In search of attributes that support self-regulation in blended learning environments

Education and Information Technologies

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 1395-1454

  Van Laer, Stijn ^a   Elen, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Blended learning; Instructional design; Self regulation; Support; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

EID: 84969761326     PISSN: 13602357     EISSN: 15737608     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-016-9505-x     Document Type: Article

References (206)

1. Ai-Lim Lee, E., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2010). How does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? a structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1424–1442. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.006.
2. Alant, E., & Dada, S. (2005). Group learning on the web. International Journal of Educational Development, 25(3), 305–316. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2004.11.010.
3. Aleven, V. A. W. M. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science, 26(2), 147–179. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(02)00061-7.
4. Allan, J. (1996). Learning outcomes in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 21(1), 93–108. doi:10.1080/03075079612331381487.
5. Ambrose-Oji, B., Lawrence, A., & Stewart, A. (2014). Community based forest enterprises in Britain: two organising typologies. Forest Policy and Economics. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2014.11.005.
6. Anseel, F., Lievens, F., & Schollaert, E. (2009). Reflection as a strategy to enhance task performance after feedback. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(1), 23–35. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.05.003.
7. Artino, A. R. (2009a). Online learning: are subjective perceptions of instructional context related to academic success? Internet & Higher Education, 12(3/4), 117–125. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.07.003.
8. Artino, A. R. (2009b). Think, feel, act: motivational and emotional influences on military students’ online academic success. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21(2), 146–166. doi:10.1007/s12528-009-9020-9.
9. Artino, A. R., & Jones, K. D., II. (2012). Exploring the complex relations between achievement emotions and self-regulated learning behaviors in online learning. Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 170–175. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.01.006.
10. Artino, A. R., & Stephens, J. M. (2009). Academic motivation and self-regulation: a comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students learning online. Internet and Higher Education, 12(3-4), 146–151. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.02.001.
11. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191.
12. Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175.
13. Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S.-L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005.
14. Barratt, P. E. H. (1971). Bases of psychological methods (vol. 7). Australia: Wiley.
15. Barzilai, S., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2015). The role of epistemic perspectives in comprehension of multiple author viewpoints. Learning and Instruction, 36, 86–103. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.12.003.
16. Baumeister, R. F., & Heatherton, T. F. (1996). Self-regulation failure: an overview. Psychological Inquiry, 7(1), 1–15. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0701_1.
17. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1(3), 311.
18. Benson, P. (2013). Teaching and researching: Autonomy in language learning: Routledge.
19. Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., & Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379–439. doi:10.3102/00346543074003379.
20. Bersin, J., & others. (2003). What works in blended learning. Learning circuits.
21. Blok, H., Oostdam, R., Otter, M. E., & Overmaat, M. (2002). Computer-assisted instruction in support of beginning reading instruction: a review. Review of Educational Research, 72(1), 101–130. doi:10.3102/00346543072001101.
22. Boekaerts, M. (1992). The adaptable learning process: initiating and maintaining behavioural change. Applied Psychology, 41(4), 377–397. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.1992.tb00713.x.
23. Boekaerts, M. (1995). The interface between intelligence and personality as determinants of classroom learning. International handbook of personality and intelligence (161–183): Springer.
24. Boekaerts, M. (1996a). Coping with stress in childhood and adolescence.
25. Boekaerts, M. (1996a). Self-regulated learning at the junction of cognition and motivation. European Psychologist, 1(2), 100. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.1.2.100.
26. Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: a new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 161–186. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00015-1.
27. Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445–457. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2.
28. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (2005). Handbook of self-regulation: Elsevier.
29. Boelens, R., Van Laer, S., De Wever, B., & Elen, J. (2015). Blended learning in adult education: towards a definition of blended learning.
30. Borkowski, J., Carr, M., Rellinger, E., Pressley, M., & others. (1990). Self-regulated cognition: interdependence of metacognition, attributions, and self-esteem. Dimensions of Thinking and Cognitive Instruction, 1, 53–92.
31. Brusso, R. C., & Orvis, K. A. (2013). The impeding role of initial unrealistic goal-setting on videogame-based training performance: identifying underpinning processes and a solution. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1686–1694. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.006.
32. Butler, D. L. (1998). The strategic content learning approach to promoting self-regulated learning: a report of three studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 682.
33. Butler, D. L. (2002). Individualizing instruction in self-regulated learning. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 81–92.
34. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281. doi:10.2307/1170684.
35. Casillas, J. M., & Gremeaux, V. (2012). Evaluation of medical students’ expectations for multimedia teaching materials: illustration by an original method using the evaluation of a web site on cardiovascular rehabilitation. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 55(1), 25–37. doi:10.1016/j.rehab.2011.12.001.
36. Chen, Y.-C. (2014). An empirical examination of factors affecting college students’ proactive stickiness with a web-based English learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 159–171. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.040.
37. Cheng, B., Wang, M., Mørch, A. I., Chen, N.-S., Kinshuk, & Spector, J. M. (2014). Research on e-learning in the workplace 2000–2012: a bibliometric analysis of the literature. Educational Research Review, 11, 56–72. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2014.01.001.
38. Chia-Wen, T., Pei-Di, S., & Meng-Chuan, T. (2011). Developing an appropriate design of blended learning with web-enabled self-regulated learning to enhance students’ learning and thoughts regarding online learning. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(2), 261–271. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2010.514359.
39. Cholowski, K. M. R. N. B. M. P., & Chan, L. K. S. B. P. (2004). Cognitive factors in student nurses’ clinical problem solving. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 10(1), 85–95.
40. Clark, E., Draper, J., & Rogers, J. (2015). Illuminating the process: enhancing the impact of continuing professional education on practice. Nurse Education Today, 35(2), 388–394. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2014.10.014.
41. Corbalan, G., Kester, L., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2008). Selecting learning tasks: effects of adaptation and shared control on learning efficiency and task involvement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 733–756. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.02.003.
42. Corbalan, G., Kester, L., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2009). Dynamic task selection: effects of feedback and learner control on efficiency and motivation. Learning and Instruction, 19(6), 455–465. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.07.002.
43. Cox, E. D., Koscik, R. L., Olson, C. A., Behrmann, A. T., Hambrecht, M. A., McIntosh, G. C., & Kokotailo, P. K. (2006). Caring for the Underserved: blending service learning and a web-based curriculum. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 31(4), 342–349. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2006.06.024.
44. Cramer, M. E., High, R., Culross, B., Conley, D. M., Nayar, P., Nguyen, A. T., & Ojha, D. (2014). Retooling the RN workforce in long-term care: nursing certification as a pathway to quality improvement. Geriatric Nursing, 35(3), 182–187. doi:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2014.01.001.
45. Dai, C.-Y., & Huang, D.-H. (2015). Causal complexities to evaluate the effectiveness of remedial instruction. Journal of Business Research, 68(4), 894–899. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.048.
46. Davis, J. M., & Yi, M. Y. (2012). User disposition and extent of web utilization: a trait hierarchy approach. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70(5), 346–363. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.12.003.
47. De Corte, E., Greer, B., & Verschaffel, L. (1996). Mathematics teaching and learning.
48. De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., Entwistle, N., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2003). Unravelling basic components and dimensions of powerful learning environments. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
49. De Jong, T., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179–201. doi:10.3102/00346543068002179.
50. Demetriadis, S. N., Papadopoulos, P. M., Stamelos, I. G., & Fischer, F. (2008). The effect of scaffolding students’ context-generating cognitive activity in technology-enhanced case-based learning. Computers & Education, 51(2), 939–954. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.012.
51. Donnelly, R. (2010). Harmonizing technology with interaction in blended problem-based learning. Computers & Education, 54(2), 350–359. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.012.
52. Doo, M. Y. (2006). A problem in online interpersonal skills training: do learners practice skills? Open Learning, 21(3), 263–272. doi:10.1080/02680510600953252.
53. Driscoll, M. (2002). Blended learning: let’s get beyond the hype. E-learning, 1.
54. DuBois, J. M. P. D., Dueker, J. M. M. P. H., Anderson, E. E. P. M. P. H., & Campbell, J. P. (2008). The development and assessment of an NIH-funded research ethics training program. Academic Medicine, 83(6), 596–603. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181723095.
55. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001.
56. Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines: John Wiley & Sons.
57. Gerhard, M., Moore, D., & Hobbs, D. (2004). Embodiment and copresence in collaborative interfaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61(4), 453–480. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.12.014.
58. Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., & Gijselaers, W. (2013). Investigating the relations between motivation, tool use, participation, and performance in an e-learning course using web-videoconferencing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 285–292. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.09.005.
59. Gomez, E. A., Wu, D., & Passerini, K. (2010). Computer-supported team-based learning: the impact of motivation, enjoyment and team contributions on learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 55(1), 378–390. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.003.
60. Govaere, L. J., de Kruif, A., & Valcke, M. (2012). Differential impact of unguided versus guided use of a multimedia introduction to equine obstetrics in veterinary education. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1076–1084. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.006.
61. Graddol, D., Maybin, J., & Stierer, B. (1994). Researching language and literacy in social context: a reader: Multilingual matters.
62. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems. CJ Bonk & CR Graham, The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. Pfeiffer.
63. Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). A theoretical review of Winne and Hadwin’s model of self-regulated learning: new perspectives and directions. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 334–372. doi:10.3102/003465430303953.
64. Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Martens, R. L. (2005). The surplus value of an authentic learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(3), 509–521. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.028.
65. Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (2001). CoNoteS2: a software tool for promoting self-regulation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 7(2-3), 313–334.
66. Harris, K. R., & Pressley, M. (1991). The nature of cognitive strategy instruction: interactive strategy construction. Exceptional Children, 57(5), 392–404.
67. Harrison, M. (2003). Blended learning in practice.
68. Hart, C. (2009). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination: Sage.
69. Higgins, J. P., & Green, S. (2008). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (vol. 5): Wiley Online Library.
70. Ho, C., & Dzeng, R.-J. (2010). Construction safety training via e-learning: learning effectiveness and user satisfaction. Computers & Education, 55(2), 858–867. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.017.
71. Ho, C., & Swan, K. (2007). Evaluating online conversation in an asynchronous learning environment: an application of Grice’s cooperative principle. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 3–14. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.11.002.
72. Hodges, C. B., & Murphy, P. F. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy beliefs of students in a technology-intensive asynchronous college algebra course. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(2), 93–97. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.06.005.
73. House, R. (2002). Clocking in column. The Spokesman-Review.
74. Hughes, M. G., Day, E. A., Wang, X., Schuelke, M. J., Arsenault, M. L., Harkrider, L. N., & Cooper, O. D. (2013). Learner-controlled practice difficulty in the training of a complex task: cognitive and motivational mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(1), 80–98. doi:10.1037/a0029821.
75. Hung, H.-L., & Hyun, E. (2010). East Asian international graduate students’ epistemological experiences in an American University. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34(4), 340–353. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2009.12.001.
76. Hung, S.-Y., Huang, K.-L., & Yu, W.-J. (2011). An empirical study of the effectiveness of multimedia disclosure of informed consent: a technology mediated learning perspective. Information & Management, 48(4–5), 135–144. doi:10.1016/j.im.2011.03.002.
77. Ibabe, I., & Jauregizar, J. (2010). Online self-assessment with feedback and metacognitive knowledge. Higher Education, 59(2), 243–258. doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9245-6.
78. Ifenthaler, D. (2010). Learning and instruction in the digital age: Springer.
79. Ioannou, A., Brown, S. W., & Artino, A. R. (2015). Wikis and forums for collaborative problem-based activity: a systematic comparison of learners’ interactions. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 35–45. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.09.001.
80. Jonas, D., & Burns, B. (2010). The transition to blended e-learning. changing the focus of educational delivery in children’s pain management. Nurse Education in Practice, 10(1), 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2009.01.015.
81. Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. Instructional Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, 2, 215–239.
82. Joy, M. (2007). Research methods in education (6th Edition). Bioscience Education, 10. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3108/beej.10.r1.
83. Kearsley, G., & Moore, M. (1996). Distance education: a systems view. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Washington, 290, 80.
84. Keegan, D. (1996). Foundations of distance education: Psychology Press.
85. Keller, J. M. (2010a, 2010). Challenges in learner motivation: A holistic, integrative model for research and design on learner motivation.
86. Keller, J. M. (2010a). Motivational design for learning and performance. Boston: Springer US.
87. Kim, M., & Ryu, J. (2013). The development and implementation of a web-based formative peer assessment system for enhancing students’ metacognitive awareness and performance in ill-structured tasks. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 549–561. doi:10.1007/s11423-012-9266-1.
88. Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2014). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development: Routledge.
89. Kobak, K. A., Craske, M. G., Rose, R. D., & Wolitsky-Taylor, K. (2013). Web-based therapist training on cognitive behavior therapy for anxiety disorders: a pilot study. Psychotherapy, 50(2), 235–247. doi:10.1037/a0030568.
90. Koh, J. H. L., & Chai, C. S. (2014). Teacher clusters and their perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) development through ICT lesson design. Computers & Education, 70, 222–232. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.017.
91. Koke, T., & Norvele, I. (2008). Incorporation of learning strategies into adult distance learning. Studies for the Learning Society, 1(1), 39. doi:10.2478/v10240-012-0017-y.
92. Kovačević, I., Minović, M., Milovanović, M., de Pablos, P. O., & Starčević, D. (2013). Motivational aspects of different learning contexts: “My mom won’t let me play this game…”. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(2), 354–363. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.023.
93. Kumar, V. S., Gress, C. L., Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (2010). Assessing process in CSCL: an ontological approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 825–834.
94. Kuo, F.-R., Hwang, G.-J., & Lee, C.-C. (2012). A hybrid approach to promoting students’ web-based problem-solving competence and learning attitude. Computers & Education, 58(1), 351–364. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.020.
95. Lafuente Martínez, M., Álvarez Valdivia, I. M., & Remesal Ortiz, A. (2015). Making learning more visible through e-assessment: implications for feedback. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27(1), 10–27. doi:10.1007/s12528-015-9091-8.
96. Law, E. L.-C., & Sun, X. (2012). Evaluating user experience of adaptive digital educational games with activity theory. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70(7), 478–497. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.01.007.
97. Leen, E. A. E., & Lang, F. R. (2013). Motivation of computer based learning across adulthood. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 975–983. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.025.
98. Liaw, S.-S., Hatala, M., & Huang, H.-M. (2010). Investigating acceptance toward mobile learning to assist individual knowledge management: based on activity theory approach. Computers & Education, 54(2), 446–454. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.029.
99. Lin, K.-M. (2011). e-Learning continuance intention: moderating effects of user e-learning experience. Computers & Education, 56(2), 515–526. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.017.
100. Lin, A. C. H., Fernandez, W. D., & Gregor, S. (2012). Understanding web enjoyment experiences and informal learning: a study in a museum context. Decision Support Systems, 53(4), 846–858. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.020.
101. Lin, S., Zimmer, J. C., & Lee, V. (2013). Podcasting acceptance on campus: the differing perspectives of teachers and students. Computers & Education, 68, 416–428. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.003.
102. Lodewyk, K. R., Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. L. (2009). Implications of task structure on self-regulated learning and achievement. Educational Psychology, 29(1), 1–25.
103. Lynch, R., & Dembo, M. (2004). The relationship between self-regulation and online learning in a blended learning context. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5.
104. Ma, Y. (2012). A study on teachers’ online distance learning at Shangluo University.
105. Makoe, M., Richardson, J. T., & Price, L. (2008). Conceptions of learning in adult students embarking on distance education. Higher Education, 55(3), 303–320. doi:10.1007/s10734-007-9056-6.
106. Martens, R., de Brabander, C., Rozendaal, J., Boekaerts, M., & van der Leeden, R. (2010). Inducing mind sets in self-regulated learning with motivational information. Educational Studies, 36(3), 311–327. doi:10.1080/03055690903424915.
107. Mauroux, L., Konings, K. D., Zufferey, J. D., & Gurtner, J.-L. (2014). Mobile and online learning journal: effects on apprentices’ reflection in vocational education and training. Vocations and Learning, 7(2), 215–239. doi:10.1007/s12186-014-9113-0.
108. Melton, R. (1997). Objectives, competences and learning outcomes. London: Kogan Page.
109. Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59. doi:10.1007/Bf02505024.
110. Michalsky, T. (2014). Developing the SRL-PV assessment scheme: preservice teachers’ professional vision for teaching self-regulated learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 43, 214–229. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2014.05.003.
111. Michinov, E., & Michinov, N. (2007). Identifying a transition period at the midpoint of an online collaborative activity: a study among adult learners. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1355–1371. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.12.013.
112. Mohammadi, H. (2015). Investigating users’ perspectives on e-learning: an integration of TAM and IS success model. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 359–374. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.044.
113. Mohammadyari, S., & Singh, H. (2015). Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: the role of digital literacy. Computers & Education, 82, 11–25. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.025.
114. Mouly, G. J. (1978). Educational research: The art and science of investigation. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
115. Mulder, Y. G., Lazonder, A. W., & de Jong, T. (2011). Comparing two types of model progression in an inquiry learning environment with modelling facilities. Learning and Instruction, 21(5), 614–624. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.01.003.
116. Niemi, H., Nevgi, A., & Virtanen, P. (2003). Towards self-regulation in web-based learning. Journal of Educational Media, 28(1), 49–71. doi:10.1080/1358165032000156437.
117. Obura, T., Brant, W. E., Miller, F., & Parboosingh, I. J. (2011). Participating in a community of learners enhances resident perceptions of learning in an e-mentoring program: proof of concept. BMC Medical Education, 11, 3. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-11-3.
118. Oliver, M., & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can ‘blended learning’be redeemed. E-learning, 2, 17–26. doi:10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.17.
119. Oosterbaan, A. E., van der Schaaf, M. F., Baartman, L. K. J., & Stokking, K. M. (2010). Reflection during portfolio-based conversations. International Journal of Educational Research, 49(4–5), 151–160. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2011.02.001.
120. Orey, M. (2002). Definition of blended learning. University of Georgia. Retrieved February, 21, 2003.
121. Orey, M. (2002b, 2002). One year of online blended learning: Lessons learned.
122. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1988). Teaching and practicing thinking skills to promote comprehension in the context of group problem solving. Remedial and Special Education, 9(1), 53–59.
123. Perry, N. E. (1998). Young children’s self-regulated learning and contexts that support it. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 715. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.715.
124. Perry, N. E., Phillips, L., & Dowler, J. (2004). Examining features of tasks and their potential to promote self-regulated learning. The Teachers College Record, 106(9), 1854–1878. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00408.x.
125. Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2008). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide: John Wiley & Sons.
126. Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: a research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401–426. doi:10.2307/3250989.
127. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning.
128. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33.
129. Popham, W. J., Eisner, E. W., Sullivan, H. J., & Tyler, L. L. (1969). Instructional objectives (vol. 3): Rand McNally Chicago.
130. Popping, R. (2000). Computer-assisted text analysis: Sage.
131. Pressley, M., Levin, J. R., & McDaniel, M. A. (1987). Remembering versus inferring what a word means: Mnemonic and contextual approaches.
132. Puustinen, M., & Pulkkinen, L. (2001). Models of self-regulated learning: a review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45(3), 269–286. doi:10.1080/00313830120074206.
133. Raupach, T., Munscher, C., Pukrop, T., Anders, S., & Harendza, S. (2010). Significant increase in factual knowledge with web-assisted problem-based learning as part of an undergraduate cardio-respiratory curriculum. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(3), 349–356. doi:10.1007/s10459-009-9201-3.
134. Ream, E., Gargaro, G., Barsevick, A., & Richardson, A. (2015). Management of cancer-related fatigue during chemotherapy through telephone motivational interviewing: modeling and randomized exploratory trial. Patient Education and Counseling, 98(2), 199–206. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2014.10.012.
135. Reay, J. (2001). Blended learning-a fusion for the future. Knowledge Management Review, 4, 6.
136. Reeve, R. A., & Brown, A. L. (1985). Metacognition reconsidered: implications for intervention research. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13(3), 343–356.
137. Regan, K., Evmenova, A., Baker, P., Jerome, M. K., Spencer, V., Lawson, H., & Werner, T. (2012). Experiences of instructors in online learning environments: identifying and regulating emotions. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 204–212. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.12.001.
138. Reichelt, M., Kämmerer, F., Niegemann, H. M., & Zander, S. (2014). Talk to me personally: personalization of language style in computer-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 199–210. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.005.
139. Reychav, I., & Wu, D. (2015). Are your users actively involved? a cognitive absorption perspective in mobile training. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 335–346. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.021.
140. Robinson, B. (1995). LEARNER SUPPORT. Open and distance learning today, 221.
141. Roca, J. C., Chiu, C.-M., & Martínez, F. J. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: an extension of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(8), 683–696. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003.
142. Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2007). Educational data mining: a survey from 1995 to 2005. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(1), 135–146. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2006.04.005.
143. Rooney, J. E. (2003). Knowledge infusion. Association Management, 55, 26–32.
144. Rossett, A. (2002). The ASTD e-learning handbook: Best practices, strategies, and case studies for an emerging field: McGraw-Hill Trade.
145. Salden, R. J. C. M., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2006). Personalised adaptive task selection in air traffic control: effects on training efficiency and transfer. Learning and Instruction, 16(4), 350–362. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.07.007.
146. Sands, P. (2002). Inside outside, upside downside. Strategies, 8.
147. Sansone, C., Fraughton, T., Zachary, J. L., Butner, J., & Heiner, C. (2011). Self-regulation of motivation when learning online: the importance of who, why and how. Etr&D-Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(2), 199–212. doi:10.1007/s11423-011-9193-6.
148. Sansone, C., Smith, J. L., Thoman, D. B., & MacNamara, A. (2012). Regulating interest when learning online: potential motivation and performance trade-offs. Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 141–149. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.10.004.
149. Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351–371. doi:10.1007/Bf02212307.
150. Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36(1-2), 111–139. doi:10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8.
151. Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: theory, research, and applications.
152. Sewart, D. (1993). Student support systems in distance education. Open Learning, 8(3), 3–12.
153. Siampou, F., Komis, V., & Tselios, N. (2014). Online versus face-to-face collaboration in the context of a computer-supported modeling task. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 369–376. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.032.
154. Singh, H., Reed, C., & others. (2001). A white paper: achieving success with blended learning. Centra software, 1.
155. Smith, G. G., & Kurthen, H. (2007). Front-stage and back-stage in hybrid e-learning face-to-face courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 6(3), 455–474.
156. Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (1999). Instructional design. New York: Wiley.
157. Smith, L. N., Craig, L. E., Weir, C. J., & McAlpine, C. H. (2008). The evidence-base for stroke education in care homes. Nurse Education Today, 28(7), 829–840. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2008.02.002.
158. Spanjers, I. A., Könings, K. D., Leppink, J., Verstegen, D. M., de Jong, N., Czabanowska, K., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. (2015). The promised land of blended learning: quizzes as a moderator. Educational Research Review. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.05.001.
159. Sternberg, B. K. (1991). A review of some experience with the induced-polarization/resistivity method for hydrocarbon surveys: Successes and limitations. Geophysics, 56(10), 1522–1532.
160. Strang, K. D. (2011). Knowledge articulation dialog increases online university science course outcomes. Education and Information Technologies, 16(2), 123–137. doi:10.1007/s10639-010-9130-z.
161. Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296. doi:10.1023/A:1022193728205.
162. Tait, A. (2000). Planning student support for open and distance learning. Open Learning, 15(3), 287–299.
163. Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T. C., Shaw, S. M., & Liu, X. (2006). Teaching courses online: a review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 93–135. doi:10.3102/00346543076001093.
164. Tan, K. E., & Richardson, P. W. (2006). Writing short messages in English: out-of-school practices of Malaysian high school students. International Journal of Educational Research, 45(6), 325–340. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2006.11.010.
165. Tao, Y.-H. (2008). Typology of college student perception on institutional e-learning issues—an extension study of a teacher’s typology in Taiwan. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1495–1508. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.02.002.
166. Taplin, R. H., Kerr, R., & Brown, A. M. (2013). Who pays for blended learning? a cost–benefit analysis. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 61–68. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.002.
167. Thomson, I. (2002). Thomson job impact study: the next generation of corporate learning. Retrieved July, 7, 2003.
168. Thorpe, M. (2002). Rethinking learner support: the challenge of collaborative online learning. Open Learning, 17(2), 105–119.
169. Ting, Y.-L. (2013). Using mobile technologies to create interwoven learning interactions: an intuitive design and its evaluation. Computers & Education, 60(1), 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.004.
170. Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: a theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89–125. doi:10.3102/00346543045001089.
171. Tseng, F.-C., & Kuo, F.-Y. (2010). The way we share and learn: an exploratory study of the self-regulatory mechanisms in the professional online learning community. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1043–1053. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.005.
172. van den Boom, G., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2007). Effects of elicited reflections combined with tutor or peer feedback on self-regulated learning and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 532–548. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.003.
173. van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills: A four-component instructional design model for technical training: Educational Technology.
174. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Clark, R. E., & De Croock, M. B. (2002). Blueprints for complex learning: the 4C/ID-model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50, 39–61. doi:10.1007/BF02504993.
175. van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merriënboer, J. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 270–279. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004.
176. Verhagen, T., Feldberg, F., van den Hooff, B., Meents, S., & Merikivi, J. (2012). Understanding users’ motivations to engage in virtual worlds: a multipurpose model and empirical testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 484–495. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.020.
177. Vighnarajah, W., Luan, W. S., & Abu Bakar, K. (2009). Qualitative findings of students’ perception on practice of self-regulated strategies in online community discussion. Computers & Education, 53(1), 94–103. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.021.
178. von Bastian, C. C., & Oberauer, K. (2013). Distinct transfer effects of training different facets of working memory capacity. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(1), 36–58. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.02.002.
179. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the Development of Children, 23(3), 34–41.
180. Ward, J., & LaBranche, G. A. (2003). Blended learning: the convergence of e-learning and meetings. Franchising World, 35, 22–24.
181. Weaver, S. B., Oji, V., Ettienne, E., Stolpe, S., & Maneno, M. (2014). Hybrid e-learning approach to health policy. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 313–322. doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2013.11.013.
182. Wegerif, R., & Mercer, N. (1997). Using computer-based text analysis to integrate qualitative and quantitative methods in research on collaborative learning. Language and Education, 11(4), 271–286.
183. Wesiak, G., Steiner, C. M., Moore, A., Dagger, D., Power, G., Berthold, M., & Conlan, O. (2014). Iterative augmentation of a medical training simulator: effects of affective metacognitive scaffolding. Computers & Education, 76, 13–29. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.004.
184. Whitelock, D., & Jelfs, A. (2003). Editorial for special issue on blended learning: blending the issues and concerns of staff and students. Journal of Educational Media, 28, 99–100.
185. Wilson, B. G. (1996). Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design: Educational Technology.
186. Winne, P. H. (1982). Minimizing the black box problem to enhance the validity of theories about instructional effects. Instructional Science, 11(1), 13–28. doi:10.1007/Bf00120978.
187. Winne, P. H. (1985). Steps toward promoting cognitive achievements. The Elementary School Journal, 85(5), 673–693. doi:10.1086/461429.
188. Winne, P. H. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30(4), 173–187. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3004_2.
189. Winne, P. H. (1996). A metacognitive view of individual differences in self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8(4), 327–353. doi:10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90022-9.
190. Winne, P. H. (2006). Handbook of educational psychology: Psychology Press.
191. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, 93, 27–30.
192. Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. (2002). Exploring students’ calibration of self reports about study tactics and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(4), 551–572.
193. Winne, P. H., & Marx, R. W. (1989). A cognitive-processing analysis of motivation within classroom tasks. Research on Motivation in Education, 3, 223–257.
194. Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning.
195. Wouters, P., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2009). Observational learning from animated models: effects of modality and reflection on transfer. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.03.001.
196. Xie, K., Miller, N. C., & Allison, J. R. (2013). Toward a social conflict evolution model: examining the adverse power of conflictual social interaction in online learning. Computers & Education, 63, 404–415. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.01.003.
197. Yang, Y.-F., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010). Conceptions of and approaches to learning through online peer assessment. Learning and Instruction, 20(1), 72–83. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.01.003.
198. Young, J. R. (2001). “ Hybrid” teaching seeks to end the divide between traditional and online instruction. The Chronicle of Higher Education.
199. Yu, S., Chen, I. J., Yang, K.-F., Wang, T.-F., & Yen, L.-L. (2007). A feasibility study on the adoption of e-learning for public health nurse continuing education in Taiwan. Nurse Education Today, 27(7), 755–761. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2006.10.016.
200. Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: which are the key subprocesses? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 307–313.
201. Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: an overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2.
202. Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Academic studing and the development of personal skill: a self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33, 73–86.
203. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: an essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychololgy, 25(1), 82–91. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1016.
204. Zimmerman, B. J., & Pons, M. M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614–628. doi:10.3102/00028312023004614.
205. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives: Routledge.
206. Zumbrunn, S., Tadlock, J., & Roberts, E. D. (2011). Encouraging self-regulated learning in the classroom: a review of the literature. Metropolitan Educational Research Consortium (MERC).