Individual differences in category learning: Memorization versus rule abstraction

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 283-297

  Little, Jeri L ^a,b   McDaniel, Mark A ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HILLSDALE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Categorization; Category learning; Exemplar based processes; Individual differences; Rule learning

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; LEARNING; MEMORY; PHYSIOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; LEARNING; MEMORY; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84922795159     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: 15325946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-014-0475-1     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Allen, S., & Brooks, L. (1991). Specializing the operation of an explicit rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 3–19. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.120.1.3
2. Anderson, J. R., & Betz, J. (2001). A hybrid model of categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 629–647. doi:10.3758/BF03196200
3. Ashby, F. G., Alfonso-Reese, L. A., Turken, A. U., & Waldron, E. M. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review, 105, 442–481. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.3.442
4. Ashby, F. G., & Ell, S. W. (2001). The neurobiology of human category learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 204–210. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01624-7
5. Ashby, F. G., & Gott, R. E. (1988). Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 33–53. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.14.1.33
6. Ashby, F. G., & Townsend, J. T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 93, 154–179. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.154
7. Bors, D. A., & Stokes, T. L. (1998). Ravens Advanced Progressive Matrices: Norms for first-year university students and the development of a short form. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 382–398.
8. Bott, L., & Heit, E. (2004). Nonmonotonic extrapolation in function learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 38–50. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.38
9. Bourne, L. E., Jr. (1974). An inference model of conceptual rule learning. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Theories in cognitive psychology: The Loyola symposium (pp. 231–256). Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
10. Bourne, L. E., Jr., Healy, A. F., Parker, J. T., & Rickard, T. C. (1999). The strategic basis of performance in binary classification tasks: Strategy choices and strategy transitions. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 223–252.
11. Bourne, L. E., Jr., Raymond, W. D., & Healy, A. F. (2010). Strategy selection and use during classification skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 500–514. doi:10.1037/a0018599
12. Clark, V. P., Luger, G. F., McClain, J. T., Verzi, S. J., McDaniel, M. A., Hamilton, D., & Morisette, N. (2006). fMRI analysis of human function learning (Sandia National Laboratories Report). Albuquerque, NM: U.S. Department of Energy.
13. Craig, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2012). Whichever way you choose to categorize, working memory helps you learn. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 439–464. doi:10.1080/17470218.2011.608854
14. DeCaro, M. S., Thomas, R. D., & Beilock, S. L. (2008). Individual differences in category learning: Sometimes less working memory capacity is better than more. Cognition, 107, 284–294. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.001
15. Erickson, M. A., & Kruschke, J. K. (1998). Rules and exemplars in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 107–140. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.127.2.107
16. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3
17. Goldstone, R. L., Medin, D. L., & Gentner, D. (1991). Relational similarity and the nonindependence of features in similarity judgments. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 222–262.
18. Johansen, M. K., & Palmeri, T. J. (2002). Are there representational shifts during category learning? Cognitive Psychology, 45, 482–553.
19. Juslin, P., Jones, S., Olsson, H., & Winman, A. (2003a). Cue abstraction and exemplar memory in categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 924–941. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.924
20. Juslin, P., Olsson, H., & Olsson, A.-C. (2003b). Exemplar effects in categorization and multiple-cue judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 133–156. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.133
21. Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., & Conway, A. R. A. (2005). Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: Comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005). Psychological Bulletin, 131, 66–71. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.66
22. Kruschke, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22–44. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.22
23. Levine, M. (1975). A cognitive theory of learning: Research on hypothesis testing. New York, NY: Wiley.
24. Lewandowsky, S. (2011). Working memory capacity and categorization: Individual differences and modeling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 720–738. doi:10.1037/a0022639
25. Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., Yang, L.-X., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2010). A working memory test battery for MATLAB. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 571–585. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.2.571
26. Little, D. R., & Lewandowsky, S. (2009). Beyond nonutilization: Irrelevant cues can gate learning in probabilistic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 530–550. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.35.2.530
27. Little, D. R., Nosofsky, R. M., & Denton, S. E. (2011). Response-time tests of logical-rule models of categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1–27. doi:10.1037/a0021330
28. Mack, M. L., Preston, A. R., & Love, B. C. (2013). Decoding the brain’s algorithm for categorization from its neural implementation. Current Biology, 23, 2023–2027. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.035
29. McDaniel, M. A., Cahill, M. J., Robbins, M., & Wiener, C. (2014). Individual differences in learning and transfer: Stable tendencies for learning exemplars versus abstracting rules. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 668–693. doi:10.1037/a0032963
30. McDaniel, M. A., Dimperio, E., Griego, J. A., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2009). Predicting transfer performance: A comparison of competing function learning models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 173–195.
31. McKinley, S. C., & Nosofsky, R. M. (1995). Investigations of exemplar and decision bound models in large, ill-defined category structures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 128–148. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.1.128
32. Medin, D. L. (1989). Concepts and conceptual structure. American Psychologist, 44, 1469–1481. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.12.1469
33. Medin, D. L., Altom, M. W., Edelson, S. M., & Freko, D. (1982). Correlated symptoms and simulated medical classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 37–50. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.8.1.37
34. Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207–238. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.3.207
35. Medin, D. L., & Smith, E. E. (1981). Strategies and classification learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 241–253. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.7.4.241
36. Nosofsky, R. M. (1984). Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 104–114. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.10.1.104
37. Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification–categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39–57. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.39
38. Nosofsky, R. M. (1987). Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 87–108. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.1.87
39. Nosofsky, R. M., Palmeri, T. J., & McKinley, S. (1994). Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning. Psychological Review, 101, 53–79. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.53
40. Pachur, T., & Olsson, H. (2012). Type of learning task impacts performance and strategy selection in decision making. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 207–240. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.03.003
41. Raijmakers, M. E. J., Schmittmann, V. D., & Visser, I. (2014). Costs and benefits of automatization in category learning of ill-defined rules. Cognitive Psychology, 69, 1–24. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.12.002
42. Raven, J. C., Raven, J. E., & Court, J. H. (1998). Progressive matrices. Oxford, UK: Oxford Psychologists Press.
43. Regehr, G., & Brooks, L. R. (1993). Perceptual manifestations of an analytic structure: The priority of holistic individuation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 92–114. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.122.1.92
44. Sewell, D. K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2012). Attention and working memory capacity: Insights from blocking, highlighting, and knowledge restructuring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 444–469.
45. Smith, J. D., & Minda, J. P. (1998). Prototypes in the mist: The epochs of category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1411–1436. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.24.6.1411
46. Trabasso, T., & Bower, G. H. (1968). Attention in learning: Theory and research. New York, NY: Wiley.
47. Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(89)90040-5
48. Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—WAIS III (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
49. Wiley, J., Jarosz, A. F., Cushen, P. J., & Colflesh, G. J. H. (2011). New rule use drives the relation between working memory capacity and Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 256–263.