391-411.
343. Yus, F. (2000). On reaching the intended ironic interpretation. International Journal of Communication, 10, 27-78.
344. Zhang, Y. (2001). Second language acquisition of Chinese grammatical morphemes: A processability perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
345. Zhang, Y. (2007). Testing the topic hypothesis: The L2 acquisition of Chinese syntax. In F. Mansouri (Ed.), Second language acquisition research. Theory-construction and testing (pp. 173—198). Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishers.
346. Zhang, X. (in progress). The teachability hypothesis and concept-based instruction: Topicalization in Chinese as a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.