Spatial Organization and Presentation Mode in the Representation of Complex Data

Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2014

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1940-1945

  Braithwaite, David W ^a   Goldstone, Robert L ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

education; external representations; graphs; human factors; mathematics

Indexed keywords

HUMAN ENGINEERING;

COLOR AND TEXTURES; COMPLEX DATA; EXTERNAL REPRESENTATIONS; GRAPH; PRESENTATION MODES; SPATIAL DIMENSION; SPATIAL ORGANIZATION; VERTICAL POSITIONS;

GRAPHIC METHODS;

EID: 84975636059     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Bjork, R. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe & A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185-205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Gentner, D. (2010). Bootstrapping the mind: Analogical processes and symbol systems. Cognitive Science, 34(5), 752-75.
3. Hegarty, M. (2011). The cognitive science of visual-spatial displays: Implications for design. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(3), 446-474.
4. Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 722-738.
5. Kurtz, K. J., Boukrina, O., & Gentner, D. (2013). Comparison promotes learning and transfer of relational categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
6. Loess, H., & Duncan, C. (1952). Human discrimination learning with simultaneous and successive presentation of stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43(3), 215-221.
7. Mayer, R. E., Hegarty, M., Mayer, S., & Campbell, J. (2005). When static media promote active learning: annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11(4), 256-65.
8. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.
9. Shah, P., & Carpenter, P. a. (1995). Conceptual limitations in comprehending line graphs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(1), 43-61.
10. Tversky, B., Corter, J. E., Yu, L., Mason, D. L., & Nickerson, J. V. (2012). Representing category and continuum: Visualizing thought. In P. Rodgers, P. Cox, & B. Plimmer (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and inference (pp. 23-34). Berlin: Springer.
11. Tversky, B., Morrison, J., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 247-262.
12. Zhang, J. (1996). A representational analysis of relational information displays. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 59-74.