The development and implementation of a web-based formative peer assessment system for enhancing students' metacognitive awareness and performance in ill-structured tasks

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 549-561

  Kim, Minjeong ^a   Ryu, Jeeheon ^b  

^a Dankook University   (South Korea)

^b Chonnam National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Formative peer assessment; Ill structured task performance; Metacognitive awareness

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879782571     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: 15566501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-012-9266-1     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. An, Y. J. (2010). Scaffolding wiki-based ill-structured problem solving in an online environment. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(4), 723-734.
2. Cho, K., & Schunn, C. (2003). Battling the tyranny of the thousands with a SWoRD: Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline. In D. Lassner & C. McNaught (Eds.), Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications (pp. 373-376). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
3. Choi, I., Land, S. M., & Turgeon, A. J. (2005). Scaffolding peer-questioning strategies to facilitate metacognition during online small group interaction. Instructional Science, 33, 484-511.
4. Choi, I., & Lee, K. (2009). Designing and implementing a case-based learning environment for enhancing ill-structured problem solving: classroom management problems for prospective teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57, 99-129.
5. Cowie, B., & Bell, B. (1999). A model for formative assessment. Assessment in Education, 6(1), 101-116.
6. Ertmer, P. A., Stepich, D. A., York, C. S., Stickman, A., Wu, X. L., Zurek, S., et al. (2008). How instructional design experts use knowledge and experience to solve ill-structured problems. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 21(1), 17-42.
7. Galvez-Martin, M., Bowman, C., & Morrison, M. (1998). An exploratory study the level of reflection attained by pre-service teachers. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 11(2), 9-18.
8. Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2003). Scaffolding students' problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 21-38.
9. Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding ill-structured problem solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 5-22.
10. Jonassen, D. H., Beissner, K., & Yacci, M. (1993). Structural knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erllbaum Associates.
11. Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructive perspective. Upper Saddle River: New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
12. Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2-10.
14. Kim, M. (2008). Peer assessment as a learning method. Saarbrucken: VDM.
15. Koschmann, T., Kelson, A. C., Feltovich, P. J., & Barrows, H. S. (1996). Computer-supported problem-based learning: A principled approach to the use of computers in collaborative learning. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of emerging Paradigm (pp. 83-124). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Laverick, A. (2007). Motivation, metacognition, mentors, and money; Ingredients that support teaching expertise. Early Childhood Education Journal, 34(4), 247-249.
17. Liu, N. F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279-290.
18. Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Callaghan, A. (2004). Implementation of a formative assessment model incorporating peer and self assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(3), 273-290.
19. Pifarre, M., & Cobos, R. (2010). Promoting metacognitive skills through peer scaffolding in a CSCL environment. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(2), 237-253.
20. Prins, F. J., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Kirschner, P. A., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2005). Formative peer assessment in a CSCL environment: A case study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 417-444.
21. Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 77-84.
22. Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475.
23. Shin, N., Janassen, D. H., & MaGee, S. (2003). Predictors of well-structured and ill-structured problem solving in as astronomy simulation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(1), 7-27.
24. Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Brand-Gruwel, S., vanMerrienboer, J. J. G., & Bastiens, T. J. (2003). The training of peer assessment skills to promote the development of reflection skills in teacher education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 29, 23-42.
25. Sluijsmans, D. M. A., & Prins, F. (2006). A conceptual framework for integrating peer assessment in teacher education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32, 6-22.
26. Stoyanov, S., & Kommers, P. (2008). Concept mapping instrumental support for problem solving. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning, 18(1), 40-53.
27. Topping, K. (2003). Self- and peer-assessment in school and university: Reliability, validity and utility. In M. Segers, F. Dochy, & E. Cascallar (Eds.), Optimizing new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards (pp. 55-87). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
28. Topping, K., Smith, F. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), 149-169.
29. Webb, N. M., & Mastergeorge, A. M. (2003). The development of students' learning in peer-directed small groups. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 361-428.
30. Wiley, J. (1998). Expertise as mental set the effects of domain knowledge in creative problem solving. Memory & cognition, 26(4), 716-732.
31. Wineburg, S. S. (1998). Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert/expert study in the interpretation of historical texts. Cognitive Science, 22, 319-346.
32. Xie, K., & Bradshaw, A. C. (2008). Using question prompts to support ill-structured problem solving in online peer collaborations International Journal of Technology in Teaching and. Learning, 4(2), 148-165.