Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 270-279

  van Zundert, Marjo ^a   Sluijsmans, Dominique ^a   van Merriënboer, Jeroen ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Attitudes towards peer assessment; Development of peer assessment skills; Peer assessment; Training of peer assessment skills

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949873808     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Boud D., Cohen R., and Sampson J. Peer learning and assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 24 (1999) 413-426
2. Brindley C., and Scoffield S. Peer assessment in undergraduate programmes. Teaching in Higher Education 3 (1998) 79-89
3. Campbell D.T., and Stanley J.C. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research (1963), Rand McNally College, Chicago
4. Cheng W., and Warren M. Having second thoughts: student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise. Studies in Higher Education 22 (1997) 233-239
5. Cheng W., and Warren M. Making a difference: using peers to assess individual students' contributions to a group project. Teaching in Higher Education 5 (2000) 243-255
6. Cho K., and MacArthur C. Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instruction 20 4 (2010) 328-338
7. Davies P. Peer assessment: judging the quality of students' work by comments rather than marks. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 43 (2006) 69-82
8. Freeman M., and McKenzie J. SPARK, a confidential web-based template for self and peer assessment of student teamwork: benefits of evaluating across different subjects. British Journal of Educational Technology 33 (2002) 551-569
9. Gielen S., Peeters E., Dochy F., Onghena P., and Struyven K. Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction 20 4 (2010) 304-315
10. Haaga D.A.F. Peer review of term papers in graduate psychology courses. Teaching of Psychology 20 (1993) 28-32
11. Hughes I.E., and Large B.J. Staff and peer-group assessment of oral communication skills. Studies in Higher Education 18 (1993) 379-385
12. Levine R.E., Kelly P.A., Karakoc T., and Haidet P. Peer evaluation in a clinical clerkship: students' attitudes, experiences, and correlations with traditional assessments. Academic Psychiatry 31 (2007) 19-24
13. Lin, S. S. J., & Chao, I. C. (1999). The manual for use with thinking style Inventory-Taiwan version Hsinchu, Taiwan: Institute of Education, National Chiao Tung University. Unpublished manual.
14. Lin S.S.J., Liu E.Z.F., and Yuan S.M. Web-based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking-styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 17 (2001) 420-432
15. Liu C.C., and Tsai C.M. Peer assessment through web-based knowledge acquisition: tools to support conceptual awareness. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 42 (2005) 43-59
16. Magin D. Reciprocity as a source of bias in multiple peer assessment of group work. Studies in Higher Education 26 (2001) 53-63
17. Mathews B.P. Assessing individual contributions: experience of peer evaluation in major group projects. British Journal of Educational Technology 25 (1994) 19-28
18. Olson V.L.B. The revising process of sixth-grade writers with and without peer feedback. Journal of Educational Research 84 (1990) 22-29
19. Pain R., and Mowl G. Improving geography essay writing using innovative assessment. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 20 (1996) 19-32
20. In: Reigeluth C.M. (Ed). Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status (1983), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
21. Sluijsmans D.M.A., Brand-Gruwel S., Van Merriënboer J.J.G., and Martens R.L. Training teachers in peer-assessment skills: effects on performance and perceptions. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 41 (2004) 60-78
22. Smith H., Cooper A., and Lancaster L. Improving the quality of undergraduate peer assessment: a case for student and staff development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 39 (2002) 71-81
23. Smith R.A. Are peer ratings of student debates valid?. Teaching of Psychology 17 (1990) 188-189
24. Stanier L. Peer assessment and group work as vehicles for student empowerment: a module evaluation. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 21 (1997) 95-98
25. Stefani L.A.J. Peer, self and tutor assessment: relative reliabilities. Studies in Higher Education 19 (1994) 69-75
26. Sternberg R.J. Thinking styles: theory and assessment at the interface between intelligence and personality. In: Sternberg R.J., and Ruzgis P. (Eds). Personality and intelligence (1994), Cambridge University Press, New York 169-187
27. Strachan I.B., and Wilcox S. Peer and self assessment of group work: developing an effective response to increased enrolment in a third-year course in microclimatology. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 20 (1996) 343-353
28. Strijbos J.W., Narciss S., and Dünnebier K. Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency?. Learning and Instruction 20 4 (2010) 291-303
29. Sung Y.T., Lin C.S., Lee C.L., and Chang K.E. Evaluating proposals for experiments: an application of web-based self-assessment and peer-assessment. Teaching of Psychology 30 (2003) 331-334
30. Topping K.J. Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research 68 (1998) 249-276
31. Tsai C.C., Liu E.Z.F., Lin S.S.J., and Yuan S.M. A networked peer assessment system based on a vee heuristic. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 38 (2001) 220-230
32. Van den Berg I., Admiraal W., and Pilot A. Design principles and outcomes of peer assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education 31 (2006) 341-356
33. Van Gennip N.A.E., Segers M.M., and Tillema H.H. Peer assessment as a collaborative learning activity: the role of interpersonal variables and conceptions. Learning and Instruction 20 4 (2010) 280-290
34. Van Gennip N.A.E., Segers M.S.R., and Tillema H.H. Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: the influence of interpersonal variables and structural features. Educational Research Review 4 (2009) 41-54
35. Van Steendam E., Rijlaarsdam G., Sercu L., and Van den Bergh H. The effect of instruction type and dyadic or individual emulation on the quality of higher-order peer feedback in EFL. Learning and Instruction 20 4 (2010) 316-327
36. Venables A., and Summit R. Enhancing scientific essay writing using peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 40 (2003) 281-290
37. Wen M.L., and Tsai C.C. University students' perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment. Higher Education 51 (2006) 27-44
38. Wen M.L., Tsai C.C., and Chang C.Y. Attitudes toward peer assessment: a comparison of the perspectives of pre-service and in-service teachers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 43 (2006) 83-92
39. Yu F.Y., Liu Y.H., and Chan T.W. A web-based learning system for question-posing and peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 42 (2005) 337-348