Transfer in pieces

Cognition and Instruction

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-71

  Wagner, Joseph F ^a  

^a XAVIER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645090685     PISSN: 07370008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s1532690xci2401_1     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 83-104). Westport, CT: Ablex.
2. Barnett, S. M, & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612-637.
3. Beach, K. (1999). Consequential transitions: A sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 101-139). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
4. Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 61-100). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
5. Carraher, D., & Schliemann, A. D. (2002). The transfer dilemma. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 1-24.
6. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
7. Detterman, D. K. (1993). The case for the prosecution: Transfer as an epiphenomenon. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction (pp. 1-24). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
8. diSessa, A. A. (1991). Epistemological micromodels: The case of coordination and quantities. In J. Montangero & A. Tryphon (Eds.), Psychologie génétique et sciences cognitives (pp. 169-194). Geneva: Fondation Archives Jean Piaget.
9. diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 105-225.
10. diSessa, A. A. (2004). Contextuality and coordination in conceptual change. In E. Redish & M. Vicentini (Eds.), Proceedings of the international school of physics "Enrico Fermi": Course CLVI (pp. 137-156). Amsterdam: ISO Press/Italian Physical Society.
11. diSessa, A. A., Abelson, H., & Ploger, D. (1991). An overview of boxer. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10(1), 300-315.
12. diSessa, A. A., & Sherin, B. L. (1998). What changes in conceptual change? International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1155-1191.
13. diSessa, A. A., & Wagner, J. F. (2005). What coordination has to say about transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 121-154). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
14. Dyson, A. H. (1999). Transforming transfer: Unruly children, contrary texts, and the persistence of the pedagogical order. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 141-171). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
15. Ferrini-Mundy, J., Floden, R., McCrory, R., Burrill, G., & Sandow, D. (2003, April). Knowledge for teaching school algebra: Challenges in developing an analytic framework. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
16. Fong, G. T., Krantz, D. H., & Nisbett, R. E. (1986). The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 253-292.
17. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Burch, M., Hamlett, C. L., Owen, R., et al. (2003). Explicitly teaching for transfer: Effects on third-grade students' mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 293-305.
18. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170.
19. Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Thompson, L. (2003). Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 393-408.
20. Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52, 45-56.
21. Gentner, D., & Medina, J. (1998). Similarity and the development of rules. Cognition, 65, 263-297.
22. Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306-355.
23. Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1-38.
24. Greeno, J. G. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 5-17.
25. Greeno, J. G., Moore, J. L., & Smith, D. R. (1993). Transfer of situated learning. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction (pp. 99-167). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
26. Hatano, G., & Greeno, J. G. (1999). Commentary: Alternative perspectives on transfer and transfer studies. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 645-654.
27. Hershkowitz, R., Schwarz, B. B., & Dreyfus, T. (2001). Abstraction in context: Epistemic actions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(2), 195-222.
28. Hill, H. C., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California's mathematics professional development institutes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 330-351.
29. Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (1992). Looking back and looking forward. In C. Hoyles & R. Noss (Eds.), Learning mathematics and logo (pp. 431-468). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-454.
32. Konold, C. (1989). Informal conceptions of probability. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 59-98.
33. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. Lobato, J. (1997). Transfer reconceived: How "sameness" is produced in mathematical activity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
35. Lobato, J. (2003). How design experiments can inform a rethinking of transfer and vice versa. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 17-20.
36. Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1996). Windows on mathematical meanings: Learning cultures and computers. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
37. Noss, R., Hoyles, C., & Pozzi, S. (2002). Abstraction in expertise: A study of nurses' conceptions of concentration. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(3), 204-229.
38. Pratt, D. (2000). Making sense of the total of two dice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(5), 602-625.
39. Pratt, D., & Noss, R. (2002). The microevolution of mathematical knowledge: The case of randomness. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(4), 453-488.
40. Reed, S. K. (1987). A structure-mapping model for word problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(1), 124-139.
41. Reed, S. K. (1993). A schema-based theory of transfer. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction (pp. 39-67). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
42. Reed, S. K., Ernst, G. W., & Banerji, R. (1974). The role of analogy in transfer between similar problem states. Cognitive Psychology, 6(3), 436-450.
43. Saxe, G. B., Dawson, V., Fall, R., & Howard, S. (1996). Culture and children's mathematical thinking. In R. J. Sternberg & T. Ben-Zeev (Eds.), The nature of mathematical thinking (pp. 119-144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
44. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. New York: Academic Press.
45. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1999). Looking toward the 21st century: Challenges of educational theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 4-14.
46. Schoenfeld, A. H., Smith, J., & Arcavi, A. (1993). Learning: The microgenetic analysis of one student's evolving understanding of a complex subject matter domain. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. IV, pp. 55-175). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
47. Sedlmeier, P. (1999). Improving statistical reasoning: Theoretical models and practical implications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
48. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
49. Singley, M. K., & Anderson, J. R. (1989). The transfer of cognitive skill. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50. Wagner, J. F. (2003). The construction of similarity: Context sensitivity and the transfer of mathematical knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
51. Well, A. D., Pollatsek, A., & Boyce, S. J. (1990). Understanding the effects of sample size on the variability of the mean. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 289-312.