Spatial language facilitates spatial cognition: Evidence from children who lack language input

Cognition

Volumn 127, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 318-330

  Gentner, Dedre ^a   Özyürek, Asli ^b,e   Gürcanli, Özge ^c   Goldin Meadow, Susan ^d  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^c RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^e MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Deaf vs. hearing; Homesign; Language and thought; Spatial cognition; Spatial language

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GESTURE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGN LANGUAGE; SPATIAL LANGUAGE; SPATIAL LEARNING; SPEECH; TASK PERFORMANCE; TURKEY (REPUBLIC);

CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COGNITION; DEAFNESS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT DISORDERS; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SIGN LANGUAGE; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 84875788652     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ari{dotless}k, E., & Wilbur, R. (January, 2008). Locatives, existentials, and possessives in Turkish Sign Language (TID). In Poster presented at the 82nd annual meeting of the LSA, Chicago, IL.
2. Bowerman M. Learning how to structure space for language: A crosslinguistic perspective. Language and space 1996, 385-436. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. P. Bloom, M.A. Peterson, L. Nadel, M.F. Garrett (Eds.).
3. Brentari D., Coppola M., Jung A., Goldin-Meadow S. Acquiring word class distinctions in american sign language: Evidence from handshape. Language Learning and Development 2013, 9(2):1-21.
4. Brown R. A first language: The early stages 1973, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Dessalegn B., Landau B. More than meets the eye: The role of language in binding and maintaining feature conjunctions. Psychological Science 2008, 19(2):189.
6. Emmorey K. Language, cognition, and the brain: Insights from sign language research 2002, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Emmorey, K. (2002b). The effects of modality on spatial language: How signers and speakers talk about space. In R. P. Meier, D. G. Quinto, & K. A. Cormier (Eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages (pp. 405-421).
8. Emmorey K. The confluence of space and language in signed languages. Language and space 1996, 171-209. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. P. Bloom, M.A. Peterson, L. Nadel, M.F. Garrett (Eds.).
9. Engberg-Pedersen E. Space in Danish sign language 1993, Signum-Verl, Hamburg.
10. Frank M.C., Everett D.L., Fedorenko E., Gibson E. Number as a cognitive technology: Evidence from Pirahã language and cognition. Cognition 2008, 108(3):819-824.
11. Gentner, D. (2010). Bootstrapping the mind: Analogical processes and symbol systems. Cognitive Science.
12. Gentner D., Christie S. Mutual bootstrapping between language and analogical processing. Language and Cognition 2010, 2(2):261-283.
13. Gentner D. Why we're so smart. Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought 2003, 195-235. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. D. Gentner, S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.).
14. Gentner D., Goldin-Meadow S. Whither Whorf. Language in mind advances in the study of language and thought 2003, 3-14. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. D. Gentner, S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.).
15. Gentner D. Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. Language, thought and culture 1982, Vol. 2:301-334. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. S. Kuczaj (Ed.).
16. Gleitman L., Papafragou A. Language and thought. Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning 2005, 117-142. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. K.J. Holyoak, R.G. Morrison (Eds.).
17. Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). The resilience of language: What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. NY: Taylor & Francis (Psychology Press).
18. Goldin-Meadow, S., & Mylander, C. (1984). Gestural communication in deaf children: The effects and noneffects of parental input on early language development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1-151.
19. Goldin-Meadow S., So W.C., özyürek A., Mylander C. The natural order of events: How speakers of different languages represent events nonverbally. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2008, 105(27):9163.
20. Gumperz J.J., Levinson S.C. Rethinking linguistic relativity 1996, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
21. Haun D.B.M., Rapold C.J., Call J., Janzen G., Levinson S.C. Cognitive cladistics and cultural override in Hominid spatial cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2006, 103:17568-17573.
22. Heine B. Cognitive foundations of grammar 1997, Oxford University Press, New York.
23. Hermer-Vasquez L., Moffet A., Munkholm P. Language, space, and the development of cognitive flexibility in humans: The case of two spatial memory tasks. Cognition 2001, 79:263-299.
24. Hermer-Vasquez L., Spelke E.S., Katsnelson A.S. Sources of flexibility in human cognition: Dual-task studies of space and language. Cognitive Psychology 1999, 39:3-36.
25. Hopper P.J., Traugott E.C. Grammaticalization 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 2nd ed.
26. Hyde D.C., Winkler-Rhoades N., Lee S.A., Izard V., Shapiro K.A., Spelke E.S. Spatial and numerical abilities without a complete natural language. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49(5):924-936.
27. Lehmann, C. (1982). Thoughts on grammaticalization. A programmatic sketch. Arbeiten des Kölner Universalien-Projekts (Vol. I, Nr. 48).
28. Levine S.C., Huttenlocher J., Taylor A., Langrock A. Early sex differences in spatial skill. Developmental Psychology 1999, 35(4):940-948.
29. Levinson S.C. Space in language and cognition 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
30. Li P., Gleitman L. Turning the tables: Language and spatial reasoning. Cognition 2002, 83(3):265-294.
31. Loewenstein J., Gentner D. Relational language and the development of relational mapping. Cognitive Psychology 2005, 50(4):315-353.
32. MacWhinney B. The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk 2000, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. 3rd ed.
33. Majid A., Bowerman M., Kita S., Haun D.B., Levinson S.C. Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8(3):108-114.
34. Malt B., Wolff P. Words and the mind 2010, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
35. Meir I., Sandler W., Padden C., Aronoff M. Emerging sign languages. Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education 2010, Vol. 2:267-280. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
36. Miller, C. (1994). Simultaneous constructions in Quebec Sign Language. In M. Brennan & G. Turner (Eds.), Word-order issues in sign language. Working papers (pp. 89-112). Durham, UK: International Sign Linguistics Association.
37. Morgan G., Woll B. Understanding sign language classifiers through a polycomponential approach. Lingua 2007, 117(7):1159-1168.
38. özyürek A., Zwitserlood I., Perniss Locative expressions in sign languages: A view from Turkish Sign Language (TID). Linguistics 2010, 48(5):1111-1145.
39. Perniss P., Vermeerbergen M., Leeson L., Crasborn O. Locative functions of simultaneous perspective constructions in German Sign Language narratives. Simultaneity in Signed Languages: Form and function 2007, 27-54. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
40. Pruden S.M., Levine S.C., Huttenlocher J. Children's spatial thinking: Does talk about the spatial world matter?. Developmental Science 2011, 14(6):1417-1430.
41. Pyers J.E., Shusterman A., Senghas A., Spelke E.S., Emmorey K. Evidence from an emerging sign language reveals that language supports spatial cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2010, 107(27):12116-12120.
42. Schick B. The effects of morphosyntactic structures on the acquisition of classifier predicates in ASL. Sign Language research: Theoretical Issues 1990, 358-371. University of Gallaudet Press, DC. C. Lucas (Ed.).
43. Senghas A., Coppola M. Children creating language: How Nicaraguan sign language acquired a spatial grammar. Psychological Science 2001, 12(4):323-328.
44. Senghas A., Kita S., özyürek A. Children creating core properties of language: Evidence from an emerging sign language in Nicaragua. Science 2004, 305:1779-1782.
45. Simms N., Gentner D. Spatial language and landmark use: Can 3-, 4-, and 5-year-olds find the middle?. Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the cognitive science society 2008, 191-196. Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX. B.C. Love, K. McRae, V.M. Sloutsky (Eds.).
46. Supalla T.R. Structure and acquisition of verbs of motion and location in American Sign Language 1982, Univ. Microfilms International.
47. Supalla T. Revisiting visual analogy in ASL classifier predicates. Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages 2003, 249-258. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. K. Emmorey (Ed.).
48. Talmy L. Syntax and semantics of motion. Syntax and semantics 1975, Vol. 4:181-238. Academic Press, New York.
49. Talmy L. How language structures space. Spatial orientation: Theory, research, and application 1983, 225-282. Plenum, New York. H. Pick, L.P. Acredolo (Eds.).
50. Tang, G., Sze, F., & Lam, S. (2007). Acquisition of simultaneous constructions by deaf children of Hong Kong Sign Language. In M. Vermeerbergen, L. Leeson, & O. Crasborn (Eds.), Simultaneity in signed languages: Form and function (pp. 283-316).
51. Zeshan U. Village sign languages. Deaf around the world: The impact of language 2010, 221-230. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. G. Mathur, D.J. Napoli (Eds.).