Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work

Language Learning

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 119-158

  Storch, Neomy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036002495     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9922.00179     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Allwright, R.L. (1984). The importance of interaction in classroom language learning. Applied Linguistics, 5, 156-171.
2. Anton, M., & Di Camilla, F. (1998). Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 314-342.
3. Appel, G., & Lantolf, J.P. (1994). Speaking as mediation: A study of L1 and L2 text recall tasks. Modern Language Journal, 78, 437-452.
4. Banbrook, L. (1999, September). Negotiations for meaning: The learner's point of view. Paper presented at the XXIV Annual Applied Linguistics Association conference, Perth, Australia.
5. Bennett, N., & Cass, A. (1988). The effects of group composition on group interactive processes and pupil understanding. British Educational Research Journal, 15, 19-32.
6. Block, D. (1996). Not so fast: Some thoughts on theory culling, relativism, accepted findings and the heart and soul of SLA. Applied Linguistics, 17, 63-83.
7. Brooks, F.B. (1990). Foreign language learning: A social interaction perspective. In B. Van Patten & J.F. Lee (Eds.), Second language acquisition: Foreign language learning (pp. 153-169). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
8. Brooks, F.B., Donato, R., & McGlone, J.V. (1997). When are they going to say 'it' right? Understanding learner talk during pair-work activity. Foreign Language Annals, 30, 524-541.
9. Clarke, M.A., & Silberstein, S. (1988). Problems, prescriptions, and paradoxes in second language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 684-700.
10. Cohen, E.G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1-35.
11. Damon, W., & Phelps, E. (1989). Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 9-19.
12. de Guerrero, M.C.M., & Villamil, O.S. (1994). Social-cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 484-496.
13. DiNitto, R. (2000). Can collaboration be unsuccessful? A sociocultural analysis of classroom setting and Japanese L2 performance in group tasks. Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese, 34, 179-210.
14. Donato, R. (1988). Beyond group: A psycholinguistic rationale for collective activity in second-language learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Delaware, Newark.
15. Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J.P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
16. Donate, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In J.P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 27-50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Ellis, R. (1995). Interpretation tasks for grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 87-105.
18. Ellis, S., & Gauvain, M. (1992). Social and cultural influences on children's collaborative interactions. In L.T. Winegar & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Children's development within social context (Vol. 2, pp. 155-180). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Ellis, S., & Rogoff, B. (1986). Problem solving in children's management of instruction. In E. Mueller & C. Cooper (Eds.), Process and outcome in peer relationships (pp. 301-325). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
20. Erickson, F. (1989). Learning and collaboration in teaching. Language Arts, 66, 430-441.
21. Faerch, C., & Kasper, G. (1986). The role of comprehension in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 7, 257-274.
22. Forman, E.A., & Cazden, C.B. (1985). Exploring Vygotskian perspectives in education: The cognitive value of peer interaction. In J.V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 323-347). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Foster, P. (1998). A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19, 1-23.
24. Frawley, W., & Lantolf, J.P. (1985). Second language discourse: A Vygotskian perspective. Applied Linguistics, 6, 19-44.
25. Gass, S., & Varonis, E. (1985). Task variation and nonnative/nonnative negotiations of meaning. In S. Gass and C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 149-161). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
26. Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for quantitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
27. Goodnow, J.J. (1993). Direction of post-Vygotskian research. In E.A. Forman, N. Minick, & C.A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 369-381). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Greenfield, P.M. (1984). A theory of teacher in learning activities of everyday life. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 117-138). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
29. Jacob, E., Rottenberg, L., Patrick, S., & Wheeler, E. (1996). Cooperative learning: Context and opportunities for acquiring academic English. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 253-280.
30. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1990). What is cooperative learning? In M. Brubacher, R. Payne, & K. Rickett (Eds.), Perspectives on small group learning: Theory and practice (pp. 68-80). Oakville, Ontario: Rubicon.
31. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1994). Cooperative learning in the culturally diverse classroom. In R.A. DeVillar, C.J. Faltis, & J.P. Cummings (Eds.), Cultural diversity in schools: From rhetoric to practice (pp. 57-73). New York: State University of New York Press.
32. Kowal, M., & Swain, M. (1994). Using collaborative language production tasks to promote students' language awareness. Language Awareness, 3, 73-93.
33. LaPierre, D. (1994). Language output in a cooperative learning setting: Determining its effects on second language learning. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Toronto (OISE), Toronto.
34. Lockhart, C., & Ng, P. (1995). Analyzing talk in ESL peer response groups: Stances, functions and content. Language Learning, 45, 605-655.
35. Long, M.H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126-141.
36. McLane, J.B. (1987). Interaction, context, and the zone of proximal development. In M. Hickmann (Ed.), Social and functional approaches to language and thought (pp. 267-285). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
37. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, M.A. (1994).An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38. Nelson, G.L., & Murphy, J.M. (1993). Peer response groups: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts? TESOL Quarterly, 27, 135-141.
39. Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1984). Social constraints in laboratory and classroom tasks. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 172-193). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40. Ohta, A.S. (1995). Applying sociocultural theory to an analysis of learner discourse: Learner-learner collaborative interaction in the zone of proximal development. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6, 93-121.
41. Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., & Morgenthaler, L. (1989). Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 63-90.
42. Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., Berducci, D., & Newman, J. (1991). Language learning through interaction: What role does gender play? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 343-376.
43. Putney, L.A., Green, J., Dixon, C., Duran, R., & Yeager, B. (2000). Consequential progressions: Exploring collective-individual development in a bilingual classroom. In O.D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 86-126). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Samuda, R., & Rounders, P.L. (1993). Reference points for analyzing tasks in action. In G. Crookes & S.M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in a pedagogical context: Investigating theory and practice (pp. 125-138). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
45. Saunders, W.M. (1989). Collaborative writing tasks and peer interaction. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 101-112.
46. Sharan, S. (1990). Cooperative learning: A perspective on research and practice. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and research (pp. 285-300). New York: Praeger.
47. Slavin, R.E. (1990). Research on cooperative learning: Consensus and controversy. Educational Leadership, 47, 52-54.
48. Smagorisnky, P., & O'Donnell-Allen, C. (2000). Idiocultural diversity in small groups. The role of the relational framework in collaborative writing. In O.D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research. Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 165-190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Smith, J. (1996). A seven-minute slice of chaos or I'm puzzling through now. Unpublished research report, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
50. Storch, N. (1998). A classroom-based study: Insights from a collaborative, text reconstruction task. ELT Journal, 52, 291-300.
51. Swain, M. (1994). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), For H.G. Widdowson: Principles and practice in the study of language. A festschrift on the occasion of his 60th birthday (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52. Swain, M. (1995, February). Collaborative dialogue: Its contribution to second language learning. Plenary paper presented at the Annual American Applied Linguistics (AAAL) Conference, Long Beach, California.
53. Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64-82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371-391.
56. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82, 320-337.
57. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (in press). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 99-118). London: Longman.
58. Teasley, S., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Constructing a joint problem space: The computer as a tool for sharing knowledge. In S.P. Lajoie & S.J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 229-258). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
59. Tharp, R.G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60. Underwood, J., & Underwood, G. (1999). Task effect on cooperative and collaborative learning with computers. In K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers: Analysing productive interaction (pp. 10-23). London: Routledge.
61. van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. London: Longman.
62. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
63. Vygotsky, L.S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64. Webb, N. (1992). Testing a theoretical model of student interaction and learning in small groups. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interactions in cooperative groups. The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 102-119). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65. Wegerif, R., & Mercer, N. (1996). Computers and reasoning through talk in the classroom. Language and Education, 10, 47-64.
66. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67. Wertsch, J.V. (1979). From social interaction to higher psychological processes: A clarification and application of Vygotsky's theory. Human Development, 22, 1-22.
68. Wertsch, J.V. (1995). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
69. Wertsch, J.V., & Hickmann, M. (1987). Problem solving in social interaction: A microgenetic analysis. In M. Hickmann (Ed.), Social and functional approaches to language and thought (pp. 251-266). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
70. Wood, D., Bruner, J.S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.