Pragmatics in analogical mapping

Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 307-346

  Spellman, Barbara A ^a   Holyoak, Keith J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MENTAL FUNCTION; MOTIVATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; PSYCHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; COGNITIVE SCIENCE; GOALS; HUMANS; MENTAL PROCESSES; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY;

EID: 0030345992     PISSN: 00100285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1996.0019     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Anderson, M. C., & Spellman, B. A. (1995). On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: Memory retrieval as a model case. Psychological Review, 102, 68-100.
2. Anderson, J. R., & Thompson, R. (1989). Use of analogy in a production system architecture. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 267-297). London: Cambridge Univ. Press.
3. Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon Press.
4. Brown, A. L., & Kane, M. J. (1988). Preschool children can learn to transfer: Learning to learn and learning from example. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 493-523.
5. Brown, A. L., Kane, M. J., & Echols, K. (1986). Young children's mental models determine transfer across problems with a common goal structure. Cognitive Development, 1, 103-122.
6. Burns, B. D., & Holyoak, K. J. (1994). Competing models of analogy: ACME versus Copycat. In A. Ram & K. Eiselt (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 100-105). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Burstein, M. H. (1986). A model of learning by incremental analogical reasoning and debugging. In R. Michalski, J. G. Carbonell, & T. M. Mitchell (Eds.), Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach (Vol. 2, pp. 351-370). Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
8. Carbonell, J. G. (1983). Learning by analogy: Formulating and generalizing plans from past experience. In R. Michalski, J. G. Carbonell, & T. M. Mitchell (Eds.), Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach (Vol. 1, pp. 137-161). Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
9. Carbonell, J. G. (1986). Derivational analogy: A theory of reconstructive problem solving and expertise acquisition. In R. Michalski, J. G. Carbonell, & T. M. Mitchell (Eds.), Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach (Vol. 2, pp. 371-392). Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
10. Catrambone, R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem solving transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1147-1156.
11. Falkenhainer, B. (1990). Analogical interpretation in context. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. (pp. 69-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K. D., & Gentner, D. (1989). The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examples. Artificial Intelligence, 41, 1-63.
13. Paries, J. M., & Reiser, B. R. (1988). Access and use of previous solutions in a problem solving situation. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 433-439). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Forbus, K. D., & Oblinger, D. (1990). Making SME greedy and pragmatic. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 61-68). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170.
16. Gentner, D. (1989). The mechanisms of analogical reasoning. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 199-241). London: Cambridge Univ. Press.
17. Gentner, D., & Gentner, D. R. (1983). Flowing water or teaming crowds: Mental models of electricity. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 99-129). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Gentner, D., & Toupin, C. (1986). Systematicity and surface similarity in the development of analogy. Cognitive Science, 10, 277-300.
19. Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K.J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306-355.
20. Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1-38.
21. Goldstone, R. L., & Medin, D. L. (1994). Similarity, interactive activation, and mapping: An overview. In K. J. Holyoak & J. A. Barnden (Eds.), Advances in connectionst and neural computation theory, Vol. 2: Analogical connections (pp. 321-362). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
22. Hall, R. (1989). Computational approaches to analogical reasoning: A comparative analysis. Artificial Intelligence, 39, 39-120.
23. Hofstadter, D. R., & Mitchell, M. (1988). Conceptual slippage and mapping: A report on the Copycat project. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 601-607). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Hofstadter, D. R., & Mitchell, M. (1994). An overview of the Copycat project. In K. J. Holyoak & J. A. Barnden (Eds.), Advances in connectionist and neural computation theory, Vol. 2: Analogical connections (pp. 31-111). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
25. Holland, J., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R., & Thagard, P. (1986). Induction: Processes of inference, learning, and discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Holyoak, K. J. (1984). Analogical thinking and human intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 199-230). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Holyoak, K. J. (1985). The pragmatics of analogical transfer. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 19, pp. 59-87). New York: Academic Press.
28. Holyoak, K. J., & Koh, K. (1987). Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer. Memory & Cognition, 15, 332-340.
29. Holyoak, K. J., Novick, L. R., & Melz, E. R. (1994). Component processes in analogical transfer: Mapping, pattern completion, and adaptation. In K. J. Holyoak & J. A. Barnden (Eds.), Advances in connectionist and neural computation theory, Vol. 2: Analogical connections (pp. 113-180). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
30. Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1989a). Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science, 13, 295-355.
31. Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1989b). A computational model of analogical problem solving. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 242-266). London: Cambridge Univ. Press.
32. Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1995). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Hummel, J. E., Burns, B., & Holyoak, K. J. (1994). Analogical mapping by dynamic binding: Preliminary investigations. In K. J. Holyoak & J. A. Barnden (Eds.), Advances in connectionist and neural computation theory, Vol. 2: Analogical connections (pp. 416-445). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
34. Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (in press). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review.
35. Kasof, J. (1993). Sex bias in the naming of stimulus persons. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 140-163.
36. Keane, M. T. (1988). Analogical problem solving. Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood.
37. Keane, M. T., Ledgeway, T., & Duff, S. (1994). Constraints on analogical mapping: A comparison of three models. Cognitive Science, 18, 387-438.
38. Kedar-Cabelli, S. (1985). Purpose-directed analogy. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 150-159). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Markman, A.B., & Gentner, D. (1993). Structural alignment during similarity comparisons. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 431-467.
40. Melz, E. R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1991). Analogical transfer by constraint satisfaction. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 822-826). Hills-dale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Novick, L. R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1991). Mathematical problem solving by analogy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 398-415.
42. Palmer, S. E. (1978). Fundamental aspects of cognitive representation. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 259-302). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Reed, S. K. (1987). A structure-mapping model for word problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 124-139.
44. Ross, B. H. (1987). This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 629-639.
45. Ross, B. H. (1989). Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: Different effects on the access and use of earlier problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 456-468.
46. Seifert, C. M. (1994). The role of goals in retrieving analogical cases. In K. J. Holyoak & J. A. Barnden (Eds.), Advances in connectionist and neural computation theory, Vol. 2: Analogical connections (pp. 95-125). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
47. Seifert, C. M., McKoon, G., Abelson, R. P., & Ratcliff, R. (1986). Memory connections between thematically similar episodes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 220-231.
48. Spellman, B. A., & Holyoak, K. J. (1992). If Saddam is Hitler then who is George Bush?: Analogical mapping between systems of social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 913-933.
49. Spellman, B. A., & Holyoak, K. J. (1993). An inhibitory mechanism for goal-directed analogical mapping. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 947-952). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Tarski, A. (1954). Contributions to the theory of models. Indigationes Mathematicae, 16, 572-588.
51. Thagard, P., Holyoak, K., Nelson, G., & Gochfeld, D. (1990). Analog retrieval by constraint satisfaction. Artificial Intelligence, 46, 259-310.
52. Tipper, S. P. (1992). Selection for action: The role of inhibitory mechanisms. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 105-109.
53. Treisman, A. (1964). Monitoring and storage of irrelevant messages in selective attention. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 3, 449-459.
54. Winston, P. (1980). Learning and reasoning by analogy. Communications of the ACM, 23, 689-703.
55. Zook, K. B., & Di Vesta, F. J. (1991). Instructional analogies and conceptual misrepresentations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 246-252.