Whichever way you choose to categorize, working memory helps you learn

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 439-464

  Craig, Stewart ^a   Lewandowsky, Stephan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Categorization; Strategy use; Working memory capacity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONCEPT FORMATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SHORT TERM MEMORY; STATISTICS;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONCEPT FORMATION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84859490138     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2011.608854     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E. and Boyle, M. O. 2005. Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs?. Psychological Bulletin, 131: 30-60.
2. Ashby, F. G. and Townsend, J. T. 1986. Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 93: 154-179.
3. Baddeley, A. D. 1986. Working memory, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
4. Baddeley, A. D. and Hitch, G. J. 1974. "Working memory". In The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, Edited by: Bower, G. H. Vol. 8, 47-89. New York, NY: Academic Press.
5. Bailey, H., Dunlosky, J. and Kane, M. J. 2008. Why does work memory span predict complex cognition? Testing the strategy affordance hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 36: 1383-1390.
6. Blair, M. R., Chen, L., Meier, K. M., Wood, M. J., Watson, M. R. and Wong, U. 2009. "The impact of category type and working memory span on attentional learning in categorization". In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Edited by: Taatgen, N. A. and van Rijn, H. 3127-3132. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
7. Brainard, D. H. 1997. The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10: 433-436.
8. Bröder, A. 2003. Decision making with the "adaptive toolbox": Influence of environmental structure, intelligence, and working memory load. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29: 611-625.
9. Chater, N. 1999. The search for simplicity: A fundamental cognitive principle?. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A: 273-302.
10. Chater, N. and Brown, G. D. A. 2008. From universal laws of cognition to specific cognitive models. Cognitive Science, 32: 36-67.
11. Cokely, E. T., Kelley, C. M. and Gilchrist, A. L. 2006. Sources of individual differences in work memory: Contributions of strategy to capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13: 991-997.
12. Colreavy, E. and Lewandowsky, S. 2008. Strategy development and learning differences in supervised and unsupervised categorization. Memory & Cognition, 36: 762-775.
13. Conway, A. R. A., Tuholski, S. W., Shisler, R. J. and Engle, R. W. 1999. The effect of memory load on negative priming: An individual differences investigation. Memory & Cognition, 27: 1042-1050.
14. Cowan, N. 1988. Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. Psychological Bulletin, 104: 163-191.
15. Daneman, M. and Carpenter, P. A. 1980. Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19: 450-466.
16. Daneman, M. and Carpenter, P. A. 1983. Individual differences in integrating information between and within sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 9: 561-584.
17. DeCaro, M. S., Carlson, K. D., Thomas, R. D. and Beilock, S. L. 2009. When and how less is more: Reply to Tharp and Pickering. Cognition, 111: 415-421.
18. DeCaro, M. S., Thomas, R. D. and Beilock, S. L. 2008. Individual differences in category learning: Sometimes less working memory capacity is better than more. Cognition, 107: 284-294.
19. Dunlosky, J. and Kane, M. J. 2007. The contributions of strategy use to working memory span: A comparison of strategy assessment models. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60: 1227-1245.
20. Engle, R. W. 2002. Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11: 19-23.
21. Engle, R. W., Carullo, J. J. and Collins, K. W. 1991. Individual differences in working memory for comprehension and following directions. Journal of Educational Research, 84: 253-262.
22. Erickson, M. A. 2008. Executive attention and task switching in category learning: Evidence for stimulus-dependent representation. Memory & Cognition, 36: 749-761.
23. Erickson, M. A. and Kruschke, J. K. 1998. Rules and exemplars in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127: 107-140.
24. Fass, D. and Feldman, J. 2002. "Categorization under complexity: A unified MDL account of human learning of regular and irregular categories". In Advances in neural information processing systems, Edited by: Becker, S., Thrun, S. and Obermayer, K. Vol. 15, 35-42. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Feldman, J. 2000. Minimization of Boolean complexity in human concept learning. Nature, 407: 630-633.
26. Feldman, J. 2003. The simplicity principle in human concept learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12: 227-232.
27. Friedman, N. P. and Miyake, A. 2004. The reading span test and its predictive power for reading comprehension ability. Journal of Memory and Language, 51: 136-158.
28. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. and Anderson, R. E. 2010. Multivariate data analysis, 7, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
29. Hanich, C. 2009. The time course of discarding information in working memory, Unpublished manuscript
30. Johansen, M. K. and Palmeri, T. J. 2002. Are there representational shifts during category learning?. Cognitive Psychology, 45: 482-553.
31. Kaakinen, J. K. and Hyönä, J. 2007. Strategy use in the reading span test: An analysis of eye movements and reported encoding strategies. Memory, 15: 634-646.
32. Kamin, L. J. 1969. "Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning". In Punishment and aversive behaviour, Edited by: Campbell, B. A. and Church, R. M. 279-296. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
33. Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A. and Engle, R. W. 2001. A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130: 169-183.
34. Kane, M. J. and Engle, R. W. 2000. Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: Limits on long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26: 336-358.
35. Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z. and Conway, A. R. A. 2005. Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: Comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005). Psychological Bulletin, 131: 66-71.
36. Klein, K. and Fiss, W. H. 1999. The reliability and stability of the Turner and Engle working memory task. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31: 429-432.
37. Kruschke, J. K. 1992. ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99: 22-44.
38. Kruschke, J. K. 2001. Toward a unified model of attention in associative learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 45: 812-863.
39. Kruschke, J. K. 2005. "Learning involves attention". In Connectionist models in cognitive psychology, Edited by: Houghton, G. 113-140. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
40. Kruschke, J. K. and Blair, N. J. 2000. Blocking and backward blocking involve learned inattention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7: 636-645.
41. Kruschke, J. K. and Johansen, M. K. 1999. A model of probabilistic category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25: 1083-1119.
42. Kyllonen, P. C. and Christal, R. E. 1990. Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?!. Intelligence, 14: 389-433.
43. Lee, M. D. and Webb, M. R. 2005. Modeling individual differences in cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12: 605-621.
44. Lewandowsky, S. 2011. Working memory capacity and categorization: Individual differences and modeling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 37: 720-738.
45. Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., Yang, L.-X. and Ecker, U. K. H. 2010. A working memory test battery for MATLAB. Behavior Research Methods, 42: 571-585.
46. Lewandowsky, S., Roberts, L. and Yang, L.-X. 2006. Knowledge partitioning in categorization: Boundary conditions. Memory & Cognition, 34: 1676-1688.
47. Little, D. R. and Lewandowsky, S. 2009. Beyond non-utilization: Irrelevant cues can gate learning in probabilistic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35: 530-550.
48. Little, D. R., Nosofsky, R. M. and Denton, S. E. 2011. Response-time tests of logical-rule models of categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 37: 1-27.
49. Love, B. C., Medin, D. L. and Gureckis, T. M. 2004. SUSTAIN: A network model of category learning. Psychological Review, 111: 309-332.
50. Maddox, W. T. 1999. On the dangers of averaging across observers when comparing decision bound mode and generalized context model of categorization. Perception & Psychonomics, 61: 354-374.
51. McNamara, D. S. and Scott, J. L. 2001. Working memory capacity and strategy use. Memory & Cognition, 29: 10-17.
52. Medin, D. L., Altom, M. W., Edelson, S. M. and Freko, D. 1982. Correlated symptoms and simulated medical classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 8: 37-50.
53. Medin, D. L. and Edelson, S. M. 1988. Problem structure and the use of base-rate information from experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117: 68-85.
54. Medin, D. L. and Schaffer, M. M. 1978. Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85: 207-238.
55. Medin, D. L. and Smith, E. E. 1981. Strategies and classification learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7: 241-253.
56. Navarro, D. J., Griffiths, T. L., Steyvers, M. and Lee, M. D. 2006. Modeling individual differences using Dirichlet processes. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 50: 101-122.
57. Nosofsky, R. M. 1986. Attention, similarity and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115: 39-57.
58. Nosofsky, R. M. and Johansen, M. K. 2000. Exemplar-based accounts of "multiple-system" phenomena in perceptual categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7: 375-402.
59. Nosofsky, R. M., Palmeri, T. J. and McKinley, S. C. 1994. Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning. Psychological Review, 101: 53-79.
60. Oberauer, K. 1993. Die Koordination kognitiver Operationen-Eine Studie über die Beziehung zwischen Intelligenz und "working memory" [The coordination of cognitive operations-A study on the relation of intelligence and "working memory"]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 201: 57-84.
61. Oberauer, K. 2001. Removing irrelevant information from working memory: A cognitive aging study with modified Sternberg task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27: 948-957.
62. Oberauer, K. 2005. "The measurement of working memory capacity". In Handbook of understanding and measuring intelligence, Edited by: Wilhelm, O. and Engle, R. W. 393-408. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63. Oberauer, K., Süß, H.-M., Schulze, R., Wilhelm, O. and Wittmann, W. W. 2000. Working memory capacity-Facets of a cognitive ability construct. Personality and Individual Differences, 29: 1017-1045.
64. Oberauer, K., Süß, H.-M., Wilhelm, O. and Sander, N. 2007. "Individual differences in working memory: Capacity and reasoning ability". In Variation in working memory, Edited by: Conway, A. R. A., Jarrold, C., Kane, M. J., Miyake, A. and Towse, J. 49-75. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
65. Oberauer, K. and Vokenberg, K. 2009. Updating of working memory: Lingering bindings. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62: 967-987.
66. Palmeri, T. J. and Nosofsky, R. M. 1995. Recognition memory for exceptions to the category rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21: 548-568.
67. Pelli, D. G. 1991. The Videotoolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10: 437-442.
68. Pothos, E. M. and Bailey, T. M. 2009. Predicting category intuitiveness with the rational model, the simplicity mode, and the generalized context model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 35: 1062-1080.
69. Pothos, E. M. and Chater, N. 2002. A simplicity principle in unsupervised human categorization. Cognitive Science, 26: 303-343.
70. Pothos, E. M. and Close, J. 2008. One or two dimensions in spontaneous classification: A simplicity approach. Cognition, 107: 581-602.
71. Raven, J., Raven, J. C. and Court, J. H. 2000. Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales: Section 3. The Standard Progressive Matrices, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
72. Rissanen, J. 1978. Modeling by shortest data description. Automatica, 14: 465-471.
73. Rosen, V. M. and Engle, R. W. 1997. The role of working memory capacity in retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126: 211-227.
74. Salthouse, T. A., Babcock, R. L. and Shaw, R. J. 1991. Effect of adult age on structural and operational capacities in working memory. Psychology and Aging, 6: 118-127.
75. Sewell, D. K. and Lewandowsky, S. 2011a. Attention and working memory capacity: Insights from blocking, highlighting and knowledge restructuring, Manuscript submitted for publication
76. Sewell, D. K. and Lewandowsky, S. 2011b. Restructuring partitioned knowledge: The role of recoordination in category learning. Cognitive Psychology, 62: 81-122.
77. Shepard, R. N., Hovland, C. I. and Jenkins, H. M. 1961. Learning and memorization of classifications. Psychological Monographs, 75 (13, Whole No. 517)
78. Smith, J. D. and Minda, J. P. 2000. Thirty categorization results in search of a model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26: 3-27.
79. Sternberg, S. 1969. Memory-scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. American Scientist, 57: 421-457.
80. Stewart, N., Brown, G. D. A. and Chater, N. 2002. Sequence effects in categorization of simple perceptual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28: 3-11.
81. Swanson, H. L., Kehler, P. and Jerman, O. 2009. Working memory, strategy knowledge, and strategy instruction in children with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43: 24-47.
82. Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. 2007. Using multivariate statistics, 5, Boston, MA: Pearson.
83. Tenenbaum, J. B. 1999. "Bayesian modeling of human concept learning". In Advances in neural information processing systems, Edited by: Kearns, M., Solla, S. and Cohn, D. Vol. 11, 59-65. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
84. Tenenbaum, J. B. 2000. "Rules and similarity in concept learning". In Advances in neural information processing systems, Edited by: Solla, S., Leen, T. and Muller, K. Vol. 12, 59-65. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
85. Tharp, I. J. and Pickering, A. D. 2009. A note on DeCaro, Thomas, and Beilock (2008): Further data demonstrate complexities in the assessment of information-integration category learning. Cognition, 111: 410-414.
86. Turley-Ames, K. J. and Whitfield, M. M. 2003. Strategy training and working memory task performance. Journal of Memory and Language, 49: 446-468.
87. Turner, M. L. and Engle, R. W. 1989. Is working memory capacity task dependent?. Journal of Memory and Language, 28: 127-154.
88. Unsworth, N. and Spillers, G. J. 2010. Variation in work memory capacity and episodic recall: The contributions of strategic encoding and contextual retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17: 200-205.
89. Yang, L.-X. and Lewandowsky, S. 2003. Context-gated knowledge partitioning in categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29: 663-679.
90. Yang, L.-X. and Lewandowsky, S. 2004. Knowledge partitioning in categorization: Constraints on exemplar models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30: 1045-1064.