Adhesion GPCRs as a putative class of metabotropic mechanosensors

Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology

Volumn 234, Issue , 2016, Pages 221-247

  Scholz, Nicole ^a   Monk, Kelly R ^b   Kittel, Robert J ^a   Langenhan, Tobias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adhesion GPCR; Mechanosensation; Mechanosensor

Indexed keywords

BINDING PROTEIN; CADHERIN; DEGENERIN SODIUM CHANNEL; G PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTOR; INTEGRIN; IONOTROPIC RECEPTOR; LATROPHILIN; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; METABOTROPIC RECEPTOR; PIEZO1 PROTEIN; PIEZO2 PROTEIN; POTASSIUM CHANNEL; PROTEIN GPR126; PROTEIN GPR56; TRANSIENT RECEPTOR POTENTIAL CHANNEL; TRANSMEMBRANE CHANNEL LIKE 1 PROTEIN; TRANSMEMBRANE CHANNEL LIKE 2 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CELL ADHESION MOLECULE; LIGAND; PROTEIN BINDING;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CELL SURFACE; HUMAN; LIGAND BINDING; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; MOLECULAR MODEL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; ANIMAL; BINDING SITE; CELL ADHESION; CELL MEMBRANE; CHEMISTRY; MECHANICAL STRESS; METABOLISM; PROTEIN DOMAIN; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; CELL ADHESION; CELL ADHESION MOLECULES; CELL MEMBRANE; HUMANS; LIGANDS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; RECEPTORS, G-PROTEIN-COUPLED; STRESS, MECHANICAL; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 84995487480     PISSN: 01712004     EISSN: 18650325     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-41523-9_10     Document Type: Chapter

References (187)

1. Hoffman BD, Grashoff C, Schwartz MA (2011) Dynamic molecular processes mediate cellular mechanotransduction. Nature 475:316–323. doi:10.1038/nature10316
2. Cantor RS (1997) Lateral pressures in cell membranes: a mechanism for modulation of protein function. J Phys Chem B 101:1723–1725. doi:10.1021/jp963911x
3. Guharay F, Sachs F (1984) Stretch-activated single ion channel currents in tissue-cultured embryonic chick skeletal muscle. J Physiol 352:685–701
4. Guharay F, Sachs F (1985) Mechanotransducer ion channels in chick skeletal muscle: the effects of extracellular pH. J Physiol 363:119–134
5. Sukharev SI, Blount P, Martinac B, Blattner FR, Kung C (1994) A large-conductance mechanosensitive channel in E coli encoded by mscL alone. Nature 368:265–268. doi:10.1038/368265a0
6. Levina N, Tötemeyer S, Stokes NR, Louis P, Jones MA, Booth IR (1999) Protection of Escherichia coli cells against extreme turgor by activation of MscS and MscL mechanosensitive channels: identification of genes required for MscS activity. EMBO J 18:1730–1737. doi:10.1093/emboj/18.7.1730
7. Perozo E, Rees DC (2003) Structure and mechanism in prokaryotic mechanosensitive channels. Curr Opin Struct Biol 13:432–442
8. Ajouz B, Berrier C, Garrigues A, Besnard M, Ghazi A (1998) Release of thioredoxin via the mechanosensitive channel MscL during osmotic downshock of Escherichia coli cells. J Biol Chem 273:26670–26674
9. Kung C (2005) A possible unifying principle for mechanosensation. Nature 436:647–654. doi:10.1038/nature03896
10. Ge J, Li W, Zhao Q, Li N, Chen M, Zhi P et al (2015) Architecture of the mammalian mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel. Nature 527:64–69. doi:10.1038/nature15247
11. Coste B, Mathur J, Schmidt M, Earley TJ, Ranade S, Petrus MJ et al (2010) Piezo1 and Piezo2 are essential components of distinct mechanically activated cation channels. Science 330:55–60. doi:10.1126/science.1193270
12. Coste B, Xiao B, Santos JS, Syeda R, Grandl J, Spencer KS et al (2012) Piezo proteins are pore-forming subunits of mechanically activated channels. Nature 483:176–181. doi:10.1038/nature10812
13. Gottlieb PA, Sachs F (2011) Piezo1: properties of a cation selective mechanical channel. Channels (Austin) 6:214–219. doi:10.4161/chan.21050
14. Woo SH, Ranade S, Weyer AD, Dubin AE, Baba Y (2014) Piezo2 is required for Merkel-cell mechanotransduction. Nature 509:622–626
15. Coste B, Murthy SE, Mathur J, Schmidt M, Mechioukhi Y, Delmas P et al (2015) Piezo1 ion channel pore properties are dictated by C-terminal region. Nat Commun 6:7223. doi:10.1038/ncomms8223
16. Faucherre A, Nargeot J, Mangoni ME, Jopling C (2013) Piezo2b regulates vertebrate light touch response. J Neurosci 33:17089–17094. doi:10.1523/JNeurosci0522-13.2013
17. Faucherre A, Kissa K, Nargeot J, Mangoni ME, Jopling C (2014) Piezo1 plays a role in erythrocyte volume homeostasis. Haematologica 99:70–75. doi:10.3324/haematol.2013.086090
18. Li J, Hou B, Tumova S, Muraki K, Bruns A, Ludlow MJ et al (2014) Piezo1 integration of vascular architecture with physiological force. Nature 515:279–282. doi:10.1038/nature13701
19. Ranade SS, Qiu Z, Woo SH, Hur SS (2014) Piezo1, a mechanically activated ion channel, is required for vascular development in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111(28):10347–10352. doi:10.1073/pnas.1409233111
20. Kim SE, Coste B, Chadha A, Cook B, Patapoutian A (2012) The role of Drosophila Piezo in mechanical nociception. Nature 483:209–212. doi:10.1038/nature10801
21. Canessa CM, Horisberger JD, Rossier BC (1993) Epithelial sodium channel related to proteins involved in neurodegeneration. Nature 361:467–470. doi:10.1038/361467a0
22. + channel is made of three homologous subunits. Nature 367:463–467. doi:10.1038/367463a0
23. Driscoll M, Chalfie M (1991) The mec-4 gene is a member of a family of Caenorhabditis elegans genes that can mutate to induce neuronal degeneration. Nature 349:588–593. doi:10.1038/349588a0
24. + channel. A new channel type with homologies to Caenorhabditis elegans degenerins. FEBS Lett 318:95–99
25. Kellenberger S, Schild L (2002) Epithelial sodium channel/degenerin family of ion channels: a variety of functions for a shared structure. Physiol Rev 82:735–767. doi:10.1152/physrev.00007.2002
26. Askwith CC, Wemmie JA, Price MP, Rokhlina T, Welsh MJ (2004) Acid-sensing ion channel 2 (ASIC2) modulates ASIC1 H+-activated currents in hippocampal neurons. J Biol Chem 279:18296–18305. doi:10.1074/jbc.M312145200
27. Baron A, Voilley N, Lazdunski M, Lingueglia E (2008) Acid sensing ion channels in dorsal spinal cord neurons. J Neurosci 28:1498–1508. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4975-07.2008
28. Benson CJ, Xie J, Wemmie JA, Price MP, Henss JM, Welsh MJ et al (2002) Heteromultimers of DEG/ENaC subunits form H+-gated channels in mouse sensory neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:2338–2343. doi:10.1073/pnas.032678399
29. Chalfie M, Sulston J (1981) Developmental genetics of the mechanosensory neurons of Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 82:358–370
30. Sulston J, Dew M, Brenner S (1975) Dopaminergic neurons in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J Comp Neurol 163:215–226. doi:10.1002/cne.901630207
31. Chalfie M, Au M (1989) Genetic control of differentiation of the Caenorhabditis elegans touch receptor neurons. Science 243:1027–1033
32. Goodman MB, Ernstrom GG, Chelur DS, O’Hagan R, Yao CA, Chalfie M (2002) MEC-2 regulates C. elegans DEG/ENaC channels needed for mechanosensation. Nature 415:1039–1042. doi:10.1038/4151039a
33. Zhang S, Árnadóttir J, Keller C, Caldwell GA, Yao CA, Chalfie M(2004) MEC-2 is recruited to the putative mechanosensory complex in C. elegans touch receptor neurons through its stomatin-like domain. Curr Biol 14:1888–1896. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.10.030
34. Chelur DS, Ernstrom GG, Goodman MB, Yao CA, Chen L, O’Hagan R et al (2002) The mechanosensory protein MEC-6 is a subunit of the C. elegans touch-cell degenerin channel. Nature 420:669–673. doi:10.1038/nature01205
35. Huang M, Chalfie M (1994) Gene interactions affecting mechanosensory transduction in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 367:467–470. doi:10.1038/367467a0
36. O’Hagan R, Chalfie M, Goodman MB (2004) The MEC-4 DEG/ENaC channel of Caenorhabditis elegans touch receptor neurons transduces mechanical signals. Nat Neurosci 8:43–50. doi:10.1038/nn1362
37. Getz GS, Reardon CA (2004) Paraoxonase, a cardioprotective enzyme: continuing issues. Curr Opin Lipidol 15:261
38. Huber TB, Schermer B, Muller RU, Hohne M, Bartram M, Calixto A et al (2006) Podocin and MEC-2 bind cholesterol to regulate the activity of associated ion channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:17079–17086. doi:10.1073/pnas.0607465103
39. Barnes TM, Jin Y, Horvitz HR, Ruvkun G (1996) The Caenorhabditis elegans behavioral gene unc-24 encodes a novel bipartite protein similar to both erythrocyte band 7.2 (stomatin) and nonspecific lipid transfer protein. J Neurochem 67(1):46–57
40. Clapham DE (2003) TRP channels as cellular sensors. Nature 426:517–524. doi:10.1038/nature02196
41. Montell C (2005) The TRP superfamily of cation channels. Sci Signal 2005:re3. doi:10.1126/stke.2722005re3
42. Christensen AP, Corey DP (2007) TRP channels in mechanosensation: direct or indirect activation? Nat Rev Neurosci 8:510–521. doi:10.1038/nrn2149
43. Owsianik G, Talavera K, Voets T, Nilius B (2006) Permeation and selectivity of TRP channels. Annu Rev Physiol 68:685–717. doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.68.040204.101406
44. Schnitzler MMY, Storch U, Meibers S, Nurwakagari P, Breit A, Essin K et al (2008) Gq-coupled receptors as mechanosensors mediating myogenic vasoconstriction. EMBO J 27:3092–3103. doi:10.1038/emboj.2008.233
45. Quick K, Zhao J, Eijkelkamp N, Linley JE, Rugiero F, Cox JJ et al (2012) TRPC3 and TRPC6 are essential for normal mechanotransduction in subsets of sensory neurons and cochlear hair cells. Open Biol 2:120068. doi:10.1098/rsob.120068
46. Sexton JE, Desmonds T, Quick K, Taylor R, Abramowitz J, Forge A et al (2015) The contribution of TRPC1, TRPC3, TRPC5 and TRPC6 to touch and hearing. Neurosci Lett 610:36–42. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2015.10.052
47. Eberl DF, Hardy RW, Kernan MJ (2000) Genetically similar transduction mechanisms for touch and hearing in Drosophila. J Neurosci 20:5981–5988
48. Walker RG, Willingham AT, Zuker CS (2000) A Drosophila mechanosensory transduction channel. Science 287:2229–2234
49. Sidi S, NompC TRP (2003) Channel required for vertebrate sensory hair cell mechanotransduction. Science 301:96–99. doi:10.1126/science.1084370
50. Li W, Feng Z, Sternberg PW, Xu XZS (2006) A C. elegans stretch receptor neuron revealed by a mechanosensitive TRP channel homologue. Nature 440:684–687. doi:10.1038/nature04538
51. Lee J, Moon S, Cha Y, Chung YD (2010) Drosophila TRPN(=NOMPC) channel localizes to the distal end of mechanosensory cilia. PLoS One 5(6), e11012
52. Cheng LE, Song W, Looger LL, Jan LY, Jan YN (2010) The role of the TRP channel NompC in Drosophila larval and adult locomotion. Neuron 67:373–380. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.07.004
53. Yan Z, Zhang W, He Y, Gorczyca D, Xiang Y, Cheng LE et al (2013) Nature 493:221–225. doi:10.1038/nature11685
54. Gong J, Wang Q, Wang Z (2013) NOMPC is likely a key component of Drosophila mechanotransduction channels. Eur J Neurosci 38:2057–2064. doi:10.1111/ejn.12214
55. Liang X, Madrid J, Gärtner R, Verbavatz J-M, Schiklenk C, Wilsch-Bräuninger M et al (2013) A NOMPC-dependent membrane-microtubule connector is a candidate for the gating spring in fly mechanoreceptors. Curr Biol 23:755–763. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.03.065
56. Zhang W, Cheng LE, Kittelmann M, Li J, Petkovic M, Cheng T et al (2015) Ankyrin repeats convey force to gate the NOMPC mechanotransduction channel. Cell 162:1391–1403. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.024
57. Göpfert MC, Albert JT, Nadrowski B, Kamikouchi A (2006) Specification of auditory sensitivity by Drosophila TRP channels. Nat Neurosci 9:999–1000. doi:10.1038/nn1735
58. Lehnert BP, Baker AE, Gaudry Q, Chiang A-S, Wilson RI (2013) Distinct roles of TRP channels in auditory transduction and amplification in Drosophila. Neuron 77:115–128. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.11.030
59. Scholz N, Gehring J, Guan C, Ljaschenko D, Fischer R, Lakshmanan V et al (2015) The adhesion GPCR latrophilin/CIRL shapes mechanosensation. Cell Rep. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.04.008
60. Tobin DM, Madsen DM, Kahn-Kirby A, Peckol EL (2002) Combinatorial expression of TRPV channel proteins defines their sensory functions and subcellular localization in C. elegans neurons. Neuron 35(2):307–318
61. Kaplan JM, Horvitz HR (1993) A dual mechanosensory and chemosensory neuron in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90(6):2227–2231
62. Colbert HA, Smith TL, Bargmann CI (1997) OSM-9, a novel protein with structural similarity to channels, is required for olfaction, mechanosensation, and olfactory adaptation in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci 17:8259–8269
63. Kim J, Chung YD, Park D-Y, Choi S, Shin DW, Soh H et al (2003) A TRPV family ion channel required for hearing in Drosophila. Nature 424:81–84. doi:10.1038/nature01733
64. Gong Z, Son W, Chung YD, Kim J, Shin DW, McClung CA et al (2004) Two interdependent TRPV channel subunits, inactive and Nanchung, mediate hearing in Drosophila. J Neurosci 24:9059–9066. doi:10.1523/JNeurosci.1645-04.2004
65. Hanaoka K, Qian F, Boletta A, Bhunia AK, Piontek K, Tsiokas L et al (2000) Co-assembly of polycystin-1 and -2 produces unique cation-permeable currents. Nature 408:990–994. doi:10.1038/35050128
66. Yu Y, Ulbrich MH, Li M-H, Buraei Z, Chen X-Z, Ong ACM et al (2009) Structural and molecular basis of the assembly of the TRPP2/PKD1 complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:11558–11563. doi:10.1073/pnas.0903684106
67. Nauli SM, Alenghat FJ, Luo Y, Williams E, Vassilev P, Li X et al (2003) Polycystins 1 and 2 mediate mechanosensation in the primary cilium of kidney cells. Nat Genet 33:129–137. doi:10.1038/ng1076
68. Nauli SM, Kawanabe Y, Kaminski JJ, Pearce WJ, Ingber DE, Zhou J (2008) Endothelial cilia are fluid shear sensors that regulate calcium signaling and nitric oxide production through polycystin-1. Circulation 117:1161–1171. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.710111
69. AbouAlaiwi WA, Takahashi M, Mell BR, Jones TJ, Ratnam S, Kolb RJ et al (2009) Ciliary polycystin-2 is a mechanosensitive calcium channel involved in nitric oxide signaling cascades. Circ Res 104:860–869. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.192765
70. Sharif-Naeini R, Folgering JHA, Bichet D, Duprat F, Lauritzen I, Arhatte M et al (2009) Polycystin-1 and -2 dosage regulates pressure sensing. Cell 139:587–596. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.08.045
71. Wilson PD (2004) Polycystic kidney disease: new understanding in the pathogenesis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 36:1868–1873. doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2004.03.012
72. Harris PC, Torres VE (2009) Polycystic kidney disease. Annu Rev Med 60:321–337. doi:10.1146/annurev.med.60.101707.125712
73. Nieberler M, Kittel RJ, Petrenko AG, Lin H-H, Langenhan T (2016) Control of adhesion GPCR function through proteolytic processing. In: Langenhan T, Schöneberg T (eds) Adhesion G protein-coupled receptors: molecular, physiological and pharmacological principles in health and disease. Springer, Heidelberg
74. Praetorius HA, Spring KR (2001) Bending the MDCK cell primary cilium increases intracellular calcium. J Membr Biol 184:71–79
75. Köttgen M, Buchholz B, Garcia-Gonzalez MA, Kotsis F, Fu X, Doerken M et al (2008) TRPP2 and TRPV4 form a polymodal sensory channel complex. J Cell Biol 182:437–447. doi:10.1083/jcb.200805124
76. Brohawn SG (2015) How ion channels sense mechanical force: insights from mechanosensitive K2P channels TRAAK, TREK1, and TREK2. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1352:20–32. doi:10.1111/nyas.12874
77. Noël J, Sandoz G, Lesage F (2014) Molecular regulations governing TREK and TRAAK channel functions. Channels (Austin) 5:402–409. doi:10.4161/chan.5.5.16469
78. + channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:3614–3619. doi:10.1073/pnas.1320768111
79. + currents: two-pore domain potassium channels. Physiol Rev 90:559–605. doi:10.1152/physrev.00029.2009
80. + channel involved in polymodal pain perception. EMBO J 25:2368–2376. doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601116
81. + channel involved in neuroprotection and general anesthesia. EMBO J 23:2684–2695. doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600234
82. Peyronnet R, Sharif-Naeini R, Folgering J, Arhatte M (2012) Mechanoprotection by polycystins against apoptosis is mediated through the opening of stretch-activated K2P channels. Cell Rep 1:241–250
83. Sanders KM, Don KS (2006) Two‐pore‐domain potassium channels in smooth muscles: new components of myogenic regulation. J Physiol 570:37–43. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2005.098897
84. Kurima K, Peters LM, Yang Y, Riazuddin S, Ahmed ZM, Naz S et al (2002) Dominant and recessive deafness caused by mutations of a novel gene, TMC1, required for cochlear haircell function. Nat Genet 30:277–284. doi:10.1038/ng842
85. Pan B, Géléoc GS, Asai Y, Horwitz GC, Kurima K, Ishikawa K et al (2013) TMC1 and TMC2 are components of the mechanotransduction channel in hair cells of the mammalian inner ear. Neuron 79:504–515. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.06.019
86. Kurima K, Ebrahim S, Pan B, Sedlacek M, Sengupta P, Millis BA et al (2015) TMC1 and TMC2 localize at the site of mechanotransduction in mammalian inner ear hair cell stereocilia. Cell Rep 12:1606–1617. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.07.058
87. Keresztes G, Mutai H, Heller S (2003) TMC and EVER genes belong to a larger novel family, the TMC gene family encoding transmembrane proteins. BMC Genomics 4:24. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-4-24
88. Labay V, Weichert RM, Makishima T, Griffith AJ (2010) Topology of transmembrane channel-like gene 1 protein. Biochemistry 49:8592–8598. doi:10.1021/bi1004377
89. Chatzigeorgiou M, Bang S, Hwang SW, Schafer WR (2013) tmc-1 encodes a sodiumsensitive channel required for salt chemosensation in C. elegans. Nature 494:95–99. doi:10.1038/nature11845
90. Kawashima Y, Géléoc GSG, Kurima K, Labay V, Lelli A, Asai Y et al (2011) Mechanotransduction in mouse inner ear hair cells requires transmembrane channel-like genes. J Clin Invest 121:4796–4809. doi:10.1172/JCI60405
91. Vreugde S, Erven A, Kros CJ, Marcotti W, Fuchs H, Kurima K et al (2002) Beethoven, a mouse model for dominant, progressive hearing loss DFNA36. Nat Genet 30:257–258. doi:10.1038/ng848
92. Beurg M, Kim KX, Fettiplace R (2014) Conductance and block of hair-cell mechanotransducer channels in transmembrane channel-like protein mutants. J Gen Physiol 144:55–69. doi:10.1038/ng848
93. Gale JE, Marcotti W, Kennedy HJ, Kros CJ, Richardson GP (2001) FM1-43 dye behaves as a permeant blocker of the hair-cell mechanotransducer channel. J Neurosci 21:7013–7025
94. Marcotti W, Van Netten SM (2005) The aminoglycoside antibiotic dihydrostreptomycin rapidly enters mouse outer hair cells through the mechano-electrical transducer channels. J Physiol 567:505–521
95. Kazmierczak P, Sakaguchi H, Tokita J (2007) Cadherin 23 and protocadherin 15 interact to form tip-link filaments in sensory hair cells. Nature 449(7158):87–91. Abstract
96. Sakaguchi H, Tokita J, Müller U, Kachar B (2009) Tip links in hair cells: molecular composition and role in hearing loss. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 17:388. doi:10.1097/MOO.0b013e3283303472
97. Maeda R, Kindt KS, Mo W, Morgan CP, Erickson T, Zhao H et al (2014) Tip-link protein protocadherin 15 interacts with transmembrane channel-like proteins TMC1 and TMC2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:12907–12912. doi:10.1073/pnas.1402152111
98. Beurg M, Xiong W, Zhao B, Müller U (2015) Subunit determination of the conductance of hair-cell mechanotransducer channels. 2015. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(5):1589–1594. doi:10.1073/pnas.1420906112
99. Hynes R (1987) Integrins: a family of cell surface receptors. Cell 48:549–554. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(87)90233-9
100. Hynes RO (2002) Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell 110:673–687
101. Plow EF, Haas TA, Zhang L, Loftus J, Smith JW (2000) Ligand binding to integrins. J Biol Chem 275:21785–21788. doi:10.1074/jbc.R000003200
102. Shattil SJ, Kim C, Ginsberg MH (2010) The final steps of integrin activation: the end game. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11:288–300. doi:10.1038/nrm2871
103. Campbell ID, Humphries MJ (2011) Integrin structure, activation, and interactions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3(3):a004994
104. Balaban NQ, Schwarz US, Riveline D, Goichberg P, Tzur G, Sabanay I et al (2001) Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates. Nat Cell Biol 3:466–472. doi:10.1038/35074532, Abstract
105. Galbraith CG, Yamada KM, Sheetz MP (2002) The relationship between force and focal complex development. J Cell Biol 159(4):695–705
106. Wang N, Butler J, Ingber D (1993) Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science 260:1124–1127. doi:10.1126/science.7684161
107. Choquet D, Felsenfeld DP, Sheetz MP (1997) Extracellular matrix rigidity causes strengthening of integrin–cytoskeleton linkages. Cell 88(1):39–48
108. Meyer CJ, Alenghat FJ, Rim P, Fong JH-J, Fabry B, Ingber DE (2000) Mechanical control of cyclic AMP signalling and gene transcription through integrins. Nat Cell Biol 2:666–668. doi:10.1038/35023621, Abstract
109. Chen J, Fabry B, Schiffrin EL, Wang N (2001) Twisting integrin receptors increases endothelin-1 gene expression in endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 280:C1475–C1484
110. Riveline D, Zamir E, Balaban NQ, Schwarz US, Ishizaki T, Narumiya S et al (2001) Focal contacts as mechanosensors: externally applied local mechanical force induces growth of focal contacts by an mDia1-dependent and rock-independent mechanism. J Cell Biol 153:1175–1186. doi:10.1083/jcb.141.2.539
111. Lo CM, Wang HB, Dembo M, Wang Y (2000) Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophys J 79(1):144–152
112. Chen CS, Mrksich M, Huang S, Whitesides GM, Ingber DE (1997) Geometric control of cell life and death. Science 276(5317):1425–1428
113. Dike LE, Chen CS, Mrksich M, Tien J, Whitesides GM, Ingber DE (1999) Geometric control of switching between growth, apoptosis, and differentiation during angiogenesis using micropatterned substrates. Dev Biol 35:441–448
114. Parker KK, Brock AL, Brangwynne C, Mannix RJ, Wang N, Ostuni E et al (2002) Directional control of lamellipodia extension by constraining cell shape and orienting cell tractional forces. FASEB J 16(10):1195–1204
115. McHugh BJ, Buttery R, Lad Y, Banks S (2010) Integrin activation by Fam38A uses a novel mechanism of R-Ras targeting to the endoplasmic. J Cell Sci 123(1):51–61. doi:10.1242/jcs.056424
116. Nose A, Tsuji K, Takeichi M (1990) Localization of specificity determining sites in cadherin cell adhesion molecules. Cell 61:147–155
117. Shapiro L, Weis WI (2009) Structure and biochemistry of cadherins and catenins. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 1:a003053. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a003053
118. Prakasam AK, Maruthamuthu V, Leckband DE (2006) Similarities between heterophilic and homophilic cadherin adhesion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:15434–15439. doi:10.1073/pnas.0606701103
119. Leckband D, Prakasam A (2006) Mechanism and dynamics of cadherin adhesion. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 8:259–287. doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.8.061505.095753
120. Shi Q, Maruthamuthu V, Li F, Leckband D (2010) Allosteric cross talk between cadherin extracellular domains. Biophys J 99:95–104. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2010.03.062
121. Desai R, Sarpal R, Ishiyama N, Pellikka M, Ikura M, Tepass U (2013) Monomeric α-catenin links cadherin to the actin cytoskeleton. Nature 15:261–273. doi:10.1038/ncb2685
122. le Duc Q, Shi Q, Blonk I, Sonnenberg A, Wang N, Leckband D et al (2010) Vinculin potentiates E-cadherin mechanosensing and is recruited to actin-anchored sites within adherens junctions in a myosin II-dependent manner. J Cell Biol 189:1107–1115. doi:10.1083/jcb.201001149
123. Yonemura S, Wada Y, Watanabe T, Nagafuchi A, Shibata M (2010) alpha-Catenin as a tension transducer that induces adherens junction development. Nature 12:533–542.doi:10.1038/ncb2055
124. Yonemura S (2011) A mechanism of mechanotransduction at the cell-cell interface: emergence of α-catenin as the center of a force-balancing mechanism for morphogenesis in multicellular organisms. Bioessays 33:732–736. doi:10.1002/bies.201100064
125. Leckband DE, de Rooij J (2014) Cadherin adhesion and mechanotransduction. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 30:291–315. doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100913-013212
126. Saez A, Buguin A, Silberzan P, Ladoux B (2005) Is the mechanical activity of epithelial cells controlled by deformations or forces? Biophys J 89:L52–L54. doi:10.1529/biophysj.105.071217
127. Liu Q-S, Zhang J, Liu M, Dong W-G (2010) Lentiviral-mediated miRNA against liverintestine cadherin suppresses tumor growth and invasiveness of human gastric cancer. Cancer Sci 101:1807–1812. doi:10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01600.x
128. Barry AK, Wang N, Leckband DE (2015) Local VE-cadherin mechanotransduction triggers long-ranged remodeling of endothelial monolayers. J Cell Sci 128:1341–1351. doi:10.1242/jcs.159954
129. Roh-Johnson M, Shemer G, Higgins CD, McClellan JH, Werts AD, Tulu US et al (2012) Triggering a cell shape change by exploiting preexisting actomyosin contractions. Science 335:1232–1235. doi:10.1126/science.1217869
130. Levayer R, Lecuit T (2013) Oscillation and polarity of E-cadherin asymmetries control actomyosin flow patterns during morphogenesis. Dev Cell 26:162–175. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2013.06.020
131. Tabdili H, Langer M, Shi Q, Poh Y-C, Wang N, Leckband D (2012) Cadherin-dependent mechanotransduction depends on ligand identity but not affinity. J Cell Sci 125:4362–4371. doi:10.1242/jcs.105775
132. Ladoux B, Anon E, Lambert M, Rabodzey A, Hersen P, Buguin A et al (2010) Strength dependence of cadherin-mediated adhesions. Biophys J 98:534–542. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2009.10.044
133. Dufour S, Mège R-M, Thiery JP (2014) α-Catenin, vinculin, and F-actin in strengthening E-cadherin cell–cell adhesions and mechanosensing. Cell Adh Migr 7:345–350. doi:10.4161/cam.25139
134. Thomas WA, Boscher C, Chu Y-S, Cuvelier D, Martinez-Rico C, Seddiki R et al (2013) α-Catenin and vinculin cooperate to promote high E-cadherin-based adhesion strength. J Biol Chem 288:4957–4969. doi:10.1074/jbc.M112.403774
135. Lecuit T, Lenne P-F, Munro E (2010) Force generation, transmission, and integration during cell and tissue morphogenesis. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 27:157–184. doi:10.1146/annurevcellbio-100109-104027
136. Maıˆtre J-L, Heisenberg C-P (2013) Three functions of cadherins in cell adhesion. Curr Biol 23:R626–R633. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.06.019
137. Andreeva AV, Han J, Kutuzov MA, Profirovic J, Tkachuk VA, Voyno-Yasenetskaya TA (2010) T-cadherin modulates endothelial barrier function. J Cell Physiol 223:94–102. doi:10.1002/jcp.22014
138. Groschwitz KR, Hogan SP (2009) Intestinal barrier function: molecular regulation and disease pathogenesis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 124:3–20. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2009.05.038,quiz 21–2
139. Gumbiner BM (2005) Regulation of cadherin-mediated adhesion in morphogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6:622–634. doi:10.1038/nrm1699
140. Bockaert J, Pin JP (1999) Molecular tinkering of G protein-coupled receptors: an evolutionary success. EMBO J 18:1723–1729. doi:10.1093/emboj/18.7.1723
141. Schnitzler MY, Storch U, Gudermann T (2011) AT1 receptors as mechanosensors. Curr Opin Pharmacol 11:112–116
142. Zou Y, Akazawa H, Qin Y, Sano M, Takano H, Minamino T et al (2004) Mechanical stress activates angiotensin II type 1 receptor without the involvement of angiotensin II. Nat Cell Biol 6:499–506. doi:10.1038/ncb1137
143. Jarajapu YPR, Knot HJ (2002) Role of phospholipase C in development of myogenic tone in rat posterior cerebral arteries. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 283:H2234–H2238. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00624.2002
144. Osol G, Laher I, KelleyM(1993) Myogenic tone is coupled to phospholipase C and G protein activation in small cerebral arteries. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 265:H415–H420
145. Farrens DL, Altenbach C, Yang K, Hubbell WL (1996) Requirement of rigid-body motion of transmembrane helices for light activation of rhodopsin. Science 274(5288):768–770
146. Karnik S, Gogonea C, Patil S, Saad Y, Takezako T (2003) Activation of G-protein-coupled receptors: a common molecular mechanism. Trends Endocrinol Metab 14:431–437. doi:10.1016/j.tem.2003.09.007
147. Yasuda N, Miura S-I, Akazawa H, Tanaka T, Qin Y, Kiya Y et al (2008) Conformational switch of angiotensin II type 1 receptor underlying mechanical stress-induced activation. EMBO Rep 9:179–186. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7401157
148. Storch U, Mederos y Schnitzler M, Gudermann T (2012) G protein-mediated stretch reception. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 302:H1241–H1249. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00818.2011
149. Chachisvilis M, Zhang Y-L, Frangos JA (2006) G protein-coupled receptors sense fluid shear stress in endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:15463–15468. doi:10.1073/pnas.0607224103
150. Mannstadt M, Jüppner H, Gardella TJ (1999) Receptors for PTH and PTHrP: their biological importance and functional properties. Am J Physiol 277:F665–F675
151. Zhang Y-L, Frangos JA, Chachisvilis M (2009) Mechanical stimulus alters conformation of type 1 parathyroid hormone receptor in bone cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 296:C1391–C1399. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00549.2008
152. Abdul-Majeed S, Nauli SM (2011) Dopamine receptor type 5 in the primary cilia has dual chemo- and mechano-sensory roles. Hypertension 58:325–331
153. Makino A, Prossnitz ER, Bunemann M, Wang JM, Yao WJ, Schmid-Schoenbein GW (2006) G protein-coupled receptors serve as mechanosensors for fluid shear stress in neutrophils. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 290:C1633–C1639. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00576.2005
154. Langenhan T, Aust G, Hamann J (2013) Sticky signaling-adhesion class G protein-coupled receptors take the stage. Sci Signal 6:re3. doi:10.1126/scisignal.2003825
155. Petersen SC, Luo R, Liebscher I, Giera S, Jeong S-J, Mogha A et al (2015) The adhesion GPCR GPR126 has distinct, domain-dependent functions in Schwann cell development mediated by interaction with laminin-211. Neuron 85:755–769. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.057
156. White JP, Wrann CD, Rao RR, Nair SK, Jedrychowski MP, You JS et al (2014) G proteincoupled receptor 56 regulates mechanical overload-induced muscle hypertrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. doi:10.1073/pnas.1417898111
157. Liebscher I, Schöneberg T (2016) Tethered agonism: a common activation mechanism of adhesion GPCRs. In: Langenhan T, Schöneberg T (eds) Adhesion G protein-coupled receptors: molecular, physiological and pharmacological principles in health and disease. Springer, Heidelberg
158. Kishore A, Hall RA (2016) Versatile signaling activity of adhesion GPCRs. In: Langenhan T, Schöneberg T (eds) Adhesion G protein-coupled receptors: molecular, physiological and pharmacological principles in health and disease. Springer, Heidelberg
159. Arac¸ D, Sträter N, Seiradake E (2016) Understanding the structural basis of adhesion GPCR functions. In: Langenhan T, Schöneberg T (eds) Adhesion G protein-coupled receptors: molecular, physiological and pharmacological principles in health and disease. Springer, Heidelberg
160. Lin H-H, Chang G-W, Davies JQ, Stacey M, Harris J, Gordon S (2004) Autocatalytic cleavage of the EMR2 receptor occurs at a conserved G protein-coupled receptor proteolytic site motif. J Biol Chem 279:31823–31832. doi:10.1074/jbc.M402974200
161. Krasnoperov VG, Bittner MA, Beavis R, Kuang YN, Salnikow KV, Chepurny OG et al (1997) alpha-Latrotoxin stimulates exocytosis by the interaction with a neuronal Gprotein- coupled receptor. Neuron 18:925–937. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80332-3
162. Arac¸ D, Boucard AA, Bolliger MF, Nguyen J, Soltis SM, Südhof TC et al (2012) A novel evolutionarily conserved domain of cell-adhesion GPCRs mediates autoproteolysis. EMBO J 31:1364–1378. doi:10.1038/emboj.2012.26
163. Liebscher I, Schön J, Petersen SC, Fischer L, Auerbach N, Demberg LM et al (2014) A tethered agonist within the ectodomain activates the adhesion G protein-coupled receptors GPR126 and GPR133. Cell Rep 9:2018–2026. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.11.036
164. Stoveken HM, Hajduczok AG, Xu L, Tall GG (2015) Adhesion G protein-coupled receptors are activated by exposure of a cryptic tethered agonist. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. doi:10.1073/pnas.1421785112
165. Demberg LM, Rothemund S, Schöneberg T, Liebscher I (2015) Identification of the tethered peptide agonist of the adhesion G protein-coupled receptor GPR64/ADGRG2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 464:743–747. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.07.020
166. Wilde C, Fischer L, Lede V, Kirchberger J, Rothemund S, Schöneberg T et al (2015) The constitutive activity of the adhesion GPCR GPR114/ADGRG5 is mediated by its tethered agonist. FASEB J. doi:10.1096/fj.15-276220
167. Sigoillot SM, Monk KR, Piao X, Selimi F, Harty BL (2016) Adhesion G protein-coupled receptors in the nervous system: from synapse and dendrite morphogenesis to myelination. In: Langenhan T, Schöneberg T (eds) Adhesion G protein-coupled receptors: molecular, physiological and pharmacological principles in health and disease. Springer, Heidelberg
168. Monk KR, Naylor SG, Glenn TD, Mercurio S, Perlin JR, Dominguez C et al (2009) A G protein-coupled receptor is essential for Schwann cells to initiate myelination. Science 325:1402–1405. doi:10.1126/science.1173474
169. Monk KR, Oshima K, Jörs S, Heller S, Talbot WS (2011) Gpr126 is essential for peripheral nerve development and myelination in mammals. Development 138:2673–2680. doi:10.1242/dev.062224
170. Glenn TD, Talbot WS (2013) Analysis of Gpr126 function defines distinct mechanisms controlling the initiation and maturation of myelin. Development 140:3167–3175. doi:10.1242/dev.093401
171. Mogha A, Benesh AE, Patra C, Engel FB, Schöneberg T, Liebscher I et al (2013) Gpr126 functions in Schwann cells to control differentiation and myelination via G-protein activation. J Neurosci 33:17976–17985. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1809-13.2013
172. Feltri ML, Wrabetz L (2005) Laminins and their receptors in Schwann cells and hereditary neuropathies. J Peripher Nerv Syst 10:128–143. doi:10.1111/j.1085-9489.2005.0010204.x
173. Monk KR, Feltri ML, Taveggia C (2015) New insights on Schwann cell development. Glia 63:1376–1393. doi:10.1002/glia.22852
174. Colognato H, Yurchenco PD (1999) The laminin alpha2 expressed by dystrophic dy(2J) mice is defective in its ability to form polymers. Curr Biol 9:1327–1330
175. Yang D (2005) Coordinate control of axon defasciculation and myelination by laminin-2 and -8. J Cell Biol 168:655–666. doi:10.1083/jcb.200411158
176. Xu H, Christmas P, Wu XR, Wewer UM, Engvall E (1994) Defective muscle basement membrane and lack of M-laminin in the dystrophic dy/dy mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:5572–5576
177. Eberl DF (1999) Feeling the vibes: chordotonal mechanisms in insect hearing. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9:389–393. doi:10.1016/S0959-4388(99)80058-0
178. White JP (2016) Control of skeletal muscle cell growth and size through adhesion GPCRs. In: Langenhan T, Schöneberg T (eds) Adhesion G protein-coupled receptors: molecular, physiological and pharmacological principles in health and disease. Springer, Heidelberg
179. Budday S, Steinmann P, Kuhl E (2015) Physical biology of human brain development. Front Cell Neurosci 9:257. doi:10.3389/fncel.2015.00257
180. Peng Y-M, van de Garde MDB, Cheng K-F, Baars PA, Remmerswaal EBM, van Lier RAW et al (2011) Specific expression of GPR56 by human cytotoxic lymphocytes. J Leukoc Biol 90:735–740. doi:10.1189/jlb.0211092
181. Boyden SE, Desai MS, Cruse G, Young ML, Bolan HC, Scott LM et al (2016) Vibratory urticaria associated with a missense variant in ADGRE2. N Engl J Med 374(7):656–663. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1500611
182. Bridges JP, Ludwig M-G, Mueller M, Kinzel B, Sato A, Xu Y et al (2013) Orphan G proteincoupled receptor GPR116 regulates pulmonary surfactant pool size. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 49:348–357. doi:10.1165/rcmb.2012-0439OC
183. Yang MY, Hilton MB, Seaman S, Haines DC, Nagashima K, Burks CM et al (2013) Essential regulation of lung surfactant homeostasis by the orphan G protein-coupled receptor GPR116. Cell Rep 3:1457–1464. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.019
184. Fukuzawa T, Ishida J, Kato A, Ichinose T, Ariestanti DM, Takahashi T et al (2013) Lung surfactant levels are regulated by Ig-Hepta/GPR116 by monitoring surfactant protein D. PLoS One 8:e69451. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0069451
185. Ludwig M-G, Seuwen K, Bridges JP (2016) Adhesion GPCR function in pulmonary development and disease. In: Langenhan T, Schöneberg T (eds) Adhesion G protein-coupled receptors: molecular, physiological and pharmacological principles in health and disease. Springer, Heidelberg
186. McMillan DR, Kayes-Wandover KM, Richardson JA, White PC (2002) Very large G proteincoupled receptor-1, the largest known cell surface protein, is highly expressed in the developing central nervous system. J Biol Chem 277:785–792. doi:10.1074/jbc.M108929200
187. McGee J, Goodyear RJ, McMillan DR, Stauffer EA, Holt JR, Locke KG et al (2006) The very large G-protein-coupled receptor VLGR1: a component of the ankle link complex required for the normal development of auditory hair bundles. J Neurosci 26:6543–6553. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0693-06.2006