Mechanism and dynamics of cadherin adhesion

Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 8, Issue , 2006, Pages 259-287

  Leckband, Deborah ^a   Prakasam, Anil ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell adhesion; Cell sorting; Differential adhesion; Molecular force measurements; Morphogenesis

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; CELLS; COMPLEXATION; MORPHOLOGY; PROTEINS; TISSUE;

CELL ADHESION; CELL SORTING; DIFFERENTIAL ADHESION; MOLECULAR FORCE MEASUREMENTS; MORPHOGENESIS;

CYTOLOGY;

CADHERIN; CELL ADHESION MOLECULE;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; BIOMECHANICS; CELL ADHESION; CELL JUNCTION; CELL SELECTION; CYTOARCHITECTURE; DYNAMICS; FORCE; HUMAN; KINETICS; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; MORPHOGENESIS; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW; STRENGTH;

ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; CADHERINS; CELL ADHESION; CELL MEMBRANE; GAP JUNCTIONS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 33748195976     PISSN: 15239829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.8.061505.095753     Document Type: Review

References (102)

1. Takeichi M. 1995. Morphogenetic roles of classic cadherins. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7:619-27
2. Gumbiner BM. 1996. Cell adhesion: the molecular basis of tissue architecture and morphogenesis. Cell 84:345-57
3. Gumbiner BM. 2005. Regulation of cadherin-mediated adhesion in morphogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6:622-34
4. Godt D, Tepass U. 1998. Drosophila oocyte localization is mediated by differential cadherin-based adhesion. Nature 395:387-91
5. Gonzalez-Reyes A, St Johnson D. 1998. The Drosophila AP axis is polarised by the cadherin-mediated positioning of the oocyte. Development 125:3635-44
6. Takeichi M. 1991. Cadherin cell adhesion receptors as a morphogenetic regulator. Science 251:1451-55
7. Laure L, Ohsugi M, Hirchenhain J, Kemler R. 1994. E-Cadherin null mutant embryos fail to form a trophectoderm epithelium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:8263-67
8. Detrick RJ, Dickey D, Kintner CR. 1990. The effects of N-cadherin misexpression on morphogenesis in Xenopus embryos. Neuron 4:493-506
9. Fujimori T, Miyatani S, Takeichi M. 1990. Ectopic expression of N-cadherin perturbs histogenesis in Xenopus embryos. Development 110:97-104
10. Radice GL, Rayburn H, Matsunami H, Knudsen KA, Takeichi M, Hynes RO. 1997. Developmental defects in mouse embryos lacking N-cadherin. Dev. Biol. 181:64-78
11. Matsunaga M, Hatta K, Takeichi M. 1988. Role of N-cadherin cell adhesion molecules in the histogenesis of neural retina. Neuron 1:289-95
12. Bonner-Fraser M, Wolf JJ, Murray BA. 1992. Effects of antibodies against N-cadherin and N-CAM on the cranial neural crest and neural tube. Dev. Biol. 153:291-301
13. Makrigiannakis A, Coukos G, Christofidou-Solomidou M, Gour BJ, Radice GL, et al. 1999. N-cadherin-mediated human granulosa cell adhesion prevents apoptosis: a role in follicular atresia and luteolysis? Am. J. Pathol. 154:1391-406
14. Ong LL, Kim N, Mima T, Cohen-Gould L, Mikawa T. 1998. Trabecular myocytes of the embryonic heart require N-cadherin for migratory unit identity. Dev. Biol. 193:1-9
15. Miyatani S, Shimamura K, Hatta M, Nagafuchi A, Nose A, et al. 1989. Neural cadherin: role in selective cell-cell adhesion. Science 245:631-35
16. Nose A, Nagafuchi A, Takeichi M. 1988. Expressed recombinant cadherins mediate cell sorting in model systems. Cell 54:147-55
17. Thomas W, Edelman B, Lobel S, Breithart A, Steinberg M. 1981. Two chick embryonic adhesion systems: molecular vs tissue specificity. J. Supramol. Struct. Cell. Biochem. 16:15-27
18. Cavallero U, Christofori G. 2004. Cell adhesion and signaling by cadherins and IgCAMs in cancer. Nat. Rev. 4:118-32
19. Semler E, Lancin PA, Dasgupta A, Moghe PV. 2005. Engineering hepatocellular morphogenesis and function via ligand-presenting hydrogels with graded mechanical compliance. Biotech. Bioeng. 89:296-307
20. Semler E, Dasgupta A, Moghe PV. 2005. Cytomimetic engineering of hepatocyte morphogenesis and function by substrate-based presentation of acellular E-cadherin. Tissue Eng. 11:734-50
21. Brieva T, Moghe PV. 2004. Exogenous cadherin microdisplay can interfere with endogenous signaling and reprogram gene expression in cultured hepatocytes. Biotech. Bioeng. 85:283-92
22. Bixby JL, Zhang R. 1990. Purified N-cadherin is a potent substrate for the rapid induction of neurite outgrowth. J. Cell Biol. 110:1253-60
23. Nelson CM, Jean RP, Tan JL, Liu WF, Sniadecki NJ, et al. 2005. Emergent patterns of growth controlled by multicellular form and mechanics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:11594-99
24. Yap AS, Brieher WM, Gumbiner BM. 1997. Molecular and functional analysis of cadherin-based adherens junctions. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 13:119-46
25. Shapiro L, Kwong PD, Fannon AM, Colman DR. 1995. Considerations on the folding topology and evolutionary origin of cadherin domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:6793-97
26. 2+ dependence and mutational analysis reveal molecular details of E-cadherin homoassociation. EMBO J. 18:173847
27. 26a. Boggon T, Murray J, Chappuis-Flament S, Wong E, Gumbiner BM, Shapiro L. 2002. C-Cadherin ectodomain structure and implications for cell adhesion mechanisms. Science 296:1308-13
28. Pokutta S, Herrenknecht K, Kemler R, Engel J. 1994. Conformational changes of the recombinant extracellular domain of E-cadherin upon calcium binding. Eur. J. Biochem. 223:1019-26
29. 27a. Koch AW, Pokutta S, Lustig A, Engel J. 1997. Calcium binding and homo-association of E-cadherin domains. Biochemistry 36:7697-705
30. Nagar B, Overduin M, Mitsuhiko I, Rini JM. 1995. Structural basis of calcium-induced E-cadherin rigidification and dimerization. Nature 380:360-64
31. Tomschy A, Charlotte F, Landwehr R, Engel J. 1996. Homophilic adhesion of E-cadherin occurs by a cooperative two-step interaction of N-terminal domains. EMBO J. 15:3507-14
32. Laur OY, Klingelhofer J, Troyanovsky RB, Troyanovsky SM. 2002. Both the dimerization and immunochemical properties of E-cadherin EC1 domain depend on Trp residue. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 400:141-47
33. Tamura K, Shan WS, Hendrickson WA, Colman DR, Shapiro L. 1998. Structure-function analysis of cell adhesion by neural (N-) cadherin. Neuron 20:1153-63
34. Nose A, Tsuji K, Takeichi M. 1990. Localization of specificity determining sites in cadherin cell adhesion molecules. Cell 61:147-55
35. 32a. Perret E, Benoliel AM, Nassoy P, Pierres A, Delmas V, et al. 2002. Fast dissociation kinetics revealed by flow chamber analysis. EMBO J. 21:2537-46
36. Shan WS, Tanaka H, Phillips GR, Arndt K, Yoshida M, Colman DR. 2000. Functional cis-heterodimers of N- and R-cadherins. J. Cell Biol. 148:579-90
37. Chappuis-Flament S, Wong E, Hicks LD, Kay CM, Gumbiner BM. 2001. Multiple cadherin extracellular repeats mediate homophilic binding and adhesion. J. Cell Biol. 154:231-43
38. Renaud-Young M, Gallin WJ. 2002. In the first extracellular domain of E-cadherin, heterophilic interactions, but not the conserved His-Ala-Val motif, are required for adhesion. J. Biol. Chem. 277:39609-16
39. Perret E, Leung A, Feracci H, Evans E. 2004. Trans-bonded pairs of E-cadherin exhibit a remarkable hierarchy of mechanical strengths. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:16472-77
40. Zhu B, Chappuis-Flament S, Wong E, Jensen I, Gumbiner BM, Leckband DE. 2003. Functional analysis of the structural basis of homophilic cadherin adhesion. Biophys. J. 41:12163-70
41. Sivasankar S, Brieher W, Lavrik N, Gumbiner B, Leckband D. 1999. Direct molecular force measurements of multiple adhesive interactions between cadherin ectodomains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:11820-24
42. Sivasankar S, Gumbiner B, Leckband D. 2001. Direct measurements of multiple adhesive alignments and unbinding trajectories between cadherin extracellular domains. Biophys. J. 80:1758-68
43. Bayas M, Leung A, Evans E, Leckband D. 2006. Lifetime measurements reveal kinetic differences between homophilic cadherin bonds. Biophys. J. 90:1385-95
44. Israelachvili J. 1992. Adhesion forces between surfaces in liquids and condensable vapours. Surf. Sci. Rep. 14:110-59
45. Leckband D, Israelachvili JN. 2001. Intermolecular forces in biology. Q. Rev. Biophys. 34:105-267
46. Israelachvili J. 1973. Thin film studies using multiple-beam interferometry. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 44:259-72
47. Deleted in proof
48. Johnson C, Jensen I, Prakasam A, Vijayendran R, Leckband D. 2002. Engineered protein A for the orientational control of immobilized proteins. Bioconjug. Chem. 14:974-78
49. Shan W, Yagita Y, Wang Z, Koch A, Svenningsen AF, et al. 2004. The minimal essential unit for cadherin-mediated intercellular adhesion comprises extracellular domains 1 and 2. J. Biol. Chem. 279:55914-23
50. Baisera M, Stepaniants S, Izrailev S, Oono Y, Schulten K. 1997. Reconstructing potential energy functions from simulated force-induced unbinding processes. Biophys. J. 73:1281-87
51. Evans E, Ritchie K. 1997. Dynamic strength of molecular adhesion bonds. Biophys. J. 72:1541-55
52. Hummer G, Szabo A. 2003. Kinetics from single molecule pulling experiments. Biophys. J. 85:5-15
53. Florin E-L, Moy VT, Gaub HE. 1994. Adhesion forces between individual ligand-receptor pairs. Science 264:415-17
54. Pierres A, Feracci H, Delmas V, Benoliel AM, Thiery JP, Bongrand P. 1998. Experimental study of the interaction range and the association rate of surface-attached cadherin 11. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:9256-61
55. Baumgartner W, Hinterdorfer P, Ness W, Raab A, Vestweber D, et al. 2000. Cadherin interaction probed by atomic force microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:4005-10
56. Haussinger D, Ahrens T, Sass H-J, Pertz O, Engel J, Grzesiek S. 2002. Calcium-dependent homoassociation of E-cadherin by NMR spectroscopy: changes in mobility, conformation, and mapping of contact regions. J. Mol. Biol. 324:823-39
57. Ahrens T, Pertz O, Häussinger D, Fauser C, Schulthess T, Engel J. 2002. Analysis of heterophilic and homophilic interactions of cadherins using the c-Jun/c-Fos dimerization domains. J. Biol. Chem. 277:19455-60
58. Harrison OJ, Corps EM, Berge T, Kilshaw PJ. 2004. The mechanism of cell adhesion by classical cadherins: the role of domain 1. J. Cell Sci. 118:718-21
59. Koch A, Bozic D, Pertz O, Engel J. 1999. Homophilic adhesion by cadherins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9:275-81
60. Shapiro L, Fannon AM, Kwong PD, Thompson A, Lehmann MG, et al. 1995. Structural basis of cell-cell adhesion of cadherins. Nature 374:327-37
61. Troyanovsky RB, Sokolov E, Troyanovsky SM. 2003. Adhesive and lateral E-cadherin dimers are mediated by the same interface. Mol. Cell Biol. 23:7965-72
62. 58a. Prakasam A, Chien Y-H, Maruthamuthu V, Leckband DE. 2006. Calcium binding site mutations in cadherin: impact on adhesion and evidence of cooperativity. Biochemistry. In press
63. Fuchs M, Hutzler P, Handschug G, Hermannstadter Brunner I, Hofler H, Luber B. 2004. Dynamics of cell adhesion and motility in living cells is altered by a single amino acid change in E-cadherin fused to enhanced green fluorescent protein. Cell Motil. Cytoskelet. 59:50-61
64. Handschuh G, Candidusand S, Luber B, Reich U, Schott C, Oswald S. 1999. Tumor associated E-cadherin mutations alter cellular morphology, decrease cellular adhesion, and increase cellular motility. Oncogene 18:4301-12
65. Handschuh G, Luber B, Hutzler P, Hofler H, Becker KF. 2001. Single amino acid substitutions in conserved extracellular domains of E-cadherin differ in their functional consequences. J. Mol. Biol. 314:445-54
66. Hynes RO. 2002. Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell 110:673-87
67. Rounsevell WSR, Steward A, Clarke J. 2005. Biophysical investigations of engineered polyproteins: implications for force data. Biophys. J. 88:2022-29
68. Haussinger D, Ahrens T, Engel J, Stetefeld J, Grzesiek S. 2004. Proteolytic E-cadherin activation followed by solution NMR and X-ray crystallography. EMBO J. 23:1699-708
69. Bayas M, Schulten K, Leckband D. 2004. Forced rupture of the strand-dimer interface between C-cadherin ectodomains. Mech. Chem. Biosyst. 1:101-11
70. Harrison OJ, Corps EM, Kilshaw PJ. 2005. Cadherin adhesion depends on a critical salt bridge at the N-terminus. J. Cell Sci. 118:4123-30
71. He W, Cowin P, Stokes DL. 2003. Untangling desmosomal knots with electron tomography. Science 302:109-13
72. Martel L, Johnson C, Boutet S, Al-Kurdi R, Konovalov O, et al. 2002. X-ray reflectivity investigations of two-dimensional assemblies of C-cadherin: first steps in structural and functional studies. J. Phys. IV 12:365-77
73. Brieher WM, Yap AS, Gumbiner BM. 1996. Lateral dimerization is required for the homophilic binding activity of C-cadherin. J. Cell Biol. 135:487-96
74. Yap AS, Brieher WM, Ruschy M, Gumbiner B. 1997. Lateral clustering of the adhesive ectodomain: a fundamental determinant of cadherin function. Curr. Biol. 7:308-15
75. Yap AS, Niessen CM, Gumbiner BM. 1998. The juxtamembrane region of the cadherin cytoplasmic tail supports lateral clustering, adhesive strengthening and interaction with p120ctn. J. Cell Biol. 141:779-89
76. Klingelhofer J, Laur OY, Troyanovsky RB, Troyanovsky SM. 2002. Dynamic interplay between adhesive and lateral E-cadherin dimers. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:7449-58
77. Ozawa M. 2002. Lateral dimerization of the E-cadherin extracellular domain is necessary but not sufficient for adhesive activity. J. Biol. Chem. 22:19600-8
78. Bibert S, Jaquinod MJ, Concord E, Ebel C, Hewati E, et al. 2002. Synergy between extracellular modules of vascular endothelial cadherin promotes homotypic hexameric interactions. J. Biol. Chem. 277:12790-801
79. Steinberg MS. 1962. On the mechanisms of tissue reconstruction by dissociated cells. I. Population kinetics, differential adhesiveness, and the absence of directed migration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 48:1577-82
80. Niessen C, Gumbiner BM. 2002. Cadherin-mediated cell sorting not determined by binding or adhesion specificity. J. Cell Biol. 156:389-99
81. Steinberg MS. 1963. Reconstruction of tissues by dissociated cells. Science 141:401-8
82. Friedlander DR, Mege RM, Cunningham BA, Edelman GM. 1989. Cell sorting out is modulated by both the specificity and amount of different cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) expressed on cell surfaces. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:7043-47
83. Pierres A, Benoliel A-M, Bongrand P. 1995. Measuring the lifetime of bonds made between surface-linked molecules. J. Biol. Chem. 270:26586-92
84. Goldsmith HL, Quin AT, Drury G, Spanos C, McIntosh FA, Simon SI. 2001. Dynamics of neutrophil aggregation in couette flow revealed by videomicroscopy: effect of shear rate on two-body collision efficiency and doublet life-time. Biophys. J. 81:2020-34
85. Laurenzi IJ, Diamond SL. 1999. Monte Carlo simulation of the heterotypic aggregation kinetics of platelets and neutrophils. Biophys. J. 77:1733-46
86. Shankaran H, Neelameghan S. 2004. Hydrodynamic forces applied on intercellular bonds, soluble molecules, and cell-surface receptors. Biophys. J. 86:576-88
87. Duguay D, Foty RA, Steinberg MS. 2003. Cadherin-mediated cell adhesion and tissue segregation: qualitative and quantitative determinants. Dev. Biol. 253:309-23
88. Bell GI. 1978. Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. Science 200:618-27
89. Volk T, Cohen O, Geiger B. 1987. Formation of heterotypic adherens-type junctions between L-CAM containing liver cells and A-CAM containing lens cells. Cell 50:987-94
90. Brackenbury R, Rutishauser U, Edelman G. 1981. Distinct calcium-independent and calcium-dependent adhesion systems of chick embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:387-91
91. 2+ dependent cell-cell adhesion molecule expressed in the retina. Neuron 7:69-79
92. Luo Y, Ferreira-Cornwall M, Baldwin H, Kostetskii I, Lenox J, et al. 2001. Rescuing the N-Cadherin knockout by cardiac-specific expression of N- or E-cadherin. Development 128:459-69
93. Murphy-Erdosh C, Yoshida CK, Paradies N, Reichardt LF. 1995. The cadherin-binding specificities of β-cadherin and LCAM. J. Cell Biol. 156:389-99
94. Deleted in proof
95. Foty RA, Steinberg MS. 2005. The differential adhesion hypothesis: a direct evaluation. Dev. Biol. 278:255-63
96. Beysens DA, Forgacs G, Glazier JA. 2000. Cell sorting is analogous to phase ordering in fluids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:9467-71
97. Steinberg MS, Takeichi M. 1994. Experimental specification of cell sorting, tissue spreading, and specific spatial patterning by quantitative differences in cadherin expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:206-9
98. Steinberg MS. 2003. Cell adhesive interactions and tissue self-organization. In Origination of Organismal Form: Beyond the Gene in Developmental and Evolutionary Biology, ed. G Müller, SA Newman. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books
99. Hinck L, Nathke IS, Papkoff J, Nelson WJ. 1994. Dynamics of cadherin/catenin complex formation: novel protein interactions and pathways of complex assembly. J. Cell Biol. 125:1327-40
100. Rimm DL, Koslov ER, Kebrial P, Cianci CD, Morrow JS. 1995. α-1 (E)-catenin is an actin-binding and -bundling protein mediating the attachment of F-actin to the membrane adhesion complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:8813-17
101. Imamura YM, Itoh Y, Maeno Tsukita S, Nagafuchi A. 1999. Functional domains of α-catenin required for strong state of cadherin-based function. J. Cell Biol. 114:1311-22
102. Shibamoto S, Hayakawa M, Takeuchi K, Hori K, Oku T, et al. 1994. Tyrosine phosphorylation of beta-catenin and plakoglobin enhanced by hepatocyte growth factor and epidermal growth factor in human carcinoma cells. Cell Adhes. Commun. 1:295-305