The development and assessment of an NIH-funded research ethics training program

Academic Medicine

Volumn 83, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 596-603

  DuBois, James M ^a   Dueker, Jeffrey M ^a   Anderson, Emily E ^b   Campbell, Jean ^c  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION   (United States)

^c MISSOURI INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOETHICS; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONTINUING EDUCATION; COURSE EVALUATION; CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ETHICAL DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FUNDING; JOB SATISFACTION; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRETEST POSTTEST DESIGN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; REVIEW; TRAINING; WEB BROWSER; ARTICLE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERNET; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; RESEARCH ETHICS; UNITED STATES;

CURRICULUM; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; INTERNET; MISSOURI; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION; TRAINING SUPPORT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 45549102124     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181723095     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Rest JR, Narvaez D, Bebeau MJ, Thoma SJ. Postconventional Moral Thinking: A Neo- Kohlbergian Approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 1999.
2. Bebeau MJ. The Defining Issues Test and the four component model: Contributions to professional education. J Moral Educ. 2002; 31:271-295.
3. Gibbs JC, Basinger KS, Fuller D. Moral Maturity: Measuring the Development of Sociomoral Reflection. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1992.
4. Bebeau MJ. Moral reasoning in scientific research. Cases for teaching and assessment. Available at: (http://poynter. indiana.edu/mr/mr.pdf). Accessed February 20, 2008.
5. Fisher CB. Decoding the Ethics Code: A Practical Guide for Psychologists. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 2003.
6. Koocher GP, Keith-Spiegel PC. Ethics in Psychology: Professional Standards and Cases. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998.
7. Steneck N. Assessing the integrity of publicly funded research. In: Steneck N, Sheetz M, eds. Investigating Research Integrity. Proceedings of the First ORI Research Conference on Research Integrity. Bethesda, Md: Office of Research Integrity; 2000:1-16.
8. Powell S, Allison M, Kalichman M. Effectiveness of a responsible conduct of research course: A preliminary study. Sci Eng Ethics. 2007;13:249-264.
9. Macrina FL, Funk CL, Barrett K. Effectiveness of responsible conduct of research instruction: Initial findings. J Res Admin. 2004;35:6-12.
10. Bebeau M, Tohma S. The impact of a dental ethics curriculum on moral reasoning. J Dent Educ. 1994;58:684-692.
11. Bebeau MJ, Rest JR, Yamoor C. Measuring dental students' ethical sensitivity. J Dent Educ. 1985;49:225-235.
12. Thomasma DC, Marshall PA, Kondratowicz D. Clinical medical ethics: Cases and readings. Lanham, Md: University Press of America; 1995.
13. Childress JF, Faden RR, Gaare RD, et al. Public health ethics: Mapping the terrain. J Law Med Ethics. 2002;30:170-178. (Pubitemid 39273228)
14. Jennings B, Kahn J, Mastroianni A, Parker LS. Ethics and the Public Health: Model Curriculum. Available at: (http://www. asph.org/document.cfm?page= 723). Accessed February 20, 2008.
15. DuBois JM. Ethics in Mental Health Research. Principles, Guidance, and Cases. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2008.
16. Sieber JE. Using our best judgment in conducting human research. Ethics Behav. 2004;14:297-304.
17. Goldie J, Schwarz L, McConnachie A, Jolly B, Morrison J. Can students' reasons for choosing set answers to ethical vignettes be reliably rated? Development and testing of a method. Med Teach. 2004;26:713-718. (Pubitemid 40125007)
18. Mumford MD, Devenport LD, Brown RP, et al. Validation of ethical decision making measures: Evidence for a new set of measures. Ethics Behav. 2006;16:319-345.