The nonindependence of stimulus properties in human category learning

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 790-799

  Love, Bradley C ^a   Markman, Arthur B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COLOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VERBAL MEMORY;

EID: 0042161531     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196117     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. ANDERSON, J. (1991). The adaptive nature of human categorization. Psychological Review, 98, 409-429.
2. BIEDERMAN, I., & SHIFFRAR, M. (1987). Sexing day-old chicks: A case study and expert systems analysis of a difficult perceptual learning task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 640-645.
3. BRUNER, J. S., GOODNOW, J. J., & AUSTIN, G. A. (1956). A study of thinking. New York: Wiley.
4. EDELMAN, S. (1999). Representation and recognition in vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. FELDMAN, J. (2000). Minimization of Boolean complexity in human concept learning. Nature, 407, 630-633.
6. GARNER, W. R. (1974). The processing of information and structure, Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
7. GENTNER, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170.
8. GENTNER, D. (1989). The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical processing (pp. 199-241). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. IMAI, M., GENTNER, D., & UCHIDA, N. (1994). Children's theories of word meaning: The role of shape similarity in early acquisition. Cognitive Development, 9, 45-75.
10. KAHNEMAN, D., TREISMAN, A., & GIBBS, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
11. KEANE, M. T., LEDGEWAY, T., & DUFF, S. (1994). Constraints on analogical mapping: A comparison of three models. Cognitive Science, 18, 387-438.
12. KOLODNER, J. (1993). Case-based reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Kaufmann.
13. KRUSCHKE, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22-44.
14. LANDAU, B., SMITH, L. B., & JONES, S. S. (1988). The importance of shape in early lexical learning. Cognitive Development, 3, 299-321.
15. LOCKHEAD, G. R. (1966). Effects of dimensional redundancy on visual discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 95-104.
16. LOVE, B. C. (2001). Three deadly sins of category learning modelers. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 687-688.
17. LOVE, B. C. (2002). Comparing supervised and unsupervised category learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 829-835.
18. LOVE, B. C. (2003). The multifaceted nature of unsupervised category learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 190-197.
19. LOVE, B. C., MEDIN, D. L., & GURECKIS, T. (in press). SUSTAIN: A network model of human category learning. Psychological Review.
20. MARKMAN, A. B. (1999). Knowledge representation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. MARKMAN, A. B., & MAKIN, V. S. (1998). Referential communication and category acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 331-354.
22. MARKMAN, A. B., & ROSS, B. H. (in press). Category use and category learning. Psychological Bulletin.
23. MARKS, L. E. (1989). On cross-modal similarity: The perceptual structure in pitch, loudness, and brightness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 586-602.
24. MEDIN, D. L., GOLDSTONE, R. L., & GENTNER, D. (1993). Respects for similarity. Psychological Review, 100, 254-278.
25. MEDIN, D. L., & SCHAFFER, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207-238.
26. NORMAN, D. A., & RUMELHART, D. E. (1975). Explorations in cognition. San Francisco: Freeman.
27. NOSOFSKY, R. M., GLUCK, M. A., PALMERI, T. J., McKINLEY, S. C., & GLAUTHIER, P. (1994). Comparing models of rule-based classification learning: A replication and extension of Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961). Memory & Cognition, 22, 352-369.
28. NOSOFSKY, R. M., PALMERI, T. J., & McKINLEY, S. C. (1994). Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning. Psychological Review, 101, 53-79.
29. SCHANK, R. C., COLLINS, G. C., & HUNTER, L. E. (1986). Transcending inductive category formation in learning. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 9, 639-686.
30. SCHYNS, P. G., GOLDSTONE, R. L., & THIBAUT, J.-P. (1998). The development of features in object concepts. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 21, 1-54.
31. SHANON, B. (1988). The similarity of features. New Ideas in Psychology, 6, 307-321.
32. SHEPARD, R. N., HOVLAND, C. L., & JENKINS, H. M. (1961). Learning and memorization of classifications. Psychological Monographs, 75 (13, Whole No. 517).
33. ULLMAN, S. (1996). High-level vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. WISNIEWSKI, E. J., & MEDIN, D. L. (1994). On the interaction of theory and data in concept learning. Cognitive Science, 18, 221-281.
35. YAMAUCHI, T., LOVE, B. C., & MARKMAN, A. B. (2002). Learning nonlinearly separable categories by inference and classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 585-593.
36. YAMAUCHI, T., & MARKMAN, A. B. (1998). Category learning by inference and classification. Journal of Memory & Language, 39, 124-149.