Relational categories as a bridge between cognitive and educational research

Psychological Bulletin

Volumn 142, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 729-757

  Goldwater, Micah B ^a   Schalk, Lennart ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Analogy; Categorization; Conceptual change; Relational categories; STEM education

Indexed keywords

CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMAN; LEARNING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; RESEARCH;

COGNITIVE SCIENCE; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMANS; LEARNING; PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL; RESEARCH;

EID: 84959526280     PISSN: 00332909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/bul0000043     Document Type: Article

References (298)

1. Alfieri, L., Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Schunn, C. D. (2013). Learning through case comparisons: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 48, 87-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.775712
2. Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, W. T. (2005). Human category learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 149-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070217
3. Bannert, M., Reimann, P., & Sonnenberg, C. (2014). Process mining techniques for analysing patterns and strategies in students' selfregulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 9, 161-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9107-6
4. Barr, R. A., & Caplan, L. J. (1987). Category representations and their implications for category structure. Memory & Cognition, 15, 397-418. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03197730
5. Bassok, M., Chase, V. M., & Martin, S. A. (1998). Adding apples and oranges: Alignment of semantic and formal knowledge. Cognitive Psychology, 35, 99-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0675
6. Belenky, D. M., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2012). Motivation and transfer: The role of mastery-approach goals in preparation for future learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 399-432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.651232
7. Belenky, D. M., & Schalk, L. (2014). The effects of idealized and grounded materials on learning, transfer, and interest: An organizing framework for categorizing external knowledge representations. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 27-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9251-9
8. Billman, D., & Knutson, J. (1996). Unsupervised concept learning and value systematicity: A complex whole aids learning the parts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 458-475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.2.458
9. Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417-444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823
10. Bloom, P. (1996). Intention, history, and artifact concepts. Cognition, 60, 1-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00699-0
11. Blouw, P., Solodkin, E., Thagard, P., & Eliasmith, C. (2015). Concepts as semantic pointers: A framework and computational model. [early view]. Cognitive Science. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12265
12. Braithwaite, D. W., & Goldstone, R. L. (2014). Benefits of variation increase with preparation. Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1940-1945). Quebec City, Canada: Cognitive Science Society.
13. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14. Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24, 61-100.
15. Burgess, P. W., Gilbert, S. J., Okuda, J., & Simons, J. S. (2006). Rostral prefrontal brain regions (Area 10): A gateway between inner thought and the external world? In W. Prinz & N. Sebanz (Eds.), Disorders of volition (pp. 373-396). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Butler, A. C. (2010). Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1118-1133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019902
17. Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual development in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Carey, S. (2000). Science education as conceptual change. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21, 13-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00046-5
19. Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367638.001.0001
20. Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Jacobs, V. R., Fennema, E., & Empson, S. B. (1998). A longitudinal study of invention and understanding in children's multidigit addition and subtraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 3-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/749715
21. Carvalho, P. F., & Goldstone, R. L. (2014). Putting category learning in order: Category structure and temporal arrangement affect the benefit of interleaved over blocked study. Memory & Cognition, 42, 481-495. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0371-0
22. Carvalho, P. F., & Goldstone, R. L. (2015). The benefits of interleaved and blocked study: Different tasks benefit from different schedules of study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 281-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0676-4
23. Catrambone, R. (1995). Aiding subgoal learning: Effects on transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 5-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.1.5
24. Catrambone, R. (1998). The subgoal learning model: Creating better examples so that students can solve novel problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 355-376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.127.4.355
25. Catrambone, R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1147-1156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.6.1147
26. Chan, J., & Schunn, C. (2015). The impact of analogies on creative concept generation: Lessons from an in vivo study in engineering design. Cognitive Science, 39, 126-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12127
27. Chen, O., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2015). The worked example effect, the generation effect, and element interactivity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 689-704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000018
28. Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1302_1
29. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2
30. Chi, M. T. H., Roscoe, R. D., Slotta, J. D., Roy, M., & Chase, C. C. (2012). Misconceived causal explanations for emergent processes. Cognitive Science, 36, 1-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01207.x
31. Chi, M. T. H., & VanLehn, K. A. (2012). Seeing deep structure from the interactions of surface features. Educational Psychologist, 47, 177-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.695709
32. Christie, S., & Gentner, D. (2010). Where hypotheses come from: Learning new relations by structural alignment. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11, 356-373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15248371003700015
33. Christoff, K., Prabhakaran, V., Dorfman, J., Zhao, Z., Kroger, J. K., Holyoak, K. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2001). Rostrolateral prefrontal cortex involvement in relational integration during reasoning. NeuroImage, 14, 1136-1149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0922
34. Clark, R. E., Feldon, D., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Yates, K., & Early, S. (2007). Cognitive task analysis. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. J. G. van Merriënboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communication and technology (3rd ed., pp. 577-593). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Clement, C. A., & Gentner, D. (1991). Systematicity as a selection constraint in analogical mapping. Cognitive Science, 15, 89-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1501_3
36. Clement, J. (1982). Students' preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50, 66-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.12989
37. Clement, J. (1993). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students' preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 1241-1257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660301007
38. Cohen, N. A. (2009). Relational memory and the hippocampus. Oral presentation given at the University of Texas at Austin Department of Psychology.
39. Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80069-1
40. Corral, D., & Jones, M. (2014). The effects of relational structure on analogical learning. Cognition, 132, 280-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.04.007
41. Craig, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2012). Whichever way you choose to categorize, working memory helps you learn. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 439-464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2011.608854
42. Davis, T., & Love, B. C. (2010). Memory for category information is idealized through contrast with competing options. Psychological Science, 21, 234-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797609357712
43. Davis, T., Love, B. C., & Preston, A. R. (2012). Learning the exception to the rule: Model-based fMRI reveals specialized representations for surprising category members. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 260-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr036
44. Day, S. B., & Gentner, D. (2007). Nonintentional analogical inference in text comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 35, 39-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03195940
45. Day, S. B., & Goldstone, R. L. (2011). Analogical transfer from a simulated physical system. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 551-567. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0022333
46. Day, S. B., & Goldstone, R. L. (2012). The import of knowledge export: Connecting findings and theories of transfer of learning. Educational Psychologist, 47, 153-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.696438
47. De Bock, D., Deprez, J., Van Dooren, W., Roelens, M., & Verschaffel, L. (2011). Abstract or concrete examples in learning mathematics: A replication and elaboration of Kaminski, Sloutsky, and Heckler's study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42, 109-126.
48. De Corte, E. (2003). Transfer as the productive use of acquired knowledge, skills, and motivations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 142-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01250
49. Delosh, E. L. (1997). Effect of mnemonic variables on function and category learning. Unpublished Dissertation. Purdue University, U.S.
50. diSessa, A., Gillespie, N. M., & Esterly, J. B. (2004). Coherence versus fragmentation in the development of the concept of force. Cognitive Science, 28, 843-900. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2806_1
51. Dominey, P. F., Lelekov, T., Ventre-Dominey, J., & Jeannerod, M. (1998). Dissociable processes for learning the surface structure and abstract structure of sensorimotor sequences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 734-751. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/089892998563130
52. Donovan, J. J., & Radosevich, D. J. (1999). A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: Now you see it, now you don't. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 795-805. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.5.795
53. Doumas, L. A., & Hummel, J. E. (2013). Comparison and mapping facilitate relation discovery and predication. PLoS ONE, 8, e63889. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063889
54. Doumas, L. A., Hummel, J. E., & Sandhofer, C. M. (2008). A theory of the discovery and predication of relational concepts. Psychological Review, 115, 1-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.1.1
55. Dumas, D., Alexander, P. A., & Grossnickle, E. M. (2013). Relational reasoning and its manifestations in the educational context: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Psychology Review, 25, 391-427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9224-4
56. Dunbar, K., & Blanchette, I. (2001). The in vivo/in vitro approach to cognition: The case of analogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 334-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01698-3
57. Duncan, J. (2010). The multiple-demand (MD) system of the primate brain: Mental programs for intelligent behaviour. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 172-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.004
58. Ebenezer, J. V., Chacko, S., Kaya, O. N., Koya, S. K., & Ebenezer, D. L. (2010). The effects of common knowledge construction model sequence of lessons on science achievement and relational conceptual change. Journal of Research in Science Education, 47, 25-46.
59. Ebenezer, J. V., & Gaskell, P. J. (1995). Relational conceptual change in solution chemistry. Science Education, 79, 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790102
60. Edelsbrunner, P. A., Schalk, L., Schumacher, R., & Stern, E. (2015). Pathways of conceptual change: Investigating the influence of experimentation skills on conceptual knowledge development in early science education. In D. C. Noelle, R. Dale, A. S. Warlaumont, J. Yoshimi, T. Matlock, C. D. Jennings, & P. P. Maglio (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 620-625). Austin: TX: Cognitive Science Society.
61. Erickson, M. A., & Kruschke, J. K. (1998). Rules and exemplars in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 107-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.127.2.107
62. Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K. D., & Gentner, D. (1989). The structuremapping engine: Algorithm and examples. Artificial Intelligence, 41, 1-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(89)90077-5
63. Forbus, K. D., Gentner, D., & Law, K. (1995). MAC/FAC: A Model of Similarity-Based Retrieval. Cognitive Science, 19, 141-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1902_1
64. Fox, E. J., & Sullivan, H. J. (2007). Comparing strategies for teaching abstract concepts in an online tutorial. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37, 307-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/EC.37.3.e
65. French, R. M. (2002). The computational modeling of analogy-making. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 200-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01882-X
66. Friedman, S. E. (2012). Computational conceptual change: An explanation based approach. Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Evanston, IL.
67. Friedman, S. E., Barbella, D., & Forbus, K. (2012). Revising domain knowledge with cross-domain analogy. Advances in Cognitive Systems, 2, 13-24.
68. Fyfe, E. R., McNeil, N. M., Son, J. Y., & Goldstone, R. L. (2014). Concreteness fading in mathematics and science instruction: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 9-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9249-3
69. Gabora, L., Rosch, E., & Aerts, D. (2008). Toward and ecological theory of concepts. Ecological Psychology, 20, 84-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10407410701766676
70. Gadgil, S., Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Chi, M. T. H. (2012). Effectiveness of holistic mental model confrontation in driving conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 22, 47-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.06.002
71. Gelman, S. A., & Legare, C. H. (2011). Concepts and folk theories. Annual Review of Anthropology, 40, 379-398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145822
72. Gentner, D. (1981). Some interesting differences between verbs and nouns. Cognition and Brain Theory, 4, 161-178.
73. Gentner, D. (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In S. A. Kuczaj (Ed.), Language development: Vol. 2. Language, thought and culture (pp. 301-334). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
74. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3
75. Gentner, D. (2003). Why we're so smart. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 195-235). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
76. Gentner, D. (2010). Bootstrapping the mind: Analogical processes and symbol systems. Cognitive Science, 34, 752-775. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01114.x
77. Gentner, D., Anggoro, F. K., & Klibanoff, R. S. (2011). Structure mapping and relational language support children's learning of relational categories. Child Development, 82, 1173-1188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01599.x
78. Gentner, D., & Asmuth, J. (2008). Can relationality be distinguished from abstractness in noun mutability. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 863-868). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
79. Gentner, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2001). Individuation, relational relativity and early word learning. In M. Bowerman & S. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 215-256). Cam-bridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620669.010
80. Gentner, D., Brem, S., Ferguson, R., & Wolff, P. (1997). Analogy and creativity in the works of Johannes Kepler. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 403-459). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10227-016
81. Gentner, D., & France, I. M. (1988). The verb mutability effect: Studies of the combinatorial semantics of nouns and verbs. In S. L. Small, G. W. Cottrell, & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Lexical ambiguity resolution: Perspectives from psycholinguistics, neuropsychology, and artificial intelligence (pp. 343-382). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-051013-2.50018-5
82. Gentner, D. & Smith, L. (2012). Analogical reasoning. In V. S. Ramachandran (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (2nd Ed.) (pp. 130-136). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
83. Gentner, D., & Kurtz, K. J. (2005). Relational categories. In W. K. Ahn, R. L. Goldstone, B. C. Love, A. B. Markman, & P. Wolff (Eds.), Categorization inside and outside the laboratory: Essays in honor of Douglas L. Medin (pp. 151-175). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/11156-009
84. Gentner, D., Levine, S. C., Ping, R., Isaia, A., Dhillon, S., Bradley, C., & Honke, G. (2015). Rapid learning in a children's museum via analogical comparison. [early view]. Cognitive Science. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12248
85. Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Hung, B. (2007). Comparison facilitates children's learning of names for parts. Journal of Cognition and Development, 8, 285-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15248370701446434
86. Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Thompson, L. (2003). Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 393-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.393
87. Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., Thompson, L., & Forbus, K. D. (2009). Reviving inert knowledge: Analogical abstraction supports relational retrieval of past events. Cognitive Science, 33, 1343-1382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01070.x
88. Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52, 45-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.1.45
89. Gentner, D., Ozyürek, A., Gürcanli, O., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2013). Spatial language facilitates spatial cognition: Evidence from children who lack language input. Cognition, 127, 318-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.01.003
90. Gentner, D., & Rattermann, M. J. (1991). Language and the career of similarity. In S. A. Gelman & J. P. Byrnes (Eds.), Perspectives on language and thought: Interrelations in development (pp. 225-277). London: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511983689.008
91. Gentner, D., Rattermann, M. J., & Forbus, K. D. (1993). The roles of similarity in transfer: Separating retrievability from inferential soundness. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 524-575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1993.1013
92. Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90013-4
93. Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(83)90002-6
94. Goldberg, R. F., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2009). Developmental "roots" in mature biological knowledge. Psychological Science, 20, 480-487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02320.x
95. Goldstone, R. L. (1994). The role of similarity in categorization: Providing a groundwork. Cognition, 52, 125-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90065-5
96. Goldstone, R. L. (1996). Isolated and interrelated concepts. Memory & Cognition, 24, 608-628. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03201087
97. Goldstone, R. L. (1998). Perceptual learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 585-612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.585
98. Goldstone, R. L., & Day, S. B. (2013). Similarity. In H. Pashler (Ed.), The encyclopedia of mind (pp. 696-699). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Reference. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452257044.n257
99. Goldstone, R. L., Landy, D. H., & Son, J. Y. (2010). The education of perception. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 265-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01055.x
100. Goldstone, R. L., & Medin, D. L. (1994). Time course of comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 29-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.1.29
101. Goldstone, R. L., & Rogosky, B. J. (2002). Using relations within conceptual systems to translate across conceptual systems. Cognition, 84, 295-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00053-7
102. Goldstone, R. L., & Sakamoto, Y. (2003). The transfer of abstract principles governing complex adaptive systems. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 414-466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00519-4
103. Goldstone, R. L., & Son, J. Y. (2005). The transfer of scientific principles using concrete and idealized simulations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 69-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1401_4
104. Goldwater, M. B., & Gentner, D. (2015). On the acquisition of abstract knowledge: Structural alignment and explication in learning causal system categories. Cognition, 137, 137-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.12.001
105. Goldwater, M. B., & Markman, A. B. (2011). Categorizing entities by common role. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 406-413. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0058-0
106. Goldwater, M. B., Markman, A. B., & Stilwell, C. H. (2011). The empirical case for role-governed categories. Cognition, 118, 359-376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.009
107. Goldwater, M. G., Sibley, D., Gentner, D., LaDue, N., & Libarkin, J. (under revision). Analogical retrieval and the development of science expertise.
108. Goldwater, M. B., Smith, L., & Hinze, S. (in preparation). Failure of retrieval practice to support spontaneous analogical transfer.
109. Goodman, N. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., Griffiths, T. L., & Feldman, J. (2008). Compositionality in rational analysis: Grammar-based induction for concept learning. In M. Oaksford & N. Chater (Eds.), The probabilistic mind: Prospects for rational models of cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199216093.003.0017
110. Green, A. E., Fugelsang, J. A., Kraemer, D. J., Shamosh, N. A., & Dunbar, K. N. (2006). Frontopolar cortex mediates abstract integration in analogy. Brain Research, 1096, 125-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.024
111. Gurlitt, J., Dummel, S., Schuster, S., & Nückles, M. (2012). Differently structured advance organizers lead to different initial schemata and learning outcomes. Instructional Science, 40, 351-369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9180-7
112. Halford, G. S., Andrews, G., Wilson, W. H., & Phillips, S. (2012). Computational models of relational processes in cognitive development. Cognitive Development, 27, 481-499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2012.08.003
113. Halford, G. S., Baker, R., McCredden, J. E., & Bain, J. D. (2005). How many variables can humans process? Psychological Science, 16, 70-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00782.x
114. Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H., & Phillips, S. (1998). Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: Implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 803-831. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X98001769
115. Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H., & Phillips, S. (2010). Relational knowledge: The foundation of higher cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 497-505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.08.005
116. Hambrick, D. Z. (2003). Why are some people more knowledgeable than others? A longitudinal study of knowledge acquisition. Memory & Cognition, 31, 902-917. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196444
117. Hambrick, D. Z., Libarkin, J. C., Petcovic, H. L., Baker, K. M., Elkins, J., Callahan, C. N.,... Ladue, N. D. (2012). A test of the circumventionof-limits hypothesis in scientific problem solving: The case of geological bedrock mapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 397-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025927
118. Hambrick, D. Z., & Meinz, E. J. (2011). Limits on the predictive power of domain-specific experience and Knowledge in skilled performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 275-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963721411422061
119. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1994). Young children's naive theory of biology. Cognition, 50, 171-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90027-2
120. Heckler, A. F. (2011). The ubiquitous patterns of incorrect answers to science questions: The role of automatic, bottom-up processes. Psychology of Learning and Motivation-Advances in Research and Theory, 55, 227-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00008-9
121. Heckler, A. F., & Scaife, T. M. (2015). Patterns of response times and response choices to science questions: The influence of relative processing time. Cognitive Science, 39, 496-537. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12166
122. Hegarty, M., Mayer, R. E., & Monk, C. A. (1995). Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: A comparison of successful and unsuccessful problem solvers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 18-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.1.18
123. Heit, E. (2001). Background knowledge and models of categorization. In U. Hahn & M. Ramscar (Eds.), Similarity and categorization (pp. 155-178). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198506287.003.0009
124. Heit, E., & Nicholson, S. P. (2010). The opposite of republican: Polarization and political categorization. Cognitive Science, 34, 1503-1516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01138.x
125. Higgins, E. J., & Ross, B. H. (2011). Comparisons in category learning: How best to compare for what. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1388-1393). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, Austin.
126. Holyoak, K. J., & Koh, K. (1987). Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer. Memory & Cognition, 15, 332-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03197035
127. Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1989). Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science, 13, 295-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1303_1
128. Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1997). The analogical mind. American Psychologist, 52, 35-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.1.35
129. Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review, 104, 427-466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.3.427
130. Jacobson, M. J. (2001). Problem solving, cognition, and complex systems: Differences between experts and novices. Complexity, 6, 41-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cplx.1027
131. Jacobson, M. J., Kapur, M., So, H. J., & Lee, J. (2011). The ontologies of complexity and learning about complex systems. Instructional Science, 39, 763-783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9147-0
132. Jacoby, L. L., Wahlheim, C. N., & Coane, J. H. (2010). Test-enhanced learning of natural concepts: Effects on recognition memory, classification, and metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1441-1451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020636
133. Jamrozik, A., Sagi, E., Goldwater, M., & Gentner, D. (2013). Relational words have high metaphoric potential. Meta4NLP, 2013, 21.
134. Jee, B. D., Uttal, D. H., Gentner, D., Manduca, C., Shipley, T. F., & Sageman, B. (2013). Finding faults: Analogical comparison supports spatial concept learning in geoscience. Cognitive Processing, 14, 175-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10339-013-0551-7
135. Johnson, S. C., & Carey, S. (1998). Knowledge enrichment and conceptual change in folkbiology: Evidence from Williams syndrome. Cognitive Psychology, 37, 156-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0695
136. Jones, M., & Love, B. C. (2007). Beyond common features: The role of roles in determining similarity. Cognitive Psychology, 55, 196-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.09.004
137. Jung, W., & Hummel, J. E. (2011). Progressive alignment facilitates learning of deterministic but not probabilistic relational categories. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. F. Shipley, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2643-5648). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
138. Kalish, M. L., Lewandowsky, S., & Davies, M. (2005). Error-driven knowledge restructuring in categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 846-861. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.846
139. Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38, 23-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_4
140. Kaminski, J. A., Sloutsky, V. M., & Heckler, A. F. (2008). The advantage of abstract examples in learning math. Science, 320, 454-455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1154659
141. Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 379-424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07370000802212669
142. Karpicke, J. D., & Aue, W. R. (2015). The testing effect is alive and well with complex materials. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 317-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9309-3
143. Kellman, P. J., & Massey, C. M. (2013). Perceptual learning, cognition, and expertise. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 58, 117-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407237-4.00004-9
144. Kemp, C. (2012). Exploring the conceptual universe. Psychological Review, 119, 685-722. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029347
145. Kemp, C., Tenenbaum, J. B., Niyogi, S., & Griffiths, T. L. (2010). A probabilistic model of theory formation. Cognition, 114, 165-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.003
146. Kittur, A., Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (2004). Feature-vs. relationdefined categories: Probab(alistic)ly not the same. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 696-701). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
147. Klenk, M., & Forbus, K. (2013). Exploiting persistent mappings in crossdomain analogical learning of physical domains. Artificial Intelligence, 195, 398-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2012.11.002
148. Kloos, H., Fisher, A., & Van Orden, G. C. (2010). Situated naïve physics: Task constraints decide what children know about density. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 625-637. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020977
149. Koedinger, K. R., Corbett, A. T., & Perfetti, C. (2012). The knowledgelearning-instruction framework: Bridging the science-practice chasm to enhance robust student learning. Cognitive Science, 36, 757-798. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01245.x
150. Koedinger, K. R., & Roll, I. (2012). Learning to think: Cognitive mechanisms of knowledge transfer. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 789-806). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0040
151. Kok, E. M., de Bruin, A. B. H., Robben, S. G. F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2013). Learning radiological appearances of diseases: Does comparison help? Learning and Instruction, 23, 90-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.07.004
152. Koponen, I. T., & Pehkonen, M. (2010). Coherent knowledge structures of physics represented as concept networks in teacher education. Science & Education, 19, 259-282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9200-z
153. Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2008). Learning concepts and categories: Is spacing the "enemy of induction"? Psychological Science, 19, 585-592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02127.x
154. Kruschke, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.22
155. Kurtz, K. J., & Loewenstein, J. (2007). Converging on a new role for analogy in problem solving and retrieval: When two problems are better than one. Memory & Cognition, 35, 334-341. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193454
156. Kurtz, K. J. (2013). Learning toward analogical transfer: The category status hypothesis. Oral presentation at the Third International Conference on Analogy at the University of Burgundy, Dijon, France.
157. Kurtz, K. J., Boukrina, O., & Gentner, D. (2013). Comparison promotes learning and transfer of relational categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1303-1310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031847
158. Kurtz, K. J., & Gentner, D. (2013). Detecting anomalous features in complex stimuli: The role of structured comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 19, 219-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0034395
159. Kurtz, K. J. (2007). The divergent autoencoder (DIVA) model of category learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 560-576. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196806
160. Lachner, A., Gurlitt, J., & Nückles, M. (2012). A graph-oriented approach to measuring expertise-detecting structural differences between experts and intermediates. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 653-658).
161. Lachner, A., & Nückles, M. (2015). Bothered by abstractness or engaged by cohesion? Experts' explanations enhance novices' deep-learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 21, 101-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xap0000038
162. Landy, D., & Goldstone, R. L. (2007). How abstract is symbolic thought? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 720-733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.720
163. Lassaline, M. E., & Murphy, G. L. (1996). Induction and category coherence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 95-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03210747
164. Leahy, W., Hanham, J., & Sweller, J. (2015). High element interactivity information during problem solving may lead to failure to obtain the testing effect. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 291-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9296-4
165. Libarkin, J. C. (2001). Development of an assessment of student conception of the nature of science. Journal of Geoscience Education, 49, 435-442.
166. Libarkin, J. C. (2008). Concept inventories in higher education science. Prepared for the National Research Council Promising Practices in Undergraduate STEM Education Workshop 2 (Washington, DC, Oct. 13-14, 2008).
167. Linsey, J. S., Wood, K. L., & Markman, A. B. (2008). Modality and representation in analogy. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 22, 85-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0890060408000061
168. Little, D. R., Lewandowsky, S., & Heit, E. (2006). Ad hoc category restructuring. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1398-1413. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03195905
169. Little, J. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (2015). Individual differences in category learning: Memorization versus rule abstraction. Memory & Cognition, 43, 283-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0475-1
170. Loewenstein, J. (2010). How one's hook is baited matters for catching an analogy. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 53, 149-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(10)53004-4
171. Loewenstein, J., & Gentner, D. (2001). Spatial mapping in preschoolers: Close comparisons facilitate far mappings. Journal of Cognition and Development, 2, 189-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327647JCD0202_4
172. Loewenstein, J., & Gentner, D. (2005). Relational language and the development of relational mapping. Cognitive Psychology, 50, 315-353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.09.004
173. Loibl, K., & Rummel, N. (2014). Knowing what you don't know makes failure productive. Learning and Instruction, 34, 74-85.
174. Love, B. C. (2003). The multifaceted nature of unsupervised category learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 190-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196484
175. Love, B. C., & Markman, A. B. (2003). The nonindependence of stimulus properties in human category learning. Memory & Cognition, 31, 790-799. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196117
176. Love, B. C., Medin, D. L., & Gureckis, T. M. (2004). SUSTAIN: A network model of category learning. Psychological Review, 111, 309-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.309
177. Markman, A. B. (1997). Constraints on analogical inference. Cognitive Science, 21, 373-418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2104_1
178. Markman, A. B. (1999). Knowledge representation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
179. Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (1993a). Structural alignment during similarity comparisons. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 431-467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1993.1011
180. Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (1993b). Splitting the differences: A structural alignment view of similarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 517-535. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1027
181. Markman, A. B., & Ross, B. H. (2003). Category use and category learning. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 592-613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.592
182. Markman, A. B., & Stilwell, C. H. (2001). Role-governed categories. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 13, 329-358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09528130110100252
183. Mathy, F. (2010). The long-term effect of relational information in classification learning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 360-390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09541440902903603
184. Mayer, R. E. (1981). Frequency norms and structural analysis of algebra story problems into families, categories, and templates. Instructional Science, 10, 135-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00132515
185. Mayer, R. E. (1982). Memory for algebra story problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 199-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.2.199
186. McDaniel, M. A., Cahill, M. J., Robbins, M., & Wiener, C. (2014). Individual differences in learning and transfer: Stable tendencies for learning exemplars versus abstracting rules. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 668-693. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032963
187. McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R. C., Agarwal, P. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (2013). Quizzing in middle-school science: Successful transfer performance on classroom exams. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 360-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.2914
188. McRae, K., Cree, G. S., Seidenberg, M. S., & McNorgan, C. (2005). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 547-559. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03192726
189. Medin, D. L., & Atran, S. (2004). The native mind: Biological categorization and reasoning in development and across cultures. Psychological Review, 111, 960-983. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.960
190. Medin, D. L., Wattenmaker, W. D., & Hampson, S. E. (1987). Family resemblance, conceptual cohesiveness, and category construction. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 242-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(87)90012-0
191. Mestre, J. P., Docktor, J. L., Strand, N. E., & Ross, B. H. (2011). Conceptual problem solving in physics. Cognition and education: The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, 55, 269-298.
192. Ming, N. C. (2009). Analogies vs. contrasts: A comparison of their learning benefits. In B. Kokinov, D. Gentner, & K. Holyoak (Eds.), New frontiers in analogy research: Proceedings of the second international conference on analogy (pp. 338-347). Sofia, Bulgaria: New Bulgarian University.
193. Moran, S., Bereby-Meyer, Y., & Bazerman, M. (2008). Stretching the effectiveness of analogical training in negotiations: Teaching diverse principles for creating value. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 1, 99-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-4716.2007.00006.x
194. Muller, D. A., Sharma, M. D., & Reimann, P. (2008). Raising cognitive load with linear multimedia to promote conceptual change. Science Education, 92, 278-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.20244
195. Murphy, G. L. (2002). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
196. Murphy, G. L., & Allopenna, P. D. (1994). The locus of knowledge effects in concept learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 904-919. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.904
197. Murphy, G. L., & Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289-316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.289
198. Nokes, T. J. (2009). Mechanisms of knowledge transfer. Thinking & Reasoning, 15, 1-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13546780802490186
199. Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Mestre, J. P. (2013). Toward a model of transfer as sense-making. Educational Psychologist, 48, 184-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.807556
200. Nosofsky, R. M., Palmeri, T. J., & McKinley, S. C. (1994). Rule-plusexception model of classification learning. Psychological Review, 101, 53-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.53
201. Novick, L. R. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 510-520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.510
202. O'Connor, C. M., Cree, G. S., & McRae, K. (2009). Conceptual hierarchies in a flat attractor network: Dynamics of learning and computations. Cognitive Science, 33, 665-708. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01024.x
203. Ohlsson, S. (2009). Resubsumption: A possible mechanism for conceptual change and belief revision. Educational Psychologist, 44, 20-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520802616267
204. Ohlsson, S. (2011). Deep learning: How the mind overrides experience. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511780295
205. Ohlsson, S. (2013). Beyond evidence-based belief formation: How normative ideas have constrained conceptual change research. Frontline Learning Research, 2, 70-85.
206. Opfer, J. E., & Doumas, L. A. A. (2008). Analogy and conceptual change in childhood. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 723. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X08005992
207. Opfer, J. E., Nehm, R. H., & Ha, M. (2012). Cognitive foundations for science assessment design: Knowing what students know about evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 744-777. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.21028
208. Parkin, B. L., Hellyer, P. J., Leech, R., & Hampshire, A. (2015). Dynamic network mechanisms of relational integration. The Journal of Neuroscience, 35, 7660-7673. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4956-14.2015
209. Patalano, A. L., & Ross, B. H. (2007). The role of category coherence in experience-based prediction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 629-634. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196812
210. Penn, D. C., Holyoak, K. J., & Povinelli, D. J. (2008). Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 109-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X08003543
211. Pillay, H. K. (1999). An analysis of knowledge representation of students in electronic problem tasks. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 325-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03173118
212. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
213. Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353-363.
214. Quilici, J. L., & Mayer, R. E. (1996). Role of examples in how students learn to categorize statistics word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 144-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.144
215. Quinn, F., Pegg, J., & Panizzon, D. (2009). First-year biology students' understandings of meiosis: An investigation using a structural theoretical framework. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 1279-1305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690801914965
216. Rawson, K. A., Thomas, R. C., & Jacoby, L. L. (2014). The power of examples: Illustrative examples enhance conceptual learning of declarative concepts. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 483-504.
217. Reed, S. K. (1989). Constraints on the abstraction of solutions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 532-540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.4.532
218. Rehder, B. (2010). Causal-based categorization: A review. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 52, 39-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(10)52002-4
219. Rehder, B., & Hastie, R. (2001). Causal knowledge and categories: The effects of causal beliefs on categorization, induction, and similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 323-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.323
220. Rehder, B., & Murphy, G. L. (2003). A knowledge-resonance (KRES) model of category learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 759-784. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03196543
221. Rehder, B., & Ross, B. H. (2001). Abstract coherent categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1261-1275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.5.1261
222. Rein, J. R., & Markman, A. B. (2010). Assessing the concreteness of relational representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1452-1465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021040
223. Resnick, I., & Shipley, T. F. (2013). Breaking new ground in the mind: An initial study of mental brittle transformation and mental rigid rotation in science experts. Cognitive Processing, 14, 143-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10339-013-0548-2
224. Resnick, L. B. (2010). Nested learning systems for the thinking curriculum. Educational Researcher, 39, 183-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X10364671
225. Richland, L. E., Morrison, R. G., & Holyoak, K. J. (2006). Children's development of analogical reasoning: Insights from scene analogy problems. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 249-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2006.02.002
226. Richland, L. E., & Simms, N. (2015). Analogy, higher order thinking, and education. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 6, 177-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1336
227. Richland, L. E., Zur, O., & Holyoak, K. J. (2007). Mathematics. Cognitive supports for analogies in the mathematics classroom. Science, 316, 1128-1129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1142103
228. Rikers, R. M., Schmidt, H. G., & Boshuizen, H. P. (2002). On the constraints of encapsulated knowledge: Clinical case representations by medical experts and subexperts. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 27-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2001_2
229. Rittle-Johnson, B., & Star, J. R. (2011). The power of comparison in learning and instruction: Learning outcomes supported by different types of comparisons. In J. P. Mestre & B. H. Ross (Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation: Cognition in education (Vol. 55, pp. 199-225). Waltham, MA: Elsevier. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00007-7
230. Rittle-Johnson, B., Star, J. R., & Durkin, K. (2009). The importance of prior knowledge when comparing examples: Influences on conceptual and procedural knowledge of equation solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 836-852. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0016026
231. Roediger, H. L., III, Putnam, A. L., & Smith, M. A. (2011). Ten benefits of testing and their applications to educational practice. Psychology of Learning and Motivation-Advances in Research and Theory, 55, 1-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00001-6
232. Rohrer, D. (2012). Interleaving helps students distinguish among similar concepts. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 355-367.
233. Rohrer, D., Dedrick, R. F., & Burgess, K. (2014). The benefit of interleaved mathematics practice is not limited to superficially similar kinds of problems. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1323-1330. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0588-3
234. Rohrer, D., & Pashler, H. (2010). Recent research on human learning challenges conventional instructional strategies. Educational Researcher, 39, 406-412. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X10374770
235. Rohrer, D., Taylor, K., & Sholar, B. (2010). Tests enhance the transfer of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 233-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017678
236. Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9
237. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-X
238. Ross, B. H. (1984). Remindings and their effects in learning a cognitive skill. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 371-416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(84)90014-8
239. Ross, B. H. (1987). This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 629-639. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.13.4.629
240. Ross, B. H. (1989). Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: Different effects on the access and use of earlier problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 456-468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.3.456
241. Ross, B. H., & Kennedy, P. T. (1990). Generalizing from the use of earlier examples in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 42-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.1.42
242. Rottman, B. M., Gentner, D., & Goldwater, M. B. (2012). Causal systems categories: Differences in novice and expert categorization of causal phenomena. Cognitive Science, 36, 919-932. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01253.x
243. Rütsche, B., & Schalk, L. (in preparation). Constructing complex relational categories: The influence of prior knowledge.
244. Sagi, E., Gentner, D., & Lovett, A. (2012). What difference reveals about similarity. Cognitive Science, 36, 1019-1050. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01250.x
245. Sagi, E., Kaufmann, S., & Clark, B. (2009). Semantic density analysis: Comparing word meaning across time and phonetic space. In R. Basili & M. Pennacchiotti, Proceedings of the EACL 2009 Workshop on GEMS: Geometrical Models of Natural Language Semantics (pp. 104-111). Athens, Greece.
246. Sakamoto, Y., & Love, B. C. (2010). Learning and retention through predictive inference and classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16, 361-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021610
247. Schneider, M., Grabner, R. H., & Paetsch, J. (2009). Mental number line, number line estimation, and mathematical achievement: Their interrelations in grades 5 and 6. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 359-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0013840
248. Schneider, M., & Hardy, I. (2013). Profiles of inconsistent knowledge in children's pathways of conceptual change. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1639-1649. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030976
249. Schneider, W., Körkel, J., & Weinert, F. E. (1989). Domain-specific knowledge and memory performance: A comparison of high-and lowaptitude children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 306-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.306
250. Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 475-522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1604_4
251. Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D., & Sears, D. (2005). Efficiency and innovation in transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 1-51). Norwich, CT: Information Age.
252. Schwartz, D. L., Chase, C. C., Oppezzo, M. A., & Chin, D. B. (2011). Practicing versus inventing with contrasting cases: The effects of telling first on learning and transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 759-775. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025140
253. Schyns, P. G., Goldstone, R. L., & Thibaut, J. P. (1998). The development of features in object concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X98000107
254. Semendeferi, K., Armstrong, E., Schleicher, A., Zilles, K., & Van Hoesen, G. W. (2001). Prefrontal cortex in humans and apes: A comparative study of area 10. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 114, 224-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1096-8644(200103)114:3_224:: AID-AJPA1022_3.0.CO;2-I
255. Sewell, D. K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2011). Restructuring partitioned knowledge: The role of recoordination in category learning. Cognitive Psychology, 62, 81-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.09.003
256. Sewell, D. K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2012). Attention and working memory capacity: Insights from blocking, highlighting, and knowledge restructuring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 444-469. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0026560
257. Shepard, R. N., Hovland, C. I., & Jenkins, H. M. (1961). Learning and memorization of classifications. Psychological Monographs, 75 (13, Whole No. 517).
258. Shipley, T., Tikoff, B., Manduca, C., & Ormand, C. J. (2013). Structural geology practice and learning, from the perspective of cognitive science. Journal of Structural Geology, 54, 72-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2013.07.005
259. Shtulman, A., & Valcarcel, J. (2012). Scientific knowledge suppresses but does not supplant earlier intuitions. Cognition, 124, 209-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.005
260. Simms, N. K. (2013). Overcoming the object bias in analogical development: Encoding time, allocation of attention, and relational knowledge (Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University).
261. Singley, M. K., & Anderson, J. R. (1989). Transfer of cognitive skill. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
262. Sloman, S. A., Love, B. C., & Ahn, W. K. (1998). Feature centrality and conceptual coherence. Cognitive Science, 22, 189-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2202_2
263. Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J., & Rips, L. J. (1974). Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. Psychological Review, 81, 214-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0036351
264. Smith, J. P., III, diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1994). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 115-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0302_1
265. Spellman, B. A., & Holyoak, K. J. (1996). Pragmatics in analogical mapping. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 307-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1996.0019
266. Stains, M., & Talanquer, V. (2008). Classification of chemical reactions: Stages of expertise. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 771-793. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.20221
267. Stern, E., & Schneider, M. (2010). A digital road map analogy of the relationship between neuroscience and educational research. ZDM-International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42, 511-514.
268. Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 123-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5
269. Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Cognition in Education, 55, 37-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8
270. Sweller, J., & Cooper, G. A. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 59-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0201_3
271. Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205
272. Taatgen, N. A. (2013). The nature and transfer of cognitive skills. Psychological Review, 120, 439-471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0033138
273. Taconis, R., Ferguson-Hessler, M. G. M., & Broekkamp, H. (2001). Teaching science problem solving: An overview of experimental work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 442-468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.1013
274. Talanquer, V. (2006). Common sense chemistry: A model for understanding students alternative conceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 83, 811-816. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed083p811
275. Taylor, E. G., & Ahn, W. K. (2012). Causal imprinting in causal structure learning. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 381-413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.07.001
276. Tenenbaum, J. B., Kemp, C., Griffiths, T. L., & Goodman, N. D. (2011). How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction. Science, 331, 1279-1285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1192788
277. Thagard, P. (1997). Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
278. Thagard, P. (2007). Coherence, truth, and the development of scientific knowledge. Philosophy of Science, 74, 28-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/520941
279. Tomlinson, M. T., & Love, B. C. (2006). From pigeons to humans: Grounding relational learning in concrete examples. In Y. Gil & R. J. Mooney (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-first National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 199-204). AAAI Press.
280. Tomlinson, M. T., & Love, B. C. (2010). When learning to classify by relations is easier than by features. Thinking & Reasoning, 16, 372-401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2010.530464
281. Tran, R., Rohrer, D., & Pashler, H. (2015). Retrieval practice: The lack of transfer to deductive inferences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 135-140.
282. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.327
283. Tytler, R. (1998). Children's conceptions of air pressure: Exploring the nature of conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 929-958. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200803
284. Vendetti, M. S., Matlen, B. J., Richland, L. E., & Bunge, S. A. (2015). Analogical reasoning in the classroom: Insights from cognitive science. Mind, Brain, and Education, 9, 100-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12080
285. Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90018-3
286. Vosniadou, S. (Ed.), (2010). International handbook of research on conceptual change. Mahwah, NY: Erlbaum.
287. Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535-585. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90018-W
288. Vosniadou, S., Vamvakoussi, X., & Skopeliti, I. (2008). The framework theory approach to the problem of conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 3-34). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
289. Wagner, J. F. (2006). Transfer in pieces. Cognition and Instruction, 24, 1-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2401_1
290. Walker, C. H. (1987). Relative importance of domain knowledge and overall aptitude on acquisition of domain-related information. Cognition and Instruction, 4, 25-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0401_2
291. Waltz, J. A., Lau, A., Grewal, S. K., & Holyoak, K. J. (2000). The role of working memory in analogical mapping. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1205-1212. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03211821
292. Wattenmaker, W. D., Dewey, G. I., Murphy, T. D., & Medin, D. L. (1986). Linear separability and concept learning: Context, relational properties, and concept naturalness. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 158-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(86)90011-3
293. Weinert, F. E., & Schneider, W. (Eds.). (1999). Individual development from 3-12: Findings from the Munich Longitudinal Study. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
294. Wilensky, U., & Resnick, M. (1999). Thinking in levels: A dynamic systems approach to making sense of the world. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 3-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A: 1009421303064
295. Wisniewski, E. J., & Medin, D. L. (1994). On the interaction of theory and data in concept learning. Cognitive Science, 18, 221-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1802_2
296. Woodworth, R. S., & Thorndike, E. L. (1901). The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. Psychological Review, 8, 247-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0074898
297. Ziegler, E., & Stern, E. (2014). Delayed benefits of learning elementary algebraic transformations through contrasted comparisons. Learning and Instruction, 33, 131-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.04.006
298. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential move to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016