A Graph-Oriented Approach to Measuring Expertise- Detecting Structural Differences between Experts and Intermediates

Building Bridges Across Cognitive Sciences Around the World - Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 653-658

  Lachner, Andreas ^a   Gurlitt, Johannes ^a   Nückles, Matthias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

expertise; graph theory; knowledge encapsulation; knowledge integration

Indexed keywords

CASE DESCRIPTION; EXPERTISE; FINE-GRAINED ANALYSIS; IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS; KNOWLEDGE ENCAPSULATION; KNOWLEDGE INTEGRATION; KNOWLEDGE STRUCTURES; LABORATORY DATUM; MEDICAL CASE; STRUCTURAL DIFFERENCES;

GRAPH THEORY;

EID: 84925664221     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1981). Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Boshuizen, H. P., & Schmidt, H. G. (1992). On the role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning by experts, intermediates and novices. Cognitive Science, 16, 153-184. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1602_1
3. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121-152. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2.
4. Chi, M.T.H. (2006). Methods to assess the representations of experts' and novices’ knowledge. In K.A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. Feltovich, & R. Hoffman (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. (p. 167-184), Cambridge University Press.
5. Dijkstra, E. W. (1959). A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik, 1(1), 269-271. doi:10.1007/BF01386390
6. Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.). (2006). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163-182. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
8. Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1990). Abstract planning and perceptual chunks: Elements of expertise in geometry. Cognitive Science, 14(4), 511-550. doi:16/0364-0213(90)90008-K
9. Nückles, M., Wittwer, J., & Renkl, A. (2005). Information about a layperson’s knowledge supports experts in giving effective and efficient online advice to laypersons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11(4), 219-236. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.11.4.219
10. Patel, V. L., & Groen, G. J. (1986). Knowledge based solution strategies in medical reasoning. Cognitive Science, 10(1), 91-116. doi:10.1207/s15516709 cog1001_4
11. Rikers, R. M. J. P., Schmidt, H. G., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2002). On the constraints of encapsulated knowledge: Clinical case representations by medical experts and subexperts. Cognition and Instruction, 20(1), 27-45. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI2001_2
12. Schmidt, H. G, & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2007). How expertise develops in medicine: knowledge encapsulation and illness script formation. Medical Education, 41(12), 1133-1139. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02915.x
13. Schraw, G. (2009). Knowledge: structures and processes. In P.A. Alexander & P.H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (245-265). NY: Routledge.
14. Sowa, J. E., & Shapiro, S. C. (2006). Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical, and computational foundations. CA: Brooks/Cole.