Architecture of the mammalian mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel

Nature

Volumn 527, Issue 7576, 2015, Pages 64-69

  Ge, Jingpeng ^a   Li, Wanqiu ^a   Zhao, Qiancheng ^a,b   Li, Ningning ^a   Chen, Maofei ^a   Zhi, Peng ^b   Li, Ruochong ^a   Gao, Ning ^a   Xiao, Bailong ^a,b   Yang, Maojun ^a  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Tsinghua University   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATION CHANNEL; PIEZO1 CHANNEL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ION CHANNEL; PIEZO1 PROTEIN, MOUSE; PROTEIN SUBUNIT;

AMINO ACID; CATION; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ION; PROTEIN; SENSOR;

ARTICLE; CHANNEL GATING; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; HUMAN; ION CONDUCTANCE; MAMMAL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SENSOR; ANIMAL; CELL MEMBRANE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; METABOLISM; MOUSE; PLIABILITY; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; PROTEIN QUATERNARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

MAMMALIA;

ANIMALS; CELL MEMBRANE; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ION CHANNEL GATING; ION CHANNELS; MICE; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PLIABILITY; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, QUATERNARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEIN SUBUNITS;

EID: 84946570196     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature15247     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Chalfie, M. Neurosensory mechanotransduction. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 44-52 (2009)
2. Coste, B., et al. Piezo1 and Piezo2 are essential components of distinct mechanically activated cation channels. Science 330, 55-60 (2010)
3. Coste, B., et al. Piezo proteins are pore-forming subunits of mechanically activated channels. Nature 483, 176-181 (2012)
4. Nilius, B., & Honoré, E. Sensing pressure with ion channels. Trends Neurosci. 35, 477-486 (2012)
5. Volkers, L., Mechioukhi, Y., & Coste, B. Piezo channels: from structure to function. Pflugers Arch. 467, 95-99 (2015)
6. Bae, C., Gottlieb, P. A., & Sachs, F.Human PIEZO1: removing inactivation. Biophys. J. 105, 880-886 (2013)
7. Gottlieb, P. A., & Sachs, F. Piezo1: properties of a cation selective mechanical channel. Channels 6, 214-219 (2012)
8. Kim, S. E., Coste, B., Chadha, A., Cook, B., & Patapoutian, A. The role of Drosophila Piezo in mechanical nociception. Nature 483, 209-212 (2012)
9. Faucherre, A., Nargeot, J., Mangoni, M. E., & Jopling, C. piezo2b regulates vertebrate light touch response. J. Neurosci. 33, 17089-17094 (2013)
10. Schneider, E.R., et al. Neuronalmechanismfor acute mechanosensitivity in tactileforaging waterfowl. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 14941-14946 (2014)
11. Maksimovic S et al. Epidermal Merkel cells are mechanosensory cells that tune mammalian touch receptors. Nature 509, 617-621 (2014)
12. Woo, S. H., et al. Piezo2 is required for Merkel-cell mechanotransduction. Nature 509, 622-626 (2014)
13. Ranade, S. S., et al. Piezo2 is the major transducer of mechanical forces for touch sensation in mice. Nature 516, 121-125 (2014)
14. Ikeda, R., et al.Merkel cells transduce and encode tactile stimuli to driveAb-Afferent impulses. Cell 157, 664-675 (2014)
15. Schrenk-Siemens, K., et al. PIEZO2 is required formechanotransduction in human stem cell-derived touch receptors. Nature Neurosci. 18, 10-16 (2015)
16. Ranade, S. S., et al. Piezo1, a mechanically activated ion channel, is required for vascular development in mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 10347-10352 (2014)
17. Li, J., et al. Piezo1 integration of vascular architecture with physiological force. Nature 515, 279-282 (2014)
18. Faucherre, A., Kissa, K., Nargeot, J., Mangoni, M. E., & Jopling, C. Piezo1 plays a role in erythrocyte volume homeostasis. Haematologica 99, 70-75 (2014)
19. Cahalan, S.M., et al. Piezo1linksmechanical forces to redbloodcell volume. eLife 4, 07370 (2015)
20. McHugh, B. J., et al. Integrin activation by Fam38A uses a novel mechanism of R-Ras targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Cell Sci. 123, 51-61 (2010)
21. Pathak, M. M., et al. Stretch-Activated ion channel Piezo1 directs lineage choice in human neural stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 16148-16153 (2014)
22. Albuisson, J., et al. Dehydrated hereditary stomatocytosis linked to gain-of-function mutations in mechanically activated PIEZO1 ion channels. Nature Commun. 4, 1884 (2013)
23. Andolfo, I., et al. Multiple clinical forms of dehydrated hereditary stomatocytosis arise from mutations in PIEZO1. Blood 121, 3925-3935 (2013)
24. Bae, C., Gnanasambandam, R., Nicolai, C., Sachs, F., & Gottlieb, P. A. Xerocytosis is caused by mutations that alter the kinetics of the mechanosensitive channel PIEZO1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E1162-E1168 (2013)
25. Beneteau, C., et al. Recurrent mutation in the PIEZO1 gene in two families of hereditary xerocytosis with fetal hydrops. Clin. Genet. 85, 293-295 (2014)
26. Shmukler, B. E., et al. Dehydrated stomatocytic anemia due to the heterozygous mutation R2456H in themechanosensitive cation channel PIEZO1: a case report. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 52, 53-54 (2014)
27. Zarychanski, R., et al. Mutations in the mechanotransduction protein PIEZO1 are associated with hereditary xerocytosis. Blood 120, 1908-1915 (2012)
28. Coste, B., et al. Gain-of-function mutations in the mechanically activated ion channel PIEZO2 cause a subtype of distal arthrogryposis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 4667-4672 (2013)
29. McMillin, M. J., et al.Mutations in PIEZO2 cause Gordon syndrome, Marden-Walker syndrome, anddistal arthrogryposis type5.Am. J.Hum.Genet.94, 734-744(2014)
30. Zhang, X., et al. Crystal structure of an orthologue of the NaChBac voltage-gated sodium channel. Nature 486, 130-134 (2012)
31. Payandeh, J., Scheuer, T., Zheng, N., & Catterall, W. A. The crystal structure of a voltage-gated sodium channel. Nature 475, 353-358 (2011)
32. Kawate, T., Michel, J. C., Birdsong, W. T., & Gouaux, E. Crystal structure of the ATPgated P2X(4) ion channel in the closed state. Nature 460, 592-598 (2009)
33. Paulsen, C. E., Armache, J. P., Gao, Y., Cheng, Y., & Julius, D. Structure of the TRPA1 ion channel suggests regulatory mechanisms. Nature 520, 511-517 (2015)
34. Liao, M., Cao, E., Julius, D., & Cheng, Y. Structure of the TRPV1 ion channel determined by electron cryo-microscopy. Nature 504, 107-112 (2013)
35. Liu, Z., Gandhi, C. S., & Rees, D. C. Structure of a tetrameric MscL in an expanded intermediate state. Nature 461, 120-124 (2009)
36. Bass, R. B., Strop, P., Barclay, M., & Rees, D. C. Crystal structure of Escherichia coli MscS, a voltage-modulated and mechanosensitive channel. Science 298, 1582-1587 (2002)
37. Chang, G., Spencer, R. H., Lee, A. T., Barclay, M. T., & Rees, D.C. Structure of theMscL homolog fromMycobacteriumtuberculosis: a gatedmechanosensitive ion channel. Science 282, 2220-2226 (1998)
38. Kung, C., Martinac, B., & Sukharev, S. Mechanosensitive channels in microbes. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 64, 313-329 (2010)
39. Brohawn, S.G., delMármol, J., & MacKinnon, R. Crystal structure of the human K2P TRAAK, a lipid-And mechano-sensitive K1 ion channel. Science 335, 436-441 (2012)
40. Coste, B., et al. Piezo1 ion channel pore properties are dictated by C-Terminal region. Nature Commun. 6, 7223 (2015)
41. Hou, X., Pedi, L., Diver, M. M., & Long, S. B. Crystal structure of the calcium releaseactivated calcium channel Orai. Science 338, 1308-1313 (2012)
42. Penna, A., et al. The CRAC channel consists of a tetramer formed by Stim-induced dimerization of Orai dimers. Nature 456, 116-120 (2008)
43. Kamajaya, A., Kaiser, J. T., Lee, J., Reid, M., & Rees, D. C. The structure of a conserved Piezo channel domain reveals a topologically distinct b sandwich fold. Structure 22, 1520-1527 (2014)
44. Prole, D. L., & Taylor, C. W. Identification and analysis of putative homologues of mechanosensitive channels in pathogenic protozoa. PLoS One 8, e66068 (2013)
45. Gonzales, E. B., Kawate, T., & Gouaux, E. Pore architecture and ion sites in acidsensing ion channels and P2X receptors. Nature 460, 599-604 (2009)
46. Vilceanu, D., & Stucky, C. L. TRPA1 mediates mechanical currents in the plasma membrane of mouse sensory neurons. PLoS One 5, e12177 (2010)
47. Kwan, K. Y., Glazer, J. M., Corey, D. P., Rice, F. L., & Stucky, C. L. TRPA1 modulates mechanotransduction in cutaneous sensory neurons. J. Neurosci. 29, 4808-4819 (2009)
48. Smart, O.S., Goodfellow, J. M., & Wallace, B.A. The pore dimensions of gramicidin A. Biophys. J. 65, 2455-2460 (1993)
49. Otwinowski, Z., & Minor, W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276, 307-326 (1997)
50. Winn, M. D., et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D 67, 235-242 (2011)
51. Schneider, T. R., & Sheldrick, G. M. Substructure solution with SHELXD. Acta Crystallogr. D 58, 1772-1779 (2002)
52. McCoy, A. J., et al.Phaser crystallographic software. J.Appl.Crystallogr.40, 658-674 (2007)
53. Cowtan, K. D., & Main, P. Improvement of macromolecular electron-density maps by the simultaneous application of real and reciprocal space constraints. Acta Crystallogr. D 49, 148-157 (1993)
54. Emsley, P., & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2126-2132 (2004)
55. Adams, P. D., et al. PHENIX: building new software for automated crystallographic structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D 58, 1948-1954 (2002)
56. Tang, G., et al. EMAN2: an extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 38-46 (2007)
57. Scheres, S. H. RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J. Struct. Biol. 180, 519-530 (2012)
58. Radermacher, M., Wagenknecht, T., Verschoor, A., & Frank, J. Three-dimensional reconstruction from a single-exposure, random conical tilt series applied to the 50S ribosomal subunit of Escherichia coli. J. Microsc. 146, 113-136 (1987)
59. Shaikh, T. R., et al. SPIDER image processing for single-particle reconstruction of biological macromolecules from electron micrographs. Nature Protocols 3, 1941-1974 (2008)
60. Li, X., et al. Electron counting and beam-induced motion correction enable nearatomic-resolution single-particle cryo-EM. Nature Methods 10, 584-590 (2013)
61. Mindell, J.A., & Grigorieff, N. Accurate determinationof local defocus and specimen tilt in electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 142, 334-347 (2003)
62. Scheres, S. H., & Chen, S. Prevention of overfitting in cryo-EM structure determination. Nature Methods 9, 853-854 (2012)
63. Chen, S., et al. High-resolution noise substitution to measure overfitting and validate resolution in 3D structure determination by single particle electron cryomicroscopy. Ultramicroscopy 135, 24-35 (2013)
64. Voorhees, R. M., Fernández, I. S., Scheres, S. H., & Hegde, R. S. Structure of the mammalian ribosome-Sec61 complex to 3.4Å resolution. Cell 157, 1632-1643 (2014)
65. Greber, B. J., et al. The complete structure of the large subunit of the mammalian mitochondrial ribosome. Nature 515, 283-286 10.1038/nature13895 (2014)
66. Brown, A., et al. Structure of the large ribosomal subunit from human mitochondria. Science 346, 718-722 (2014)
67. Fernández, I. S., Bai, X. C., Murshudov, G., Scheres, S. H., & Ramakrishnan, V. Initiation of translation by cricket paralysis virus IRES requires its translocation in the ribosome. Cell 157, 823-831 (2014)
68. Kucukelbir, A., Sigworth, F. J., & Tagare, H. D. Quantifying the local resolution of cryo-EM density maps. Nature Methods 11, 63-65 (2014)
69. Pettersen, E. F., et al. UCSF Chimera-A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605-1612 (2004)
70. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G., & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486-501 (2010)
71. Larkin, M. A., et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23, 2947-2948 (2007)
72. Yachdav, G., et al. PredictProtein-An open resource for online prediction of protein structural and functional features. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W337-W343 (2014)
73. Bernsel, A., Viklund, H., Hennerdal, A., & Elofsson, A. TOPCONS: consensus prediction of membrane protein topology. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, W465-W468 (2009)
74. Sonnhammer, E. L., von Heijne, G., & Krogh, A. A hidden Markov model for predicting transmembrane helices in protein sequences. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol. 6, 175-182 (1998)
75. Tusnády, G. E., & Simon, I. The HMMTOP transmembrane topology prediction server. Bioinformatics 17, 849-850 (2001)
76. Käll, L., Krogh, A., & Sonnhammer, E. L. Advantages of combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction-The Phobius web server. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W429-W432 (2007).